THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

That post Bob has to be placed in the "Obvious" category, or the "we are all doomed" one. Frankly I'm thankful for those clowns and their inability to stand up to the "Jonestown Kidz" and their Faithful Colored Companions. This helps create evolutionary breathing space and opportunity for a new intellectual and political leadership. When we can teach enough people on how to handle the cultists instead of shrieking back inefectively we will become dominant and strong. Can anyone here tell me what is wrong with being a white man, could Hannity?

The answer to the question "If that's all you saw, how did you know it was an INTERRACIAL couple?" is because like most people, he sees first with his eyes and then puts on the PC-specs because that's what he WANTS to believe that they are two children of God.

He yells at David Duke because we WANTS to believe that David Duke is a Nazi because of his own feelings and how 'wrong' he's been told they are.

He'd scream at us because he WANTS to believe that we're wrong. He HATES us because it's easier to be blinded by rage than it is to make a living, stay married and an (very in quotes) "Upstanding" member of the crowd. He WANTS to believe that "It's 2007" is a good enough reason to sell out.

So what if it's 2007? One year closer to VICTORY!

... and I still find myself wondering why I answer rhetorical questions. Must still be in 'Ethics 101' mode.

Hannity on the witness stand.

Attorney: When you see a gay couple together, what do you see?

Hannity: Two Children of God.

Attorney: You are a Conservative, are you not?

Hannity: Yes sir, a Respectable Conservative.

Attorney: What makes a Respectable Conservative respectable?

Hannity: The same thing that makes an invertebrate an invertebrate.

Its amazing to think that people see Hannity and his like as right wingers.

(I look forward to another go on his forum)

It appears the establishment here in the UK is also seeing the growing anger and fatigue that people are feeling against the relentless Left Wing propaganda in the media etc. combined with the reality on the ground, and is orchestrating a (fake) move to the right.

Of course there is ALWAYS the one Holy grail, the one line in the sand that can NOT be crossed.

As long as you are prepared to S.CK SATANS C.CK and promote GENOCIDE against your own race, then anything else maybe tolerated and you TOO can become respectable.

I say, F.CK EM!!!!

National Review WAS a Catholic theocratic magazine. I read it way back then. It is mostly Jewsih today on the issues that I care about.

Two things about Hannity:

He does not hesitate to call names when his inferior intellect cannot come up with an intelligent rebuttal -- or when he's just plain wrong. This goes for Laura "sounds-like-a-man" Ingram, Hush Bimbo, and even those screamin' jews, Michael Savage and Mark Levin.

Also, Hannity and crowd don't hesitate to whine about "those mean liberals" when the libs start calling them names. Hannity has the audacity to say he's above name calling -- right before he begins to call names!

Last week I was flipping through the dial and Hannity had a caller who said he felt he had done enough for the blacks (alluding to affirmative action) and it was time for the blacks to do for themselves, whereas Hannity butted in to 1.) correct the man for calling afro-americans "black", and 2.) to say he had no problem with helping blacks (again, alluding to affirmative action) because of past anti-black racism. He then changed subjects and went to a commercial. (This is the same conservative shill who agreed with Bush's immigration bill a year before America went ballistic over it, and then he promptly changed his mind and went anti-Bush-immigration to stay in the good graces of his audience.)

I, of course, promptly changed over to listen to Dr. Laura Schlesinger bash feminists while wondering who in the hell could be stupid enough to believe the sewage that boob headed Hannity was spewing.

I guess I won't be considered a "Great American" any time soon, now will I?

This is why the primacy of RACE is the issue that no one dares address. All of the issues that appeal to the market the Controlled "Right" Wing are trying to "appeal to/manipulate" are simply derivatives of RACE, write large, as the Living Bridge between Family and Culture.

So much attention is paid to superifical issues, that are pale reflections of the issue of RACE, to the exclusion of any substantial discussion of RACE, that one and all are fighting furiously at Shadows, and no one sees what the Shadows reveal.

Thus, by reducing the most substantial issue of all, RACE, to the substance of a theatrical sideshow, the immense Creative Power that RACE has to offer OUR RACE is throttled down.

The first outcome is this: our Children become, to a frightening degree, hollow, self-hating (and thus, self-destructive) parodies of what they MUST become, if our RACE is to meet its unique Duty, and fulfill our unique Destiny.

I think it was Toynbee who was the first to see hedonism as the cultural response to despair...

