THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

STATUS QUO ANTE | 2013-10-29

After these heated exchanges, it is time for us to ask, just as we did right after the SPLC crisis, "What just happened?"

One of the comments to my last article was "I do have a problem with the man who convinced me that the situation was not hopeless just walking away."

Despite what I said, in the real world, that is the least of your problems. One of my big problems is that you know very well that I will die loyal, actively loyal, to our race. Being taken for granted makes it too easy to ignore any discipline I try to impose.

Having been taken for granted, I am also supposed to be "nice."

NICE!?

Nice in BUGS, where our idea of being pleasant is charging into a site where a pleasant discussion of Bugs Bunny cartoons is going on and bombarding it with hard politics?

I am NOT trying to train our people to be NICE. This is gladiator training, where we take people from "nice" membership outfits and turn them into interrogators, attackers, the guys that scare the lions.

The good thing that seems to have come out of this fit of mine is that we MAY get back to those of you with experience calling down the ones who go sailing away on their own verbiage.

I SAW us going national. Seeing a forward movement, as a good officer, I looked at what we had blasted away and what they were falling back on. After all these years!

They have dropped back from "racism" and hide behind "Hate" and "Diversity."

So we go after Hate and Diversity, right?

No, though the reports desperately avoided "Racism," commenters said it meant nothing.

Other commenters say they already "took care of that" by denouncing Diversity before.

Of course I blew my stack!

I have been dealing with stumbling blind crap like that for almost twenty years, and here it is AGAIN.

HERE!

OK, status quo ante, all is as it was.

Except that maybe, just maybe, you will consider my strategy before you you repeat all the SF crap.

Yes, we can win, but we have to stop repeating the same mistakes in different language.

COMMENTS (72)

#1 -frank- | 2013-10-29 14:50

I see no "victory" over the terms "hate" and "diversity". I see the anti-White haters just shifting their terminology in order to continue their genocidal program.

In fact, as noted in a post in the last article's comments, I see evidence of another "new front" being opened by them.

That new front is "Denial", used as a meme to enforce their version of History. Smells like PFH (Politically Factual History) to me.

We need to use the other side of that two edged sword against them. "They" are giving us a gift to use, and all we have to do is pick it up and change a few words, to make it OUR weapon.

-----

I'm going to repeat something I said on the prior thread:

THANK GOD Bob isn't "nice"!

I'd also like to purge all this "girly-talk" expectation of "niceness" in a war zone, and hope it grows up.

I've worked hard at becoming a nasty old bastard who lives to change the crap that's destroying my people. We need more nasty bastards who want to wreck the whole anti-White system. No more "nice" crap, please.

#2 The Asgardian known as Michael | 2013-10-29 15:41

We slapped the term racist around, now we do the same to DIEversity and HATE.

RACIST IS A HATEWORD.

Point out what REAL HATE IS.

Wishings ones race to survive is not hate, forcing the conditons to extinguish one is the cruelst of all hates.

#3 -frank- | 2013-10-29 16:15

Sysop, I'm AGREEING that "we go after Hate and Diversity", and noted that I don't yet see any "Victory" over these terms, which implies they are proper targets.

I also suggested using "Denial" as a part of the phrasing of this project.

Who/What is "GG"?

I can always benefit from some slapping if it makes a nasty old bastard more effective!

#4 -cecilhenry- | 2013-10-29 17:10

Okay, dammit, I'm confused as hell now.

I don't care about offended feelings, I just want this to work. Period. So be clear for the retards out here....

Are we supposed to still be hammering away with Mantra's and Mini-Mantra's?

ARe these supposed to be only the ant-racist ones or the ones that attack 'diversity' and hate too??

I thought that was all we were doing. Its all I'm doing (or so I think!!)

Consistent and persistent message right??

What exactly are all these Stormfronters doing that we shouldn't be doing. I'd like to know clearly so I make damn sure I don't start doing it.

I know we can't go off the consistent message. ARe these tweaks to certain phrases an example of going off message???

Please advise dammit. Thanks!!!!!

#5 SwampRabbit | 2013-10-29 22:36

It's like, when they call you a racist, you might normally say,

"In your opinion I'm a racist. You're just saying that because I'm White."

Now, when they call you, or someone else, "racist", you just say, "That's hate.", and walk away. (taking that word away from them)

But, I wouldn't stop doing what is working. I don't think you let up on your attack when the enemy retreats. You keep up pressure and hit them on their flank.

