THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

The drive to wipe out the name of Christmas because of its Christian origins has become so obvious that some Jews were mentioning it in the media. Even a few respectable conservatives were allowed a mild protest. "Happy Holidays" is the mantra of the PC crowd. Of course, everyone is expected to give Hanukkah equal billing with Christmas. Hanukkah was historically a minor Jewish holiday, but because they wanted "equal time" with Christians, it has been inflated all out of proportion.

Kwanzaa is completely ridiculous, but that doesn't prevent it from being shoved down our throats.

But what about Martin Luther King Day? Is there any move afoot to tone it down for those who might be offended, as Jews and Blacks supposedly are by Christmas? Or to allow those of "other faiths" to choose their own holiday?

How about "Great Leaders Day" where everyone can celebrate great leaders of their own people? So Southerners could go back to their Lee - Jackson celebrations.

Right.

In 1950, the hundreds of men on the Ford assembly line were far smarter than all the thousands of brilliant people who had gone before in that industry. The assembly line men were smarter than all the Fords, Edisons and all the thousands who had made small and large improvements to auto design.

If you are not college trained, you won't understand this. You see, the assembly line produced a 1950 car whereas none of those thousands of smart people and originators and geniuses could not make a car that was that fast or well designed.

This was the logic every college student learned. It was called socialism. College professors taught them that the way for third world countries to develop was to bypass all the old-fashioned market stuff and have professors from the London School of Economics and Harvard plan out how they could go from a 1500 AD economy to a 1950 economy without all that waste of time, money and energy growing in a market framework.

The geniuses Karl Marx and Vladimir Lenin, they were told, could put together a truly efficient and planned production-distribution network, as could their successor intellectuals.

We also learned that Orientals are smarter than Westerners. The Japanese jumped from Asian poverty to first-world status in a single generation, just as the assembly line workers could produce a modern car. Professors, Orientals, and assembly line workers were clearly superior creatures.

When Japan reached a Western level, a level already reached by the West, their miraculous brilliance stopped. When 1950 assembly line workers produced a 1950 car, their genius reached its final stage. Socialist economies didn't even get there.

Orientals were able to reach the white living standard before hitting a brick wall. Blacks cannot get there, copy as they might. Socialism kept white Eastern Europe to a third world level. So Orientals are better than blacks. Socialism can't even COPY, so any form of market economy is superior to that, just as Orientals are superior to blacks.

But the IQ obsession teaches that Orientals can copy, and are therefore equal. An assembly line, says the IQ obsession, is smarter than the inventors.

If you have a college degree, you truly cannot imagine that anything is wrong with that logic.

There it hangs, the threat of superterrorism.

You can find out how to make a suitcase-size atomic bomb on the Internet. Russia probably has hundreds of times as much plutonium missing as is needed. Disease and poisoning of water supplies are constantly mentioned as cheaper, less complicated means of superterrorism.

There is no reason liberals or moderates or respectable conservatives would look at this threat. The minute superterrorism appears, the entire, narrow world of liberalism collapses.

As you will see below, the first thing that will disappear as soon as superterrorism appears will be the liberal concept of a society planned on rules set down by social experts.

Liberals don't like to think about superterrorism, so moderates and respectable conservatives ignore it.

Someone once said that facing execution concentrates one's attention wonderfully.

Atomic devices will concentrate our attention wonderfully.

As I mentioned at the Redshirt meeting, the first atomic terrorist explosion will cause instant decentralization. Suddenly, when anybody could carry an atomic device into a community, all this multiracial, multicultural nonsense will evaporate.

Today, liberalism forces us to make heroes of anybody who has a grudge against American society or white people or, in the case of fanatical environmentalism, even mankind itself.

To the liberals, all the other terrorists are just right-wing extremists, but the Unibomber was a semihero. Suddenly, it will no longer be fashionable to treat guilt-sellers as colleagues. The Unibomber will be the man of this future, though compared to his nuclear successors, this leftist radical was a piker. The guy who got his arms blasted off by the Unibomber got his attention concentrated abruptly.

He wrote a book about it, and in that book he no longer shows the usual businessman's tolerance for environmental radicals.

If political resentment leads people to use atomic terrorism, and you say you feel America really belongs to the Indians, I do not want you within a mile of me.

Literally.

Every liberal and respectable conservative will declare that superterrorism will be end of civilization. Not long ago, that might have been the case. But today, the same thing that makes secession so efficient will preserve civilization after superterrorism, probably without too much of a bump. Industry is no longer concentrated the way it once was. We no longer need the sort of huge cities that superterrorists can threaten as the center of our civilization. We can easily spread out and defend our production facilities.

How will we unite without the United States Army to force all of us to be part of a single Union?

