TRAGER'S BACK! | 2006-10-12
Oh, sure, everything can turn into verbiage (NOT fine white powder, as you used to say). I am not sure how it could be otherwise. Once primates developed the ability to form new concepts, they were bound to come up with ones that corresponded to nothing in the external world. The *Racial* difference is that one small group in the remote northwest corner of the vast Eurasian landmass had a critical number of folks who insisted on checking ideas against the facts. It only took a critical mass of such determined objectivists to change the world, but this does not mean that there were very many of them. It is quite apparent to me every day that such thinkers are very few. Just vastly more numerous in the White race.
Comment by Trager Smith
ME:
I am very glad to have Trager back! He and I have been in this seminar together for over fifty years. I need him and he needs me. He can give us an incredible amount.
Trager is the person who said to me years ago, "Bob, your talent is that things jump out at you that other people completely miss."
Let me give an example of that to deal with another of Trager's comments.
I can't FIND it, but Trager made a comment about DEFINING "our" race. That is because he has been attending those intellectual funerals too damned long. This is the sort of "intellectual" stuff that is death in the real world.
I hope the time comes when we are in a position to waste time on such trivia. But in the real world we have no difficulty knowing that our race is under genocidal attack. If you want to know what "white" is, read Bob's Mantra:
Bob's Mantra
" Liberals and respectable conservatives say there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries."
"The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them."
"Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to "assimilate," i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites."
"What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?"
"How long would it take anyone to realize I'm not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?"
"And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn't object to this?"
"But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews."
They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.
"Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white."
http://whitakeronline.org
HERE IS WHAT HAS HUMPED OUT AT ME THAT NO ONE ELSE HAS NOTICED:
Within a year of the collapse of the Soviet Empire, a general topic of media discussion was, "Is Eastern Europe READY FOR IMMIGRANTS yet?"
If Vietnam threw off the Reds, no one would even think of the question, "Is Vietnam ready for immigrants yet?" and we all know it.
What jumps out at me is what everybody else takes so much for granted that it never comes up.
Why, exactly, does everybody keep pressing Putin and other Eastern European leaders about whether their country is READY for immigrants yet? We all know it is because they are WHITE countries.
We all KNOW that, but nobody SAYS that.
Trager, "white" has already been defined for us. Everybody knows what it is or we wouldn't take that "ready for immigration" line as so routine that we don't even NOTICE it. You want to spend time defining it, but what is important here is that it is already defined, or you would have NOTICED the point I just made.
If you ant to know whether a people is white, simply look at whether immigration to those countries is being talked about.
It is ridiculous for us to get into definitions of something that has already been defined so far down into your parietal lobe that you don't even notice it.