THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

MARK | 2007-06-11

Mark says:

"I said in my 1976 book that tomorrow's scientific establishment would be more powerful and more dangerous than the PC one we have now."

Bob, how is this true? If science breaks with acadamia, as you predict, and if people demand geneticaly altered genes producing white babies instead of their brown or black (also as you predict) then how does this hurt the white race? Seems to me the best thing that could happen is science breaking the PC yoke that restricts research. I mean, if they could make us live longer, feel younger, and be whiter, what's the harm in any of this? Or am I missing something here?

ME:

On the contrary, I'm all for it.

My point is that this train is coming around the corner and nobody notices it.

We have the very recent example of conservative success and its immediate takeover by the neos. Neos took over while conservatives bitched and babbled to each other. So if we spend ur time talking abut the latest balloon we will get blindsided, too.

All power for good has dangers. The greater the power, the greater the danger. But you can't deal with the danger involved by just wishing it away. Some of my bloggers will join in the hopeless objectins to the whole biological revolution, so I treaded carefully about it.

But I am the most most RADICAL person you will ever meet. I have nothing invested in the world as it is and where it is now going, so I am all for radical human technology. I keep repeating that the one thing that is certain is that the trends of hte past have nothng to do with the future,but people keep saying "before it's too late" and other standard stuff, which means they didn't HEAR what I am saying.

COMMENTS (9)

#1 Al Parker | 2007-06-11 22:51

I think this is because these Ron Paul-loving "patriots" are NOT radical. An activist by the name of Keith Fulton (not Harold Covington) had a few observations about so-called white nationalists that ring very true in his article <a href="http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php/white-nationalism-and-character-197184.html">The Character Issue</a>:

<p>5. The majority of White nationalists have joined the Movement because we want to get something OUT of it, not because we want to put something INTO it.

6. Most White nationalists are not revolutionaries. They are what is known as paleo-conservatives. They do not want to change the entire political, social, and economic order in America. They want the EXISTING order to work for THEM personally and give them money and success.

10. White nationalists are completely materialistic and driven by money and consumerism. Their real beef with America is that America has not kept its promise to THEM personally and showered them with wealth, or else in the case of conservatives America demands that they pay taxes on the comparatively small amount of wealth they have managed to accumulate.

16. White nationalists crave, respect, and worship money, because they have so little of it. Let's be honest, people. Give your typical White racist something to lose, give him a $100,000 a year job, a house in a nice suburb, and three cars in the garage (one an SUV), and he would be OUTTA HERE. Give a White nationalist a taste of wealth and in a heartbeat he will be voting for President Bush, cheering on the American invasion of every small country, hollering to "reform" Social Security, and watching Fox News with his slack jaw hanging down. It has to be said again: the overwhelming majority of so-called White nationalists are simply blue-collar conservatives who have gotten the shaft from the system. If the need ever arose, they could be bought, and bought cheaply.

17. A very large number of White Nationalists are involved in the Movement because of their own personal resentment at the crappy lives they have led. Granted, sometimes it's not their fault. In fact, a LOT of times it genuinely isn't their fault. But the fact is that petty personal resentment simply isn't a very good political or revolutionary motivation, with the result that Middle American Whites don't make good revolutionaries.

</p>

Also, there are many more people in the paleoconservative "patriotic" conspiracy-theory-loving anti-Zionist rite-wing and since humans are social animals, the group's message naturally becomes seductive and people find themselves drawn to it.

And you get to feel like a good patriot instead of an evil racist.

#2 Mark | 2007-06-11 23:31

"Some of my bloggers will join in the hopeless objectins to the whole biological revolution, so I treaded carefully about it."

I think this and your objections to bloggers genuflecting at the alter of Ron Paul is due to the fact that it is easier to follow than to lead. Many white nationalists confuse complaining about something with taking action. Many of us here would prefer for some magical pied piper to appear and lead the way to sanity. As you've said before, most people dont want to lead, they want someone else to.

That leaves the follower class to fall for any old line of reasoning that comes down the "official" white nationalist pipeline. Since we all suffer from the herd mentality it's frightenly easy to back something or someone without really thinking it out.

#3 shari | 2007-06-11 23:31

You know as much as I agree with what you say, and as much as I realize that science reveals what it does, I think that something is still not realized,here. That's all I can say.

#4 neechee | 2007-06-12 00:52

My bartender tonight was an aryan beauty who told me she was studying genetics. I asked her about designer baby's and then asked her if she intended to sell her DNA to others who wanted to have the world's most beautiful children. She didn't get it. Why can't white women take a compliment these days that refers to their race? One other note, this same bar hosts speed dating nights. You can sign up for "speed dating" or "black speed dating", however there is no "white speed dating". I just can't wait to hear what the rational is for this? Blacks can have black only, but anything with whites must be open to the black race. What's that mantra again? Its sad and I think it deserves an email to the organizers to let them know some of us out here don't go along with it anymore. These PC idiots just need to be told, hey, its all BS, I don't agree. Show them some resistance.

