THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

THINK, AL! | 2007-03-26

Al Parker

NOT SPAM

NOT SPAM

While this is an interesting post, I don't think it has a solid point. You seem to dislike it when people marry for love and when people marry for money. You say they should marry solely for aesthetics. But aesthetics is something you get used to — that's why it's discussed as only as a mere preference. You get used to what your partner looks like — this is why ugly people look less ugly as you become more familiar with them. The parents don't seem to care what their children look like since they are acquainted with them from birth. And I have never any non-white say, "I wish I were white."

Just for fun, I searched Google: 898 results for "I wish I were white" — 253 or so results for "I wish I were black" and 248 for Asian to put it in context.

If you grow up looking a certain way, you cannot imagine looking differently, nor would you seriously want to, unless you were a Semite in the Third Reich.

P.S. Are the browns in Brazil really going crazy over the blonds in Brazil because they are blond or because they look "exotic"? (Like the inverse of what we think of exotic here).

–Al Parker

ME:

All the old crap in one package.

"You seem to dislike it when people marry for love and when people marry for money. You say they should marry solely for aesthetics. " Yes, and if you criticize Jews, you are a Nazi, right? I said that if you sell out your race, you are prostituting yourself. Money is not forever, miscegenation is. We are talking about women who prefer white looks but are willing to have permanently ugly offspring for money.

Think a little there, Al.

And the old one abut how exotic is beautiful! I've heard THAT one all my life! Bay Watch was a worldwide favorite, whoever was exotic. There is no evolutionary justification for blondes except to compete on looks. Peacock males would not have that fan if they were fighting for bare survival against other species.

Thank a little, there, Al.

"If you grow up looking a certain way, you cannot imagine looking differently, nor would you seriously want to, unless you were a Semite in the Third Reich."

You just pointed out that people WANT to be white.

Are you thinking AT ALL, Al?

COMMENTS (8)

#1 LibAnon | 2007-03-26 14:27

NOT SPAM

NOT SPAM

Al Parker: "P.S. Are the browns in Brazil really going crazy over the blonds in Brazil because they are blond or because they look "exotic"?"

The sexual taste for the "exotic" per se, where it does exist, is not only found exclusively among whites, but it presumes the SUPREMACY of those whites. It's a leftover from the days of colonialism, when our race ruled the earth. To assume that the phenomenon is universal, as Al Parker does, is nothing but racial and temporal provincialism.

The white lover of the "exotic" is simply the Great White Conqueror turned literary and sentimental. It is a leftover indulgence of the 19th century plutocracy, like big game hunting or missionary work. To understand it, one must understand that it was white people who went to Borneo to indulge their curiosity about the headhunters. The Borneo headhunters did not travel to Europe to study US.

Within the white race, there's also an element of status-seeking in this "taste for the exotic." A taste for brown skin is flaunted as a status symbol and seldom reflects an honest preference. Black bedmates are usually taken by whites to indicate that they are "sophisticated" and "educated" and "worldly," not because of any intrinsic attraction to black skin, bulging lips, and nappy hair. These tend to be the same white people who are likely to serve an exotic, smelly, runny cheese at their dinner parties rather than a humble cheddar, and for exactly the same reason. What would it do for one's social status to serve a run-of-the-mill cheese that people actually LIKE?

But as I said, this "attraction to the exotic" is not only confined to whites, and generally to elite whites, but also to whites of a certain era. It's a remnant from the days when whites ruled the earth. As we settle into our new role as an increasingly embattled and dispossessed minority within our own countries, however, I predict we'll be too busy safeguarding our own white skin to be sexually infatuated with the copper-colored tide in which we're drowning. The "exotic" won't seem quite so charming once THEY'RE ruling US.