Might well be.

I have long argued Judaism is the EXACT opposite of Christianity; to see what Christianity SHOULD be, just look at Judaism, and then look at the EXACT opposite, and see how much power has been drained from Christianity by the Institutional practice of JUDEO-Christianity.

So, too, Conservatism has become pretty much the EXACT opposite of what Conservatism could have been, when it was a response to the Judaic/"Liberal" doctrine of mandated equality of outcomes, which immediately and directly leads to a totalitarian state.

Indeed, the most "Conservative" President of modern times, Nixon, achieved his greatest political victories when he ran on an implicit platform of RACE.

Since then, as they have specifically adopted Jewish intellectual constructions - "Wordism" in practice - the Republican Party has been battling schizophrenia, while falling ever deeper into irrelevance, and impotence.

Hannity can not be taken seriously, the "SHOW" Hannitys cohost with the liberal Jew Alan Colmes is almost as fake as any scripted sitcom. Think about this, the "SHOW", Hanity and Colmes, has the pretty boy respectable conservative Hannity taking on the ugly, Neo Communist Jew Colmes, you can predict what each one will say five minutes before they say it,reminds me of those female boxing matches where the females have on bikki's and boxing gloves the size of Ted kennedy's head,nobody really gets hurt, thats show business.

What is forgotten is that all-nonwhite and multicultural societies are derelict societies, the opposite being a social life lead responsibility with the result of a healthy genetic and economic legacy for children.

Accordingly, advocacy of dereliction is all the MSM does and has ever done from the moment it was born over one hundred and fifty years ago. It never has had any other product or goal and Hannity is in accord with its program right down to his profound and total absence of any sense of shame. He glories in dereliction in every facet of its ugliness, fully in sync with the dominating evil of his profession, being a proud and successful purveyor of its only and singular product.

And don't be confused into believing there is any need for Wordism in this. No such enabler for dereliction is required, its rotten primacy dominating us as to rise to the very core of our very own personal existences, understood by us implicitly without comment and counted as irreducible to the essence our lives and fundamental to our being. So AFKAN speaks of Asian Hive Consciousness? I speak of a people who cannot imagine there is anything but dereliction. Hannity's space in the forum is proof of it and where is the necessity of Wordism in this? Have you every met a nigger really and truly in need of it?

And where does the beast of dereliction hesitate? Our tots being prepared for it and cheer led into it with a glee so profound as to shame Satan himself. Hannity is a mere bacchanalian dancer in this ugly ceremony and in such hall of mirrors do not ever mention the necessity of responsibility, sobriety, and courage to a child. It will never make the news.

And if you do mention it, make sure you mention it in a humiliating, undignified and profoundly damaging way; therefore, shave your head, pierce your skin, and mark up your body with Gothic tattoos. Then dress up in a Nazi clown suit and go marching through a public housing district. Finish up by going to a mutt bar and pissing in a nigger's beer. Or if these suggestions are too intense as a means to get you into the news and into Hannity's consciousness, get involved in some alternative brand of righteousness and spin a fantasy life about political potency and fabulous world's to come. Never waver. You actions must always be preposterous and damaging to human dignity and encouraging to humiliation if they are to be run past Hannity's nose.

Never ever do anything actually effective. Hannity will never record it and Hannity will never acknowledge that it was ever done. That would be out of accord with his and his industry's goal of the endless promotion of dereliction and human degredation and humiliation in any form or manner it can possibility be promoted, its only and ever lasting goal.

In reply to Dave:

Good points, all.

I actually believe Wordism developed fairly late in the Game, as the way to destroy cognition, and the use of the Mind as a tool for development.

The extreme perversion, of course, is the inversion, where a word in practice means the exact opposite of what it would mean, in theory.

Thus, "equality of opportunity" becomes perverted into "mandated equality of outcomes," and all power eventually resides in the totalitarian state, where our lives are simply capital to be allocated.

The greatest error we have made is trying to be rational with the irrational; the raw drive for Power does not need the limits of Words. It simply operates, ruthlessly, and only stops when a countervailing power forces it to stop.

Years ago, in Psych class, the topic was bullies, and the Prof - Jewish, of course - was dealing with the issue of how do we deal with them, how can we understand them, etc. He posed the question, "Why do people act like bullies?" My answer - alone, in a lecture hall of more than 200 - was simply:

"They act like bullies because they ARE bullies, and being bullies simply works for them. They will stop only when the costs outweigh the benefits. A good ass-whipping is one example."

