THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

You could both be right - and wrong. Decisions, especially those made by corporations and governments often reflect various agendas, some overt, some hidden. Often I feel that the greatest unascribed cause in most events is the stupidity of the actors.

We can make guesses about what the motivation is for particular information or disinformation being disseminated, whether it is simple greed or another agenda or what, but this does not affect the perception of the broad picture which is in the background.

We know good and well that people who have zero concern for the welfare of "The Children" but a big concern for the censorship of "Hate Speech = Criticism of Them" would like to use our present day Comstocks to achieve their goal. Of this there can be no doubt.

Can you go into a library and pull up Stormfront or David Duke? If not why not?

I hate to say it, but uncle Bob is right on this one.

Sure the media have had other hysteria in the past such as Pit Bulls, Kindercare centers, the evil Germans but they are not all random attempts to engorge readership.

Ten years ago, when the pedophile hysteria began, other people noticed the pretend campaign to "save the children" was bound with calls to abolish free speech online. Remember, preventing white genocide has been compared to yelling "fire" in a crowded theatre (except that the fire is real in this case).

Save the children! KIll whitey!

I must disagree with the Tory.

Bob is correct. The Don Imus stuff was for the same reason. And lets not forget all the rioting in the black community to get rid of the N word and put an end to offensive rap. In other words, the picture is a little broader. They are after free speech and the internet is killing them. They are after it ---ACROSS THE BOARD.

The NWO is a Wordist Utopian Society. No Wordist Society can survive with 'free media'. The internet is the wildest and most free media the world has ever known. We may never see this many powerful groups on the same page. They are all against us BUT they are against free speech across the board.....and that may save free speech for us.

Big Record companies, Huge Media conglomerates, Whole Govt's from the CCP in China to the US Senate----all are threatened by this media. And they are getting chewed up on it..........right as I type! And WE OWN IT! So to hurt us......they got to hurt everybody! For once, equality may save us!

They hate it and they hate us. They are attacking from every angle at every opening. They are attacking the root .....FREE SPEECH! And none of their garbage is working. Look at how the old civil rights garbage worked against them at the last immigration debate. The ADL/Teddy Kennedy alliance got killed online. No matter what they do.......they are against time. Furthermore, no matter how hard they crack down it only makes things worse for them. Even if they shut it down........it will still not work for them.

(I bet if they do try to shut it off......the jews will be blamed for it......by everyone---liberal, conservative, muslim, atheist....they will all blame the ADL jews)

We got good trends in place folks...... the trend is your friend. Demoralization has now been undermined by ten years of internet goodness and a TON of non-white immigration. .......moving right along.

Addition:

Bob, they are worried about White Nationalism. But they are worried about a lot of things....across the board. We are just a piece in a puzzle. We are large and looming piece. But there are other pieces (like Islam and revolutions etc) and they are all tied to free speech online.

By the way, Russia will not out law speech online. They are not in the EU and will not join and cooperate with the EEOC garbage. They have already said as much. Leave it to the former commies to undermine communism!

Of course Tory does have a good point. And the thing that comes to mind is that the pedophile hysteria has been going on for some time while attempts to abolish free speech online have failed. I think that maybe the whole thing started with the desire to censor political speech, but the beast now has a mind of its own.

Many times, media interest and opinion is based upon the simple desire to justify their own existence. Finding novelty.

You know, "whats new."

At other times, the media works to "frame the debate".

If the media wanted to attack white racialists directly, then Kevin Alfred Strom would be a household word, just like Brittany Spears.

This kind of attack would be purely political.

But they don't, do they?

Instead we get debates framed upon immigration legality.

You know, we reject all these Mexicans because they are "illegal".

An argument for retards.

Someday you will really understand ...

1) How weak your enemies are.

2) Well...............................

STOP BEING SHEEP!

Tim's post really grabbed my attention

Certainly the media may be entirely benign and ineffectual. Probably if we made David Duke the media Czar for the next 20 years it would hardly be noticed. :-?