It has been noted that most eugenicists had no children.

It has also been noted that most Secretaries of the Treasury leave household finances to their wives.

It was a revolution when Robert Ardrey revealed to the world that War Heroes were not restricted to human beings. To a reading audience that was absolutely astonished at the time, he gave example after example after example of social animals of numberless types who gave their lives for the survival of the group.

What was remarkable was how gross a violation his examples often were of the tenets of Marxism. The lowest-ranking males who were denied any offspring of their own were as likely to give their lives for the group that oppressed them as were the alphas.

No Army Ant will ever father one of its kind.

We knew that about ants, but it was a shock to find that war was not a result of a lack of Wordism in higher animals. But the reason is exactly the same. Nature gives us one purpose and one purpose only: to produce offspring, of our own or of our group, who look like us.

It was thought that birds made their noises to attract females. We have only learned during my lifetime that birds make their noises to keep other INTERBREEDABLE birds out of their territory. Females go to the one with the best territory.

In our society a sterile billionaire will do exactly the same thing: he will give his money to his form of Wordism. He could have left it for white orphans as he did before, but now that is forbidden. His unnatural identity, his Book, gets the money to produce more who say what it says.

In a tiny society like a lion pride, the one or two male lions who rule it will produce all the offspring and kill the kittens of its predecessor. But in a large society each individual takes a separate role in group survival, and the lower class in a non-human society is as dedicated to the survival of the group as those in the top echelon.

This is how NATURE works. Nature is only interested in one issue, the issue of one's own type in competition with other GROUPS. Nature is the opposite of the Class Struggle. Nature is the opposite of the Libertarians.

Like nature, we are obsessed with one issue.


In rich countries, there is a Mother Goose story for children about the goose that laid the golden eggs. A child understands that if you cut open the goose that lays golden eggs, you get no more eggs. But in Cuba and Mexico, they tried to achieve prosperity by seizing foreign investments.

So they didn't get many investments for a long time, either from their own people or from the outside, and they got poorer.

A reasonably intelligent child in a developed country could have told you that would happen, but for the leftist "intellectuals" the third world listens to, "The Goose That Laid the Golden Eggs" is just too complicated.

So nobody wanted to invest in those countries. Even inside such countries, people didn't want to invest. Instead of American investment in Latin America, those with money in Latin America have historically tended to put their money in the rich countries.

So we have just explained one of many, many, MANY reasons why public policy in the third world makes them poor. It is because it's SILLY.

The Industrial Revolution is now about a quarter of a MILLENNIUM old, and those countries have still not gotten to the level of sophistication offered by Mother Goose.

Leftists would make America poor by killing the geese that lay the golden eggs. George W. Bush would make America poor by flooding it with the kind of people who vote with less sophistication than is routinely expected of a small child.

The third world is poor because its people are not wise citizens and voters. But Bush tells us that, if we import the population of the third world, they will not bring those reasons with them.

Many people on the right imply what Bush says. They want the borders opened up. They can't say that it is the stupidity of the third worlders themselves that makes them poor.

This brings us to one of the most crippling aspects of respectable conservatism: If you are going to have liberals say you are "respectable," you can't talk in plain English. You have to watch what you say, so you can't say too much.

In Michigan, a lady in a restaurant was upset about all the Spanish-speaking customers, and she said - to her companion, "Why can't these spics learn English?" She was reported, arrested, and sentenced to FORTY-FIVE DAYS IN JAIL!

Yes, she was in America. And no, respectable conservatives are not going to make trouble about it.

The most obvious -- though not the only -- reason the third world is poor is because third worlders keep making the same dumbass political mistakes. You should avoid using insulting labels to tell them this. But they have GOT to be told, and there is no way to make it sound nice.

We can import the entire Mexican excess population, and become leftist and poor ourselves. Or we can make it clear that Mexicans have to convince the world that they are not going to be stupid any more, and prosperity will come to them. Those are the only real choices.

But if anyone says out loud that third world people are responsible for third world poverty, respectable conservatives will beg their liberal masters to allow them to lead the lynch mob against him.

So if you value political respectability above speaking plain English, you're going to lose.


Leftists who opposed the Iraqi War shot themselves in the foot. This is not because they were wrong, but because their opposition to the war showed their warts. Leftists hate America and what they said in opposing the war was one long exercise in Hate America rhetoric.

Many leftists are now trying to say they were right about the war because no weapons of mass destruction have been found. If they had said they opposed the war because they doubted the existence of weapons of mass destruction, they would be in a strong position now. But that is not what anti-War leftists said in the period leading up to the war.

In the pre-war period leftists said America was Evil. They said that America was killing its young people just to get cheap oil. They said America was greedy, bloodthirsty, imperialistic and racist, and those were our good qualities.

Ever since World War II Americans have paid professors in American colleges to insult the American public. Every leftist spent most of that time telling us how awful Americans were and how good our enemies were.

Especially Communists.

Americans never did anything but grin and applaud these insults.

