THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

WHY DO WE HAVE JEWS? | 2008-06-23

Nobody EVER thinks in BASICS.

Moslems in huge numbers are new to our society.

While the Jews poured into Northern Europe umpteen centuries ago the religion of our ACTUAL Fathers, Odinism, was being stamped out. "Chistianity" -- by which I mean the Wordist institutions that grew up using the name of Christ -- did not "discriminate aganst" Odinist holdouts. It KILLED them.

Catholic countries didn't "discriminate against" Protestants and Protestants countries did not "discriminate against" Catholics.

They KILLED them.

Christian countries did not "discriminate against" Moslems who moved in.

The KILLED them.

We had Jews because our Glorious Traditional Values ALLOWED them.

Our Glorious Traditional Values ALLOWED enemies to exist within our society.

The resident aliens did what resident aliens can be expected to do.

I am NOT a conservative.

WORDISM: LOST IN SPACE | nationalsalvation.net

In "The Dispossessed Majority," written when all the debates were between socialism, and capitalism, Wilmot Robertson said that our ideological obsession with economic systems like socialism and capitalism was like trying to diagnose every human illness by studying nothing but the alimentary canal.

As a professional economist, I never took economics as the center of the universe as libertarians and Marxists did. With the fall of the Soviet Empire and the earlier disaster of British democratic socialism, the twentieth-century obsession with economic systems, which killed so many, is now largely a thing of the past.

It is the TWENTY-FIRST century gang!

For example, nobody sees the US-China situation as a competition of economic ideology.

The only people left who take this stuff seriously are American professors. European "intellectuals" got so deep into the Marxist stuff that they are embarrassed about it today.

There is a parallel between European Communists and the Mir space station. The space station was sent into space as a SOVIET mission, but while it was up there the Soviet Union ceased to exist.

Almost every member of the European professorhood was some sort of Marxist. Then the Soviet Union suddenly said, "This is ridiculous" and abandoned them in space.

WHEN PREACHERS AND PROFESSORS AGREE ON SOMETHING, BEWARE! | 2002-01-26

It is essential that we understand the enormous similarity between the year 2000 and the year 1800.

The year 1800 introduced a century when medicine marched a hundred times farther in a single century than it had in all of previous history. In 1800, university authorities in medicine were untied against this revolution. They were defending bleeding quarts of blood from sick people as the main treatment for disease and fighting the idea that doctors need to wash their hands, along with everything else that might save lives.

In 1800 as now, the preachers and professors were on the same side. Preachers were fighting vaccinations against smallpox. In fact, I do not know of a single medical advance in the entire period from 1800 to 1900 that preachers did not use the Bible to oppose.

The same is true today, and once against the whole thing is so obviously absurd only a respectable conservative would fail to notice it.

Just a few years back all the professors were pushing moral relevance. There were no absolute rules, they said.

But then came cloning and the biological revolution. Instantly they invented a field call "Ethics." Suddenly they have PhD's who were concentrating on moral relevance yesterday and who are now "biological ethicists." And exactly as in1800, academics are standing shoulder-to-shoulder with the preachers against the coming revolution.

WORDISM: THE REAL COMPUTER REVOLUTION | nationalsalvation.net

Repeat:

In the fourteenth century a really wealthy College at Oxford might have twenty books, each of them chained to the wall, and a full-time Librarian to watch over them. If you wanted a book, you had to get permission to copy it by hand.

In that age, someone who had READ books was in a class by himself. A surgeon who had learned his trade on a battle field was a common laborer. He was scum compared to a University Doctor who could quote Galen from having read that Roman book HIMSELF.

In other words, back when the few books were chained to the wall, you wowed 'em with your KNOWLEDGE.

I spent my first year in college in pre-Med. One day an old WWI vet called up y mother and said, "My boy hurt his leg. Is Bobby fur along enough in his books that he could help out?"

He had no idea that pre-med has nothing to do with medicine. His question was an echo of our history: a book is a book, and Bobby was reading books.

Medicine was dead in its tracks so long as those who could READ the ancient texts were so far above people who actually CURED things.

In fact, this ancient prejudice was very much alive in my youth. This is the age when Mommy Professor took over. Information was still very much restricted to people who had time to search it out, people who did it for a living.

The invention of movable type was a biggy. It made the literate middle class feel itself able to face the guys who had the chained books. But that revolution was not complete until the Google Age.

You can't wow anybody with your knowledge now. And every year it becomes harder to do so. Revolutions like this take a LONG time to filter down to the point where everybody realizes it.

You are the first people to even HEAR the essence of this revolution in a historical context. But BUGS is also the first place where we have realized that what has generated the dominance of anti-whites is not a Genius Conspiracy, but the simple and natural prejudices of a group that has become a major power and a concentration of wealth known as college professors.

You did not experience first-hand the sheer power of a PhD in the 1960s. The people who were "far along enough in their books" were still there.

The basis of Mommy Professor's hold is collapsing with every increase in the speed of computers.