THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

CALIFORNIA TODAY IS THE DIVERSITY SHOWCASE | 2003-07-05

The last Republican California governor tried to stop giving welfare to known illegal aliens.

Republicans have lost every state-wide election since then.

The last Republican governor of California believed what conservatives keep saying. Conservatives are for diversity, so they say that Hispanic citizens in California, including those of Hispanic descent, are just as American as anybody else. Since Hispanic Americans are as American as anybody else, they would naturally join with the overwhelming majority of their fellow Americans citizens in America and support the rights of American citizens over illegal Mexican immigrants.

The last Republican governor of California bet everything on the idea that, "Regardless of his ethnic background, an American is just an American.."

When the question of denying welfare to illegal aliens came up, California's Hispanic population had a choice between backing Americans and backing illegal aliens from Mexico. Diversity had a chance to prove it was a very American thing

When push came to shove Americans of Hispanic descent in California took the side of illegal Mexican immigrants over other people with United States citizenship papers. As always, the minute you try that melting pot crap out in the real world, it collapses.

Did conservatives admit this was a defeat for their silly "melting pot" ideas? Of course not.

Did liberals admit this was a defeat for "diversity"? Of course not.

Liberal commentators tell us that the Republican proposition to deny welfare benefits to illegal aliens was political suicide. They tell us that conservatives were insane to imagine that Americans of Hispanic descent would think of themselves as Americans first and Hispanics second.

In other words, it doesn't matter whether or not A Hispanic calls himself an American. His real loyalty naturally goes to other Hispanics.

That is how Diversity really works.

POISONED FRUIT | 1998-10-24

It is established law in this country that, if a man tortures and kills children, he is set free if any of the evidence that convicts him is collected in violation of any rules set up by a judge. So if he is searched incorrectly, or Miranda rights are not read, the policeman who did it wrong suffers no penalty, and the criminal is set free.

All evidence collected as a result of a violation of judicial rules is called "poisoned fruit." So, if an informant's name is found before Miranda rights are read, and that informant leads the police to the children's bodies and other evidence, that evidence is not admissible.

Liberals go all the way for their clients.

A few thousand kids may get molested and a few hundred killed, but that's the price you have to pay if liberal lawyers are to have their form of justice. All liberals agree that it's a bit tough on the kids, but justice is not perfect.

Unless, of course, that injustice comes from a nonliberal source. Liberals oppose the death penalty, so the possibility of one innocent person being executed worries them to death.

So liberals talk endlessly about the possibility that the death penalty may be imposed on an innocent person. They never spend one second worrying about the innocent children their policies kill.

So, when debating the death penalty, no respectable conservative ever brings up the innocent children liberals kill with their policies. By the same token, no Southern Crawler ever brings it up. You become a good respectable conservative and a respectable Southerner - a Southern Crawler - by following liberal rules.

If you are to be a good Southern Crawler, you never question the "poisoned fruit" of integration laws. The Fourteenth Amendment was adopted unconstitutionally, and the Federal court decisions outlawing antimiscegenation laws in the 1960's absolutely reject all traces of constitutional intent. The states which adopted the Bill of Rights and the Fourteenth Amendment had and enforced antimsicegenation laws. Not even the carpetbagger administrations in the South objected to them.

But the courts decided all that didn't matter. The courts didn't want miscegenation laws, so out they went. Naturally, no respectable conservative and not one Southern Creep objected to this.

Years later, in the 1970's, the Federal courts decided they didn't want states to have restrictions on abortion, either. So they declared the constitution did not allow states to have restrictions on abortion. Every Catholic bishop had cheered the court decision doing away with antimiscegenation laws. But when the court did exactly the same thing to antiabortion laws, the bishops started shouting about "original intent." Since bishops had objected, respectable conservatives felt they could object. Since Northern conservatives had objected, Southern Crawlers decided they could object to the abortion decision, too.

But all this fake courage came far too late.

Because respectable conservatives and Southern Creeps only objected when fashionable opinion allowed them to, unborn children got murdered, and other children get murdered and molested every day.

People who only object when fashionable opinion allows them to are going to betray you every single time when it counts. If you select Southern Creeps and respectable conservatives as your leaders, you get precisely what you deserve.

LAW: SIMMONS VERSUS ANTIDISESTABLISHMENTARIANISM | nationalsalvation.net

I think we are also at that point that as a political movement we could promise liberation, liberation from PC and the goofs that lord it over us.

Comment by Simmons

ME:

The platform plank Simmons is advocating will begin:

"The established religion of the United States of America, Political Correctness, is hereby disestablished."

Those who oppose this plank will be antidisestablishmentarians. I bet you never expected to see that word used in a sentence!

Ann Coulter's new book, "The Church of Liberalism" is a straight steal from my "Political Correctness is not LIKE a religion, it IS a religion." So this concept is no longer a far out idea.

All outstanding student loans will be paid out of the giant reserves universities have. Harvard University alone has several billion dollars. The rest will be charged to professors and deans and contributors who have contributed tax-exempt funds to the Political Correctness seminaries we call colleges and universities.

We just got several million votes right there.

Other platform sentences:

"Under American laws, all monopolies are illegal. Two men in the same business are subject to criminal prosecution if they DISCUSS prices in their common filed of business."

"By the same token, anyone who discusses graduation from a Political Correctness seminary as a qualification for hiring is subject to prosecution under the Clayton Anti-Trust Act."

A few million more votes from people who qualify for Mensa but never finished college.

A million votes here, a million votes there, and it adds up to serious political clout.

SIEGECRAFT: PAUL REVERE | nationalsalvation.net

I guess most of you have heard the one about the Texan and Paul Revere.

But, as I usually say when I start to tell an old joke:

"Now if you've heard this one before, try and stop me."

A Texan was talking to a New Englander and going on and on about the great heroes of Texas: Davy Crockett, Sam Houston, John Travis and on and on.

The New Englander said, "You know, Texans aren't the only ones who had heroes. We had some up east, too!"

The Texan asked, "Like who?"

"Well," the New Englander replied, "There was Paul Revere."

"Who?" the Texan asked. Then he suddenly remembered the name.

"Oh. You mean the guy who ran for help."

Actually Paul Revere was the messenger of the Revolution in more ways than his somewhat overblown ride. We all know he was a silversmith, but being a silversmith required him to be an artist. Sam Adams got him to make the first famous propaganda painting of the "Boston Massacre."

The "embattled farmers" who fought the British would not have been there if messengers had not gotten to them. Revere's ride was not particularly dangerous when he made it, but it was an act of treason from the British point of view. He could have gotten hanged for it later, and hanging in those days was not scientific. It was an awful way to die.

In wartime, before radios, a messenger had just as good a chance of getting killed as any soldier at the front.

You who carry the message today know the risk and the cost and the effort associated with it. You also know that, like messengers of the past, you will get little credit for your efforts and risks. The general who issues the orders gets credit. The brave troops who stand at the front get credit.

But if the messenger gets caught and shot, just how often will that show up in the history books?

All I read is items like, "The general sent out four messengers, but only one made it."

Spreading ideas is absolutely critical. But about all the credit you will ever get for it is to be the one who "didn't make it" or "the one who made it," no name attached.

Like the messengers in earlier days, you are not in it to get your name attached. You use my ideas because it is what you can do for the cause, and the cause cannot live without it.

That frustrating talk you have with your neighbor is as critical to this war as any heroic public statement or the open demonstrations those hundreds of private talks will eventually lead to.

The message is getting out because you are the messenger.