#6 timeforfreedom | 2013-10-29 17:18

Bob, you are totally right about the whole 'Diversity' and 'Hate' strategy that our enemy has been hiding behind. Now, I have been using the term:

"DIVERSITY AND MULTICULTURALISM ARE JUST CODEWORDS FOR WHITE GENOCIDE"

for about 2 years. Are you saying that this has been pretty much ineffective as a strategy on my part? Would it be better to only use your version instead?:

"DIVERSITY IS A CODEWORD FOR ANTI-WHITE"

I've just posted the following on one my favorite anti-White Youtube discussions:

"ANTI-RACIST AND DIVERSITY ARE JUST CODEWORDS FOR ANTI-WHITE

RACIST IS NOTHING MORE THAN AN ANTI-WHITE HATE WORD"

This video is at:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=butqiXu0iCo

My goal here is to use Bob's newer version but keeping the old version alive as well. Also, with the second line I wanted to discredit both the terms 'racist' and 'hate' by showing that they are associated with being a pathological anti-White. What do you all think?

I'm going to spend the day on this Youtube discussion to see what happens with this version.

Thanks Bob doing all this work for our race.

#7 SwampRabbit | 2013-10-29 18:20

The way I'm understanding this is that we are to remain focused on ATTACK.

When they make an antiWhite statement, call them out on it by saying, "THAT IS HATE." Then, walk away from it.

That's all you have to say. You don't have to say anything else because you aren't trying to change their minds. When the next reader comes along and sees your comment...You've made your POINT, over and over again. We're just making a point.

They say White Nationalism is "HATE". We are going to take that away from them by pointing out their own "HATE".

#8 SwampRabbit | 2013-10-29 18:23

but not arguing...just making a POINT

over and over

antiRacist is a codeword for antiWhite

#9 SwampRabbit | 2013-10-29 19:25

For example:

In a swarm, or other dialog, if an antiWhite responds with a label (i.e., "That's racist!"), you simply respond with, "That's hate."

Any label they apply is "hate".

#10 Cleric_Preston | 2013-10-30 02:10

Quote " They say White Nationalism is "HATE". We are going to take that away from them by pointing out their own "HATE". " Unquote

That is about the same as posting "They say White Nationalism is "RACISM". We are going to take that away from them by pointing out their own "RACISM".

How is calling an Anti-White statement 'Hate' different from calling an Anti-White statement 'Racist' ?

'Hate' is still THEIR word.

Bob clued us in the other day, just go to some random article and if someone expresses an opinion on anything, reply "That's Hate !"

Call EVERYTHING 'Hate' EXCEPT Anti-White statements, that way it makes the word meaningless instead of reinforcing it.

#11 SwampRabbit | 2013-10-30 11:13

Exactly...

making it meaningless = taking it away from them

#12 -frank- | 2013-10-31 10:52

Cleric, I think you just gave -frank- a good slap.

In my first comment above, I referred to "anti-White haters". For the reasons you gave, it was a mistake to use "haters", because it's not only THEIR word, "Hate" and "Haters" is a word we want to take the air out of and delegitimize as a weapon used against us.

Bob has already given us a one-liner to deal with this:

"Saying that disagreement is "Hate" is childish"

I don't know if you intended to slap -frank- awake, but you did. Thanks.

#13 TheRanged MartialArtist | 2013-10-29 17:27

Diversity is a codeword for fewer White people. Sounds like a good response to "diversity".

#14 -frank- | 2013-10-29 19:02

"Diversity is a code word for Ethnic Cleansing, targeting only White people.

#15 Cleric_Preston | 2013-10-30 01:53

On 'Diversity'

"Diversity means LESS White people.

That's GENOCIDE

'Anti-racist' is a codeword for Anti-White "

#16 Jason | 2013-10-29 18:16

Here is the thing on NICENESS. I don't think anyone here asked for that so it becomes a bit of a straw man to attack.

As a result of my life experiences, I associate people who routinely attack others because they woke up in a bad mood with ineffectiveness. Maybe I am too hard on them, but sometimes "grizzled bastards", whether young or old, are like children we have to indulge.

This doesn't come from some touchy feely place. I have inflicted serious harm on others before.

But if we are professionals, we should distinguish between someone who gives straight forward commentary, versus someone who just wants the online thrill of "stirring things up".

You all can have any opinion you like and so will I. But there is an obvious difference between a heated debate over, say, religion, that has NO impact on the working relationship, versus just saying a bunch of insulting stuff to someone because you feel safe behind a keyboard.

If it is just trading insults, I would prefer to snap bones, which I have done before and enjoyed (I believe honorably and certainly legally).

Anyway, I will say what I want from now on, ban me if necessary.

