I just said that the blacks were almost certainly right that Obama's win would have been far greater had he been white. That is heresy for conservatives, but I am anti-liberal, not conservative. The only purpose "conservatives" have is to be a harmless opposition.

I'm not harmless. So let me agree with the liberals on another point they constantly make which every professional conservative denies:

It's racial.

For National Review, True Western Civilization consists of a sterile pedophile in a dress shouting at the ceiling in a dead language. That is the kind of "opposition" the establishment thrives on.

In the broadest sense the opposition is as sterile as the establishment. Political Correctness offer us the future of an ant colony. Conservatives differ with them only in the nature of the ants they want.

Political Correctness sees a brown stagnant future where mankind, each one of which is a carbon emitter, will fit in with the stagnant environment.

National Review sees a future Latin America, where a racially mixed population concentrates on going to church and living according to the dictates of a sterile ruling class.

In both cases one's society is dedicated to guilt. Young people can spend their lives trying to appease God for their Original Sin or they can spend their lives being sterile to keep down their carbon emissions. In both case they are Born in Sin and deserve less than nothing.

Liberals and conservatives insist that any other scenario smacks of Racism. They are perfectly correct. This all started with white self-hatred.

Once you learn self-hatred, it spreads to the rest of your thinking.

Conservatives now insist they are far more anti-white than liberals. They are certainly more DESPERATELY anti-white. They want all humans to be guilty of being human. Political Correctness rests on the same foundation.