NOW I'LL EXPLAIN WHAT THE ARTICLE BELOW MEANT | 2007-09-14
There is PLENTY of room here for copy and paste and how it affects what we are doing. But I really like thought within our framework, putting together seemingly unrelated ideas.
The "No Compomise" articlebelow is an example. Before you copy and paste Covington or Hitler or somebody, take a look at what it ACTUALLY says.
We all hear people say "I've got a life." But we ONLY hear that as discouragement. The SF grumps sit around and talk abut how HOPELESS everything is because everybody isn't our therein a torchlight parade.
It is a REALITY that most people don't spend their lives concentrated on saving our race. So hatis our reaction? We can do what we always do when we lose, and moan and dribble and cry over it, or we can take that reality into account.
We can quote Hitler and wait for the whole population to come out with their torches and sob abut our disappointment iwth everybody else.
Or we can do what successful revolutionaries always did and GET REAL..
Nobody is going to RECOGNIZE that the article below, n how revolutions succeeded, is another take on the same "I've got a LIFE" reality. I pointed out how Lenin, Hitler and Mussolini all took power because most people wanted someone to come in and end the chaos.
I will now reveal to you that that was why I corrected the earlier wording from "planning for victory" to "planning for the other side's FAILURE." Nothing like the Perot phenomenon of 1992 ever came close to happening any time before in American history, when Perot said he would be wiling to run and was soon leading the candidates of the entire electoral history, power, and machinery of a sitting president and his opponent.
People on our side mostly remember only that he had big ears and then go back to their Death Watch and competing with the Professional Mourners.
The Western world has chaos. It is growing daily. We need to plan for THAT, before the neoconservative types take us over the way the neocons did the conservatives.