THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

WHITAKER THINKING, BIOLOGICAL REVOLUTION, AND RACE | 2007-07-06

Several commenters have responded wth their opinions on the biological revolution. One brought up his specific doubts abut our producing real whites and not "paint jobs." But what is really critical is not our predictions.

If you do what I keep recommending, and step back from the immediate argument to take a new look at it, the important observation takes place:

THIS IS THE ONLY PLACE WHERE THIS DISCUSSION IS GOING ON!

On every one of the hundreds of sites which are dedicated to saving the white race, every discussion is in terms of the PAST. But I am NOT an Only True Way type. I wish there were ten thousand of those sites talking about the white birth rate and assimilation as a threat. I am NOT saying that now that we have found The True Whitaker Way all others should abandon what they are doing and sit at my feet.

We have ADDED a dimension to the discussion. As SysOp and I have discussed in terms of evolution, we can add dimensions to our discussion precisely because we DO NOT agree on the facts. This leads to a more important general point: To any society but ours, this is an absolutely ALIEN concept.

Only whites developed the concept of The Moot. The whole idea of a seminar is becoming alien to OUR society. In every other society, the Disciples ask questions and The Master comes up with The Answer.

I'm fat, but I ain't Buddha.

So Scimitar brings up Vermont and Al Parker brings up posterity and I give AN answer. That's what I'm here for. But our uniqueness, if I succeed, is that you begin to realize how UNIQIUE we need to be in a world of Only True Faiths, established religions and professor-priesthoods.

This also means I want more EXTENSIONS of our way of thought. That is HARD work. It is a lot easier to talk about what is on other web sites. People were discussing gravity long before Newton came along.

COMMENTS (1)

#1 Prometheus | 2007-07-07 01:10

Whenever someone predicts the future, they are telling me what they think the future SHOULD be.

When people predict that we will be multiracial, it is NOT a prediction, but a statement they hope becomes a self fulfilling prophesy. By making me think that it is an inevitability and part of 'the evolution of man', they are priming me to accept what they plan to engineer.

The birth rate argument is based on the assumption that a nation MUST increase it's population to surive and MUST import non-whites.

That argument is wrong on so so many levels.

What is important is not how it is wrong. What is important is the assumptions made when stating that there is a birth rate problem.

You are assuming that we will always need masses of labour to do unskilled tasks. Robotics may have taken care of much of that.

You are assuming that we will not organise ourselves in a manner to remove the 'need' for larger and larger populations. Changes to our economy may take care of that.

My position on future genetic engineering is that I honestly don't know what form it will take. I am not willing to make bets on what will happen, yet.

But I am willing to put two bob on the current status quo disapearing and becoming obselete.