THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

BOB DOING THE MANTRA | 2011-12-30

Bob Doing the Mantra: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9MN46eRkwds

One of our commenters pointed out that the best statement of the Mantra he had ever heard was mine in my own broadcast years ago.

Instead of just pointing this out, one of bugsers, maybe the same one under one of those codenames you folks use:

Stop Racism and Genocide

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9MN46eRkwds

This is Bob's Mantra under a left wing title, LOL.

Attacking these people from the left really seems to upset them.

I was DELIGHTED!

I was younger and had more energy, and I, the man who spent years making the Mantra was stating it as clearly as he could, so it certainly tells you what I meant by it. I was trying desperately, after years of effort, to get ONE person to use it.

I did this on Stormfront Radio and when I looked at Stormfront, I got not one comment. They wanted to talk about IRAQ and JEWS.

Now that I hear it, it IS exactly the way I wish had the energy to do it again.

So this is PERFECT. Our commenter went back and DID it.

Her did NOT suggest maybe someone should do it.

He DID it.

Please go to

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9MN46eRkwds

And listen. It's less than three minutes long.

It's the best I could do, and back then I did pretty well.

END

WHITAKERISM: HEARING THE SILENCE | nationalsalvation.net

Not just our established religion of Political Correctness, but EVERY ruling group uses the Orwellian Memory Hole. When something it is known for advocating, EVERY ruling group ceases to mention it.

That, after all, is the main POINT of being in control of Opinion, to dictate what is remembered and what is NOT to be remembered.

That is one of the main things respectable conservatives are paid for. National Review grovels before Saint Martin Luther the King and never mentions the disastrous failures of liberalism. NR avoids gun control like the plague.

In other words, if all you have is a huge file of things the media DO say, you are deaf. If you only discuss what they DO say, which is what respectable conservatives get paid for, you are deaf.

How many times have you heard anyone with a paycheck from the media quote what segregationist said integration would lead to?

In the 1960s Hans Eysenck wrote an article for National Review predicting that integration would damage most blacks by having its natural leaders melt into white suburban society, leaving the mass of blacks devoid of leadership and talent. Since then, I have read numerous articles in the mainline media about how this has happened.

Usually when a magazine makes a deadly accurate prediction, it proudly quotes it regularly.

It will be a long, cold day in the Eight Circle of Hell before National Review or any other respectable conservative publication quotes that Eysenck prophecy.

When I was trying to get thousands of Stormfront readers to notice I was tearing the guts out of anti-whites in Opposing Views, they obediently talked about Iraq and ONLY Iraq, which was the media's choice of Big Issues.

I worked hard, I spent money, but I was stopped by people who didn't listen to the silence.

MY COMMENT IN SF PUTIN THREAD | 2008-03-20

As far as Putin goes, everybody TALKS the Ent Position, but nobody really WALKS it.

One group here says Putin is our guy, another says he isn't. The Ent Position is that nobody is REALLY on OUR side. Putin makes all the right people chew the rug. That makes people think he's our guy.

Then, because all the important people are chewing the rug at him, Putin joins the outcry against Iran.

In this case, talk IS cheap. Putin will kiss Jewish backsides as a practical matter, like any other player in the PRESENT power.

But I doubt seriously he will DO anything against iran or do anything for Jews that he doesn't get paid for.

All this is politics as usual. The only thing that surprises me is how SERIOUSLY people take a debate about whether Putin is Christ or anti-Christ.

MARK | 2006-09-26

NOT SPAM

NOT SPAM

Another process is wholly unnoticed by the media. As minorities grow, whites become more and more united. Right now they vote solidly Republican.

Bob how does this with the viewpoints of the white South Africans prior to the end of apartheid?

Were they united in anything?

Comment by Mark

ME:

This brings up a CRITICALLY important point.

The Afrikaaner nation collapsed completely because of Wordism. The Southern Nation was defeated in the Civil War, crushed and outnumbered by minorities in many states, but it threw off Reconstruction because it existed as whites.

Afrikaaners existed as part of the Reformed Church, as the solid bloc which voted National Party. They invested their nationhood in institutions, in books and platforms. In aingle year, both the National Party and die Kerk turned on them.

As a result, the collapse of the Boers was complete when they gave up power. They had no means of uniting. You see, the Boere did not merely to survive, they also wanted to preach the True Religion. Part of them was invested in the True Religion and in the philosophy of their Party, and part of them was pro-white.

Die Boere looked upon themselves as conservatives, guardians of Family Values, True Religion, their language. The list was very, very long.

It reminds me of hte fatal mistake that Sauron made in The Lord of the Rings. In order to control all the Rings of Power, he made the One Ring. To do that, he invested a major part of his OWN power in that One Ring. When that Ring was destroyed by Frodo, his empire collapsed.

South Carolinians were united on one thing: race.

You see this every day. "Christians" who are pro-white can betray us overnight, as Bob Jones did, simply by suddenly discovering a quote from the Bible at a convenient moment. Afdter all, which is more important, white skin or Jehovah?

In a Wordist world, we are trained to code all our natural loyalties into books. We do not say, "I demand the right to do what I wish, even if you think it is bad." We have to get a thick book written by libertarians to show that doing what we want to do is, to use Ayn Rand's word, Objective.

That is the libertarian Wordist idea of Freedom. But freedom, without the capital letter, is simply insisting that my world begins with my own preferences. If you want to MAKE me do something, your excuse doesn't hold any water.

ALL tyrants have excuses.

Race mixing is ugly. Genocide against my race would be evil in any case. But since my race is the ONLY thing that makes a world worth living in, skin color is the ONLY loyalty I have.

Afrikaaners can TALK about having a nation of their own, but what would that nation be based on?

In South Carolina, we were NOT united religiously. Our single aim was to restore white supremacy.

This is the first time I have stated all this so flatly, so any comments or amendments or disagreements are more than welcome.