#17 GregP | 2013-10-29 20:28

If you were explaining or demonstrating to a White audience what "Diversity" meant, would you say:

A) "Diversity" is a codeword for anti-White

or

B) "Diversity" is a codeword for White Genocide.

I can't imagine anyone would use A over B.

Diversity IS a codeword for White Genocide. The people who promote, support, or defend White Genocide are ANTI-WHITE.

The policies and propaganda that promote WHITE GENOCIDE are ANTI-WHITE.

This is OBVIOUS, and the true. We call anti-Whites anti-White in almost every single response/mini-Mantra we use. That isn't changing. The term "Anti-White" is always and will continue to always be used to call out those who are. IN EVERY ENGAGEMENT.

Please, someone correct me if I am missing something here.

People have been posting ARIACWFAW for a decade. Countless thousands or millions of times it was used for it to have the effect it did and continues to have.

And Bob expects the same results for "Diversity" because A TINY MINORITY of BUGSers have been using: "'Diversity' is a codeword for White Genocide" for a year or two?

That's irrational, and I haven't seen a single good reason not to use DIACWFWG. It was inspired, if not taken RIGHT from your playbook!

Bob, you've CHANGED MY LIFE. "Mantra Thinking," strengthened my resolve when I thought "all hope was lost" for my race. I have never taken that thought seriously since I was exposed to the Mantra and the BUGS approach. Your books and writings are still having a major effect on my thinking and approach today. I can't even describe how it's changed how I do and approach things in my life.

Coach, no one expects perfection out of you. Least of all someone who shares the same disease. I've learned that harsh, even hateful criticism often has some truth in it that I need to examine, regardless of how mad it makes me. Just be big enough to admit and correct your mistakes. A lot of us look up to you, whether you like it or not. Lead by example. Not for yourself but for our race.

#18 GregP | 2013-10-29 20:39

Jason said "Here is the thing on NICENESS. I don't think anyone here asked for that so it becomes a bit of a straw man to attack."

Exactly.

If I were in ANY working groupeven hard, harsh military onesI would get called out for continually personally attacking people who made tactical mistakes. Especially those learning.

There is a benefit for not coddling people, especially BUGSers. We wash out the Take My Toys And Go Home types so we can actually WORK without writing volumes to convince someone to use an effective approach. That's undeniable.

At the same time, it's STUPID and UNPRODUCTIVE to take out my anger at anti-Whites (or from life on life's terms) on other BUGSers who are in the same trenches. I'm not using any of my ammo on my comrades or slapping around some new recruit because he makes a rookie mistake.

In my experience, it's most productive to make simple, direct corrections and critiques. When I get all emotional about it the other person usually focuses more on my emotion than on the POINT I was trying to make.

#19 -frank- | 2013-10-29 20:49

BUGSer Radio Alert:

At http://www.blogtalkradio.com/renegadebroadcasting/2013/10/30/riding-shotgun-with-truck-roy

Truck Roy and friends are talking in Mantra terms about stuff that concerns Whites.

#20 timeforfreedom | 2013-10-29 22:19

It as a really good show...It's good to see Truck Roy start his show again.

#21 AnotherOne | 2013-10-29 22:25

I was surprised to see Bob change the last line of the Mantra. But after thinking about it for a while it makes sense.

The typical Anti-white that you will come across on the street still uses "racist" but when you look at an Anti-white organisation like the SPLC they use "hate". Potok uses "hate" more than any other word. Their website is even called "hatewatch". We need to do like Bob is saying and attack "hate". I remember the blog entry, "saying disagreement is "hate" is childish." This is a talking point that will take care of "hate".

The same thing goes for "diversity". Bob gave us the talking point to use, "diversity is a code word for Anti-white".

As I said earlier in this post, the Anti-whites on the street, the kind that we encounter are picking up their terminology from their higher ups. Their higher ups are the SPLC. What the SPLC says now is what the street Anti-whites will say in the future. If we start tackling the terms the SPLC is using now their terms will be stale by the time the street Anti-whites start using them.

As usual, Bob is right. :)

#22 Henry Davenport | 2013-10-29 23:30

And so the almost inevitable dissolution of the Mantra begins, hastened by the very man who wrote it. (Begging your pardon, Another One!)

Bob, will you please state clearly, even if you believe you've already done so, whether you want us to change the last line of the Mantra?

#23 Henry Davenport | 2013-10-29 23:52

Can we be conservative in one of the true senses of the word, and take a little step instead of a big step?

I suggested yesterday to occasionally use the ending in this mini, but no more than once if every ten swarm posts:

ALL White countries and ONLY White countries are being flooded with third world non-whites, and Whites are forced by law to integrate with them so as to "assimilate," i.e. intermarry and be blended out of existence.

