THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

FROM THE PULPIT: ETERNAL SALVATION WOULD BE NICE, BUT HERE'S THE IMPORTANT POINT | 2006-08-20

I cannot get anybody to understand that the Declaration of Inddependence is a SILLY document beause it was written in the middle of a WAR.

There may have been a truly objective delaration of principles written inthe middle of a war by those in charge of fighting it, but I don't know of any.

The Declaration began by declaring all men, euqal, which a French libeal might have taken seriously, but nobody else. It then went on to delcare "inalienable rights." If they believed those rights were inalienable, there would have been no war.

Then they blamed everything onthe kind, not parliament. You would have to be a true ignoramus on British Government to bleieve THAT. TO have been a literate man who had lived his life under British Law, you would have had to be insane.

But nobody can understand ANY of this.

C.S. Lewis would get terribly upset when he woud hear what is spewed from every pulpit today: That Chrisitianity is good because it leads to a good society.

Lewish kept repeating, the ONLY question about Christianity is whether it is TRUE or not.

Preachers today talk about "Chrisitan" principles, by which they mean the Old Testament. Actually, Jesus repeated over and over and over that he came about NONE of that. When he criticized the rich, it was not for social revolution, it was because they were damning their own eternal souls. Compared to the loss of one soul, said Jesus, social justice is nothing.

The problem with this, of course, is htat it puts all your eggs in one basket. The preacher stops being a general social commentator and puts his entire life, his entire religion and, above all, his own livelihood on the bet that there is such a thing as eternal salvation.

In other words, those who do not believe him think he is a superstitious fool, and he can't take it.

So they stake everything on one sentence Jesus uttered, that he came to fulfill the law, not to replace it.

Nobody pays the slightest bit of attnetion to the fact that the Declaration of Independence was written in the middle of a war. Nobody pays the slightest bit of attention to the fact that when Jesus said, "Render unto Caesar what is Caesar's and unto God what is God's" he was avoiding a deadly trap set for him by hte peopl ehwo asked him the qiestion.

He didn't even look them inthe eye. He was not procaliming truth. He wasnot defending Caesar's rights. He kept drawing inthe sand for a reason.

But none of that matters. The fact that Jesus said he came to fulfill the law not to destroy it was the ONLY thing he could have said if he did want to be stoned on the spot. So every word of the Old Testament is as valid as every word Jesus spoke, and that's good because the Old Testament is full of worldly wisdom rather than an obsession about salvation.

If you think Jesus always said exactly what he meant you have never lived in a totalitarian society.

Hell, you've never lived in THIS society!

So people keep prattling on to me about how salvation would be nice, but it's all about Christian Principles leading to a Good World, THIS world.

That's what ****I**** believe. Please stop twisting it.

TIM | 2008-01-30

"So while kids, who seem to be more racially aware than we take for granted are suppressed and punished by the old PC fogies, we miss a perfect opportunity to create another group of revolutionaries, a new counter culture."

We have a common sense of oppression based on race within our race. White people punishing white kids/folks for being white. And the minorities just reinforce it in every way....every day. It has NO precedent.....so the outcome will be unprecedented.

This has went so far for so long it will be like a mini explosion. I do not think the SHWM's have ANY idea just how radicalized the young whites are. Prometheus is one of the first to really comment on it. The people on this board are as bright as they come. But I do not think most people (esp. liberals) really fully comprehend just radical you make a young white kid when every minute of every day all day long as they are held captive in a situation that is 100% racial. It is not really comprehendable to anyone that has NOT spent a few years on bus as a minority in a constant violent situation.

I have always thought Hitler secretly wrote this script. This is precisely what it takes to radicalize whites racially. Something extreme like this. There are some liberals now that are very crafty and very afraid of what they have created. The internet has let the genie out of the bottle and they feel change is in the air. BIG CHANGE.

TIGERS ATTITUDE | 2009-12-10

With friends like Tiger Woods, PC doesn't need people like me.

"The Babe Ruth of Golf" was shown with his blond Scandinavian wife as often as possible. He was even as tall as she was. Here was a True Love Match "which happened to be interracial" or, as Hannity puts it, "two Children of God."

