THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

WHAT JUST HAPPENED TO BUGS? THAT'S NOT THE POINT (STALWARTS, PLEASE READ MY COMMENT #41) | 2013-06-30

BUGS has had a crisis. As one comment pointed out, you are getting expertise and experience from me free that you definitely could not afford. Once again, you owe it to me to read what I am saying and not to buzz off into titillating facts about Names I mention the way you have been accustomed to do in membership organizations.

We actually have more fun in BUGS than membership orgs do, simply because we are so deadly serious here. High steel workers, people in combat, underage kids like me working on the old deadly brick plants all remember the humor that helped us survive.

That is what humor is for. You laugh to keep from despairing and to keep your underwear clean.

But you don't listen to a serious warning or lesson and then talk about some name that triggers a memory or a joke. Here are the most critical words of all:

"We laugh and we joke but we don't PLAY."

This crisis will not be discussed in detail. As usual, what I will tell you is about crises. If experience counts, I have dealt with enough of these so this is almost routine, that is, if you take in the fact that I have had two nervous breakdowns and two heart attacks and I am on disability.

So listen.

Let me tell you about one of my crises.

I was back from Africa with a new wife and my way of life did not allow us to get a Belk's credit card when they were mailing out active credit cards to everybody else. As an economist from one of the best economics departments in America, I went into aviation negotiations.

But my real purpose, as always, was power politics.

Obviously to me, what was needed was to combine what was then called "The Wallace Vote" with the conservative Republican vote. That combined vote in 1968 had been a landslide. That was on the record.

On Election Day 1980, the term "Wallace voters" instantly disappeared from all political dialogue, especially from the commentaries of who had used it most. On that November Day in November, 1980, they became "Reagan Democrats." The strategy had given Reagan all but his opponent's home state and, for the first time since 1955, a quarter century, the Republicans controlled a House of Congress.

Please, please do not let the commentary slide into "I remember what I was doing the day of that election." This is BUGS, and we have some professional pride.

One thing that was forgotten was one of those crises, the one that almost destroyed me. I had just completed my first book, a demand, as the NR article said, from INSIDE the populist movement, the "Wallace Democrats," for the coalition.

At that moment came The Whitaker Nazi Scare. All of a sudden people who had published my articles refused to speak to or tell me why. The only one of them who had the decency and the courage to talk to me said his hands were tied because word was round that I was member of the American Nazi Party.

Like most of these crises, in a society where anybody had any balls, this would have been funny.

The very idea that a career Federal employee, no matter what his personal politics, would be waltzing around with a Nazi membership card should have gotten guffaws from a retard. But not from professional conservatives, who are unbelievable cowards.

Every one of those Brave Leaders deserted me. After the crisis passed, not one of them apologized or told me who had slandered me.

The only thing that saved my career was that Bill Rusher needed me, he needed me badly. On Election Day, 1974, this grandson of an Indiana coalminer, who had spent his years living that down by posing as the most snobbish of conservative snobs, God rest his socialite soul, switched from hard opposition to the Wallace idea for a majority.

Bill NEEDED me desperately.

I was the only person on the right who had worked with those dirty old "Wallace voters.' I had written FOR them and not just ABOUT them. I had gotten tens of thousands of working people marching the streets of Washington.

As soon as Rusher got behind me, the rumors vanished. I was back in and on my way to Capitol Hill.

But please note this: Not one of the Brave Names of the New Right would tell the name of anyone who had slandered me. Even the one who returned my calls said, "Let's just forget it."

How slimy, cowardly and treacherous can conservatives be, routinely?

Well, this was and is routine.

Let me regress for a moment to our own recent crisis. Discussion of a crisis always involves Mirrors and Masturbation. I am not going to even look, because it would make me sick, and I hope I am wrong, but I assume that somebody, using an assumed name, has given a lecture about how brave HE would have been and done it all right.

It's like seeing someone masturbating in the mirror, it's nauseating.

So when this incident occurred, I, Robert Walker Whitaker, talked to the SPLC writer and faced him down. Scared me too, because it brought up so many other things like this I had gone through.

Let me once again try to head off the almost miraculous ability of commenters to get off the subject.

This is a lecture in the midst of a seminar, which is a special thing. I do not want to hear who you blame or what you suspect. Read what I am writing.

Nor do I need apologies. I have repeatedly said that using pseudonyms under the present Terror is essential for most. The one catch is that if you use a pseudonym, you look ridiculous saying how wonderfully you would have handled being outed by the SPLC.

