THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

THE JEWS DID NOT INVENT OUR DEDICATION TO SELF-DESTRUCTION | 2010-12-26

People who blame everything on Jews miss a fundamental point of strategy.

When an enemy breaks through your lines into your own territory, of course you raise hell about it and call for your people to see them as enemies and insist the territory is yours. But that is not all you do.

A general who does nothing but bitch about an attack is a fool. When his line is breached, he takes a look at WHY his line broke.

No one has any use for a general who simply cries and blames the enemy for his defeat.

He looks at his line and finds why his defense didn't WORK.

We are not innocent bystanders. We are a people which has allowed itself to be threatened with extinction. Whining about a Genius Conspiracy won't do what a sane people, a people with guts, has to do.

An enemy will always be there, and that enemy will always exploit your weaknesses. And if all you think about is what meanies they are some enemy will very soon take you down.

They exploit our weakness to destroy us. We refuse to admit what our weaknesses ARE.

In fact, we insist that our Traditional Values are perfect. Like French generals in three consecutive and very similar defeats in 1870, 1914 and 1940, we refuse to look at the basic weaknesses in our strategy.

The fact is that a race that has built its traditional values on idealizing sterility for two thousand years is lucky to have survive this long. Christianity has become nothing but self-hatred and Judaism has become nothing but self-pity.

Nothing cold be more conservative than the "radical" bottom line that good people want us to die out.

We have a set of traditional values based on human sacrifice. Yet when the movie The Happening reached is climax with a professor literally yelling that the existence of humanity is a danger to the Planet, they thought they were being radicals.

There is nothing radical about the idea that the highest morality is to die out. Instead of good old-fashioned cutting out of hearts, we have dedicated ourselves to teaching every young and intelligent man or woman, who is especially able to read,  to lock themselves up in a place with others of their sex, join them and spent their lives talking to the ceiling and, above all, dying without children.

A completely unnoticed basis of the feeling that Nazis were evil was because they took genetics into account. The heresy of a group that advocated child-bearing, which dared even to advocate child bearing by the beautiful and the smart, hit us in a weak spot we don't recognize.

It infuriated us. Today the mere mention of beautiful and intelligent children is immediately identified with an alien mind set.

Today there is a fury against the idea of intelligent white women having children. It is a form of enslavement, a pure evil. But that is not because of Hitler.

Naturally they USE Hitler. But that fury was here long before Hitler, before GERMANY, existed. That fury is altogether a conservative one that has been adopted by anti-whites, not one that they invented.

Judaism is not our worst enemy. What we have made of Christianity is our worst enemy. And it is not just the Catholic Church. White Protestant countries are even more sterile than Catholic ones are.

Jesus told the young man to sell all he had and give it to the poor and FOLLOW ME. But I never heard a sermon, Protestant or Catholic, that even noticed the last two words. They were all about how the young man failed to hurt himself, not about  the unique opportunity he had to follow Christ.

Peter was married, and Christ did not reject him. Christ had brothers and probably sisters, but this is treated as a shameful secret.

Until we SEE this worship of self-destruction in ourselves, our lines will continue to fall apart.

And just whining about Jews won't fix it.

AMERICA'S FIRST WHITE GUILT COMPLEX IS IN DANGER | 2005-01-02

Discoveries in South Carolina of men who were here 50,000 years ago are making trouble for the Indian guilt complex white liberals are so fond of.

About those pre-Indian Americans:

I read a fun book published in 1968 by the MacMillan Company of New York, in other words, very main-line, called Lone Star by T.R. Fehrenbach.

On page 3-4 he talks about the first people to be in Texas:

"Modern radiocarbon tests from one camp site to be beyond the dating range of the carbon-14 technique -- and this process can search back 37,000 years. Man in Texas is not, as scientists once believed, a late arrival. Fluorine analysis of ancient human bones found in Texas limestone showed that these were contemporary with the bones of the ages-extinct Pleistocene horse, uncovered beside them. Archeologists, who once firmly thought that Indians were the first proprietors of North America, grudgingly named these original Texans Paleo-Americans, or simply Old Americans."

"They were biologically true men -- the half-men, such as the European Neanderthal, had died out long before they left the Old World. They were not Mongoloid. The skulls they left behind are longheaded, more longheaded than any race of modern men.... They are more unlike American Indians than white men are different from Chinese, and they may have been a Caucasoid race that roamed east out of central Asia in the human dawn."

In other words, the facts keep getting in the way of our guilt complexes about driving the Indians out of America, since they drove others out. But no professor ever mentions any of this in the indoctrination of each new generation that we pay for.

THANKS, DON! | 2005-04-12

Don is writing his own blog here. Don writes a LOT.

But wait a minute, Bob, isn't this Bob's Blog?

It certainly is, and Bob's Blog is about getting you people THINKING. I am not interested in just sitting here talking to myself.

I got Don to thinking and writing. I would like to get YOU to thinking and writing.

I take credit for what YOU write. I take credit for what my book team does because they wouldn't have done it without me.

I take credit for the Hubble Telescope because it wouldn't be up there if it wasn't for me. I take credit for the fact that the INS was stopped from imposing racial quotas on private schools thirty years ago because I USED other people to stop it.

And they appreciated my go-ahead.

I take credit for many, many ideas that I got started.

That is what power, real power, is. I have changed the world in more ways than I can count.

In his autobiography Ben Franklin said that, if you want something done, be sure someone else gets the credit for it. They deserve it. You can spend your life on doing one thing, or you get the ball rolling and find other people to do the job better than you can.

The only thing that worries me about Don's comments is that he is the only one who is doing it. I come here twice a day to moderate comments. What really depresses me is when I see "Comments to be Moderated (0)."

Which seems to mean that what I said didn't hit any buttons in your mind.

I think what I say should get you to THINKING.

Keep it up, Don.

And as for the rest of you, I'd like to kick you in what you seem to think is your brain.

SLAVE TRAPS | 2005-04-04

Historians compare ancient non-Western societies to Western societies.

There is no comparison.

What historians call ancient Great Civilizations were what I call slave traps. Those Great Civilizations built the giant structures historians worship because they had millions of subjects who could go nowhere else.

Egypt's population could not move out of the narrow strip beside the Nile River.

The Mesopotamian Civilizations were less stable. Mesopotamian means "between the rivers," the Tigris and the Euphrates, but it was easier to get out of than the Egyptian Strip, the ideal slave trap.

China's slave traps were the rice paddy cultures. Paddies can only be cultivated beside huge water sources. They were concentrated beside the Hwang Ho and the Yan Tsu Rivers.

For at least a thousand years, Westerners have worried about the Chinese conquering the world. It is a remarkable feat that China has contained almost exactly one fifth of the human race for at least two thousand years.

In the meantime the Chinese never even conquered the parts of CHINA that were outside the rice paddy area. Conquerors came in from outside. China conquered nobody north of them. They conquered more rice paddies in southeast Asia, though.

And lost them.

South America had a lot of brief slave traps, too. But that is a somewhat longer story.

The paddies came from a completely new, invented crop called aquatic rice. China got it from India when India was still ruled by whites around 2000 BC.

The Chinese took aquatic rice back to China and made slave traps out of Hwang Ho and Yang Tsu areas, just as Great Civiliations had developed in the slave traps of the Nile and Mesopotamia.

Thus another Great Civilization emerged.