THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

DAVE | 2009-01-11

Dave says:

"And noticing what is compulsory is Mantra thinking."

Thanks, Dave.

Yes! Noticing where they are coming from is how one wins with Mantra Thinking.

I had just written a piece on the same subject, or what to MY mind is the same subject. I decided that no one would understand my point.

Well, courtesy of Dave, I'll try it:

Bullshitters and Tape Recorders

Anti-WHITES are divided into two groups:

1) The ones who just recite Mommy Professor, and

2) The ones who are reciting bullshit and they know it's bullshit.

You will note that when I go after an anti-WHITE in OV he is obviously outclassed.

Forty-five years ago when I was a grad student at the University of Virginia, it was a standing joke at parties when a student or professor would hear that I was a racist and would come over to me to straighten me out. People would watch them come over to me and watch me cut them down.

They enjoyed watching it because I had cut most of THEM down the same way. It became fascinating to them. As one prof said, "What is interesting is to watch how the time it takes you goes down. It took you five or ten minutes when you got here, now they start backing away in two or three minutes."

My secret, then as now, was simply knowing that anti-WHITES come in two groups:

1) The ones who just recite Mommy Professor and

2) The ones who are reciting bullshit and they know it's bullshit.

So I made Group feel like the Mommy Professor Tape Recorders they are, and I cut through the BS in Group 2.

It ALWAYS worked. It always WORKS.

WORDIST HISTORY IS COLLAPSING | 2011-03-06

Zoroastrianism is verboten because it represents intellectual influence of Aryans ON the Middle East, while official history says all ideas originated IN the Middle East.

This Aryan Heresy (pun, gang!) is slowly becoming known, but it is not unique. It is a part of the whole unraveling of the accepted picture of history that is the basis of all modern Wordism.

Even in the Testaments you can't avoid Zoroastrianism without twisting things to the point of outright lying. Cyrus is described as doing the work of the Lord, and he was a Persian, ZOROASTRIAN emperor. In the New Testament, it is the Magi who know Christ is coming and honor him, while the Jews reject him.

There was the Babylonian Captivity of an indeterminate number of Jews, but there was exactly the same kind of thing with the Iranians, but it is not referred to as a captivity. Jews were kept in Iran or Iraq for just as long, but Cyrus rebuilt their Temple.

And somewhere in the process, by some accident, Jews became monotheistic. "No other gods BEFORE me" became "No other Gods at all."

THIS is the form of Judaism that converted a tenth of the entire Roman population, the Hellenic Jews, who became the Christian Church.

For centuries after the conversion of Rome to Christianity and its simultaneous move to Constantinople, the Christian Empire's only truly powerful enemy was the Zoroastrian Empire of Iran. The link between the origins of Christianity and Zoroastrianism was suppressed, just as the link between Marxist and Christian Doctrine was mildly discouraged in the USSR.

Communists have been described by one wise observer as "Economic Calvinism."

To truly understand Christ, which I do not claim to, one would to look DIRECTLY at each aspect of the Christian Institution that stands between his words and us.

But this real history of Christianity is just one part of the whole revolution in history.

Nothing is changing faster than history.

When I say our PICTURE of history is changing, it could not be more literally true. Tyrannosaurus Rex is suddenly running around with a beak and claws, we now know that someone from Ancient Rome would have gone into hysterics of laughter if we showed him our national capitol and called it a Classical Building.

Herds of animals are no longer the democratic libertarian structures we always assumed they are. Those peaceful packs of chimpanzees, once assumed to be mere subunits of the World Federation of Chimpanzee kind, suddenly turn out not only to have rigid borders, but patrol them and kill violators.

WHITE GENOCIDE IS NOT A THEORETICAL DEBATE, IT IS A CRIMINAL CHARGE | 2014-02-23

Adolf Eichmann was convicted in Israel for "Crimes Against Humanity," a charge that Was invented in Israel and had never been used before.

Who decided where they took place: Nazi occupied Europe. He was not violating the law, he was carrying it out.

At the end of World War II, the saying "I was just following orders" became, for everybody from Goering down to a fourteen-year-old boy who had been ordered to police a concentration camp for the SS, became "No Defense."

"I was just following orders" became the most discredited phrase in America.

So BUGS is not theorizing or trying to win a debate with reasonable people.

And anti-whites are, in fact, using exactly the same tactics as any felon who is faced with charges he cannot deny. They shout insults, they say that those bringing the charges are stupid, mean and ugly.

You together see this behavior all the time when a criminal is caught dead to rights.

Pro-whites outside of BUGS begin by accepting the premise that anti-whites are just following orders. They blame aliens for pushing White Genocide.

Those who have overriding loyalties, like anti-white Jews, are as guilty of genocide as any Nazi who carried out his orders. But the minorities are NOT guilty of treason.

As I have repeatedly pointed out, the Tenth Circle, the Circle of Ice, the worst place in Hell, was specifically reserved for TRAITORS. No other crime comes close to Treason.

"I was just following orders" or "I was just doing what my professor told me" is not accepted by any decent person as an excuse.

If we are "arguing," we are only "arguing" the Case for the Prosecution.

HISTORY IS BUNK | 2008-02-23

You can't begin to understand history if you don't get a belly laugh out of looking at the Federal Capitol Building and 49 of the 50 state ones.

Looking at them, I imagine an American showing these edifices to a person from Classical Times. He says, "You see? We build our buildings just like YOU did. This is a Classical Style Building."

I can see the person from Ancient Rome backing away from this lunatic, "What in the Hell is this nut talking about? Is he physically dangerous?"

The "Classical" buildings and sculptures come from a time when we dug up ancient statues that had had all the coloring rubbed off of them. They were gray stone. When you see a movie made in Rome the place looks like Spanish Harlem on a bad day. All the old buildings are gray stone.

We have LONG since found the traces of marble and coloring that made ancient Rome bright with color. But we will never correct any of this.

Historians talk endlessly about the Fall of the Roman Empire. The Romans would find that a curious notion. Nothing fell. The capitol was moved. If Congress decided to move the seat of government from Washington to a more central location, we wouldn't consider it The Fall of America. The Emperor in Rome moved to Byzantium. He would be surprised to be told that his government had fallen.

But the problems here are simply practical. Can anybody imagine congress deciding to paint the Capitol Building? That "Classical" style would be totally alien to the actual Romans, but it is absolutely essential to US.

Another practical problem. If we were burn all the books that trace everything to the Middle East, what would we replace them WITH? Our version of history is already a belly laugh and gets sillier every day. But it is OUR version of history. Tens of billions of dollars are invested in it.

Another practical problem. How would you feel if you invested your entire life in studying ancient history and then discovered it didn't exist?

This is not just a difficulty for regular history. Marxism as developed in the mid-nineteenth century and it is as firmly grounded in this mythical version as is any conservative version. Read the Introduction to the Communist Manifesto of 1848 and you will find that it begins by saying that all class distinctions are artificial. When that was written, it was ASSUMED that only man had upper and lower classes.

Since then we have found that every other societal animal has a class system that makes Victorian England look egalitarian. Anyone talking about that in a Marxist society would have bought himself a one-way ticket to the Gulag.

As technology and findings advance, our already belly-laugh idea of history becomes sillier every day.