THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

WHAT END? | 2005-12-15

One thing that has ocurred to me is that there is a fundamental difference in the way I think and the way others in our movement think.

They keep discussing whether we will win or not.

I think I need to remind you that we are talking about politics here, not religion.

Christianity and Islam end on Judgement Day. Hinduism and Buddhism end when the last person is freed from the Wheel of Life and goes into Oblivion. Communism ends when the world is truly communist and all men are as equal and peaceful as a herd of castrated steers.

Judaism ends when the whole world is sorry for Jews and pays them reparations so Jews can devote their entire energies to feeling sorry for themselves.

Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, Communism and Judaism are RELIGIONS. They have an alpha and an omega, a beginning and an end. Politics does not have an end.

In an all white country, politics abound. In an all-white country Anonymous and I could take all our differences on the size of government and social programs with deadly earnestness and have a rare old time fighting over them.

Peter and I could fight it out about the Old Testament's place in public schools.

If we save our race politics will be more fun but it will still thrive.

In an opposite kind of world, I remind you that less than one person in five hundred on this planet is a Jew and the Jews are still very much here. As I keep saying, the number of Indians who will CHOOSE to have a genuinely Aryan child will produce more whites than there are Jews even if the whole world goes brown.

I don't know when the political alpha was. Politics goes back to the first animals who ever lived in a herd, and I have a strong suspicion that, a billion years before that, some one-celled animal before them wanted to be the TOP one-celled animal in its piece of slime.

I cannot pinpoint the alpha of politics, but I know when the omega of politics will be:

Never.

COMMENTS (4)

#1 Bruce | 2005-12-15 16:55

I think when people want to know whether we will win or not, what most of them really mean is that they want to know if things will get on the right track in their own lifetimes.

#2 Mark | 2005-12-16 00:00

"I think I need to remind you that we are talking about politics here, not religion."

I had a sociology teacher in high school make a comment that man is insufferably religous. If he would have said insufferably political as well I believe he would have hit the mark as well.

Personally I believe that politics is a religion. Religion is a canon of beliefs that men hold to be true above all else. So is politics to those of us who partake at it's alter. You have said yourself that political correctness is not like a religion but is a religion. I think the same can be said for all forms of politics, some bordering on orthodoxy, others on cult.

As far as an "end" to religions, being agnostic, I politely scoff at your notion - although I'm sure I'm taking your meaning out of context. If there was an end to religion the high priests and magicians with backward collars would be out of a business and you know god hates idle hands.

#3 lemon | 2005-12-16 14:07

As far as high priests and magicians with backward collars being out of business, I think that those who actually believed something would not mind being out of business. The rest, I sure wouldn't mind seeing out of business, and I don't think God would mind either. Shari

#4 Bob | 2005-12-16 17:45

Mark, if the profession of the clergy were aabolished, as Sheri

says in the comment below yours, the few good ones would

preach anyway.

The majority of today's clergy would go into seeling used cars

and the other occupations their fellow sociopaths follow.