THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan believes the clear language of the First Amendment, after it has been diddled with by lawyers, does not protect a variety of expressions, one of which is hate speech. A more elastic a phrase than 'hate speech' cannot be imagined. Bob's Mantra would surely fit within that corral according to PC logic.

So why does this advocate of civil rights concoct categories beyond the domain of the First Amendment's prohibition on restraints of free speech? It is racial. She is not an American of the Founding Stock, an ornery cuss who speaks his mind and does not care if others do the same.

Kagan is a racist, a Talmudic Jew, of a tribe with no tradition or understanding of liberty. To her the Constitution is only words to be twisted, pretzel like, into a knot to strangle any criticism of her rabbis and their Zionist enterprise. Just as the Founding Stock Americans understand liberty because they are free [at least for now], she uses words to forge chains because she is a slave to her tribal instincts. She has no experience of and cannot understand life without shackles.

The only way Americans can preserve all that makes this a unique country with a culture unfettered as no other across the millennia of human experience is to seize control of the levers of power again. A good place to start would be to defeat this mediocre careerist who has been chosen to complete the expulsion of the Protestant core of the American ethos from the judiciary. It is also a good opportunity to post and post and post the Mantra, hate speech as she would have it, in the middle of what promises to be a lively debate.

No one can understand the constitution like old Protestants, but to Jews, all WASPs seem like what "Yankee" can imply; due to their historical trajectory to the country, they unconsciously assume American government HAD a king, queen, tsar, kaiser, shah, etc. and the Americans they de-legitimized, "took power [from them and over others] for themselves." But America never had a king.

Americans can't figure out why people who look like them, but have no loyalty to them, suddenly want to be kings and queens when we dispensed with that crap a zillion years ago, and so, the whole scene just looks weird and inexplicable.

But for others, America is now where ANYBODY can become Lord Tyrant over past savings of people to whom they're not blood-related--taking wealth earned and saved, or whatever you want. ---A free-for-all. In Debtors Anonymous terms, what's done with the money by such people might be called "Big Shot-ism." Like when girls get a first job and still go into debt buying clothes and makeup.

Kagan is first generation like most of the government. So America is "A land of opportunity." (no "real" American EVER went to a "Land of Opportunity." In fact, that's an INSULT). Even 5-year "immigrants" who did it "the right way" shown on Beck's show, could not have been angrier at the endless stream of usurpers. They WAITED IN LINE five years, but now, all the free stuff is given away to people who didn't even WAIT.

U.S. is now where an average person can become KING. But first, you "Get In Line" for stuff. No American came to a Land of Opportunity where they Got In Line. Unlike mean KINGS, Immigrant Kings take the wealth and give to themselves (b/c they want to be rich), and to only the most truly destitute (b/c they wish the King had done that for them, so they could have become KING a whole lot sooner, but they also can't enable anyone but the most destitute---since people with more on the ball could usurp this very precarious Kingship. You could be "training your replacement," accidently).

A Kagan could never understand NO AMERICAN was fighting to be King. Americans were LIVING in a SOCIETY where they could create, earn and keep.

Maybe they'll just become more paranoid. They toss out money they don't have---to appease increasingly hostile mobs. They will import more destitute mobs from elsewhere, hoping the new mobs will be nicer than the mean mobs who will not vote for them anymore.

Backbaygrouch,

That was an excellent post, but the one thing I would change is the phrase "the only way is to seize control of the levels of power again".

Kagan cannot understand the real source of freedom: Each of us is issued exactly one brain, two hands, and two feet. That brain, two hands, and two feet is responsible for acquiring freedom. Freedom has no other source.

The instruments of tyranny in America are entirely "sewn up". I make no distinction whatsoever among the various uniformed forces. A judge with his or her black robe is simply an officer endowed with a particularly wide ambit of unrestrained authority within a system of nested jurisdictions that imprisons the public involuntarily (to the extent they personally do not find a means of escape).

Each and every one of us is responsible for resisting the jurisdiction of the institutions that attempt to imprison us. You do that by resistance. Real substantive resistance. Resistance is usually a subterranean activity. It has to be. We ARE IN PRISON after all. The tyranny we are fighting is not a figment of our imaginations.

There is no distinction in reality between the courts and the police, the courts are simply the command headquarters for a variety of uniformed forces and this is true of the Supreme Court also.

It takes a mutiny to change this. But a mutiny doesn't change where freedom is necessarily sourced, which is with your very own brain, two hands, and two feet. "Seizing control of the levers of power" is a sterile activity. That does not get you to freedom.

What gets you to freedom is noticing how weak the police and courts really are. They are incapable of perceiving the secret storehouse of weapons that is guarded by destiny's emissary hidden in the shadows.

YOU see destiny's emissary hidden in the shadows because you have not ceded your personal authority and power by trading it for the personal advantages and bribes offered by the institution. THEY, in contrast, have traded it away and are now blind.

That fact puts YOU in power. And that is the moral order of the world.

And being in power, you know that freedom is YOUR RESPONSIBILITY. You can't fop that responsibility off by claiming that it is necessary "to seize the levers of power".

Those "levers" you refer to in fact contain no real power at all.

Kagan et al get away with their little shtick because no one thinks about just asking them what their basic shtick is. Instead we waste our time on jew conspiracy and other less than useful endeavors.

Hell just ask them to describe their religion and culture and ask it justifies genocide (which it does command them to do)

See the latest issue of OC a man named Ryssen actually has read their religious/political tracts and it is written quite explicitly that it is commanded to lay waste to all seperate nations save theirs, but all in the name of world peace of course.

Judaism is a cult, and no cult can withstand any daylight. It literally as a cult is about 5 or 6 sequential questions away from being completely irrelavant and a hideous joke that no one would claim as their own. But all the wordist cults are a joke they rely on fear of the "other" to keep them in line and functional.

No cultist wants to hear, "So please tell me about your (insert cult name here), because I have alot of questions concerning it?"

"Those levers..in fact contain no real power at all" I agree, but they aren't out of business ENTIRELY. I do think the time is here, that nothing those who THINK they are in power DO, will work a little ,or even seem to. The mantra is legal. They can't put the third world in every white country a little at a time. It's careened out of control! But the ability to do harm is still there.

BGLass. Americans have an attitude towards royalty and it is a self perception. "Every man a King, but no one wears a crown." - Huey P. Long