THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

THE WHITE SHIFT RIGHT | 2004-09-18

It has been noticed that many states have become totally controlled by the Democrats because of their growing minority populations. What is amazing is that the Republican Party still exists at all.

As I point out in Why Johnny Can't Think: America's Professor-Priesthood we pay our universities to produce whole generations of liberals at public expense. At the same time we are importing liberal votes by the millions.

The serious polls show that universities are doing their job. They are not turning out a solid group of liberal youth the way we pay them to, but young college graduates are well to the left of the general population.

Before you recite the tired old line that youth is radical, let me remind you that there is nothing radical about liberalism. In the real world the college-educated population has generally been to the RIGHT of the general population. In 1896 students at Yale rioted to prevent the economically left-wing William Jennings Bryan from speaking on campus, just as they would riot to prevent a conservative from speaking today.

But despite manufacturing liberals at public expense and importing them by the millions, there is a Republican president and a Republican majority in both Houses of Congress. That can only be because the population of non-imported people, of people who did not recently graduate from college, and of college graduates who have outgrown their college indoctrination must have grown stupendously.

HARDRIC VERSUS THE SWAMP | 2007-06-30

mderpelding says:

There is one problem with this whole discussion.

The concepts of left and right and liberal and conservative and republican and democrat all have NO MEANING. If you are still discussing our political/existential situation in those terms you are STILL part of the problem.

All those above terms are meaningless and deadly in a multiracial polity. You have minorities practicing racial politics behind the facade of unity politics.

Ah, yes, the political terminology of yesteryear. We can, nevertheless, in this transition period from Petty Party Politics to Racial Politics, use these terms to suit our needs. Conservative? If you want to categorize verbose fools of the William Buckley School, include a racial adjective and an additional: "Respectable White Conservative Fools." Bring race into the picture.

Are you a Respectable White Conservative Fool? Nice to meet you, anytime you want to get serious about the future we must have a chit chat.

ME:

Thanks, Hardric, for getting us out of the swamp.

I talked about the swamp before. What I have to say here is difficult to explain. So when someone starts critiquing the only language I have at my disposal, all it does is trip me up. I end up neck-deep in the swamp, off track.

It is like when I try to explain the nature of power as I understand it, which is my function in BUGS, and somebody informs me that the other side is very large and very powerful or gives me another lecture about how this is a RACIAL struggle or any of a hundred ways to sound profound and get the discussion off track.

Our problem with Stormfront is that it is at least 90% swamp.

WE cannot do anything about the white birth rate, so Al's telling me we might as well close up shop if whites don't have more children is pure swamp stuff. It's certainly a concern. The question is whether it is a concern that we should deal with HERE, or is it just taking attention off of what we CAN do something about?

WHAT I WANT US TO BE | 2007-11-07

Responses to the article below, "Tim: Traitors, the Denazification Approach" provide a very useful example of how I want you to look at things I write and life in general.

Lord Nelson and mderpelding got the point.

My entire real emphasis here was on providing a threat that would realistic bother the other side, especially the ones we need. You see, we are4 involved in a REAL fight here, not a theoretical exercise.

After all these years of ineffectiveness, this is almost impossible for our people to realize.

So on your side we envision a great torchlight Parade of Victory when everybody suddenly becomes Awakened. So it is very, very unusual for somebody to actually pay any attention to what I am actually talking about.

Look at it from the point of view of someone TODAY who is on the other side. They talk a lot about Nazi Suppression and Holocaust, but they talk about precisely they don't take it seriously. As Isawi pointed out, today's social scientists, like today's generals, are fighting the last war.

Meanwhile, what is the REAL nightmare that could scare them today? It is the one we are familiar with: a group of activitists who get paid to hunt them down for the rest of our lives. That is VERY realistic. It will PAY MONETY. It will end when it stops paying money to go back and get somebody for what they did for white genocide in our age.

In other words, it will never end, and we have the example before us from the other side.

It is not a torchlight parade, it is realistic. Only a fool or a conservative would fail to use such a vehicle. It tells them what will happen if a group takes over that does not have William Buckley's inferiority complex and groveling attitude toward those we are fighting.

It is in short 1 )probable, 2) workable and 3) common sense.

The comments on it from our side were entirely predictable:

1) Denazification BAD. BAD people did.

2) It is ridiculous for people in our hopeless position to talk about the results of victory... ALL IS LOST! and that is what we should be talking about,

3) Bob is not talking about JUSTICE. The sound of chest beating drowns out the rest, but it boils down to we should deport then or hold them morally responsible or some such muck.

I am looking for tactics which will 1) encourage or side and 2) is obviously realistic and therefore scary to our opponents. In the mass of predictable comments here and on Stormfront, that point was totally lost from the word Go.

PROFESSORS AND OTHER RUBES | 2004-10-28

Every con man who has ever lived has fooled the rubes, the suckers, the hicks, with the following phrase:

"Things are not as they appear."

Did God give us eyes or did Evolution give us eyes? God or evolution, the reason we have eyes is because things ARE as they appear.

What a con man does to a hick, a rube, a moron is to get something from him for nothing.

So he says, "What you get from me APPEARS to be nothing. But things are not as they appear."

Somewhere in me there is a Bob Whitaker who screams in rage when I take organized religion seriously. That Bob says:

"Preacher, if you mean what you say you will be like St. Paul and make tents for a living. Preacher, if you are serious you will be like St. Peter and work for a living."

Somewhere in me is a Bob Whitaker who says, "No, Family Values or Equality or We Owe it to So-and-So means nothing."

When you preach at me, the Diplomatic Bob Whitaker pretends to take you seriously.

But inside me there is a voice saying, "I am not a moron. I am not a hick or a rube or a professor or a New York City provincial. I am Bob Whitaker, and what you are saying doesn't mean a damned thing."