THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

SHARI, WATCH OUT FOR THE NEORATS! | 2007-09-11

Neoracism would be an open admission that genociding the whites is the goal. The mantra would deal with the new type racism even more because the cover of "equality" would be thrown off.

-- Shari

ME:

No, Neoracism will be an exact replay of Neoconservatism. When liberals policies failed so obviously that it became the l word, they needed an exit strategy. So they made up a new title that said that everything they did before was fine. The official line today is that everything liberals did until on or abut January 1, 1970 and then the whole thing suddenly and inexplicably went out of control.

Which is EXACTLY why we are right back in Vietnam again today.

Meanwhile all SFers can think of is the big noses.

Why won't anybody THINK about what I say?

I was so proud of Lord Nelson for describing Neoracism in its formative stages. He thinks he missed a point because I had just discussed the phenomenon and given it a name. He is ONE step behind me. Everybody else is a Marathon back and losing ground.

They are too busy reading Pat Buchanan on Jews in Neoconservatism to realize what the phenomenon itself is.

Neoracism will say that everything anti-racists DID was good. As Lord Nelson said, with them we will need the manta more than ever. Neoracism will say that GENETICS is important, NOT RACE. They will divide us by CLASS, with our present leaders soaking in the sunshine of Big Name approval and leading the lynch mob against those who keep pointing out that their new-found heroes are TRAITORS, and it won't WORK.

That is exactly what conservatives do today. THAT IS WHY WE ARE BACK IN VIETNAM!!!!

Kennedy and Roosevelt are GODS to neos, and more than gods to professional conservatives. So we are doing the same thing in the name of conservatism we did forty years ago in the name of liberalism. Reality doesn'care about the label. Do the same again, under any title, and you get the same results.

Fool me once, shame n you. Fool me twice, shame on ME.

Conservatives were so busy groaning about how hopeless everything was that they never planned for victory. That is SF today. Conservatives won the war and lost the peace.

ONLY MEDIA DEATHS COUNT | 2000-05-07

Two people died in a nuclear plant accident in Japan. It's the first time anybody died in nuclear energy production in a developed country. But only those two deaths are important. The Jane Fondaista media is licking its chops, declaring that this will probably end Japan's use of nuclear power.

Japan uses coal and oil for its non-nuclear power. Would anybody care to estimate how many people in South African coal mines and on oil rigs died producing that gigantic amount of energy? No, of course not. People who die producing coal and oil are just working people. They don't matter.

By the same token, the kids that died at Littleton matter. Their deaths can be used to push gun control. Hundreds of people who die defenseless throughout America each week are never mentioned.

So working stiffs who die on oil rigs or in coal mines make no difference. People who die in nuclear incidents matter. People only matter if liberals can use them.

BASICS: AN INDIVIDUAL POINT OF VIEW | nationalsalvation.net

One reason I see things clearly is because I see them from what Aleksander Solzhenitsyn in the Gulag Archipelago called "an individual point of view." Few readers and no intellectuals understood what he meant by this.

Up until his time in the Gulag, Solzhenitsyn adhered to the established religion of his country, Marxism-Leninism. He thought Stalin was a thug and said so, which is what got him into the Gulag. But he considered Lenin the greatest man in history and it was his life's work to write the definitive biography of that Saint.

What Solzhenitsyn meant by an "individual point of view" was what he later became: a Russian, not a Marxist. He saw himself as an individual with a, repeat A, meaning ONE, personal point of view: "an individual point of view." Only then was he able to observe THE REST of the world accurately.

If you are part of the established religion, regardless of what that institution may be, you are not a part of the world or the people you are analyzing. You look down on others in the light of your own Final Truth.

Everybody is a provincial, but you cannot understand anything about real people unless you face the fact that you are a hick, too. The people who cannot understand reality at all are those who THINK the INSTITUTION they are part of does not have a "point of view."

Those who have an institutional view analyze everything as a step up or down toward their Final Truth. They are the most extreme form of provincial. They possess a hickdom no real hick could even imagine.

And, unlike a normal hick, the institutional hick cannot imagine that he IS a provincial.

SF PIECE: TRIBUTE TO AN ANTI | 2007-04-27

Web Censorship "Bypass" Unveiled

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/technology/6187486.stm

I remember a young Canadian anti-racist whoinisisted helived in a free country. When racist cites were outlawed, he mirrored every "hate" site he culd find in protest. I do not know whether he is out of prison yet.

Antis here talk abut free speech, butnone of them are ever upset about gag laws,and I am sure the Blue Ribbon Free Speech crowd dsavowed this young man completely.

We have an oppositin thread here, but no anti demands the same of their own media. But there was one honest anti once, though I cannot find out what the other antis did to him.