The people carrying out this genocide say they support diversity.

What they really support is White Genocide.

Diversity is a code word for White Genocide.

Have that ending in one out of every ten swarm posts, if it's felt we need to change. Let's not act like liberals and upturn everything all at once as if there's no complexity in what already is that will produce unforeseen consequences in changing it.

"Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white" is just beginning to get traction, to the point that people are now making banners and signs. We're going to throw all that away? Jimmy's excellent wry (I hope) response to that at the head of the thread two blogs ago I didn't understand at the time.

I wrote more about this yesterday, and I'm already over my two cents.

#24 Henry Davenport | 2013-10-30 00:00

I may as well not even have written my comments yesterday on how hard it's going to be to maintain something that goes against our habits to the great extent that the Mantra does.

Start seriously mucking with it and it's OVER.

The time will come when it needs to be changed or replaced. But not yet.

#25 AnotherOne | 2013-10-30 12:55

HD,

I was hesitant about the change too. I was just talking about the WHY for the change.

I agree with you 100% though to NOT stop using the Mantra in it's regular form.

I'm going to try posting it with "diversity is a code word for Ant-white" maybe 1 out of 5 times.

We NEED to keep on using "anti-racist is a code word for Anti-white" as well.

I think it's great that there was a rebellion against the change. It shows that were committed to staying on message. :)

#26 Simmons | 2013-10-30 10:30

Very smart idea, as I always say everyone has a script and if you know what that script says you are way ahead of the game. And secondly the Left is a very top down cult, by following your advice we are literally intercepting their party line as its being handed down. Talk about fish in the barrel.

I'm being hammered by the essayist egos at Occidental Dissent and I was going to continue my less than worthwhile debate with them, but now I am going to offer to help them counter "Hatewatch."

#27 Henry Davenport | 2013-10-29 23:23

Yesterday's episode was drama that didn't need to happen.

And I'm the one who called for "niceness" as it's now being referred to. I gave what I consider to be a very good reason, but that reason obviously hasn't made a dent where it counts. This group will continue to suffer the consequences of that.

This blog is categorized under "How Things Work."

I recommend it be moved to the category, "How to Make Things NOT Work."

My two cents, and it's the last two cents I'll offer on what happened yesterday.

Yes, it will be good if new bugsters especially (but the rest of us too) will post some of our swarm posts on the working thread as used to be often done, so that if experienced bugsters see room for improvement they can offer it. I would say that is probably the most effective teaching tool available to us, and I believe we've let it fall by the wayside.

If that practice is resumed and maintained as an important feature of BUGS, that will make yesterday worthwhile many times over.

Despite what I've written above, we obviously have the essentials we need and much more besides to do our work. So,

Onward! :D

#28 Ice Knight | 2013-10-30 03:22

Really it's a simple question of where we direct limited resources.

We've got our foot on the throats of the anti-Whites with the terms "racist" and "anti-racist" through thousands of hours of repetition.

Are we confident we have inflicted enough damage at this point that we can now re-direct our resources to attacking "hate" and "diversity instead"?

Tough call.

#29 Bob | 2013-10-30 10:21

I can't see the complication.

We don't repeat the whole Mantra as much as we have. Sometimes substituting "Diversity" for "anti-racist" in the last line is perfectly accurate, and would not have been noticed if I done it in the original.

Just don't go substituting whatever you feel like. The enemy is moving from anti-racist to Diversity so we direct some fire in that direction. This is a simple tactical move.

If some people go nuts with it, they are people we can spare.

Jason says no one said nice and offers to be shot for it. HD said he did, so let's cut the drama.

Yes, when one of my best people throws in "the Jews" and someone says airily that there has been no effect on the words racist and anti-racism, I can lose my temper.

The perfectly calm young man you thought you had seems to have left the building.

#30 ElectricWhiteRabbit | 2013-10-30 11:53

The enemy is moving from "anti-racist" to "DIEversity. Okay so now do I hammer "DIEversity" is a codeword for anti-White?

Me personally I think "DIEversity is a codeword for White genocide" would be a lot more accurate because yes it's anti-White, but it's the very technique anti-Whites use to commit their genocide. I don't know maybe I'm looking at this with the wrong mindset.

I will do what you say coach without hesitation. You're a lot more advanced with this type of stuff.

#31 Bob | 2013-10-30 12:58

I hope you are joking about that DIEversity.

It's OK among us, but in the field, no cuties.

#32 -frank- | 2013-10-31 10:55

I see DIEversity and GeNOcide often in Swarms, and agree with Bob for the same reasons.

