TIM | 2006-06-11
Tim says,
The only flaw I see in David Duke is identical to the flaw I see in Jared Taylor. They both seem like nice men —except they always stress NON-Violence. David Duke has something on Jared Taylor my book. First, he has been to Jail. And second, he is friends with BW. If he was not friends with BW, I would not trust him. Especially, since he stresses "non-violence" all the time. Even while this govt. converts former army bases to concentration camps.
Everything in History is generally solved with some kind of violence or threats thereof. I would love it–if our enemy anounced that they would NOT get violent. The only reason I pay attn.to BW is because he is brilliant. I have learned alot from reading his blog. But more importantly, he stated he was NOT a pacifist. I trust him more for that comment and because of that—-I still post.That post alone told me David Duke had to be ok. Or BW would not be around him.
MY REPLY:
Mahatma Ghandi, that man of nonviolent resistance, tried to explain dozens if not hundreds of times that he was NOT, repeat NOT, a pacifist.
He would give out little hints like, "Goddammit, I am NOT a friggin' PACIFIST!" and phrased only a little more lightly.
Right now, we are winning the battle to prove that the violent thugs are on the other side.
I do not know Jared Taylor nor am I ever likely to. But David and I take the same approach Mahatma Ghandi did: You do what WORKS.
David has risked his life many, many times.
Tim, let me remind you of something. You know all those guys who are always telling everybody else on Stormfront that they are a bunch of wimps, because the writer is ready to revolt and fight and do all the macho stuff right now?
You definintely don't to mixed in with that bunch. They sicken you the way they do me, and they are a good example to keep in mind when you find all this Dream of Peace talk a bit nauseating.
It's the old story: You don't pull a gun out until you are sure you are READY and WILLING to USE it.
If David made the slightest hint that he would be willing to use violence he could win, the media would use it endlessly. So why the HELL would he let out the slightest quotable hint of such a thing?
You were talking about how violence determines history.
Did you happen to notice how much violence was involved in the collapse of the entire Soviet Empire?
Suddenly everybody realized that the whole system was a sillyass way for a bunch of white people to live. When the time came for the Soviets to get Yeltsin, their WILL collapsed.
Serious causes and serious laoyalties like those in Europe during the two world wars result in unprecdented slaughter.
But the British under a Labor Government in 1948 had no will to keep India. So Ghandi used nonviolent resistance. He put them in a position where THEY had to use violence, and they did not have the WILL to do so.
If Ghandi had put violent masses of Indian revolutionaries into the streets, India might still be a colony today. "Our boys are dying over there!" the Brits would scream. They might have reelected Churchill, and nobody was more ruthless.
I proposed that, if I were president, I would break up OPEC FOR THE UNITED STATES ONLY. I pointed out that we need only point out the fact that a cartel that retards OUR economy is an act of aggression. I would give them a date certain when we would go take the oil we needed from one of the states that is joining in a conspiracy against the United States, which is the only country of which I am president and the only country for which I am responsible.
Note the caps. PLEASE note the caps. I would NOT break up OPEC. They would be welcome to keep OPEC against Europe and Japan and anybody but US.
In all the industrial world, only the US would get oil at reasonable prices.
Do you really think there would be the slightest violence involved?
As long as we banned reexport of their oil, and boy, would I ever! -- OPEC would come to US to close the deal.
They could make it up by raising oil prices for Europe and Japan, which would put my country at a slight competitive edge in the world economy.
No violence at all.
The neos would scream that I was not a Macho Man. I am willing to threaten violence against OPEC, but I am not willing to go to war for the Principle of breaking up this cartel for All Mankind.
I'm perfectly willing to be a wimp if it WORKS.