THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

WORDISM: TODAY'S GNOSTICISM IS WORDISM | nationalsalvation.net

We desperately need to demystify some of these words that sound so abstract and intellectual.

Peter was talking about the Gnostic Heresy.

The Gnostic Heresy is alive and well today and this needs explaining clearly and simply.

The Gnostic Heresy in early Christianity was what I call Wordism today.

The Gnostic Heresy was simply the idea that the only people who got to Heaven were the scholars. You obtained salvation by spending all your time digging through the Old Testament finding the most obscure passages and learning the Hidden Truth, the Key to Salvation, that was hidden in them.

What Gnosticism condemned was the idea that you could attain Heaven by common sense and common decency. What Gnosticism condemned was the concept that one could attain salvation by getting out among the sinners and telling them the simple truth.

Gnosticism said that Heaven was for the Learned, not for the masses.

We call those same Gnostics today "professors." The common sense and decency of the Founding Fathers is not for them. They do not see the practical cornerstone we call the Constitution. They believe the true statement of what America is all about is in the Declaration of Independence, a propaganda document written right in the middle of a war in a city the enemy was about to occupy.

Today's professor-priesthood, the clergy of our established religion of Political Correctness, love the thundering words of the Declaration that dedicate America to the French radical idea that all men are created equal. Liberals insist that America's whole purpose is to found a New World Order for all mankind, and to cram it down their throats.

For today's Gnostics it is absolutely repellant to even consider that the Founding Fathers who wrote the Constitution in peacetime and for us, meant what they said. The Constitution states flatly that the only people it was written for was the people of the United States and OUR posterity. The Constitution states flatly that the only AUTHORITY it rests on is we the people of the United States and OUR posterity.

The Constitution says simply that we the people of THIS country are doing what we have a right to do, and no more. It says we are setting up our own government ON OUR OWN, not because of some obscure Gnostic principle of a World Mission.

Abraham Lincoln said, "Our fathers founded upon this continent a great nation, dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal."

They did no such thing and they said so. The Soviet Union was dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal and it meant to enforce that on every human being on the planet.

No wonder today's Gnostics of this world despise George Washington and love Karl Marx, just as the Gnostics of the next world despised Jesus Christ and worshipped the Old Testament.

No Gnostic will tell you he despises Jesus Christ or George Washington. But if there were two men in all of history you could not possibly twist into Gnostics, those were the two.

Jesus never told anyone to read the Bible. He spoke in Aramaic and He quoted the scriptures his listeners knew about. He specifically condemned the High Priest to Hell who knew every word of those Scriptures and who PRACTICED them. Jesus said very, very specifically that the sinful tax gatherer in the back of the Temple who admitted he was a sinner and SIMPLY asked for forgiveness was the one who attained salvation.

There is no way that anybody can reject what was later called Gnosticism any more clearly than Jesus did. He repudiated it repeatedly, blatantly, plainly, obviously, openly - you could exhaust any Thesaurus with this.

In my little way, I try to do what Jesus did. I study so I can explain the truths of decency and good sense to the people, and discredit Gnosticism in any form.

I have read those huge tomes for the specific purpose of discrediting the idea that reading and studying Karl Marx or the Old Testament is the key to salvation in this world or the next.

And the more I study the more I realize that Jesus was dead right, and the closeted Old Testament scholars and professors, the High Priests of yesterday and today, were dead wrong and ARE dead wrong.

LORD NELSON | 2007-06-04

Remember you asked ME for MY assessment.

The Conservative Citizens meeting in Greenville had three main speakers who had all been on national television repeatedly. Jared Taylor and Sam Dickson demonstrate that the movement is going mainstream. But James Edwards is the spokesman we NEED and no one seemed to notice.

I met Gordon Baum, the head of CC a generation ago, and I am flattered that he wants me there. It is important that such meetings take place. This is about the only organization we have that goes out in public and it is essential.

Jared made some points I could use so I asked him if I could get a copy of the events he described. His response was to tell me he writes from notes. What I needed was not the point. He wanted to make the point that Jared Taylor is one hell of a speaker.

He interrupted me to take congratulations so I walked away.

Jared Taylor shows we are going mainstream, as is Pat Buchanan and Joe Sobran. Sam Dickson has always been a class act and a hell of a speaker.

Their appearance was the point of the conference.

But are they GOING anywhere?

Gordon asked me why I didn't join Conservative Citizens and I told him that since my friend Sam Francis died my part in their publication, Citizen's Informer, was cancelled without notice. He walked away and may not speak to me again.