Those (mis)spellings are "insider jargon", and mess up the effectiveness of communicating with straight words. Such "cute" stuff actually confuses readers, and also makes us look like a cult.

#33 Jason | 2013-10-31 11:00

I'm glad you said that because one of the Minis I've copied and pasted does say DIEversity. I have to admit I like it, but I can see that it may be too "cute". If so, we should take it out of the Minis list.

#34 Bob | 2013-10-30 13:04

To BUGSERS in general:

I am getting very tired of making political judgement calls, which are my BUSINESS, like: "We have battered 'racist' and 'anti-racist' down, so we should aim at the other stuff they're hiding behind," and then having somebody say, "Waaal, I ain't seen none of that, but you're the expert."

If you don't see what I'm pointing to, at least have the courtesy to LOOK before you throw in the standard contradiction.

You who do this are playing a game,but this is serious business to me.

#35 Henry Davenport | 2013-10-30 15:27

I'm not playing a game. I'm very disturbed by what's going on here.

Back to the meat. You and I are having an argument, but I'm noticing that just as when I argue with other people elsewhere, you're sniping at me rather than addressing what have been my points for the last three days:

1. Can we agree that as an outer parameter for discussion, the movement you see toward "diversity" and away from "racism" hasn't been so strong as to make "Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white" an ineffective weapon?

As I've said, I don't think the TV news folk at those Oregon stations and Alabama stations who reported on the public displays of "Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white" are going to be fired for reporting "yesterday's news."

2. We are doing with the phrase, "Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white," what a tobacco company did with the jingle, "Winstons taste good like a cigarette should," back in the 1950s, when that jingle absolutely ruled this country and shot Winstons to the top in cigarette sales.

When our own sales are finally beginning to shoot up for our principal catch-phrase, should we switch to, "Winstons smell good like a cigarette should"?

3. The noun/adjective problem that I discuss in a comment below.

4. For most of us, the Mantra method we use has been hard to learn despite it's simplicity, because it operates differently from our accustomed habits of thought and discourse. This FACT means that the Mantra method is going to be very hard to maintain in the long stretch ahead. We have new bugsters now who don't quite get it, just as I didn't get it for months after I arrived here. Almost all the forces that are at work on the Mantra method work toward its dissolution rather than toward its maintenance, and ANY change in something whose existence is that fragile should be made only when very necessary. Bugsters have the same habits of mind as the rest of the population, and a chief habit of mind of all of us is to take whatever is given us and CHANGE it, by God, to make it BETTER! That's just one of the forces that in the years ahead will work to dissolve the Mantra method back into the same old same old.

5. The "niceness" (as you phrase it) issue: Your calling us words like "idiots" models that same disruptive behavior for anyone among us who has a strong bent toward being uncivil. You don't realize that's been a problem here, but it has been. Both yourself and some that imitate you have created an atmosphere here that keep many away who would otherwise join us. You're trying to deck out a principal weakness of BUGS as a military virtue, and those who don't know any better are supporting you. And some of those supporters are persons who spend more time elsewhere...I wonder why!

6. I would appreciate a comment from you about my suggestion in my comment (presently #23) above at 11:52 pm 10/29/13 yesterday that "Diversity is a code word for White Genocide" makes a better ending (with the preceding lines of the Mantra adjusted as I show) than does "Diversity is a code word for anti-white," to be used maybe one time out of ten swarm posts at the most (because of my point #3 above).

I know all that is a lot, Bob, but I hope you'll have time to consider it and respond, and I thank you in advance if you do.

#36 Henry Davenport | 2013-10-30 15:42

Please add to item 4:

You model that strong destructive urge to change the Mantra for the "better" (is anyone reading this who has witnessed that urge at work at Stormfront? It's been something to behold!) if you change the Mantra before it really needs it.

#37 Henry Davenport | 2013-10-30 15:53

"If you don't see what I'm pointing to, at least have the courtesy to LOOK before you throw in the standard contradiction."

I did look, and as I reported, I saw current articles in the Wash Post and Wash Times that had in their headlines the question or assertion that even the gov't shutdown was the result of "racism," among many other articles that had "racism" in their headlines.

#38 Henry Davenport | 2013-10-30 15:59

I agree that the charge of racism doesn't have quite the impact it used to, but I don't think it's weakened to the point that we ought to change the full Mantra or very often vary our use of its ending.

#39 The Asgardian known as Michael | 2013-10-30 22:42

"You who do this are playing a game,but this is serious business to me."

Coach, for the younger ppl here like myself with young children this is as serious as it gets.

