THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

THE ISSUE IS RACE | 2006-09-10

I got many responses to my last articles, for which I am grateful. But they dealt with immigration and the third-worlding of America.

Please never forget that the issue is the end of the white race. If we followed the neoconservative program and cut immigration and dediated ourselves to assimilating with the nonwhites we have here now, there would be no white race in America. We already have PLENTY of nowhites here to become the colored conservatives liberals, respectable conservatives and neoconservativves dream of.

It is no accident that the present immigration law was passed in 1965, right after the Civil Rights Act of 1964. It is part and parcel of the same package. The same conservatives who say the 1965 act was a disaster praise the 1964 Civil Rights Act to the skies.

That is WHY they call themselves NEOconservaties. They say that everything liberals did on race in the 1960s was perfect in the 1960s. Those of us who said the whole program was aimed at an end to the white race, according to National Review and the neos, was right. The will lead the lyunch mob against anyone who criticizes any of that program.

Decolonization, they insist, was wonderful. They insist that all those little poverty-stricken dictatorships in the third world were a wonderful product of Holy Progress.

BUT... now that those wonderful colored sovereign states are beginning to get hold of atomic weapons, they say the whole thing is just getting out of hand. They want white countries to have colonial authority over third world weapons, but how they treat their own people is THEIR business.

That is the ONLY difference between an openly colonial attitude and a neoconservative attitude.

Neoconservative means that everything they did to get us into this condition was GOOD, but the CONSEQUENCES we predicted back then are a pure accident of history.

The point is that respectable conservatives and neoconservatives protect libeals from admitting that their whole world view after WWII was Evil, it was WRONG from the word Go.

As long as all we bitch about is hte LATEST MANIFESTATIONS of that attitude, we are AGREEING with them.

It is easy to join in the hue and cry against the latest outrages. It is hard work to tie those latest manifestations to the fundamental WRONGNESS our society has accepted.

THAT is our job. We must turn our people AROUND. We must guide the thought to basics, to RACIAL issues.

Their position had been that the Declaration and not the Constitution is the basis of America, all the way back to Lincoln.

We must fight the fight on the BASICS. Not a single comment traced our problem back to the BASICS:

Bob's Mantra

" Liberals and respectable conservatives say there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries."

"The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them."

"Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to "assimilate," i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites."

"What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?"

"How long would it take anyone to realize I'm not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?"

"And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn't object to this?"

"But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews."

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

"Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white."

http://whitakeronline.org

FOR THE RECORD | 2014-10-06

My boss, Congressman John Ashbrook, died in 1982, having been consistently healthy till then, in April. He died of an ailment that is classic among anybody in or near Intelligence. John was a former member of the famous HUAC, Ranking Member of its successor, the House Special Committee on Intelligence.

We were flown out to his funeral in Johnstown, Ohio.  It was not known to the press, but his body was not in the coffin. The police were still examining it.

Ashbrook stopped the establishment of a Martin Luther King, Jr. National Holiday for fourteen years after King was shot. The new holiday passed the House a month after John's death and was signed into law the first time it came up after John's death in April of  1983.

John and his three far-right colleagues in the House held the whole place up by denying unanimous consent. One of the four of them were in the House all day to deny consent whenever they were waging this particular war.

John's three colleagues in this were McDonald of Georgia, Bauman of Maryland, and Dornan of California.

John died suspiciously in 1982.

On September 4, 1983, regular airline Flight KAL007 went unaccountably into Soviet air space and was shot down. All passengers were killed, including Congressman Larry McDonald.

Bauman lost his career in a unique incident.  The press outed him as a homosexual. This was at the height of Gay Lib, and this was almost unique.

Bob Dornan, who was Ronald Reagan's congressman from California and who won Emmys before his election to Congress, was the only survivor of this wreck.

PLEASE do not start any comment with the insulting, "What you are saying is..."

I am a professional writer and I have said what I have to say. If these coincidences had occurred with any congressmen on the left, it would have caused all sorts of conspiracy theories in the press.

LOOKING BACK ON 2012 | 2013-01-01

For once, I agree with the headlines: Election 2012 was the most important thing that happened this year.

The election of 2012 actually mattered. For headlines to accidentally coincide with anything that really matters is a once-in-a-lifetime occurrence.

Don't carry this too far. It is enough of a coincidence for the news to feature anything important. Needless to say, there is very little overlap between their reasons for putting it front and center and the real reason to do so.

In 2012 paycheck conservatives finally ran into the reality they have made a living by denying. Their biggest value to the establishment has been reciting their own mantra: "Whatever it is, it has nothing to do with race."

The 2012 election made it clear that whatever the political process is, it has everything to do with race.

Paycheck conservatism is a corpse.

But even a corpse doesn't give up easily.

Few will remember I said this, but in 2014 the paycheck conservative corpse will sit up in the morgue.

History makes it clear that the presidential party loses seats in both Houses in the next congressional election after a president is reelected.

Paycheck conservatives got lots of false hopes from 2010. They used it to argue that 2008 was a fluke.

In 2014 they will claim that the news of their death was greatly exaggerated.

Meanwhile, back On Planet Earth, the electorate in an off year election is simply different from that in a presidential year.

So in 2014 paycheck conservatives will get one more chance to say, "It has nothing to do with race."

So paycheck conservatives will get one more chance to deny that demography is destiny.

Paycheck conservatism is a corpse, but it has one more chance to sit up.

PAIN | 2006-11-12

NOT SPAM

NOT SPAM

Good observation Edwin. And each time they come up with another weird one, they have changed holds.

I once owned a pit bull dog. He caused some difficulties, but I learned from him.

The pit bull dog does not make a sound when he attacks. The fight is not personal. Before he sprints to his foe, he pauses stock still, wheels spinning, as he chooses his hold. He has an instinctive ability to balance strengths — which have to be taken out — and weaknesses — which are easy to take out. Whatever hold he chooses he keeps until thrown off. He is only thrown off when he lacks experience. Pretty grim.

My bull dog could hike with me anywhere and climb slippery rocks and some trees. One day I stupidly took him off the leash when I was running back down a mountain on a new trail. At one switch back, he froze, and I saw his wheels spinning. I knew what that meant.

What I didn't expect was a horse on the other side, his owner beside him.

Before I could tackle him he was off like a shot. This was his first (and only) chance at a large animal. He grabbed the horse on his fleshy thigh. The horse threw him off twice and the dog flew in an arc about ten feet and landed with a loud thud. The third time I tackled him. The dog was fine, the horse badly hurt. I paid the vet bill and was lucky that was it.

A bad thing it was, but it was impressive to watch a disciplined professional (dog) in action.