Writing this is a lot of work, and unpleasant work for me, so if I am a bit testy, please try to forgive.

But don't you DARE blame or second think anyone but me.

I talked to the head writer for SPLC. They had spent a great effort to reach me. They even called an ex-wife of a divorce thirty years ago.

SPLC does not consist of Mantra Thinkers. I had been on their mailing list at this address for YEARS!

James Kelso is a gutsy pro. I was staying in a hotel room with Kelso when this kind of thing first hit him. Suddenly a major pro-white leader told him he was a mole and a traitor.

This came from the babblings of one of the people fighting for control of the National Alliance after Pierce's death.

Kelso is NOT a Mirror Masturbator. Kelso will tell you very freely that I had to talk him down off the roof when his whole pro-white career suddenly seemed doomed.

I have been through a LOT of these, and Kelso will tell you that is VERY useful.

Now, for those who are still with me and haven't drifted off into how Communists treat Christians or what they knew would happen, some lessons from this.

This is what may happen to me in the near future. There are two lessons in it. First, what might happen, and second the total Doublethink that is routine in the present Terror.

The interviewer began with the standard gambit. He said the Mantra was all over the place and it had been found in the home of a guy who committed murders and did I feel guilty.

I asked him, every time he started on this, whether he could guarantee that not one of the black on white murders occurring daily had been perpetrated by people who had heard some of HIS condemnation of whites.

He was honest enough to back down. I told him that was a sillyass gambit for a professional to take.

Here is the double think in what may be done to me. They spent fourteen million dollars to get David Duke in jail. I am nowhere near Dr. Duke's league. So they would freely say that they were not after me because I was not important enough.

They called me to tell me how important I had been, but if you control the Silence, you can and will instantly say I never had any influence at all.

The fact that they led off the attack by talking about my influence will go right down in the Silence.

The interviewer then asked if I had ever been with the CIA. I said he knew I wouldn't discuss that. He then said I had lied about my background.

A professional political speechwriter LIES about his background!

Impossible!

But I have mentioned here before that one way for them to get me is to find any Intelligence incidence where anyone got killed in and blame me for it. There is no statute of limitations on first degree murder, and the charge does not have to come within parsecs of the truth to ruin me financially.

The fact that they also say I never did any of that stuff will never come up.

They own the Silence.

This all sounds like Solzhenitsyn talking about Stalinism.

Wonder why?

I mentioned before an incident most readers probably forgot. These lessons have cost me plenty so I really resent it when they are trivialized by stream-of-thought comments

Please read all THIS at least twice before you comment. Then, if you really can't contain it, you go head off into Membership babblings.

The example I gave was critical, it was about the Great Leftist Proponent of Freedom of Speech Alan Derschowitz.

He began a TV "debate" by telling his opponent that he had better put his house in his wife's name before he said mean things about Dershowitz. Derschowitz is a practicing attorney and Harvard Law professor.

This is exactly like Mr. T telling a debate opponent that if he says anything T doesn't like he'll send him to the emergency room.

Only Mr. T has too much class for that.

I have to be financially ruined before I can get free legal advice. So God knows what kind of humiliating babble I may have to do if they come down on me.

So don't give anybody who is actually in this situation any Mirror Masturbation.

BUT THE BIG POINT IS that I do not matter! They can't handle the message so they are going after the messengers.

SUNDAY MEANDERINGS FOR MY DAY OF REST | 2013-04-22

            My Sunday Meanderings

Definitions from the Martian Dictionary:

"Fascists call all disagreement Communist.   Communists call all disagreement Nazi.

"Oriental - noun - a member of one of the non-green races."

"Female -- A pleasantly lumpy human."

"Dictatorship -- noun -- "one man, one vote," where the man is specified.

"Hard vacuum -- noun -- The softest thing in the universe.

Rush Hour -- A time and place where nobody rushes.

"Democracy -- A society where the people think they rule.

"Franks -- A people who had a lot of Gaul.

"Objectivity -- The opinion of the one guy in the room who has a gun.

"Truth -- See "Objectivity."

"Defeat -- A noun for losers, a verb for winners.

"Jewish -- Something a little bit red is called reddish, something just a bit blue is bluish.   So calling an Orthodox Rabbi "Jewish" is really strange.

"Religion -- Either Ultimate Truth or the world's largest and oldest protection racket.

"Englishman -- A German trying to be a Frenchman.