We know what's coming if we don't stop this.

I mangled 2 fingers the day you wrote the article on ending the seminar while I was at work....I didn't care about my fingers I cared about keeping this going.

Diversity is a CodeWord for Anti White.

Hate is a CodeWord for White Neighboorhoods.

#40 Bob | 2013-10-30 13:38

People keep saying "I don't understand" and "Should we use the Mantra and when?"

Ask these questions on the Working Thread, where our guys in action are, not here.

#41 Henry Davenport | 2013-10-30 13:41

Sometimes substituting "Diversity" for "anti-racist in the last line is perfectly accurate, and would not have been noticed if I done it in the original.

Let me try that out:

They say they're anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

Diversity is a code word for anti-white

Nuts, sometimes I can't do the simplest things. I notice that the last line doesn't follow from what immediately precedes it, as the last line did in the original. Let me try again:

They say they support diversity. What they are is anti-white.

Diversity is a code word for anti-white

Almost have it. But the jarring lack of parallel structure in that next to last part will certainly be noticed. So maybe this:

They say they support diversity. What they support is anti-whitism.

Diversity is a code word for anti-white

Nuts. Complete mess. Now the lack of parallel structure in the last line itself is really noticeable, and of course the awkward lack of parallel structure in connecting "diversity" with "anti-whitism" in the first part and then connecting "diversity" with "anti-white" in the last part is very noticeable also.

Okay, here's the first one I wouldn't give a D to back when I was grading papers in college:

They say they support diversity. What they support is anti-whitism.

Diversity is a code word for anti-whitism

Well, we DO want to introduce the term anti-whitism. But in what context? It's an awkward term just in itself...do we want to introduce an awkward term in the Mantra itself, which is a load of new stuff to most readers just as it was?

Bob, if when you wrote the original Mantra the world had been exactly as it is today, I don't believe in a million years that you would have written the Mantra with the last line being, "Diversity is a code word for anti-white."

It doesn't work. Basically because diversity is a noun and anti-white is an adjective. Maybe that awkwardness can be passed over when the sentence stands alone (or maybe not), but it makes if very difficult to fit the sentence into the Mantra.

I learned long ago that I can be wrong even when I'm sure I'm right, so my mind is open. But that's my 2 cents for today.

#42 Henry Davenport | 2013-10-30 13:48

Also, even if we somehow resolve the noun/adjective problem in "Diversity is a code word for anti-white," whatever result we end up with will lack the bonus of having the parallel hyphenation that makes "Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white" read and sound so fine.

#43 Sunlit Iceberg | 2013-10-30 15:03

Diversity is a code word for less white people?

#44 Sunlit Iceberg | 2013-10-30 15:59

Or even:

Diversity is a code word for no white people?

#45 -Gar5- | 2013-10-30 15:44

I think I see Bob's objections.

We Bugsters are a very small force; our purpose really, is to make phrases and words viral.

"Anti-racist is a codeword for anti-White" is now viral.

"Anti-White" is even more viral.

However "Diversity is a codeword for White genocide", is not, we're the only ones that use it.

I think he's suggesting that it is not because it has been changed too much.

All our words and phrases are made from the same "viral recipe", but with a slight change in each one; and if the "Diversity=White genocide" phrase is not viral it means the recipe does not work.

Bob is trying to go back to the original recipe.

I know I'm the one that caused this discussion, but I'd have to agree with Bob now.

#46 Henry Davenport | 2013-10-30 16:48

Well that's a good point I hadn't thought of.

As I've noted, I have less objection to Bob's suggested phrasing as a stand-alone than I do to making it a new ending to the Mantra or to mini-Mantras...I've tried to display above why I think it clearly doesn't work in those contexts.

"Diversity is a code word for anti-white"

Well, maybe it's not too bad, as a stand-alone. It's ungrammatical (if that's the right term...unsyntactical?) as it can be.

I'm beginning to like it better. As a stand-alone. It will likely provoke responses about diversity...okay, I'm beginning to see it maybe. Probably wouldn't hurt to try it out some, but if we subtract any impetus at all from our effort to turn "Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white" into the country's new "Winstons taste good like a cigarette should," we will be making a huge mistake IMO. If the judgment is that our present catch phrase is already so viral that nothing can stop it (I don't think that's the case yet; I think it just looks that way from where WE stand), well, I hope that judgment is correct. Bob IS the expert...I'll say that again...but all my objections still stand. And now I'm out of here before I change my mind completely.

#47 Bob | 2013-10-30 16:04

Does anyone else feel that this crap has gone on long enough?