#2 Peter | 2007-03-26 14:32

NOT SPAM

NOT SPAM

You say "think a little" when you really mean "think differently." Being a group participant for some time, I should be able to see the points of what's being said. Maybe it's just me. I will try to reply to your response:

Referring to your second and third rebuttals, I admit I cannot prove that people do or do not want to be white. We don't have a survey -- only anecdotal stuff, ie: what you saw on a TV commercial in India, the prevalence of hair straightening among black women, the number of women that dye their hair blond, rich black men that like white women, etc.

I'll answer the first point. First of all, the label of prostitute is applied inappropriately because the term also applies to women who would chose a richer white man over a poorer white man. More importantly, however, it does not say anywhere that women prefer white men because they want to avoid ugly offspring. It could just as well be they want a man that fits their image of an ideal partner, something ingrained. When the scale tips to another side, they put preferences aside. It would be abhorrent if they were not putting the interests of their children first, but how can you safely assume that this is what they are thinking in their minds?

I am sure that arguing with me is a lot easier than arguing with an anti.

Al Parker

#3 Anonymous | 2007-03-26 14:36

not spam

not spam

That sounds like a fair deal. Pick on Al. Pick on a guy what don't know from doodoo. He should be an easy target. He can't answer back with anything that could box your ears. Pick on the young stupid heel-clicking guy. He'll snap to momentarily.

#4 Anonymous | 2007-03-26 14:44

not spam

not spam

Go, Al! I see your catching on. Think for yourself. Use your own mind. Don't borrow from the mind of a pretender. Always stay with the truth. See what you see, know what you know, never doubt yourself. Be willing to learn but be careful who you learn from. There are many phonies in the world, many pretenders to the throne. If a man lies to you once he's a liar. Never accept another word he says as the truth. The world is full of liars. Many of them are politicians. Just as many of them are the supporters of politicians. I see you're catching on.

#5 Bob | 2007-03-26 15:00

No, Al, I'mnot going to be falsely nice to you.

Yu said:

"I'll answer the first point. First of all, the label of prostitute is applied inappropriately because the term also applies to women who would chose a richer white man over a poorer white man."

Mr. Webb cannot tell the difference beteween Mommy Professor,whom he must pay and to whom students are FORCED to listen and forced to PLEASE, and me. He genuinely can't see any difference.

You cannot understand the difference between a white woman balancing different characteristics of males within her race and selling out her race completely and openly for money.

If you are really that naive, Mr. Webb is right. You're catching up with him. I would take his comments as an insult. Yu are just now, he says, learning to think for yourself.

But if my disppointment at your not THINKING before writing upsets you that much, you would play hell taking the insults he and others have aimed at me.

You have to be able to deal it out AND take it. I thought you could.

#6 Peter | 2007-03-26 16:50

NOT SPAM

NOT SPAM

Well, you don't demonstrate that the women VIEW it terms of violating group loyalty or they simply choose to ignore aesthetic preference, ie: white vs. black decision becomes nearly the same as tall vs. short or good hair vs. bald.

In the original post you say, "97% of white women actually stated their preference for white men." If the question was, "Would you prefer a white man over a non-white man?" then these questions could be substituted similarly:

Would you prefer a man with a good head of hair over a bald man?

Would you prefer a tall man over a short man?

I'm not convinced here.

--Al Parker

#7 MrWebb | 2007-03-26 20:31

not spam

not spam

Good, Parker, stay unconvinced. Use your own head. Keep using your own head. In the end you'll need it.

#8 Alan | 2007-03-28 11:02

NOT SPAM

NOT SPAM

Parker said, And I have never any non-white say, "I wish I were white." That may be true since most anything a black has or may get comes at the expense of us whites. The race traitors, mommy professor and the neo marxis have warped our sense of reality, whites must feel guilty, whites must give to the blacks all that "WE" have denied them. So darky get his free welfare check and lefty gets his bought and paied for vote, and "WE" whites who can see this BS for what it is, knows we are getting screwed. Why should any black wish he was white, other whites give them what they want, they just steal it from "US".