THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

Anti-white cover is BLOWN. Every time we say GENOCIDE, they only scream racist because they can't hide that they are pushing GENOCIDE.

Great to see Bob writing again!

This reminds me of when Jason first arrived at BUGS. Hardly revelatory on Jason's part. Anti-white pejoratives are screamed the same way Catholic nuns holler for "SILENCE!" in class, yard stick in hand. I've been subjugated to Political Correctness on multiple fronts, probably more so than most here.

Is it that they don't know how or are unwilling to adapt? Or is it the fact they don't need to yet? History teaches us that the tipping point is reached at 10%. We see this again today in Ukraine.

Imagine what anti-white terrorists will do once we hit the 10% dissident level state-side and their paychecks subsequently disappear. I can use my imagination. Can you?

They are now shooting blanks, we switched out their live rounds for dummy rounds (De powered the hatewords they throw @ us) What they are doing now is the current definition of insanity....performing the same action repeatedly and expecting a different outcome. They are flipping through roughly 3 words racist, nazi, and supremacist to try and keep them fresh. It's like they take one and put it away so it can regain it's energy.

This post is on-point, as was Jason's comment.

It's obvious that anti-Whites even frequent this site, trying to come up with ways to spin our activity in some negative way. I've seen BUGS portrayed variously, as "racist" or "White Supremacist" or whatever. They only say that because we are White, rather than ANY other group. However, for one to make any attempt at detraction, they have to point readers to us. Anyone can come to this site and read for themselves what it is about, "ending White geNOcide."

Oh, another stupid word that I've been seeing more frequently is "xenophobe".

LOL It's so ridiculous that I have a hard time responding to it.

Most anti-Whites are just approval seekers conditioned to give the same responses over and over. The only ones who even attempt to come up with anything original are the Tim Wise types of career anti-Whites. Or as I like to call them, enemy sword masters.

The Mantra is a short sword and BUGSERS form a phalanx.

The Anti-White regime is finally starting to crumble. If you watch the anti-Mantra video from LipTV you can see at 45 seconds into the video when the Anti-Whites stop reading from their script and start having a brief discussion with each other that they are talking about nothing. Nothing. Just some jibber jabber that makes no point at all.

This video also proves Jason's point further. "White Supremacist" is in the title, "hate" is mentioned a couple times by the Anti-Whites, and they put up an image saying "racism" in the background. The Anti-Whites have no proper consistency. They're all over the place and even sound random when they talk about a "recession".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4eZxhsidfiQ&feature=youtu.be

And so many thousands of times, the pro-white I was talking to would INVARIABLY tell me what my Statement reminded them of, or how some Name had said something like that, or what he had been waiting to say since before I started talking.

You BUGSERS know this, but you know it because I have no shame in constantly reminding you of it.

It took a while for this lesson to sink in. What Bob is doing is actually paying us the highest compliment (whether he knows it or not). He cares what WE actually think. Not what we can copy/paste from Plato. He is trying to snap us out of our trance and get US involved.

Sometime we need to run down what is NOT thinking. For example, it is not copy/paste from Ye Olde Intellectual from days gone by (or one alive today).

It feels more in the true spirit of Aryans thousands of years ago, who had a democratic spirit among them. Other White men were not Oriental masses to memorize and repeat slogans, but equals whose THOUGHTFUL opinion mattered.

"I don't think they know how to adapt to us." Unfortunately I think they will adapt. It will be a whole bunch of new lies and misdirection but they are far from dead. What I got out of this article is we need to keep getting the message out while we have this great advantage. If your opponent is dazed you move in for the finish, you don't let up and have him get back into it.

I read a book preview yesterday and it might give some insight into their failings. Read what is there of the first chapter, just ten pages.

http://books.google.com/books?id=656SnRCgu3sC&printsec=frontcover&dq=The+Sports+Gene:+Inside+the+Science+of+Extraordinary+Athletic+Performance&hl=en&sa=X&ei=zMjxUr-vCIi2yAGj_4GIDQ&ved=0CCsQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=The%20Sports%20Gene%3A%20Inside%20the%20Science%20of%20Extraordinary%20Athletic%20Performance&f=false

I've realized now why when I first read the mantra it appealed to me. I would in the past have put it down to being simpler, more straightforward and easier to defend than arguments about IQ, crime, social cohesiveness etc. This is not the case.