#48 Henry Davenport | 2013-10-30 16:24

If "crap" is your response to all that I wrote above, then yes, I've certainly had enough.

"Crap" is not a response, any more than "ignorant" is.

#49 Simmons | 2013-10-31 11:33

God yes, that one poster's stream of conscious rants are annoying, and frankly eye glazing.

"Does it work" is THE test. Almost all of them work, and mainly dependent on your level of expertise.

Frankly speaking I consider myself an A-level rhetorician and I can even use the dreaded J word at times that will trip up a less experienced interrogator. BUT I understand the need for Bob to try and impose discipline in the message otherwise we get this crap.

#50 Henry Davenport | 2013-10-31 13:19

You are simply awesome, Simmons! I wish so much that I could be like you! :D

#51 Denounce Genocidists | 2013-10-31 18:02

All you have to do HD is cut the deadwood.

You want information, ask the questions without essays.

#52 Daniel Genseric | 2013-10-31 19:57

Good Luck with that one.

#53 shari | 2013-10-30 16:30

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white. A true statement. Diversity is also a code word for anti-white. If anti-whites prefer to talk of diversity just say diversity is a code word for anti-white because it is.

#54 Henry Davenport | 2013-10-30 16:48

I agree with that.

#55 Henry Davenport | 2013-10-30 17:05

Johnny Mantraseed (always very worth reading, even if you disagree with him in this case) had this statement courteously tucked away on another thread, but I'm not going to let him get away with that! :D

For my part, I probably can't express how much I disagree with the notion that we have "battered 'racism' and 'racist' into submission". That opinion is based on hours of reading and absorbing, but to give a pithy example of why (so as not to be long-winded), it was only a short while ago that an elderly White woman got nationally crucified for having said the dreaded "N-word", decades in the past, while a gun was pointed to her head. The accusation? Ray-cissssssssssssss!

Our enemies don't use "racist" anymore? L-O-L

http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/topic/lets-get-some-new-ideas-on-how-to-pummel-dieversity-and-hate-1-idea-may-go-2-an/#post-54222

#56 AnotherOne | 2013-10-30 17:58

HD,

I think we've come to a conclusion as to what to do. Post the Mantra as it was before this incident and also to start posting the new line sometimes. But only sometimes.

This is what Bob said in so many words earlier,

"Just don't go substituting whatever you feel like. The enemy is moving from anti-racist to Diversity so we direct some fire in that direction. This is a simple tactical move.

If some people go nuts with it, they are people we can spare."

Were only going to use this new line sometimes. :)

#57 Henry Davenport | 2013-10-30 18:22

Sounds okay to me, if "sometimes" means no more than one post out of ten or so...that's just my view of it.

I wasn't going to post AT ALL today, but when I saw Bob's remarks...

Whatever more is said here, or on tomorrow's blog, or whenever, I HAVE to make this comment my last one on these issues.

Huge sigh of relief from all sides, especially my side.

Tomorrow night is petition night, and I'm behind schedule.

#58 Daniel Genseric | 2013-10-31 03:31

Listen.

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white

Diversity is a code word for white genocide

White Privilege means Whites MUST pay

And

Racist is a Hate Word used against whites

Ass chewing are one thing, but I can't handle the high pitched stuff. Now get back to work and no more power whining.

#59 Bob | 2013-10-31 07:48

That works with me, Henry.

What is really driving nuts me is your estimate of how little effect we've been having.

No,what is really driving me is that you may well be RIGHT.

No one has earned the right to comment more than you have, and no one can accuse you of making casual judgments about our campaign.

I would have been less upset had I been dealing with a lesser person.

#60 Denounce Genocidists | 2013-10-31 09:30

The SPLC and ADL have both said the mantra has done the necessary.

Is Coach Whitaker (and H.D) such a raging anti-semite he would brush off their admissions of defeat?

#61 Jason | 2013-10-31 11:25

To gauge our overall impact, I was watching a Fox News talk show that comes on late at night and a pundit said, "well let me tell you what my mantra about that is" on some subject and immediately, someone else said, "oh God, not another Mantra":, and they all started laughing.

I can't prove they were talking about The Mantra, but what else would it be? It was a Respectable Libertarian making the comment, so I am sure he has been bombarded with it. It may be a silly way to look get a feel, but it tells me the message is getting out.

We are an acid eating away at their terminology. BUT, I think Political Correctness is more deeply installed in the masses of young people than ever before. BUT, those young people who DO think have more ways to break free than any previous generation as well.

We are having a big impact, but I don't think we are on the cusp of radical change just yet. There is much work to be done.