We will do what we should have done in the first place. Communities will make voluntary agreements for trade and mutual protection, as the Confederacy will make with the United States and other countries. Such agreements could easily be more efficient than our present bureaucratic tangle of interstate regulations.

Can civilization survive without the Federal Courts to regulate every facet of our social life? I believe so.

Do You Have an "I Don't Molest Children" Bumper Sticker?

If a conservative wants to be allowed to speak on the liberal-controlled media he has to earn that "respectable" label from liberals. I keep repeating this because you cannot understand what passes for political debate in our age without reminding yourself of this overwhelming fact before listening to any political "discussion".

So when a liberal refers to an "anti-war movement", conservatives keep a straight face.

What if you and I were discussing crime and I said to you, "Well, unlike you, I don't abuse children." You would consider that a hell of an insult.

But if somebody refers to himself as being for Peace, with the clear implication that everybody else likes war, killing, bombing, orphaning children and all the rest, conservatives sit there looking respectful.

Do You Have the Right Feelings All the Time?

America's leadership is made up almost entirely of sociopaths. A sociopath is a person who is incapable of any genuine empathy with other people or any feelings of guilt. It sounds extreme, so we assume that genuine sociopaths are rare.

Recent studies have shown that genuine sociopaths are actually very common. There are between three million and ten million sociopaths in the United States alone.

Most sociopaths don't know that they are sociopaths. They spend their entire lives faking empathy and guilt and all the rest, and since they don't know what the real thing feels like, they think they genuinely feel empathy and guilt. The result is that it is very hard for most people to feel all the empathy and guilt that the ruling sociopaths tell them they should feel. A sociopath honestly believes that his attitudes are just right all the time.

In a multicultural society the sociopath is king. Real people, people who are not sociopaths, have a lot of gut feelings and prejudices. In a multiculture you are not allowed to have gut feelings or "prejudices". Only a true sociopath can rise to the top in a multiculture.

So on a talk show, when a liberal sociopath tells a conservative sociopath that he is anti-war the conservative has no problem with that. The conservative is playing Patriot and the liberal is playing Peace Prophet, and it never occurs to either one of them that the "discussion" they a having is insane.

For the Multicultural Sociopath, Heredity Does not Exist. A few years ago identical twins were a fad. A lot of people did not know they had identical twins because they had been adopted into different families at birth. Identical twins have exactly the same genes. What fascinated everybody about twins who had been adopted into wildly different families at birth was how alike they were when they grew up.

One twin was raised as a Catholic while the other twin was raised as a Jew. One twin would be raised in a highly educated family while the other was raised in a poorly educated family.

The twins were raised differently but the similarities were astonishing. They liked the same brand of toothpaste, they went into the same professions. It was astonishing. Throughout history identical twins studies have shown the same thing. Not only do identical twins raised in entirely different families commit the same number of crimes, they commit the same crimes at the same age!

This cannot be allowed. HITLER believed in heredity, so anybody who mentions heredity is anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.

As I said, books on identical twins were a fad for a while. But one day Phil Donahue interviewed a man who had written such a book. Donahue said, "But doesn't this argue for heredity over environment?" The man looked like he had been hit in the face. He stuttered out a denial.

That was the day that fad ended.

When Bill O'Reilly discusses educational failure, he never mentions that some children are born dumb. He says it is all a result of bad rearing or poverty. You will never see anyone ever mention heredity in any discussion of education or any other social issue.

In a multicultural society heredity cannot exist and so everybody agrees it does not exist. In a multicultural society race cannot exist so race does not exist. In a multicultural society not only does heredity not exist, nobody will ever mention that it does not exist.

In a human race made up entirely of heredity and environment, only a group of true sociopaths can totally forget heredity and not even notice that they are ignoring it have done so. They take it for granted that everybody has all the right feelings all the time.

Are You a Bigot or Are You a Sociopath?

For the sociopaths who run our society "prejudice" is an awful thing. For the sociopaths who run our society, prejudice is an alien thing. The sociopaths who run our society have no gut feelings. They have no prejudices. They do what they have done all their lives: They find out what feelings they should have and they believe they have them.

I would rather be prejudiced than be a sociopath. I would rather be a bigot than a sociopath. Freedom is all About What Sociopaths Call "Prejudice". Freedom means you do what you want to do.

The enemies of freedom always argue that you have no right to want anything they do not approve of. Religious freedom means that you have a right to believe something that I think will make you go to Hell.

Do you have the right to believe something that will send you and your children to hell for eternity? Do you have the right to have attitudes that I think are destructive or evil? Sociopaths do not hesitate to crush anybody who has the wrong attitudes.

Sociopaths rule a multicultural society.

So a multicultural society can never be free.