#3 H.S. | 2005-03-30 13:17
That's because what you say is not generally true.
It really matters where you get your history from. You of all people know that.
"Who took Schiavo off of life support? Who put her ON life support?"
White people. (Although, she was not on life support.)
White Christians were a part of the medical industry that made her continued life possible after what is most likely attempted murder.
But they are no more to be guilty about it than your question above.
I am not guilty nor have I ever been guilty that European whites took and built America, and the Indian really just merely conquered. The blacks are here because their black people stole them from neighboring tribes and sold them to Muslim (predominately) and non-Muslim business owners.
From reading your many works, when you use the term "Christian" I see it as a culture label. America is Christian. But most of those so labeled are not believers on and in and through Jesus Christ.
Again, semantics, language, the truth, is everything.
P.S.
<blockquote>This is going to make <b>"Christians"</b> furious. No other anti-liberal is going to ask it because asking this question alienates the <b>"Christian"</b> right.</blockquote>
I did note *your* distinction, Bob - and appreciate it. We need to hone our points. It was not generally "Christians" who have researched the bogus PC priesthood vaccine science myths. But your points are well-taken that it is the priesthood of a religion that overrules the truth -- for a time. God has never had a problem with scrutiny, Himself.