THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

THE POST-COMMUNIST SITUATION | 2008-05-26

Back in the 1970s an Arkansas Republican made one of those obviously true observations that gets people into trouble. His party had just won a big election and he said that it was because Israel was in a crisis at the time, and the Jewish money that would have gone to the liberal candidate had been diverted to that vital campaign for Israel.

This was the sort of exposure of the obvious that REALLY infuriates the establishment because it so obviously true and it makes the Jewish outlook so obvious. I haven't seen anybody make the equivalent point about our post-Communist world, so I will make it.

While the Communist Empire was around a major share of the money and power of the media and the left was dedicated to fighting its battles. The desperate, giant last-ditch fight to end the Strategic Defense Initiative and Reagan's ratcheting up the killing pressure on the Soviets took up a major share of the resources of the left. Those resources have not disappeared, so like that Arkansas Republican, there is room for lone heretic to ask where they have gone.

I, alone, have pointed out repeatedly where a major portion of those resources have gone. I have noted that the moment the Soviet Empire collapsed, every single leftist switched overnight from a socialist to an environmentalist. No one else seems to have noticed this BASIC rule.

The situation for leftists is a lot like that of the Jews if Israel disappeared. Their ideological homeland is gone. But the goals are the same. Leftists want the priesthood of Political Correctness to rule. When they lost the Professor-rule in Moscow, they instantly switched to Kyoto.

Jewish strategy is equally consistent. Like Emma Lazarus, who wrote the words on the Statue of Liberty and was a lifelong dedicated Zionist, Jews want 1) to destroy all other identities, and 2) to make t Jewish identity the only legitimate one. Dershowitz is as obvious about this today as Lazarus was well over a century ago.

Dershowitz has Lazarus's consistent theme, 1) he is constantly worried about the disappearance of Jews and 2) he is totally dedicated to ridding the earth of the white race. He makes comments about how blacks and whites don't kiss enough on television. What is enormously frustrating to me is that anti-Semites do not point to this obvious reality, but keep presenting Jews as supernatural Satans, which is precisely the argument they have centuries of practice countering.

The fact is that getting rid of the Soviet Empire gives us a clear shot at our enemies. I had to hold my nose and join with respectable conservatives to fight the ideological homeland of our enemies. I seem to be the only person on our side who has NOTICED this fundamental reality has changed.

In the real world of our real war, the role of respectable conservatives has not changed in the post Communist era. Their function has always been to divert attention from the real struggle, but in the case of the nuclear-powered Soviets they were actually facing a REAL enemy, a critical part of the enemy left.

Like the leftists who have morphed into environmentalists, the respectable right has had to find another way to do the same thing WITHOUT the Soviet Empire. They have morphed into anti-Arabs under the banner that we must not be divided by race in the face of the Real Enemy.

My point is that this is the basic REALITY. But no one MENTIONS it.

In the new world we must cut the old crap and take a new look at the old reality. In AFKAN's "Movement Past" leftists who were peaceniks were still our enemies. In the new reality leftists who are peaceniks are potential allies. But what is critical here is that we must look upon this, not as a Revelation, but as a simple reality of power politics.

Less tomes, more logic.

We have an argument that is easy to accept, rather than a battle for Revealing the Truth about the outright pro-Communist efforts of the left.

Simple logic, bringing people to simple reality, is our BUGS specialty.

COMMENTS (3)

#1 AFKANNow | 2008-05-26 00:56

Two quick thoughts:

One, there was a tremendous "anonymous" think piece done years ago called "The Report From Iron Mountain," where the idea was discussed that the resources currently spent on a war no one could afford to win could be spent on a war to create a better environment.

My Wise Professor told me to look at it, see how much it resembled a RAND analytical product in terms of quality, and ask myself if Someone wasn't laying the groundwork for Something to happen in the future - decades down the road.

Just as wars sop up surplus industrial capacity - and surplus people - so would a war for the control of industrial society in the facade of a war to "save" the environment sop us tons of leftists with nothing to do after Viet-Nam went away.

Two, the SPGG fell into the intellectual traps set for them; by defining their Enemies as nebulous, artificial constructs, their efforts were spent being used as cannon fodder while insuring they NEVER went for the One Idea that works - a Positive Theory of Race.

I continually refine my comments to my nephews, trying to make things simple are simpler.

"What are you for, guys?"

"A better world for our Families, and our Race."

"What are you against, guys?"

"White Genocide."

Good.

Keep It Simple, and Keep It Going.

#2 Dave | 2008-05-26 11:39

Our public schools are now working on their third generation of indoctrinates in "environmentalism" for fields where there are no jobs and will be no jobs.

Meanwhile the "French economy" is drilling new wells of "seinorage" finance (to finance the Cadillac lifestyles of engineers and professors) just as quickly as "financial innovation" (the Over-the-Counter derivatives market in commodities) is permanently monetizing commodities, a phenomenon that no government in history has ever been able to rein in once it takes over.

Consequently, all these "environmentally aware" kids are left without a pot to piss in, and with huge debts that cannot be discharged under any circumstances less than disability or death.

That is the simple reality.

And the "environmentalists" are in power all right. That you can count on. You only need to figure the true sources of their financing to get that one right.

#3 Truck Roy | 2008-05-26 14:30

Perhaps we can high-jack the Conservative effort to demonize the Arabs.

If we defend the Arabs, we have lumped ourselves in with them in eyes of most Americans. Instead, I like to refer to Arabs and Jews together. For example, in reference to 9/11 I like to say "Yeah, those Jews and Arabs are always fighting each other".

Although the anti-war crowd is becoming increasing aware of Jewish influence on foreign policy (And we should use that), the Fox News crowd has much more long term potential. The anti-war types are passive fruitcakes.

The blue-collar conservatives have much more potential because they support their leadership blindly. They don't care if they are told to attack Iraq, Iran, or Canada, they are in favor of it. These are the kind of people we need.

Instead of bucking the system and trying to fight against all those resources that the right is pouring into demonizing Arabs, lets ride the money and use the dislike of Arabs.