THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

YOUR CONSPIRACY | 2007-11-08

I am still trying to figure out what the opposite of "paranoid" is.

I love the feeling I get when I read the comments that people are conspiring behind my back to do me GOOD. I read things about how Bob's writings need to be put into a format, or this needs to be done with them. Not, "Bob, why don't you do this?" but "Why don't WE do this?"

Then there is BoardAd, who just flat DOES it.

This is, honestly, as good as it GETS. After a lifetime of plugging alone or with one or two indispensable people – I dedicated my first two books to my wife – it is a relief to see the baton being carried. And, of course, unlike the heroic Dr. Pierce, and heroic is the least I can say about him, I will not feel that my way of thinking will die with me.

No other compliment can be as satisfying as this one. Being told how smart you are in a lifetime of abuse is balm to the soul, but when people discuss how to extend what you devoted your life to, when they DO it, as BoardAd has – it makes my heart swell.

What I feel is the opposite of paranoia. Since it is a good thing, we naturally don't have a name for it. That shows how rare, and therefore how precious, it is.

COMMENTS (14)

#1 Simmons | 2007-11-08 10:16

In the Pierce biography he stated that he wanted to find a successor, but I guess that being a math quant type he was too exacting and too abstract in his directions to the people around him to get more than people who would repeat what he wrote and said. I found him interesting but not of my type since I avoid cults of personality like the plague, including the precious Third Reich which this Scots-Irish guy finds a bit offputting. Rabbi Hitler being a bit much to a guy who likes his sins at least in moderation. Even when Bob becomes too rote with the Mantra for my tastes I hold my tongue and go off on my own to inject the Mantra thinking into the mainstream. Bob makes people useful, I make people useful, and I borrow from the Mantra toolbox.

That is all a decent person can expect.

#2 shari | 2007-11-08 11:52

I have never had the idea that Bob cares HOW we do things, just ammmunition TO DO. That's what the mantra is and it sure helps to have it pop up when I try to reply to something. Sometimes just part of it.

#3 BoardAd | 2007-11-08 14:47

Now we've been getting suggestions about how to reach todays youth, and what we should do with the audio. We have the technology, and I'm going answer them here.

As far as offering a 32 and 16k resolutions, I don't think we have the server space for that.

This is a 16K version, while it's still audible, it sounds like Bob's speaking though a tube to me.

How about we compromise with a transcript? If you are planning to have a woman reread clips it might be a wise thing to do. SF is a good place to recruit one or two by the way.

For posting in clips on YouTube, you would have to rewrite Bob's points clearly and concise. Another point for transcripts.

I've become good enough with typography to be able to create ebooks with acrobat. If someone would like to arrange a collection of articles, I could format it accordingly and distribute it. I'm still learning the Tex system for printed books.

Also don't forget the power of a good Wacom tablet and photoshop/ flash. If I remember correctly Steven P. wrote a children's story, I'm sure we could work with that.

#4 AFKAN | 2007-11-09 00:00

Your points, in order, and a response:

I love the idea of a woman with a refined Southern accent reading Bob's commentaries. As I have said elsewhere, it just reaches our demographic, and we MUST reach them where they ARE.

I wouldn't worry about the TeX system. Amazon does a self-publish model that just works great, AND handles distribution for you.

I WOULD focus on digital; Acrobat is fine.

The question is, The Message.

THAT will take time.

For now, redoing Bob's commentaries so they can be downloaded to ipods seems like an excellent, cost-effective way to go.

TeX was designed for a pre-digital era.

#5 AFKAN | 2007-11-09 00:23

in reply to Simmons:

One, I think Pierce's choice of a successor was Robert Mathews.

Mathews, a natural Alpha male and a forceful leader, failed to understand the greater dynamic of the situation he was facing.

He accepted his Racial Enemy's Terms and Definitions, to his ultimate detriment.

After his untimely passing, Pierce, from what I can tell, simply looked at the assemblage he had and realized no single person had what it took to lead from the front effectively.

Unfortunately, he failed to prepare for his inevitable passing, and we all know what THAT led to.

Two, we start with the Mantra if possible. If we need to work up to it, and often times we do, I use the terms "systematic White genocide." The reaction I get tells me all I need to know.

Three, the day of the inorganic hierarchical organization is fading, fast. Flat, fast networks are the wave of the future. This means we can not look to the shortcomings, real or imagined, of any "Leadership" we may have.

Rather, <b>we must BE what we want the world to BECOME</b>.

This takes a lot more responsibility than we can easily understand, and are ready for.

Four, I have thought about the theme of "YOUR Conspiracy," and I started with the opposite - the Racial Conspiracy of our Racial Enemies.

A Pattern presents itself.

Most of what the Jews do, that works for them, works for anyone with the willingness to defer gratification and invest in a Racial Future.

By defining ourselves as AGAINST our Racial Enemies, we allow them the power to define what we are against, and, of far greater importance, what we are FOR.