Total silence, and the class looked straight ahead, in silence.

He literally ignored me, and went right on, Let's talk about some of the tools we can use to understand bullying behavior. Now..."

The System implicitly, and now explicitly, rewards the intellectual equivalent of impotence. It really can not hold together in its present form for much longer.

I was discussing where this MUST lead on another forum, and described what Symbol I use for motivation. It is the picture drawn by Ayn Rand near the end of "Atlas Shrugged," where the Taggart Transcontinental is stranded on the prairie, and the light at the front of the train grows dimmer, ever dimmer, as Eddie Willers cries helplessly in front to the symbol of a value system rejected by the degenerate society. In the distance, on the one hand, the Hidden Communities of people reuniting to survive, and on the other hand, the Raiders.

I have argued elsewhere that accepting White Nationalism is the functional equivalent of a religious conversion; small, step by step, beginning with finally accepting the plain evidence of the Senses, that SOMETHING is profoundly wrong, and that the foundation of all of this comes down to RACE, writ large, as the Living Bridge between Family and Culture, with Family as the microcosm of RACE, and RACE as the macrocosm of Family.

I listen to people talk about Hannity and Limbaugh as if they were men of substance, saying things of substance, and I feel a sense of pity, for their situation, mingled with contempt, for what curses they have left for their posterity...

I judge all actions, no matter how great or small, in the light of RACE - First, Foremost, Forever, and cringe in quiet horror at the future their posterity will face.

THEIR posterity, but hopefully, not mine.

The next time my nephews come to visit, I will discuss "Atlas Shrugged" with them, and ask them if they can see ALL decisions as reflections of one big decision: "New Atlantis," or helpless abandonment on the prairie, at the mercy of the kindness of strangers, who happen to be their implacable RACIAL Enemies.

The Reality we are dealing with goes beyond Words, but is shaped by Words, in this Earth.

Shaped by, but not limited to...

Coach, I am interested in your opinion about this.

Basic truth and common sense will always remain true, but like any war, strategies and tactics are changing from battle to battle. (the goal posts have moved)

We can not afford to JUST say "no race mixing" on its own it leaves us playing a stupid game.

Asian men in Asia (for example) don't have to compete with all other races for Asian women. And Asian women are not taught to hate their own kind.

Mass immigration and out-populating us in our own lands is the ESSENTIAL, thin end of the wedge.

Without it, race mixing would be as ridicules as dog fighting.

Just a sick fringe occupation that is disgusting, but not GENOCIDE.

When the masturbation generation were planing for D-day, the majority of German generals over ruled Erwin Rommel, and kept the bulk of the German army inland ready to make a counter attack.

Rommel argued, "if we cant stop them on the beach, then what chance do we have when they are in Paris"

I think the American version is "lets head them off at the pass"

At this moment I hope, we are STILL a big enough majority in our lands to ride this storm. But we must put equal attention on immigration and out-populating.

Let me confess that I had some bad news today, and I hope my ramblings made sense.

LN.

We simply cannot beat the system with shrieks of words, in fact it depends on such responses as part of the emotive control methods. Like John Galt we take it person by person. But there will come a point when we can become a mass liberation movement, only after we plant the seeds of doubt about the cult.

I don't know where else to put this but I feel everyone who comes here needs to read it. Here's a link to a new paper presented by the Hudson Institute on The Security and Prosperity Partnership for North America. Otherwise known as THE NORTH AMERICAN UNION. On page 32 of the paper, the author notes

"that What U.S. negotiators must realize however is that North America in the internet age can become an echo chamber in which Canadian and Mexican fears are amplified by U.S.-based criticism, and when the latter goes unanswered, the effect is corrosive to public support in all three countries. Worse, after a period of reverberating recriminations when breakthrough agreement is achieved, the Canadians and Mexicans will be more anxious and resistant to North American cooperation than before and the U.S. public more hostile and skeptical as well."

The important thing to point out here is that the author specifically points out the Internet as having a "corrosive effect". The purpose of pointing this out is to send a massage to the other globalists that the Internet is a big problem and that something needs to be done about it. Anyway, since this is the latest work regarding the NAU I suggest you folks take a look at it.

http://hudson.org/files/pdf_upload/HudsonNegotiatingNorthAmericaadvanceproof2.pdf