#5 Al Parker | 2007-06-12 12:41

I think it's much more than that, neechee. As the true radical opposition, there is no way to ask for things in a nice way and get it from the PC establishment. This has been tried, as Bob points out time and again, and has been an utter failure for the last fifty years. If you want change, you have to march in your worldview. You don't "wait for people to wake up" and you don't wait for an economic collapse. You have to say things that make your enemies hate you and make your own people uncomfortable. But you wouldn't want a pretty bartender to think you're weird, would you?

As an example, even people who are obsessed with the latest news at least show you a little about how this works when they take up a cause clbre. It cannot be denied that Alex Linder's rally, held despite attempts at blocking it -- a rally where Linder himself was arrested -- helped bring the Knoxville crime story into the mainstraem media: <a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-070610hatecrime-story,0,7700301.story?coll=chi-news-hed">here</a>. Unfortunately, the only person speaking for whites is a south-east Asian, Michelle Malkin.

On a side note, I remember one young guy on Stormfront complaining that his racial views became known at his high school. One tough white football player (the kind who would hand over his woman to a black teammate for Prima Nocte) asked him, "SO YOU HATE BLACKS?" The kid had to constantly explain himself, and experience the shunning of his peers and the resulting social isolation. Then he asks in a self-pitying tone, "Wasn't there a woman who would find it noble that I stand alone?" My instinct was to sympathize and agree with him, but after some thought I decided NO. People, but especially females, are pack animals. The superiority of ideas is not worth much by itself. You really need to build your own pack, to pull people towards your group by voicing of your ideas, creating conflict and forcing them to take sides (The mantra, a form of political propaganda, strives to do just this even if it supports is a movement for fomenting a realization and not a political movement in essence.)

I'm going to go out on a limb and say that if you cannot build a herd, you are doing something wrong or you are in the wrong cause. To truly be successful at this, you must sincerely believe in your cause and not simply be a maladjusted hater at heart. These days the basics do not go without saying.

#6 Tim | 2007-06-12 14:41

Al Parker,

There was a HUGE article on this crime and Wichita and a few others major black on white crimes. Guess what paper it was in? Chicago Tribune. We own the 'new' media online and 'they' are scared. They actually included the magic 90% black on white interracial crime stat.

I like Bob's testimonial that he has nothing invested in the 'old world technologies etc'. I like that. It is a good revolutionary attitude (and the only attitude for a revolutionary to have). This is probably why so many white nationalists are getting more radical online etc. They have nothing to loos.

In regards to designer babies, they are already trying to tamper. They want a designer hybrid 'new man'. A certain percentage black, white and asian. However, the self hating white people that want that in the UN are dissapointed that no one else is cooperating! They even have the Catholic Church speaking out against designer babies etc. But the Asians are NOT listening and the Africans do not have any 'designer power'!

Remember Bob, our strongest ally in this is Nature. The Soviet Union came down because it was not based in truth. One of the international new agers has commented that in spite of what we think ---'most korean boys still like korean girls'. The problem will not be these new agers trying to kill us ---they are failing because the rest of the world is not interested in the self hating white people. The Planet likes dealing with men like Putin ---and he is not into mixing and matching. Our redeeming grace will turn out to be what the 'white nationalists' fret night and day over----and that is our declining numbers. There won't simply WILL NOT be enough self hating White People around to kill us. This is NOT the 1920's and these fools are loosing power ever day now. The world does NOT want to listen to the fools anymore----they want to listen to a real Aryan that can solve problems. They have no interest in helping self hating white people indulge their fantasies. Just go ask the Chinese or the Indians if they think Putin should be more anti-racist and better on human rights----and listen to their response.

Look at the support of the so-called 'western leaders' who oppose Putin openly? Not too good and the more Merkel and Bush bitch ---the worse it gets among the White male supporters. You are all on the bus with me now. We are 13% on this bus. I know how things work here and if you are NOT doing what is best for our tribe----you are going to get thrown under the bus.

#7 neechee | 2007-06-12 18:12

Thanks for the feedback Al. I don't expect an email will result in anything other than letting them know, "hey, we are here". I would be willing to bet that the organizers can't even conceive that someone would have an issue with this typical racial double standard. The more these ideas make it into the mainstream, the more recessive support for our views will be encouraged to blossom. I can remember many ideas that were introduced to me during my formative years, that seemed foreign, even crazy, but I never forgot those moments when they were injected into my mind and many of those ideas I initially rejected, I now hold. The first time I read an investment article recommending gold is one of those times. I thought it sounded so kooky, so old world. Why would anyone invest in gold? 5 years later, I am a gold-bug and have profited greatly for it. Ideas are like seeds, they can be planted in many ways, many places. I guess that's why the mantra is so effective, its a seed, an idea, that grows in even the harshest PC environments.

#8 richard | 2007-06-13 01:31

I recommend 'Genome' by Matt Ridley, for those new to the whole field of genetics. Great book, although predictably PC in parts.

http://www.amazon.com/Genome-Matt-Ridley/dp/0060932902

#9 BoardAd | 2007-06-13 01:46

contact me for Richard's book recommendation.