THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

PAIN,TWO STEPS FORWARD, ONE STEP BACK | 2007-05-14

Culture is usually a canard. Some will talk about culture when they are frightened of the little word "race."

People — the Race — are always more important than culture. People create culture. The culture has worth inasmuch as it fosters people.

Since culture is both creature and servant of the Race, then the Race is always the most important.

But most people here and now talk about culture as a way to run away from "race."

Comment by Pain

ME:

Thank God -- and that is NOT blasphemy, ANOTHER expansion on OUR way of thinking!

But most people here and now talk about culture as a way to run away from "race."

EXACTLY! We all KNOW that, but we never SAY that.

The leftists always use the two steps forward, one step back policy. It always works. A person who has a Confederate flag on his car with "Heritage Not Hate" does not realize he gave our enemies a major step forward:

1) They condemn all Confederate symbols because they represent Racism.

2) Confederate flag people respond by denouncing any concern about the ongoing genocide of the white race as"Racism" and Hate and say THEIR symbol has nothing to do with that.

So the antis just got a major step forward, everybody now agrees any concern over the white race is to be denounced by everybody who loves our Heritage.

We just saw another example. The media went for Cinco de Mayo big time just at the moment it obscured the REAL founding of America exactly four hundred years ago.

Nobody on our side has noticed YET.

Yes, Peter, you hit the nail on the head: "Save our culture" like "Heritage not Hate" is the language of chicken-out. It's says everythng is culture, not genes. Which happens to be a major plank in the anti platform. Which the "culture" guy is agreeing with.

Way to go, Pain!

CARS OFF THE SHELF | 2005-11-17

It was one the rare occasions when I was in a bar, imbibing with my usual moderation. I forget exactly who I was with. All I remember is that I was somewhat embarrassed at how she was hitting the liquor.

She was so drunk she looked blurred.

There were some guys in coats and ties at one table and one of them bought a round of "free" drinks for everybody, including me and my blurry girlfriend. He was celebrating the fact that he had just "won" a car dealership.

By "won" I mean that he had bid highest among a group of people bidding big money for that dealership.

That's why I put the quotes around the "free" drink I got from him.

Guess who paid for the high bid he was able to make? Well, I have bought a number of new cars in my life, and the people who buy new cars are the ones who paid for his bid, plus the profit he made on it.

I figure, very conservatively, that that drink cost me twenty or thirty thousand dollars.

I also had to pay for the guy who works for him. You know how it is when you buy a new car. The dealer sits down with you and gives you such a deal on the car, such a deal as you never saw before in your life.

It's less than the factory cost. The dealership will lose money on it. He is giving up his commission. His family will just have to go hungry this week.

Then he goes to "clear" this money-losing deal with his supervisor. You can see through the glass as he breaks the awful news to his boss.

The boss's reaction for your benefit depends on the price of the car you are buying. If it is a luxury model, he looks stunned and sorrowful. For a super-luxury car he turns pale and has to sit down.

When it comes to cars that sell for over a hundred grand they have a special ambulance that comes in, red lights flashing, into which he gets carried, clutching his chest.

For the cars I bought, he just nodded.

So you pay for the dealership, the salesman who is standing around most of the day and clears his shirt-losing deals with the manager, overhead, the works.

Plus profits on all that.

One company is experimenting with a technique that takes all the drama out of this. They are selling cars just like you buy anythig else, off the shelf.

You would find it hard to have a life if you haggled over everything you bought in a store. The entire personnel of WalMart would have to take acting lessons and you would have to pay for them.

If this experiment is succcessful, the price of cars will drop like a rock.

A THOUSAND BITS OF "GETTING IT" | 2006-11-26

Since you have effort and dedication invested in me, I want to point out to you that I was the only person on Stormfront who has received an invitation to attend that invitation, including those who thought they were going and told me about it. This is inexcusable of those sponsoring the convention, but it also authenticates a lot of the things I have been telling you about my background.

Most of my life is deep cover, so it is nice to have my background verified from a source that is so hard for us all even to contact. When you run into names like David Duke and Paul Fromm and Joe Sobran and Pat Buchanan there is no doubt who they are. My whole modus operandi for a lifetime makes it necessary for me to toot my own horn all the time, and I can't even toot too loudly or too specifically.

This was all right when I operated alone. Not fun, but all right. But now I am trying to get people to take me seriously in the company of people with names INSIDE the movement. What makes it worse is that the last thing I want to do is COMPETE with any of them. But David and Paul and the others have me in the shade because their names and their heroic, I said heroic, history, are KNOWN.

