THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

OUR HISTORY SAYS THAT EVERYTHING WAS INVENTED IN THE GARBAGE DUMP | 2003-09-20

Great Civilizations are the garbage heaps of history. Egypt got iron from the invading Hittites, who smashed their heads in with it. They got the wheel from the Hyksos, who rode over them with it.

But the Hittites who invented iron were on the move. So were the Hyksos. So we found the first wheel in Egypt and said that Egypt invented it. The earliest iron we found was in Egypt, so it was assumed for a long time that Egypt invented iron.

Those clothes of the fair-skinned mummies in China were wearing were of a type that was first found in the Middle East a thousand years after those Caucasians in China died. So until twenty years ago official history said that those clothes were invented in the Middle East.

The Great and Ancient and Mysterious acupuncture that was a product of the Chinese Great Civilization turns out to have been in Europe a thousand years earlier, and Lord knows how long before that.

Conservatives marvel and drool over the "Great Inventions" of China, too. The Chinese invented movable type long before Europe did. They used it to print some playing cards and then forgot it. They invented gunpowder, then forgot how to make guns. A Chinese gentleman named Sung invented a mechanical clock. It disappeared, and they didn't build two.

RICHARD, AND THE MANTRA IS HERE TO COPY | 2007-01-17

NOT SPAM

NOT SPAM

What makes me worried is how did these people die out? India, China, South America, the list goes on. Early Aryans seem to have conquered the world then thrown it all away, much like we have the last century.

Is there something in our psyches that makes us stop short of a 'final solution' to the demographic timebomb?

I assume there was no jewish conspiracy before the flood!

Comment by richard

ME:

As every documentary on the white mummies in China ecstatically points out, they didn't DIE out. The solution to the white problem then was the same as it is now. If the small population of whites who give a society the wheel and everything else gets mixed into the mass, there is no further progress:

" Liberals and respectable conservatives say there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries."

"The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them."

"Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to "assimilate," i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites."

"What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?"

"How long would it take anyone to realize I'm not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?"

"And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn't object to this?"

"But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews."

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

"Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white."

http://whitakeronline.org

PLEASE, NO GOSSIP OR HEN SESSION, BUT THE LESSON | 2014-02-13

BUGS got hacked (in a way - easily managed) by a person who has had fits here regularly and been banned.

Originally, many months ago, he demanded that I provide him with hundreds of thousands of dollars he said White Rabbit had promised him for helping in a YouTube production. He had not the slightest doubt the fortune was there, and that I could either pay it myself or, even stranger, that I had the power over WR to force HIM to pay up.

So he raved and he screamed and he threatened and insulted.

Lesson One: I have warned over and over and over about working with anyone who "has real talent, but he's a bit unstable." I call them TTGH's, "Take Toys and Go Home," as in "I tell you all right now, if you don't do it my way I'll just quit, right when the whole project depends on me."

And the usual next line amounts to, "I'm as dedicated to the Cause as anybody, but it's the PRINCIPLE of the thing."

They almost invariably find this Principle at the very moment they know you are depending on you the most.

I am not withholding the name here because this is a general lesson, and as usual I don't want the lesson to be lost in a hen session about one particular person.

This incident is critical because it illustrates the LESSON I have stated over and over and over but which, like so many real lessons, gets buried in the hen session where commenters cluck about how it fits into the Latest News or other trivia.

We have been "hacked." The person who hacked us probably got his info from my computer, since my great weaknesses are computer illiteracy, pretty common in a man my age, disability-level ADD which means I have to write passwords down AND remember where I put them.

So I will no longer be able to put my stuff directly onto BUGS: I will have to have someone else do it, which, with a person with my problem in concentration, means you will be getting none of the spontaneity in muses "nigger" and comments and I can do less articles.

As an interrogator, I have some reason to doubt this guy's sincerity in our cause. My reason for this is another good lesson: He uses "nigger" and "Jew" and like terms to an extent none of us use.

By the way, I am now a "fat Jew!" And that old standby, a queer.

When someone uses those words over and over, they are trying to buddy up by using the kind of language SPLC tells them we use all the time.

But one who does a lot of interrogating quickly learns not to be SURE of any conclusion. This a caution you learn in almost any field.

This guy also seems to genuinely have a problem I ran into very, very often as a Narcotics Anonymous sponsor: bipolar disorder. He is either very, very polite or shrieking. In the shrieking phase he loves to use language like someone with Tourette's Syndrome.

So he sounds a lot like one of my sponsorees when he was, as we put it, "Off his meds."

The quotation marks are another lesson in another area. His meds may have stopped working or be the wrong meds. So we just use the term "Off his meds" as, if you will pardon the expression, a generic one.

BASICS: IT'S NOT NICE, BUT IS IT TRUE? | nationalsalvation.net

Today when affirmative action is discussed most people conclude, "Discrimination against whites will only get worse. Minorities were not satisfied with equality. They went straight on into endless and increasing race preferences."

The old segregationists would say, "Give a N an inch and he'll take a mile."

What the old segregationist said was not nice, it was not respectful, but was it true?

And if it WAS true, why SHOULD it be respectful?

On the show "Married With Children," the star, Al Bundy, was the absolute ultimate loser. He worked for minimum wage at a women's shoe store, he never bathed, his feet stank, and his only moment of glory was a high school football game.

Once Al decided to take on the phone company. His son Bud asked Al's wife Peg if, since Al had obviously lost again, he would back down and get back the family phone.

She said, "Of course, he always loses."

Bud said, "I don't know, mom, he's a proud man."

And then Peg answered with a question I have wanted to ask a thousand times:

"Of what, dear?"

I am ALWAYS hearing about how some third worlders "are a proud people." These proud people's children are starving, their communities are garbage piles, they know nothing, but, "They are a proud people."

Of WHAT, for God's sake?

As for blacks who follow today's "black liberal leaders," why should one be respectful of people whose only asset is another people's guilt? Why should one be respectful of a people that wants to be forced on another people?

Yes, one must be respectful. Yes, no one is going to remember all the old segregationist warnings because they were not put the right way.

But WOL is here to make you think. So I am just suggesting that we might look at those old words not for their diplomacy, their appropriateness, or even their decency, but for the truth in them.