THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

A MAN WITH A MEMORY LOOKS AT FROZEN EMBRYOS | 2001-07-28

The embryos that researchers want to use for stem cell research are frozen fetuses. They were stored by desperate couples who wanted to be sure that they could bring them to term if they could not have natural children.

Some of these couples were later able to carry their own children to term due to medical treatments. These couples have no use for the embryos they stored, so scientists want to use them for research that could make the crippled walk and cure other invalids.

The extreme branch of the pro-life movement wants the embryos simply destroyed.

Last week, a group of witnesses came to Congress to argue for this extreme pro-life position. They were couples who could not have children themselves, so they had ADOPTED some of those frozen embryos and brought them to term. They had the babies in their arms before the committee to show that, if the fetuses were brought to term, they became real babies.

Everybody already knew that, of course, but they showed their babies to counter the potent argument in favor of stem cell research.

Crippled, dying and desperate people who want embryonic stem cell research to save them go in front of the committee. They argue in person that they are more important than some abstract rights of frozen embryos.

To counter this, the only thing those against embryonic stem cell research could do was bring in these babies developed from frozen embryos.

But I remember when the same kind of people who now oppose stem cell research WERE TRYING TO GET THE FREEZING OF EMBRYOS OUTLAWED. They said that, since some of the embryos would have to be destroyed, they shouldn't be created in the first place.

So if their side had won back then, THE PEOPLE SITTING IN FRONT OF THE COMMITTEE WITH HEALTHY BABIES TO ARGUE THEIR SIDE WOULD NOT HAVE THOSE BABIES!!!

But now, as always, those who have a religious knee-jerk against medical advances are claiming, in effect, that they were always for the right of people to freeze embryos in case they could not have natural children. As always, they ignore the position they originally took.

They did the same thing after they opposed dissection, smallpox vaccination, blood transfusions, and practically every other advance in medical history.

THE BIG SECRET REVEALED: WHITES ARE UNIQUE ONLY IN ***GOOD*** WAYS | 2001-10-20

Every race had slavery throughout its entire history.

No white ever captured blacks for the slave trade, as "Roots" says they did. It made no sense. Blacks were happy to sell other blacks into the hell of slave ships, and they did it very cheaply.

But whites did one thing that no other race ever did.

Whites FREED their slaves.

Whites did something ELSE that no other race ever did: they forced others to free THEIR slaves. Britain forced Kunte Kinte's homeland to free its slaves in 1905. If Kinte was as high a person as "Roots" claims, it is likely that his family owned slaves.

When the poor innocent "Native Americans" (the ones we pay reparations to) came to America, they did what every other people did when they came in: They slaughtered the locals and took their land (July 7, 2001 - SURPRISE, **INDIANS** KILLED THE NATIVE AMERICANS! YES, WHAT WE CALL **NATIVE AMERICANS** KILLED THE REAL NATIVE AMERICANS)

The only thing whites did to the Indians that was unique was to provide reservations to the natives they were driving out. No other race ever did that.

Every nonwhite race either slaughtered or enslaved the locals when they moved into new land.

In Africa two thousand years ago, the ancestors of today's Hottentots occupied almost all of sub-Saharan Africa. This "Capoid" race occupied the continent all the way through Nigeria. Today Hottentots have been wiped out everywhere but in a tiny area of southern Africa.

Black Africans took Africa from the Hottentot race (the "Capoids") and slaughtered them. In other words, the poor, innocent blacks did the same thing in Africa that the Indians did in America.

These are the people whites are supposed to pay reparations to for colonialism and for slavery.

The only reason there are any Hottentots left today is because of the white Afrikaaners, the Boers. These whites moved into Africa just as the black Zulus were finishing off the Hottentots. This murdered race was being driven to the end of Africa, to be slaughtered as the others had been. But the whites who moved into Africa stopped the advance of the blacks and saved the remnant of this "Capoid" race from them.

Every race has routinely wiped out other races. Only whites ever SAVED one.

THE DAY OF FITTING IN IS PAST!! | 2008-12-13

If you READ THE COMMENTS, you will find Dave and Simmons dovetailing on the point that it is time for us to stop fitting into some long-vanished political Right or whatever.

For example, I am getting very, very tired of reading people in Stormfront talking about protecting Obamastan's borders. They are militant about keeping the Hispanics here who vote for their Brother Hispanics right to come here.

Hell, at least THOSE Hispanics have a set of consistent loyalties I can understand. There are already PLENTY of nonwhites here to make an end to whites through the Glorious Assimilation conservatives worship, so why in the Hell should I back some anti-whites in camouflage jackets protecting this ridiculous border?

The horse is out of the friggin' BARN, for God's sake. But we have all these people yelling about closing the door.

The new politics cannot be aimed at the imaginary alliance I fought for in the pre-Reagan days. That did its job. It destroyed the USSR.

But the new job is to save our race. This is a new age. There is no coalition here. We must become spokesmen for the powerful white minority.

The turning point for the Communist Party in Russia came when the Czar had fallen and the elected Duma represented conservatism and the Soviet represented the "workers." A compromise was in the works. The President of the Soviet, which then contained a huge number of revolutionary parties, asked what he thought was a rhetorical question: He said, "We must compromise. After all, is there any party here that would be willing to take on full responsibility on itself alone?"

Lenin, head of the small Bolshevik delegation, stood up and said, "There IS such a party!" From that day, it was Lenin versus non-Lenin.

I played the coalition game when it was relevant. Anyone who reads about the period knows I was a major player in it.

I tell you the Day of the Coalition is OVER.

Someone must speak for the white race, beginning with its SURVIVAL, beginning with the Mantra.

Fitting In is Yesterday. "There is such a party" is Tomorrow.

REPLY TO JOE | 2005-12-13

In response to my article, "PAINFUL Nostalgia," which described how the president of the main university in Ukraine gave Sharon and the ADL the answer that, before the group that calls istself The Greatest Generation took over, would have been considered an AMERICAN reply, Joe writes,

"Oy. Further down in the article, a paragraph reads, 'stung by growing criticism, Ukrainian officials may finally be taking the issue seriously. President Viktor Yuschenko this week urged his country's elites to condemn anti-Semitism and xenophobia.'I remember the US and international media screaming to change the presidential results to get this bozo in office. Is there any wonder why? "

Comment by joe o — 12/10/2005

My reply:

Joe, what officials in Eastern Europe say is a good deal different from what they mean.

They are still very much dependent on us.

For example, Russia has the same Hate Speech Laws every other country outside the United

States has. Under those laws you can get a prison sentence just for owning David Duke's

book "Jewish Supremacism."

It is on sale in the Russian Duma, in Russian. Going into the subay, David and I met a

man who was selling it. It sells like hotcakes in Russia.