I seem to have done nothing but sat safely inside the establishment. So this recognition from people inside the Iranian establishment, a place government agents can't influence, gives me a major leg up. If I haven't been one hell of heretic, a heretic well known among those who have access to files, this coincidence would not have taken place.

I solve big problems very quietly. The problem is that I cannot be absolutely sure that the pressure I put in the right place was the determining factor. But some of you are beginning to notice things like Buchanan using the term "code word." That was a liberal term conservatives NEVER used, never used for FORTY YEARS.

Liberals were always saying that "crime" was a code-word for suppressing non-whites or "state's rights" was a code word for racism. But it was as much liberal property as if they had a copyright on it.

I used it in the Mantra, you and I hammered at it:

"Anti-racism" is a code word for anti-white" and suddenly, after almost half a century, Pat Buchanan used the term code word.

When I spent a few years proclaiming that political correctness was a religion, Ann Coulter wrote a book about liberalism as a religion. All clues are subtle. All clues can be explained away or ignored. But my entire effort has been based on such clues.

And those clues indicate that I exercise enormous power.

Nick Griffin, head of the British National Party, had a serious problem. The BNP had been denied a back account. A back account in Europe is a wholly different matter from here, and I lack the space to explain this chiasmic difference here. So I told Nick I would do something about it.

At the next convention, Nick explained to me learnedly that the British Government had discovered that it would be better for the BNP to have an account in the UK than one they could not monitor. After years of problems with this, it so happened that the problem was solved after he asked me for help.

I tried to get Nick to appreciate what my contacts had done, because there is one man in particular who is a genius at this stuff who stuck it to the British banking regulators. He didn't knock himself out. He just made some calls saying that he could set up a US account for the BNP with connections that would put them totally out of British surveillance – there are LOTS of people who stay specifically out of British surveillance as I had to in Rhodesia – and the Brits decided Nick now had contacts they could not live with.

If you have spent your life in this business this was not a major leap. But the BNP has NOT spent its life in this. So the year after Nick public ally begged for help on this matter it had been forgotten. He told me, in all seriousness, that the Brits and simply changed their minds. Nick genuinely did not know who he had been talking to when he asked ME for help.

A word in the right place, knowing which interests counterbalance others, this is power.

No, Alan B., I did not ask you to keep up with the latest literature on genetics. My point was exactly the opposite of those who recommend tomes. My point was to NOTICE PATTERNS, not to "keep up with the literature."

I would not fit into Jared Taylor's group, for example, for a very good reason. Joe Sobran and Jared and the rest are making an impression on national media. This is not the way I work. The way I work requires one to stop reacting and philosophizing and get into the simple logistics of real power, really convincing people.

No one is going to listen to me in that kind of detail. But what I say rubs off. Different people pick up the code word bit, the leftism is a religion bit. Commenters pick up on some questioning of basics.

It is painful to watch people get the point and then lollyland off into their own usual stuff. But I have watched my plants ripen in the oddest places, because they are work, because they are needed.

What I have learned and done is essential to the salvation ahead.

No one can understand that but me. That is what I gave my life to, and that is enough.

WORDS OR PEOPLE? | 2015-02-09

In every area, the United States is moving toward the stagnation of colored countries.

All my earlier life, a certain percentage increase in per capita income was taken as inevitable. This was because technology was steadily moving forward.  In fact, any econometrician could probably chart the rate of stagnation by looking at our changing color.  The line goes from upward when white, to stagnation and to the steady decline to third world status observed in all brown lands.

Meanwhile, Mommy Professor mentions polls which show the public endorsing the statement 'The great days of America are past."

No  sh**, Dick Tracy.

These were the exact same Mommy Professors who STILL take Marxism seriously.

They STILL say that if the economy were turned over to "The Intellectuals," meaning them, Production would rocket upward.

You know, the way it did in the USSR.

To Mommy Professor and the yuppies, Economics is a Voodoo governed by "highly complex factors." Only Understood by The Intelligentsia.

To me, the economy is the product of those who make up the country:

"Ourselves and OUR posterity."

Mommy Professor, who made the USSR the stunning success it was, says that the purpose of America is "all men are created equal."   Guess who is to decide what "equal" means?

Mommy Professor insists that all that matters is the WORDS a country uses.

And we can follow Mommy Professor down the same chute the USSR did.