But at last, during the run-up to the Iraq War, those grins actually faded. Even the people who had cheered most loudly every time professors and Europeans told us how awful we were in the past suddenly woke up and wiped the drool off their faces.

Liberals shot themselves in the foot by opposing the Iraq War, but not because they opposed the War. They shot themselves in the foot because of the way they opposed the war.

For decades we have paid social science professors to insult the American public in college classrooms. For decades we have paid the United Nations to attack us.

Many people felt particularly good about paying professors and the United Nations to attack us because a lot of people have the idea that if something hurts it must be good for you.

That's sick thinking. In this world, you will be denounced plenty without paying anybody to do it.

Anti-War people who joined in the chorus about how evil or ignorant Americans are were the ones who really screwed up.

Those people included leftists, the United Nations, and Europe's Fashionable Opinion.

LIBERAL SPORES | 1998-10-24

We have to get out of the Union, because the only discussion inside the Union is between liberals and their pets, the respectable conservatives. In the present so-called discussion, the right can only delay the inevitable expansion of leftist authority.

As recent incidents are demonstrating once again, leftism will not stop until its power is absolute. Respectable conservatives and Southern Crawlers provide a false and temporary illusion of opposition.

Many infections use spores to preserve themselves. A disease germ infests an area, but then the area dries out, so the disease germs form individual, hard shells, and wait for the rain to come back. In the meantime, it looks like the disease has been beaten.

Leftism uses the same method.

Southern Crawlers insist that, now that the libs have won on all the old civil rights fronts, they will quit. How happy we all are now, with JUST ENOUGH anti-white laws. So, by giving liberals those laws, we have inoculated ourselves against any further outbreaks of this disease. We need no longer worry about limitless Federal expansion in the name of civil rights, right?

Wrong. The disease did not go into remission. Like all liberal programs short of total bureaucratic control of everything, it merely spored.

But the spores are always just waiting for their water. And for Federal power extension in the name of diversity, the "water" is a hate crime. Give them one hate crime, and the disease is back in action.

Now a homosexual got murdered, and, surprise, surprise, liberals want more Federal "Hate" laws In the name of the melting pot, we need another extension of Federal authority.

Crawly Southerners (I call them Southern Creeps) agree with liberals that they were wrong to object to such extension last time.

But the respectable conservatives and Southern Creeps say , "THIS time, you really are going too far." Quite reasonably, liberals say, "Just let us enforce it a few years and you'll LOVE it, just like you did everything else we enforced."

Experience everywhere shows us that leftists often look like they've been tamed for the moment. But in the long run, they never stop demanding more. And conservatives never stop giving them more.

Back in 1959, when I first went to England, Hyde Park in London was the world center of free speech. It was a point of pride with Britons: in Hyde Park you could say dirty words or defend dope addiction or anything else. It was a tourist draw because it was unique it the world.

Then, in the 1960s, Britain passed laws against any bad remarks about any minority group. This was a Labour Party move, and bothered a lot of people. But then something happened that made the left look like it had been tamed: a person who was convicted under the law proved that every remark he had made was a simple recitation of statistics. The judge acquitted him with a historic remark

"You cannot imprison an Englishman for telling the truth."

All the world thought freedom of speech was saved in Britain!

It wasn't.

The left was tamed for the moment, but the left always gets what it wants in the long run. It is essential to the left that all dialogue abut minorities be subject to law.

In 1986, the British courts gave the leftists all they wanted. Even the blasé British were shocked. In Crown vs. Joseph Pierce, 1986, the judge gave Pierce a year for inciting racial hatred, and the judge said

"The truth is no defense."

By the way, in 1986 the United Kingdom was under respectable conservative rule.

As usual, the left seemed to be under control, but, with the connivance of respectable conservatives, it has resumed its march toward absolute control over free speech in Britain.

We all know there is now a major offensive to expand Federal authority under new "Hate" laws.

Meanwhile the left is opening up this offensive on new fronts. There is a new cable movie starring Beau Bridges. It is called "Defending the First." The movie argues that anyone who publicly disagrees with the liberal line on race is criminally responsible for hate crimes.

But this incitement is only to be blamed on the political right. Leftists can incite all the hate crimes they want to. A year or two ago, a black man got on a subway in New York City and started shooting white people. He said he hated whites.

A couple of years ago, the New York State School Board actually approved a textbook which stated flatly that all white people were racists! It was pulled at the very last minute.

So, who got blamed for the black man's murder of a lot of white people? New Yorkers unanimously blamed the gun for it! A wife of one of the victims got elected to congress saying it was the gun's fault!

Did you hear any respectable conservative blaming any of this on leftists?

Me neither.

How about Southerner Crawlers?

Me neither.

The bottom line is this: in politics, you are either going forward or you are going back. We must either destroy the left and discredit it, or it will consume us. Respectable conservatives and Southern Creeps say that liberalism so far is not just OK, it is great.

We must either discredit liberalism totally, or we must secede.

We must stop trying to get liberals to approve of us and turn to driving them out. If the Union continues, if leftist respectability continues, your future belongs to the left.