The mantra, when it comes to White Genocide is a clear, pure statement of "I DON'T WANT THIS". It was pure "I DON'T WANT THIS" which first made me oppose multiracialism in the first place. I then set about finding the 'justification' for "I DON'T WANT THIS", which was in the end, unnecessary and a waste of time. Back then, the battle against the anti-white was selling a model of decision making.

Nietzsche, and Spinoza, whom Nietzsche thought highly of, thought that underpinning decisions isn't a free will, but biology and mechanics, what we now call genes. Science is now vindicating their position, showing that we have far less free will than we thought and are less in control of our rationality that we thought. It is even possible we have no free will at all. Scientists have found a way to tell what a persons decision will be moments BEFORE the person thinks they've made the decision. We invent morality and find rational and reasoned justifications after the fact of our decision, to frame our unconscious decisions in a moral way and if necessary, delude ourselves.

The Mantra is just our genes way of reproducing themselves.

We think we are thinking, being rational, but in reality it is largely illusion. Our decisions are prejudice, which is why even rabid anti-whites live in all-white suburbs. The anti-white then looks towards the intellectual to create the words which frame their pro-white bias in an anti-white context. Perhaps there is NOTHING except what our biology compels us to do. Wordism therefore refers to what we invent to cover this and promote ourselves to our peers, another biological imperative.

But it only provides a thin veneer. It is genes saying "I DON'T WANT THIS", or its corollary, "I WANT THIS" that underpins everything. There is not much else, not at the highest levels of religion, or in economics, or in academia or philosophy. One of Bob's blog entries about a physics student who's life was paralyzed because he had reason but no emotion made me wonder if there is anything but emotion at all in decision making.

How can one even begin to rationally make a decision weighing up the pros and cons, unless one first decides why something is a pro or a con in the first place?

Capitalism beat Communism because it had a grain of an "I WANT THIS" component that Communism didn't have.

Anti-Whites and us I think agree that when it comes to the white race, it is "I WANT THIS". Why else do fervent anti-whites live in all white areas? But anti-whites can't say this, so they invent words to convince people they think otherwise. I think now that rather than actually thinking different, they have the same biological imperative they are perhaps unconscious of. The will to obey that imperative however is stronger than the will to deny it and maintain that denial as an intellectual position.

So I can now see how our victory may pan out. Not just due to our efforts, but simply because the will behind genes is stronger than the will behind that manufactured 'rationality' and anti-white ideology. Our victory wont be a bang, but a whimper. It wont be through a parade or triumph through an electoral fight or gunfight or "Der Tag". We will remain relatively alone. It will be an anti-climax on a forgettable day. It will be the anti-white, after his 10,000th iteration of trying to get away with just using "racist" throwing his arms up exasperated in front of his computer and just saying, in their usual passive aggressive way, "I give up. You racists disgust me".

People will then begin to realize they can say "I WANT THIS" and "I DON'T WANT THIS" regarding matters of race that they couldn't before, and from that all else will follow.

Did the Soviets try to adapt too "Mr Gorbachav tear down that wall"? Did the Soviets ever attempt a message of their own or did they just imprison anyone who disagreed with them?

I see the Anti-Whites without a consistent message to counter attack us with. I see them imprisoning anyone who disagrees with the program of White geNOcide.

"What does it mean when your opponent is unable to come up with a new tactic?"

This means team anti-white is optimistic about what time it is.

Most people forget most of what they learned in university, and either stagnate or get topped up by the mass media.

People complain that Hollywood is out of ideas, and running on cliches and remakes. The people that run Hollywood don't have any ideas for new messages.

That's not entirely true. Hollywood is pushing harsher anti-white messages than ever. But these are messages telling Machete and Django it's time to off whitey, and telling the friends of Bear Jew that the time of victory is at hand.

"Kill whitey!" doesn't provide rhetorical guidance for anti-white whites. Everything new is for the new generations, which in the youngest age groups are majority non-white. Anti-white whites are an obsolete model. Their supply line has abandoned them.