MARK | 2007-06-11
Mark says:
"I said in my 1976 book that tomorrow's scientific establishment would be more powerful and more dangerous than the PC one we have now."
Bob, how is this true? If science breaks with acadamia, as you predict, and if people demand geneticaly altered genes producing white babies instead of their brown or black (also as you predict) then how does this hurt the white race? Seems to me the best thing that could happen is science breaking the PC yoke that restricts research. I mean, if they could make us live longer, feel younger, and be whiter, what's the harm in any of this? Or am I missing something here?
ME:
On the contrary, I'm all for it.
My point is that this train is coming around the corner and nobody notices it.
We have the very recent example of conservative success and its immediate takeover by the neos. Neos took over while conservatives bitched and babbled to each other. So if we spend ur time talking abut the latest balloon we will get blindsided, too.
All power for good has dangers. The greater the power, the greater the danger. But you can't deal with the danger involved by just wishing it away. Some of my bloggers will join in the hopeless objectins to the whole biological revolution, so I treaded carefully about it.
But I am the most most RADICAL person you will ever meet. I have nothing invested in the world as it is and where it is now going, so I am all for radical human technology. I keep repeating that the one thing that is certain is that the trends of hte past have nothng to do with the future,but people keep saying "before it's too late" and other standard stuff, which means they didn't HEAR what I am saying.