#7 Fred_Richthofen | 2013-01-19 13:34
"But mixed people are better"
I recall an article a few years back where scientists studying bison herds were saying that hybridization weakened the animal for its natural environment. They were careful in their wording to avoid sounding like a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews. You're supposed to understand that real genetic morality is only for animals.
When people have argued "mixed is better" I ask them why scientists say bison herds are weakened by hybridization but are afraid to say the same about humans. The child of a Kenyan runner and a NASA scientist cannot expect more than mediocrity compared to the accomplishments of either parent.
This follows true even within same race pairings. If a great warrior marries the most petite girl, then how can he expect his son to compare to him? The Norse understood this. Think of Volsunga Saga where the shield maid Brynhildr would only marry the greatest warrior. And from the same saga notice that the conception of Sinfjotli was from an incestuous relationship between Signy and her brother. Signy's reasoning was that purity of blood would make her son nearly as fierce and intelligent as his grandfather Volsung. He was bred for the purpose of revenge.
I enjoy watching dog shows to compare the pedigree of the owners with their animals. The owners that practice the words of Jesus (do unto others as you would have them do unto you) would be afraid to actually admit to it.
Peta is the exact opposite of a tree hugger on human genetics. They actually want the genetic morality that is being applied to all White countries and only White countries to be applied to animals. They have a great video demonstrating this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxAaK0iJ2vQ