THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

DAVE ON THE SIXTIES CADRE | 2007-12-05

I am currently on a mortified watch of the Baby Generation's wholesale drift into senility. It really is quite horrifying, watching it as I am in real time.

BW has said, "All I want before I die is to produce a group of clear thinkers".

That turns my mind to how extraordinary this small group of participants here are. If you dispute that, you just don't have a handle on the run of the (deteriorating) minds out there, especially the rapidly "going out of it" minds of the Baby Boomers.

The "Greatest Generation" is already completely "out if it", the few that are still alive, that is.

In contrast here in this seminar, we have people like Alan B. coming up with these absolutely fabulous phrases such as "Mommy Professor's talking dolls" and "Complexity obscures the obvious" and AFKAN making comments such as "They draw the lines and then paint within them", and Mark saying, "Those who own the present own the Future. Those who own the present NEVER have any serious relationship to what is really going to happen", and BW saying things like, "What creates the future is always little noticed".

Then there is Mperdling, Hardric, Simmons, Shari, Danebor, Pain and the all the rest, with their wonderful posts, posts of first class minds.

It just doesn't get any better than this.

Which brings us back BW's desire, "All I need is to develop a group of clear thinkers before I die".

There is nothing more important than that, which why BW's writings and audio are so important.

I see the horrifying process of the Baby Boom generation's wholesale descent into senility every day. The very nature of senility is that the "aged mind" has no awareness of its own calcification. Now, there are many extraordinary individuals, such as BW, that never go down that road. But the fact is, most do.

"Whomsoever He (God) causes to live long, He reduces to an abject state in constitution".

As I watch in real time the Baby Boomers wholesale descent into senility, I am truly horrified as to the political implications. These people were victims of the public school system and Mommy Professor to begin with. Most of them think, "With time, progress continues and justice triumphs". A sentiment perfectly suited to spoiled nitwits, who lived long but know nothing of the real world, a world where the essence of things is the perfect absence of justice, not its presence.

Accordingly, the picture ain't pretty.

DO IT! USE MY STUFF! | 2007-02-09

If anyone wants to use any or ALL of my writings in zip or any other form, all you have to do is ask my permission, an e-mail will get a quick response, since I am anxious for you to do this. You can get my permission by a note, even for ALL of my stuff.

There is a reason I must be contacted, and it is not to ask HOW you plan to use it. One must legally maintain control for practical reasons or I would issue blanket permission irght now. But our enemies could use THAT.

If you can make money on it, bless your little heart and go to it. I'm fixed for life, I don't need it.

"I'm fixed for life." I know how hard many of you are working just to keep food on the table, so I LOVE to rub that in.

WOMEN ARE DIFFERENT FROM MEN | 2007-01-31

OK, that's not a profound statement.

But as I tell people, "I don't know anything about sex. I was MARRIED." So I have little to tell you about women as a sex. But there is something about women as WRITERS that fascinates me.

Women writers tend to fall in love with the male characters they create. Agatha Christie was very upset with the fact that Hercule Poirot became so popular. I quote her word for word, "I wouldn't have minded if I had made him HANDSOMER."

Anne Rice admitted that she fell in love with her character The Vampire LeStat. If you read Inglis Fletcher's books, you will see that she was in love with Duke Roger. Colleen McCollough was so in love with her version of Julius Caesar that it is almost embarrassing to read it.

Which probably explains why a really good female writer is the best possible read in these genre. No man can throw his whole being into fiction the way a woman can.

REPLIES ON AMERICAN RENAISSANCE | 2006-03-13

Derek said he was stumped, too, which makes me feel better.

Here were the other Bob's Blogger replies:

kanefromsf :

I guess the answer seems pretty simple to me. It's a publication which talks about racial issues effecting white people and while allowing anti-zionism to some extent, does not exclude Jews from attending its conference or speaking there and does not claim that someone cannot be an x-jew.

LibAnon:

"So I ask my readers: What IS AR?"

Reminds me of a time I saw Frank Sinatra on TV. He was singing Cole Porter's tune "What Is This Thing Called Love?"

Dean Martin, standing next to him, said "Man, if YOU don't know, we're all in trouble!"

Antonio Fini :

According to ADL Bob, Amren is an intellectualized pseudoscientific White supremecy group that avoids anit-semitism.

I was releived to find Amren is not a hate group like National Vanguard, Stormfront, National Alliance, etc.

Now I'm sorry I didn't go to the conference.

MY RESPONSE:

My problem was that I asked at least twenty people at the AR convention "What IS American Renaissance?" and I couldn't get a straight answer.

You KNOW how I am about straight answers.

I called Kelso and he told me AR had a Mission Statement, and a good one. But no one at the convention seemed to know about it.

Kelso told me that the Mission Statement by Jared Taylor says that AR is dedicated to answering the question, "Can't we all get along?" and answers it with "No."

That's my kind of language.

Thay are not that interested in Jews, which suits me.

On the one hand, Stormfront is obsessed with Jews and the latest news. On the other hand, I am worried about AR's attitude only in that even pro-white Jews have a separate loyalty from white survival, which is my ONLY interest.

I have a similar problem with the Council of Conservative Citizens. What I SAW at their conventions was a long list of preachers. What I saw was a group trying to justify the existence of our race IN TERMS OF Christianity, Traditional Values, and hard-right conservatism.

This is a war, and I welcome anybody who is shooting at my enemies.

But I have learned from costly experience that there is a cleavage between allies, those hwo are shooting in the same direction, and comrades, those you can always trust not to shoot you in the back.

When the Confederate flag issue came up, Bob Jones the Fifth or Sixth, inheritor of the family business, grabbed his Bible, found some quotes, and shot us in the back.

On interracial dating, he did much the same thing.

A Jew who is on our side either 1) genuinely hates Jews or 2) may feel his people are threatened by something we say and shoot us in the back.

I would not consider anyone who genuinely hates his own people to be a comrade, and so we are left with the fact that a person who has a separate Jewish loyalty can make an ally but NEVER a comrade. So I worry about AR putting them in its central councils or toadying to them.

I worry about the CCC suddenly switching sides on us when convenient the way Bob Jones the Umpteenth did. I have seen it happen with self-styled "Christians" many, many times.

AR's Mission Statement, from what Kelso told me, is right on the money.

But, and there is always a but, they need to limit their COMRADES to those who are for white survival without any other justification, without loyalty that could override it.

AR must rigidly follow its own Mission Statement.