We spend so much time focusing on our Racial Enemies, in a battle where they choose the terms, and the terms of engagement, that we ignore the fact that these are simply parasites, living off of our Energy, our Power, and our Dreams.

In effect, <b>they see us, and the substance of our lives, as FOOD</b>.

Let me repeat that, for it is the Key to OUR Conspiracy, which will be, in the words of H.G. Wells, "An Open Conspiracy."

We have to focus on Families, to the extent we can, and do so with an implicit, as well as, when possible, an explicit, Racial focus. This recognizes that Race has a vertical component, and many, all too many, of the members of our Families are simply not worth the trouble to try and Convert them, for now.

The Living Example of our lives will be the lighthouse they will look to, as the social order around them collapses, and becomes overtly hostile.

We MUST see Families as the microcosm of Race, and Race as the macrocosm of Families, AND Race as the Living Bridge between Family and Culture.

We must simply look at the Cultural issues before us as Michaelangelo looked at a piece of marble; just get rid of everything that is not a statute, and what you have left is what you wanted all along.

It simply took your disciplined, focused efforts to bring it into being.

With my nephews as temporal compasses, I look at EVERY situation, and ask:

(1) What does this mean to them, and their future, and

(2) HOW can I turn this to their advantage?

The parasites are simply doing their organic duty; they are cleansing areas that are already dead, but don't realize it yet, because We abandoned those areas, in all meanings of the terms.

We must shift from the impotence of Defense to an Intelligent Offense.

Learning from what the Jews ACTUALLY do is a major step in the social technology of Racial Achievement.

Putting those principle into practice for US, and our Racial Goals, is the next step in the applied social technology of Racial Achievement.

And, remember, "Anger is Very Useful," and "Violence Solves Everything."

More to follow...

#6 Z | 2007-11-09 03:42

Speaking of conspiracies, the American stock market is falling, Ron Paul's cash is rising, and all the media can think about is a man named "Dog" who said the worse word in the world.

#7 woundednietzsche | 2007-11-09 10:04

Building awareness of Bob's audio chats is a great idea, but I don't think re-recording them in another voice will increase acceptance of the message and I think it will actually communicate less of what Bob is saying. Bob is speaking from experience, there is more being communicated than mere words. His voice tells you that he has been there, felt these things, seen these things with his own eyes, and you can HEAR that in his voice. His voice rings with truth and that characteristic is what made me listen. It wasn't just the words, it was his voice. I have passed some of these audio lectures on to others and their feedback always mentioned Bob's unique phrasings and speaking style. If you must, give listeners an alternative narrator, but keep the real thing.

#8 | 2007-11-09 14:08

"paranoid" - Greek "para" ("beside")+ "nous"

("self")In other words, "beside oneself", ie distraught, unglued, etc.

I suggest the opposite is "within oneself" - "endo" ("inside")+ "nous" ("self"):

ENDONOID, ie whole, integral

May Bob enjoy the heights of ENDONOIA!

#9 BoardAd | 2007-11-09 16:45

woundednietzsche

Bob is unique! Replacing Bob's recordings was NEVER part of the question.

The question we are working off of, is how can we broaden the transmission and make the impact of our propaganda more powerful.

Think of it as a targeted ad campaign, or psyops.

#10 mderpelding | 2007-11-09 18:35

This is starting to sound like some sort of right wing fever swamp "roast". This has become "all about Bob". I wonder if even half of the posters here have actually read and understood your worldview. Understanding your worldview can make a difference.

In advance, I'll thank you.

#11 BoardAd | 2007-11-10 21:25

mderpelding

If my understanding is wrong it helps when people correct me. My knowledge is technical.

Bob is my friend, and friends don't kick each other around unnecessarily. If my project is coming off as a mindless "Bob rah rah" session that's not my intention either. I wanted to revive the momentum we once had with the mantra video and saturate the internet with our propaganda.

I have so many programs that open us up to many mediums, but I cant do it all myself. A brainstorming session helps lay the groundwork to new projects that I hope someone else gets involved in.

#12 Pain | 2007-11-11 21:35

Bob,

Be realistic. People ARE carrying on.

You are a writer. If you are truly successful at being you, you can have a successor no more than Shakespeare or Schopenhauer did.

The geniuses may learn from each other, but each always goes forth and does his own thing.

Besides, don't forget that Pierce had Asperger's Syndrome and you have your own pains. Do you really want a successor to THAT?

Whoever is needed is right now learning from you. You may have met him, you may never meet him. I doubt you would care if you did, and I doubt you could appraise him anymore than they who came before you could have appraised you.

We have your writings. It's time you got some faith.

#13 Pain | 2007-11-12 00:37

"I am still trying to figure out what the opposite of 'paranoia' is."

It's called <em>faith</em>.

Without it, you live in hell. You think too much because you have no faith.

Think about it, Bob.

#14 shari | 2007-11-12 09:48

It's not easy to be a genius. That's why there aren't very many of them. It must be excruciating often times.