THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

SHARI | 2007-12-03

The reason you don't hear much about the mantra from me, is because what I do is puny and poor, but I am constantly thinking of it and send it whenever I see an obvious opportunity. The response I get is usually none and sometimes stupid. For instance, our accountant, { who is very overpaid to keep us from sinking under the IRS} says, "my response is very different, I don't care about race, but our own teenagers don't know the constitution as well as immigrants do."

I agree with Pain, that white genocide is the GREAT SIN of our age. What I think is the sin of whites as a race, is not counting our inheritance as the precious thing it is, instead selling our birthright for a mess of gruel. It's NOT oppressing the world.

I also have a question. Sailor at v-dare has a piece on Chinese farmers moving to Africa. Now I don't imagine they would have any intention of miscegenation with Africans, but what would this do to the pilium?

And thank you for the pat on the back!

-- Shari

1) READ the Mantra. Nobody is demanding that Chinese workers be accepted in Africa;

2) Ask your accountant why he expects kids to have a natural feeling for their country but none for their race.

OUR POSTERITY AND MY EXAMPLES | 2008-04-28

Al Parker says that I outline a future "and another possible future in India of people who, besides their shared Varna, will not even be our descendants."

A very useful basis for discussion.

TWO POINTS:

POINT ONE:

I was wondering when someone was going to bring this specific example up: We need a Just-So Future in which OUR descendants are the white people. My aim is the most basic one in nature: the survival of my phenotype.

If this "Posterity" bit worked I wouldn't be necessary.

An Indian child with its non-Aryan genes erased will be as kin to me as a Russian. Russians are not my descendants. Culturally India is rapidly westernizing, but Japan is doing it faster. We have been trained to believe that culture is all that matters. A society with our books but not our GENES will be just fine.

I say the opposite. Everybody can be culturally western, Orientals can catch up. But only whites can advance the West itself.

Al Parker, would you really put a pure Aryan child of Indians who wanted pure Aryan children in the same immigration category with brown Indians? I would rather have them than any rot-minded anti-white Whitakers from England.

POINT TWO:

You should look for what I am giving examples OF.

The problem is that, instead of taking every example I give as the Inevitable Bleak Things to Come, which is what our entire excuse for education has taught us, you should look for what I am giving examples OF.

The hole card for anti-whites Inevitability has always been Asia. They insist that the world is mostly Boasian "minorities" and therefore wildly pro-integration. So I gave the example of the weakness of that idea in Asia. Now I am told everybody is going to be an Indian.

It is terribly important for you to separate what I am giving EXAMPLES OF from the usual hard and fast Politically Correct Inevitabilities. We are ready to ride waves in a new age while they are desperately trying to jam everything into a hopelessly outdated framework.

When attacking the white race, the mantra of our enemies is, "This too shall pass." But it never occurs to them that THEY, too will pass. And their cult will pass a lot faster than a race will disappear.

But I will not give you a Just-So FUTURE to replace THEIR Just-So Future.

POINT TWO refers to the fact that I am attacking the very Inevitables that our depressive defeatists find so overwhelming.

Their real weakness of our cult is that it has a rigid framework. EVERYTHING hits it as an unwelcome surprise. From the Internet to genetic engineering to settling the moon and space colonization to advances in ways to find out the actual truth in any area, everything militates against their rigid framework.

But only so long as WE are NOT in a rigid framework.

SCIENCE FICTION GOES SENILE | 2015-11-28

When I was young, I loved science fiction. I went to some conventions.

Back then SF looked to the future. It demanded experimentation. In a world where population and per capita income both increased steadily science fiction was the cutting edge of demands for technological progress and optimism.

Now reading SciFi is like listening to an old man grumble to himself.

"None of these new-fangled things will do anything but cause disaster."

In today's scifi, any population increase means starvation.

One story talked about the discovery of the secret of eternal life, and then showed how it was banned forever because a society that could extend life forever did not realize it might involve a population increase, and total disaster ensued.

The very idea is laughable, but nobody laughed.

They PUBLISHED this crap.

Today's clowns READ this crap!

Science fiction is now "message media." Each story is supposed to advance the "message."

So, like all Marxist output, it is BORING.

THE MANTRA SWITCH | 2010-11-09

When people talk about big happenings, they want big causes. When Kennedy was shot, no one wanted to attribute that to one lone nut job, especially a Communist nut job.

That is a major reason conspiracy theories flourished.

That is what makes BUGS so hard to sell. No one wants to hear that the historical catastrophes we have seen were the result of simple causes. No one wants to hear that all that complicated talk about race relations just comes down the Final Solution to the White Problem.

I just wrote a piece here about how television was monomaniacally New York-centered from the history of granting licenses. The average person who hobbies in politics would say that is a cute observation and go on to Big Stuff.

In big historical events, people associate realism with Big Stuff. Reality is not made of Big Stuff. Reality has a lot of Big Stuff, medium stuff, and tiny stuff. The catch is that when you talk about the little stuff, like TV programming, very few people want to hear about it.

Which means their picture of the world is completely unreal. If a plane goes down, it may be the result of a terrorist plot or it may be a tiny piece of defective equipment like the one that knocked out all power in the entire Northeastern United States for hours in the 1960s.

If that happened today a dozen books would come out showing it was Arabs.

The article about early New York provincialism in TV programming was written to DEMONSTRATE the truth that no one is as provincial as a rube who thinks he's sophisticated.

The rule here is that you don't reach reality by searching for excitement. You could have talked yourself blue about Arab Terrorist Plots or some other Great Conspiracy causing that Blackout, but the fact is that the blackout would have continued until you replaced that one little switch.

Our movement can get lots of membership with News and Jews. But it will get nowhere until it gets to the basics.

I have spent over a decade trying to get them to change that one switch. I will probably literally die trying.