Then the black guy got too horny and decided he had to have a blond mistress, too.

But I REALLY couldn't believe it when a female commentator on CNN said that this was the "usual problem with successful black athletes, they have to get themselves a blond, trophy wife." I could not believe that the moderator didn't explode into blood and guts right there.

The guy's commentarial was a really novel thought. He said, "It has nothing to do with race!" Gosh, THERE'S a novel line! But this time it notably lacked the Required Rage.

When he had the wreck out with his blond mistress, Tiger instantly offered his wife what all black guys offer their white women: Money and lots of it. He offered her millions above their pre-nup, which already made her a millionairess, not to divorce him. There hasn't been a less True Love couple "who happened to be of different races" since OJ.

Tiger's father determined to have nothing to do with black women but in his time all he could get was an Oriental woman. Black men on television will say that they don't date black women. This is a brag.

It pisses some black women off, but I have yet to see those "precious feelings" be of the slightest concern to Women's Lib or any other part of PC. So the black guy sits there and talks black to black women about black women in a way that no white would be allowed to talk for one minute.

But I don't think the Thought Police reacted properly this time. The white woman who said this was a habit of successful black athletes should have been instantly called down and suppressed if the priests of the PC faith were going at full throttle.

The problem is that the media don't know how to react when someone is as honest as Tiger Woods. His father made it clear that they were trying to breed the n****** out of them. Tiger was no less honest about it: he bought himself as unNegroid a wife as he could find on the market.

The script calls for the WHITE WOMAN to say it's all True Love. Black male are often OPENLY proud they got a white woman. PC is in the position Doublethink often puts one in: "the enemy of my enemy is my friend," so they assume that a black male who marries a white woman, this doing the one thing most important to PC. That that black male is their friend.

But PC and the black male have absolutely different reasons for their actions. The PC priesthood wants to show it is EASY for a black man to get a white woman, that it is no different from any other match.

This is a great deal like telling blacks in new white Mercedes that it is EASY to get a Mercedes. From the propaganda natural to the PC priesthood, Tiger's ability to buy himself a brand-new Scandinavian beauty queen wife was only True Love. They were ASTONISHED, astonished to the point of letting the Thought Police miss some open heresy, when his first act was put the lie to that.

How could Tiger have betrayed PC by making, as his first move, an offer of MILLIONS of Dollars to his trophy wife? Because Tiger does not think like they do. It never OCCURRED to him to push the idea that ANY black man could buy something like that.

Tiger can do this because he is a huge success. He can have a white wife, he can buy a Mercedes.

If his Mercedes gets destroyed, Tiger will get it fixed because he has the money. If the Trophy Wife he bought might leave him, he puts up money. Black males simply do not think in terms of PC orthodoxy.

Like the Bourbons, the PC priesthood forgets nothing and learns nothing. Which is the reason that today most people don't know who "the Bourbons." were.

LIBANON? | 2006-06-24

NOT SPAM

"Intellectual life is an infomercial."

After making this same point on a previous occasion, you added that the solution to this problem is to subject intellectual life to government oversight, thereby holding intellectuals accountable.

I doubt it's simply a coincidence that you once happened to serve on the Congressional subcommittee that oversees education. So I wonder: is Bob's Blog an infomercial, too?

Comment by LibAnon

I never said "intllectual life" should be accountable to government oversight.

I DO believe that if the government puts a dime into something called "education" than that "education" has to be delivered. Exactly the same thing is true of paper clips for goverment offices.

You are talking Libspeak here. The tqxpayers should finance those who call themselves artists or intellectuals, but the taxpayer is being tyrannical if he 1) doesn't pay up or 2) demands to say what art eeucation ARE. If I pay for paper clips, they better be paperclips.

If I DON'T pay for it, you can have all the invgellectual life you want.

The problem is, of course, that without a publically-granted monpoly and publically-paid money, all those self-styled "intellectuals" would have to do something useful for a living.

Yes, Bob's Blog must be subjected to the same scrutiny. I pay for it, but I demand criticism.

It will be a long cold day in Hell before any "intellectual" does either of those things.