"Prophetic -- Ben Franklin said that the proper symbol for America was the turkey, and he died when the Federal Government was only a year old."

INSTITUTIONS AND AMOEBAE | 2011-01-21

We know that one-celled animals do not have "wants" in our sense of the word. Yet we also know that they will get away from water that is too hot or too cold. Institutions are exactly like that.

Like one-celled beings institutions are evolved by competition. The less successful ones die. But the result is the same. Institutions are very much alike and very predictable, because they compete in the same waters and you can predict what the survivors will be like.

If you can't look at things this way the world becomes a Conspiracy. The problem with a Conspiracy was covered by Benjamin Franklin over two centuries ago when he said, "Three men can keep a secret, if two of them are dead."

There is another problem with conspiracies. No one in the real world is that SMART. When you have spent your career watching people at the top scrambling to meet crises, the idea that someone has the whole world all mapped out is very hard to credit.

Institutions, like one-celled beings, come in a variety of types that compete for entirely different things. A lot of historians like to note that Odinism had a Trinity, Odin, Thor and Freya. That sounds good, but it is not clear and in any case Odinism at that time was COMPETING with another trinity called Christianity.

If Communism had its youth group, the Komsomols, Nazism would get its Hitler Youth. If Communism had its hammer and sickle, Nazism would get is swastika. Competing institutions look very much alike, just as one-celled beings do.

According to Islam, it will be Jesus who comes down to the Judgment. Islam is a mixture of its two main competitors and forerunners, Judaism and Christianity. Even Iranian Shi'ism is attributed to the special influence of Zoroastrianism and regards all other Moslems as heretics.

Those of us who are only really familiar with the three Jehovan religions do not realize how alike they are. We have real trouble understanding most religions where a specific God is nonexistent, as in Buddhism, or multiple gods as in Hinduism.

We have extreme difficulty with Political Correctness as a religion because it has a Satan, Hitler, and no Jehovah. We don't understand the many religions that had their own Holy Prostitution exactly as we have our Holy Virginity.

We KNOW it, but we don't UNDERSTAND it. Deep down we simply do not believe those were RELIGIONS, real religions, even though we know that their followers were as dedicated and faithful to them as we can ever be to ours.

We do not realize that the religions we know, Christianity, Islam and Judaism, look almost exactly alike to any other culture. Wordism takes the words so seriously it does not even see the obvious fact that, whatever the original Books say, these three institutions that survive by competing with each other are going to look as alike to the real world as different forms of Buddhism or Taoism do to us.

Each of our forms of Jehovism sees itself as The Only True Faith. In the competition, only the few that had that doctrine could survive. But in other societies not only is there no One True Faith, but each survives by NOT fighting it out to the death.

It depends, in short, on the PEOPLE, not on the WORDS.

The mainline Protestant denominations dropped precipitously in the last century while the population went up. The Catholic Church had a fairly heavy conversion rate until Vatican II when it decided to be as much like the obviously dying Anglican Church as it could be.

Evangelicals converted so many millions in Latin America they were on the way to becoming the dominant religion there. But the fire is out and they are doing their best to be just like everybody else. It no longer uses the fundamentalism because the people its leaders want to become, in part think it's dirty.

What the leaders come to want is not the same thing that makes an institution grow.

So you see that institutions are a separate evolutionary study from everything we are used to looking at in our Wordist way. For any serious political knowledge, that blind spot is exactly like trying to understand astronomy while insisting that the earth is the center of the universe.

Wordism, after all, no matter what form it takes, puts words at the center of our universe.

PANIC PAYS II | 2007-06-18

I was an econmics professor, but I grew out of it. Demography, population study, is a branch of econmics. No long-run demographic projection has EVER been accurate. In 1900 Indians were The Vanishig Americans.

Real economists call demographics Panic Science. Demographers who get published take the population tend of the last generation, make a geometric progressin of it, and declare the world is doomed one way or another. They're always wrong but nobody remembers it.

For example, everybody remembers the movie Soylent Green but nobody remembers that, in 1972, demographers had taken the arithmetic growth of the Boomer Generation, projected it into the future, and decided that WHITE people wuld be standing on each other's heads in the 21st century, hence the desperate overpopulation in that movie.

That panic led to a lot of demographers becoming famous and helped cause the population bust of the 1970s. Now THAT population bust is being projected into the future by NEW famous demographers.

Demographers who START the panics are smart oportunists. People who never cease to BELIEVE them need psychiatric help.