#62 Jason | 2013-10-31 11:46

A friend of the family, a lady in her 60s, who is a Tea Party type (although more openly pro-White) finally said she found some validity to the idea that Whites had been subjected to a genocide (in this case, she was talking about the Civil War, so this was her own spin).

A year ago when I used the term genocide she was adamant that we were NOT facing genocide. She is basically pro-White and talks about moving to a more White country - yet she still recoiled from the word genocide when I first used it. Some Whites don't like to think of themselves as victims, and some can't seem to fathom that White Supremacy is dead. They really think 1950s America can be easily brought back.

After a year, it is slowly occurring to her that it is EVEN POSSIBLE for Whites to be targeted for harm. I'm afraid too many Whites, even good ones, had a cocksure feeling that nothing could ever change their world, as if God had given them the world forever. They saw "minorities" as just a burden, in terms of taxes and crime, but never thought they could be under a true threat as a people.

I'm afraid that old cocksure belief that White Supremacy was forever in place will have to crumble in the minds of Whites, before we truly get traction. And amazingly, that belief is still there. I call them Scarlett O'Hara types. They just can't believe their world can be blown away.

#63 -Gar5- | 2013-10-31 12:08

Jason, on White genocide project there was a Black guy who said basically what you said "Whites cannot see themselves as victims".

This is why Bob says a White minority will be more powerful than any White majority.

#64 rabbit rebel | 2013-10-31 09:27

So much text in all the posts here is surprising me a bit, understandably why. But BUGS's supposed to be less theory and more practice? TEST & RAID.

"Anti-racist/Diversity/Multiculturalism/Equality" is a codeword for anti-White, the terms seem interchangable in people's minds anyways. It sums up their genocidal worldview no matter how they phrase it. We shoulden't be afraid to expose "Diversity".

Anti-Whites have every pro-White idea pinned under "far-right" or other demonizing connotations. Maybe "anti-racist" will be societys future taboo word. But we shoulden't be afraid to expand and connect all the anti-White dogma and propaganda to the core at heart - White GeNOcide.

Il head on and TEST & RAID!

#65 -Gar5- | 2013-10-31 15:56

@ Bob

As I said I would, I have written an total beginner's introduction to Bugs, would you please get the site administrator to link this thread next to the grey "the mantra" button at the top of the page?

Call it something like "Beginner's Q and A".

http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/topic/beginners-q-and-a-thread/ Here is the thread.

#66 Daniel Genseric | 2013-10-31 19:56

Like I said before and it does bear repeating:

Listen. I've been doing this for a little while.

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white

Diversity is a code word for white genocide

White Privilege means Whites MUST pay

And

Racist is a Hate Word used against whites

#67 GregP | 2013-10-31 20:21

I think that was the most logical and productive comment on this blog entry.

#68 GregP | 2013-10-31 20:40

Have you ever said anything like:

"White Privilege means Whites MUST pay for/with our own Genocide" ?

If so, what were your results?

My first reaction to "MUST pay" is that it seems a little vague. At first glance it looks like Whites must pay (strictly) in a financial sense. I think it might not communicate the severity of how we must REALLY pay for having "White Privilege" (i.e. pay for and with our own genocide in every possible sense). I could be wrong though. I've never used that one (either way) so I need to test it out for myself.

I'll copy this to the working thread too in a bit to get input from the other more experienced BUGSers.

#69 Daniel Genseric | 2013-10-31 23:02

No. What I have said and wrote in great detail about here is:

EVERYBODY agrees that there is a White Privilege.

EVERYBODY says that this Privilege will be taken away.

EVERYBODY says that there is ONLY one way to solve this problem.

They say we were BORN with it. The solution is to do away with the problem of us BEING HERE; genocide. They say things like "We all bleed red. We're all one race," what they really mean is "on Earth, whites have no place."

They say they're anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

Diversity is a code word for white genocide.

#70 Daniel Genseric | 2013-10-31 23:04

I am confident you guys can start making these bit leaps on your OWN.

This is what coach wants. This is what I want. We don't get THERE from here if you can't rock it solo, too.

#71 Henry Davenport | 2013-11-01 01:12

November petitions (three) are ready for initials.

http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/topic/november-stop-white-genocide-petitions-at-white-house-need-initials/

#72 The Beef | 2013-11-02 14:21

"DIVERSITY DIVERSITY, IF YOU DON'T LOVE DIVERSITY IT MEANS YOUR AN EVIL HATER!

Why is it this Diversity is meant for ONLY White countries and ALL White countries?

All this diversity accomplishes is leaving White people with no home.

Anti-Whites love to chant Diversity.

They ALSO love White GeNOcide! "