THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

THE ISSUE IS RACE | 2006-09-10

I got many responses to my last articles, for which I am grateful. But they dealt with immigration and the third-worlding of America.

Please never forget that the issue is the end of the white race. If we followed the neoconservative program and cut immigration and dediated ourselves to assimilating with the nonwhites we have here now, there would be no white race in America. We already have PLENTY of nowhites here to become the colored conservatives liberals, respectable conservatives and neoconservativves dream of.

It is no accident that the present immigration law was passed in 1965, right after the Civil Rights Act of 1964. It is part and parcel of the same package. The same conservatives who say the 1965 act was a disaster praise the 1964 Civil Rights Act to the skies.

That is WHY they call themselves NEOconservaties. They say that everything liberals did on race in the 1960s was perfect in the 1960s. Those of us who said the whole program was aimed at an end to the white race, according to National Review and the neos, was right. The will lead the lyunch mob against anyone who criticizes any of that program.

Decolonization, they insist, was wonderful. They insist that all those little poverty-stricken dictatorships in the third world were a wonderful product of Holy Progress.

BUT... now that those wonderful colored sovereign states are beginning to get hold of atomic weapons, they say the whole thing is just getting out of hand. They want white countries to have colonial authority over third world weapons, but how they treat their own people is THEIR business.

That is the ONLY difference between an openly colonial attitude and a neoconservative attitude.

Neoconservative means that everything they did to get us into this condition was GOOD, but the CONSEQUENCES we predicted back then are a pure accident of history.

The point is that respectable conservatives and neoconservatives protect libeals from admitting that their whole world view after WWII was Evil, it was WRONG from the word Go.

As long as all we bitch about is hte LATEST MANIFESTATIONS of that attitude, we are AGREEING with them.

It is easy to join in the hue and cry against the latest outrages. It is hard work to tie those latest manifestations to the fundamental WRONGNESS our society has accepted.

THAT is our job. We must turn our people AROUND. We must guide the thought to basics, to RACIAL issues.

Their position had been that the Declaration and not the Constitution is the basis of America, all the way back to Lincoln.

We must fight the fight on the BASICS. Not a single comment traced our problem back to the BASICS:

Bob's Mantra

" Liberals and respectable conservatives say there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries."

"The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them."

"Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to "assimilate," i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites."

"What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?"

"How long would it take anyone to realize I'm not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?"

"And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn't object to this?"

"But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews."

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

"Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white."

http://whitakeronline.org

COMMENTS (5)

#1 kane | 2006-09-10 17:34

NOT SPAM

White people have to survive, can't feel guilty about that. Yes I believe non-whites should learn the language, cut down crime, and behave well, but to mix the races in terms of marriage and to have the government force integration is only going to destroy every race. So I'm not advocating cultural relativism, but racial survival for everyone.

#2 C.E. Whiteoak | 2006-09-10 19:08

NOT SPAM

NOT SPAM

As you know better than any of us, Bob, any respectable conservative would rather throw his own grandmother down a well on her head than take the slightest chance of being called a racist. One thing about respectable conservatives that would literally make me puke if I weren't such a tough old buzzard is the way all of them fawn over Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. It's Clarence Thomas this and Clarence Thomas that, as if invoking his name is a way of passing some kind of litmus test proving they aren't racists.

CLARENCE THOMAS IS A NEGRO MARRIED TO A WHITE WOMAN FOR GOD'S SAKE!! And yet respectable conservatives hold him up as a heroic defender of their "values". Nobody could get a single one of these useless ninnies to even admit that saving the White race might be a good idea.

#3 Dave | 2006-09-10 20:58

NOT SPAM

NOT SPAM

The matter of non-white nations copying white technology for weapons parity is a crucial as anything could possibly be.

Whites differ from all other races in that whites are much more obsessed with weapons than other races and we are threatened with this most pernicious form of non-white parasitism.

Yet today we are obsessed with the "science" of ecology where some of our best minds have been diverted.

Ecology posits: 1. Nature is inherently intelligent; 2. Life governs itself in the interests of life as a whole.

These are fundamentally religious ideas, not scientific ideas, yet they govern an orthodoxy that today is almost universally accepted.

But the white man's historical obsession with weapons refutes ecological orthodoxy.

This obsession stemmed from fear, and fear is always rooted in an object that is to be respected. And the object had nothing to do with "an evolving harmony".

Hence, Aldoph Hitler was not entirely wrong when he stated: "Nature is an order of combat".

He was speaking from his four years in the trenches.

Any soldier who does not understand that "reality is free to be anything it wants to be", soon ends up dead.

White people will survive. But we are just entering a period where our race is coming to terms with the fact that we must return to a life of vigorous attack upon the world and its people.

After the terrible wars of the 20th century, our foray into the delusion that "an intelligent world" is evolving into harmony will be painful to leave.

#4 Twin Ruler | 2006-09-11 09:35

"Racism" is a code word for White people. Blacks who blame everything on Racism, actually blame everything on White people.

#5 Dave | 2006-09-12 11:51

NOT SPAM

NOT SPAM

"WE MUST GET BACK TO THE BASICS"

For 65 years enormous sums of conscious energy and legal force has been expended to desegregate society.

Yet spontaneous segregation has triumphed, despite stupendous effort against it.

The more our treasonous rulers work to turn America into a vast prison camp (something substantially accomplished at present), the more they resort to the forceful destruction of our racial dominion via mass aided and abetted third world invasion.

Yet the natural force of racial segregation asserts itself and becomes ever more prominent (like in a penal institution).

The destruction of our racial dominion has ALREADY OCCURRED. That just needs to be admitted and faced.

Direct physical violence against us is not necessary as long as we refrain from forceful resistance against our treasonous occupiers, so there is no necessity for our rulers to employ direct physical violence against us.

Also, they are relying and the sheer "on the ground" situational and physical magnitude of the millions of third-world invaders to settle resistance matters for them.

So I ask, where do we go from here?