THE ONLY WAY TO DEAL WITH SOMEONE WHO WONT ANSWER IS TO REPEAT THE QUESTION

THE ONLY WAY TO DEAL WITH SOMEONE WHO WONT ANSWER IS TO REPEAT THE QUESTION | 2011-12-25

The other side seems to be referring to us as the "new method."

It will be fatal mistake for them to refer to us at all.

I cannot believe that any bugser would reply to the criticism that we keep repeating the Mantra in any way but this:

If someone refuses to address a question, the only way to deal with them is to keep asking.

Nothing is ruder than meeting the charge of white genocide by dodging it. The only way anti-whites can deal with someone who points out that their program is genocidal is to ignore them.

We won't let our point be ignored, so anti-whites start whining about how we keep bringing that point up, again and again. Please note that what is effective here is the word "whining."

I keep pointing out that an advertising slogan is far, far more expensive than producing a book.

"If you will ANSWER the question, I will stop asking it" actually says what you mean. And when you are right, saying what you mean is the whole point.

Every extra word detracts from your message.

COMMENTS (6)

#1 Simmons | 2011-12-26 11:19

Brevity being the soul of wit and all.

One thing I notice is that there are no self-described anti-whites anymore on any of the threads we Mantra. That is one way they try and dodge our question. Back in the day when all we had were crime and IQ stats the anti-whites were proud anti-whites.

Effectiveness. Thank the dear lord for Bob.

#2 Simmons | 2011-12-26 11:24

And one more simple opinion on my part, the "respectables" and the semi-respectables will not even acknowledge the Mantra till the Left forces them to try and shut us up.

I base this on Bob's porch talk of the conservatives at National Review only believing in something if it was in the new york times.

We must pour it on the Left, we must drive the anti-white lumpen cultists back to their leaders looking for answers and from there these anti-white leaders will pressure the respectables to try and shut us up.

Think Bill O'reilly dedicating 15 minutes of his show denouncing us? I would pay good money for that.

#3 Genseric | 2011-12-26 16:08

It's on its way my friend. The time will come. I believe you will have EARNED it when that time comes.

The New York times touches on White genocide at the behest of Don Black. Thank you Don. Thank YOU Bob.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/26/us/politics/ron-paul-disowns-extremists-views-but-doesnt-disavow-the-support.html

<blockquote>Mr. Black of Stormfront said the newsletters helped make him a Ron Paul supporter. "That was a big part of his constituency, the paleoconservatives who think there are race problems in this country," Mr. Black said.

"We understand that Paul is not a white nationalist, but most of our people support him because of his stand on issues," Mr. Black said. <b>"We think our race is being threatened through a form of genocide by assimilation, meaning the allowing in of third-world immigrants into the United States."</b></blockquote>

#4 Genseric | 2011-12-26 12:14

Anti-White <b>whining</b> is more like WINNING for us.

Why?

Because what it does is REPEAT our statement/question for White children, but at a much higher (different) frequency.

They have no say in whether or not it resonates. Sing with us!

Load YOURS with the Mantra.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELK_y6EUXG4

#5 ANOTHERWHITERABBIT | 2011-12-26 12:49

exactly my thoughts Genseric

#6 Harumphty Dumpty | 2011-12-26 20:10

"I cannot believe that any bugser would reply to the criticism that we keep repeating the Mantra in any way but this:

If someone refuses to address a question, the only way to deal with them is to keep asking.

Nothing is ruder than meeting the charge of white genocide by dodging it. The only way anti-whites can deal with someone who points out that their program is genocidal is to ignore them."

Wow, Bob, how do you do it!

As I read "Why Johnny Can't Think," I see that one ingredient in the way you express yourself is that you don't allow your expression to be restricted by the "exact" definitions of words that inhibit most of us. Your prose connects things up more like poetry does.

For example, when I read the part of your post I quoted, I was just rapt with delight at what a wonderful reply it was. I didn't even notice that you equated "Mantra" with "question" with "charge"! It makes perfect and wonderful sense to do that, but, at least at my present state of training, my brain would NEVER think to do that! Because, my literalist brain thinks that a Mantra is not a question, and is not a charge, and a charge is not a question! (God, I love it!)

But I've noticed myself loosening slightly under your influence.

I hope you could write more posts like the one above, that we can directly use so the form of them sinks into us and changes us. Thanks a lot for this one!

(And if I'm totally off the mark here, I'm prepared to be informed! :))