THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

THE INTERNET IS BEING THERE | 2006-04-05

"Stop HIDING behind the compter screen! Get out into the REAL WORLD!"

Since I am about the last person who can be accused of hiding anywhere, I am the perfect on to flush this nonsense down where it belongs.

I hate the telephone, relative to the internet, for a one reason: The person I am talking to is on a schedule. He calls me when I am thinking about something else, and he is on the way to something else, too.

A good deal of the time is spent trying to get get in what he needs to say to me when he can contact me personally.

On the internet, you are here when you feel like being here. I do not have to remember your telephone number or get ready to talk to you and intrduce you to the topic I am interested in at the moment, when your mind is somewhere else -- otherwise you would be calling ME.

Phone call Stage One: Getting the number right and introducing the topic. Stage Two: Getting your input and my reaction to your input, all in the time allotted and at a time neither of us chose.

Personal visits are far, far worse t han the telephone. You have to GET there, which means that you have just been through a set of directions and little incidents.

Then comes all the "getting each comfortable."

On the internet, you are here when you want to be here and I am here when I want to be here.

Onthe internet, the topic is already introduced when you sit and when I sit down.

I am mystified as to why this constitutes HIDING:

"I actually met so-and-so."

My concern is not whether you physically sat down and saw the actual face of someone, but what did you SAY?

You can hide anything that was actually said in a talk about where he lives and how he looks.

Sight and smell are the province of a dog.

A dog can get nothing out of the Internet.

On the internet, if you tell someone you were talking to somebody on it, all you can discuss is WHAT YOU SAID.

I think the person who you of "hiding behind the computer screen" is the one who wants to hide. He wants to talk about where he was and how he was THERE, not about hwat was said, which is province of the human mind.

If anyone ever really reads and thinks about what I say, he will realize this is a repetition. The person who talks endlessly about "liars" is a liar. The person who talks endlessly about Hate is a hater. The person who talks endlessly about "hiding" is hiding.

That is the kind of thinking an interrogator does. It is the kind of thinking an interrogator gets so good at that he is paid for it.

Being there physically is a substitute for being there mentally.

DIVERSITY AND FREEDOM CANNOT COEXIST | 2013-11-13

This is a point I made here years ago:

Wordism says that a society is united by a set of words, a doctrine.  The doctrine can be libertarianism or  religion or socialism or Fascism.

No union based on any form of Wordism can maintain freedom of speech.   Very soon someone using words will be attacking, or accused of attacking, the words on which the whole system is based.

This is what is meant when someone asks, "Is this freedom of speech or is this heresy?"   "Is this freedom of speech or is this Hate?"

Any society based on a set of words rather than a common identity must eventually defend those words from heretics by force.

DON'T WORRY, NO AMERICAN IS GOING TO FIGHT FOR AMERICANS | 2003-02-08

America will soon occupy Iraq. Iraq has the second largest oil reserves on earth behind Saudi Arabia.

What will America do with Iraqi oil?

Opponents of the Iraqi War keep saying that we might use that war to benefit Americans. They say America wants to go in there to break OPEC's cartel and reduce oil prices.

Nothing is farther from the mind of George Bush and his advisors than using American troops to benefit Americans.

Nobody puts it the way I have just put it, of course. Bush lists his goals for war and throws in some words about how it's all for the good Americans. War opponents never say that the war might to used to break OPEC. They say the war will be used "for oil".

ON SOLVING MIDDLE EAST PROBLEMS | 2002-10-05

Here is what an Egyptian-American had to say to people who have a solution for the Arab-Israeli conflict and similar mattters

1) God sent Moses, and he couldn't fix it.

2) God sent Jesus, and he couldn't fix it.

3) God sent Mohammed,and he couldn't fix it.

4) Do you think YOU can fix it?

Charles Issawi, "The Laws of Social Motion"