So I am not a morally superior being to Sam and Jared. I am interested in MY message, and I say so. If you are in serious power politics, you had damned well be sure that you know your OWN motivations FIRST. That is why I had so little to say about the conference.

I could have been at the same meeting fifty years ago, when the main speakers would have been Governor Ross Barnett or Lester Maddox. CC is an army in being. But it is the guerrillas who win the war and the Jareds and Sams and Pats who take the enemy's sword at Yorktown.

I have been in this game too long to know what will succeed. It is the tide in the affairs that decides who is there at the right time to take credit.

No speakers emphasized any of our points, but they got in there, some, as they do everywhere. That's what us guerrillas are interested in.

But that is not what people came to hear. They want to hear amnesty denounced and whatever else is in the papers. They come and they pay their dues, which is the lifeblood of an organization. Don't ask an elephant to climb a tree.

RANDOM COMMENTS ON SURVIVAL IN SUPERTERRORISM | 2010-04-21

When I go to Libertarian meetings, one thing always occurs to me. I look around the room and try to imagine a group of people who would MORE helpless left in an anarchical situation.

Can you imagine trying to hold a piece of ground when everybody there is dedicated entirely to his own interest?

I don't think Survivalists would survive Superterrorism because they are not a SOCIETY. Hispanics and blacks will hunt down those White F*****rs With the Food.

In the real world, this whole business of Retiring to a Piece of Ground is another diversion from REAL thought.

The government is not good at protecting citizens, but it is GREAT at taking their guns and driving a settled group away from where they are. But all the groups I hear from assume they will be left where they are, armed.

Yea, right.

You have to have he one thing Libertarianism and Survivalism do NOT emphasize. You need a GROUP. Not only that, it must be a SOCIETY. If you have to FORMULATE rules, I believe that they will not work.

You can't afford minorities in your midst. But you also can't afford "Christians." In a lot less crucial situations than this I have seen "Christians" see how tough things are and suddenly find a quote from the Bible that INSPIRES them to do what a Libertarian would do under the same circumstances, switch sides.

If your morality comes out of a book, ANY book, I don't want you near me when things get desperate.

The same is true of the various white attempts at communities. They end up with a couple of trailers out in the ass end of nowhere. They are not mentally organized enough to formulate an argument for their race's SURVIVAL, much less hold what they've got.

In fact, we have the same old problem here. How can you have discipline when you don't have mental discipline? Any discussion of Superterrorism collapses the same way our common front collapses on race, where people become fascinated by their own oratory and anxious to pursue any point the other side makes or show how just plain smart they are.

The documentary on the suitcase bomb went off this way. It had a few relevant facts and then went off into what a TRAGEDY it would be, how some number of people would be killed and burned and how hard it would be for the heroes in costumes to reach them.

They even got off on how the Men From the Afghanistan War were available for such a situation. It is sign of the times that they didn't get onto the Greatest Generation.

Their only reference to the fact that more bombs may be on the way was that there were plans for evacuating cities.

Yea, right, a hundred New Orleanses at once.

They have a Plan. They have a Book.

I feel SO much better.

DAVE'S REVISION | 2008-09-01

I think that repetition is always good.

I also think that the reference to the Netherlands and Belgium being as crowded as Taiwan and Japan is very important.

I well remember that in my first introduction to the Mantra I was most influenced by the comparison of the Netherlands and Belgium to Taiwan and Japan.

Its logic is very powerful to anyone who has not considered the asymmetry of the standards of Political Correctness between white and nonwhite nations.

Black nationalism is a reality, Chinese nationalism is a reality, Japanese nationalism is a reality. These things need to be stressed.

********************

Â

AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!

The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third-worlders and assimilating and intermarrying with them.

The words immigration, tolerance, and especially assimilation are being used to promote a program of genocide against the white race.

Everybody says the final solution to the RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to bring in the third world and assimilate and intermarry with all those non-whites.

All this immigration and intermarriage is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries.

This is about genocide against the white race.

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

Â

******************

Notice that I dropped some style conventions in the text such as "quote unquote" and "i.e." because these are unnecessary to delivering a clear message.

Condensing the Mantra really isn't the issue.

The enemies of the white race and particularly the anti-white white traitors need to know that there are people who are intent upon bringing them to justice.

Right!

I also think the discussion of the black got off the subject.  I believe that if the Mantra stayed on the same subject, as Dave does here, I would not have lost Shank.

Shall we make this our new Mantra?

The question mark means it's a question.  A question  is a request for an ANSWER.  BUGS is no longer just Bob's.