THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

But here is another simplism little recognized.

At the most basic level war is a negotiation of a contract (however negotiated by violent or peaceful means), a means of compelling others to abide to certain demands, whatever they may be.

But when the conquered refuses to comply, the conquered leaves the peace and chooses war, whether they do so consciously or not.

Accordingly, our huge nonwhite populations whose first language is a white language (proof that they have been conquered by one means or another) makes a form of war upon us via the claims they assert under the doctrines of Political Correctness.

Were they to make these claims in their own indigenous nonwhite tongues, the threat against us would be of an entirely different character. However, the fact that nonwhites make these claims against us in our own white indigenous tongues is an assault upon our nationality. It is a rebellion of the conquered.

ACCORDINGLY, RACE CONFLICT IS FAR MORE ABOUT LANGUAGE THAN IT IS ABOUT ANYTHING ELSE.

It is long overdue that white people begin to comprehend this point. When we do, we will be well along the road to national salvation.

Dave, I think you have a bit of a non sequitur here.

Non-whites' issues with us are entirely racial.

Race conflict is about race, isn't it?

The real issue is in our perceptions of non-whites.

Language is the outward manifestation of a groups' mental habits.

Native languages reflect the mindsets of their speakers.

As long as the Asian speaks Korean, or the Mexican speaks Aztec, or the African speaks Bantu, they all seem alien to us. But if they learn to express themselves in one of our languages, we naturally assume that they are of the same "mind" as us.

Blacks don't hate us because we speak English.

They hate us because we are not black like them.

They are figuring out, however, that if they speak our language just like we do, we no longer perceive them as the alien people that they are.

Why do you think that the left keeps trying to insist that racial differences are only skin deep? Skin color is the only way we have left to identify our enemies once they can speak our language.

Once our enemies can use our language, language becomes useless to us as an identifier of friend or foe. So secondary physical characteristics become increasingly important.

Language is defined by race. Race is not defined by language.

Thank you for replying mderpelding because I think it raises the very issues that need clarification regarding white nationalism.

I accept direct personally received evidence before any other kind of evidence. And I am around black people a lot in my daily life and have been for years. Also, I am around almost every kind of nonwhites in America a lot in my daily life, interact with them directly and personally, and have for years.

Of all the nonwhite groups, I find blacks, whether they are African blacks (immigrants) or American blacks (descended from slaves) the easiest to get along with, whether they are children, teenagers, or adults, or whether they are ghetto blacks or middle class.

Here the facts from my direct experience: Blacks not only do not hate whites, they absolutely adore whites. The black women I know make no secret about wanting mulatto children. Blacks are extremely conscious of gradations in skin color lightness. They pay extreme attention to the issue without exception. Lightness of skin color is pure prestige in the black community, in Africa, in America, wherever blacks reside.

The notion that blacks hate whites is floated by Political Correctness. There is no truth to it at all.

I am the resenter, a white. I resent the fact that these black people so desperately want to be white. I resent the fact that they pretend equality to my people in my people's indigenous tongue. I resent the African immigrants I know whose central object is to shed every shred of Africaness out of themselves with unbelievable desperation.

You don't understand Africa if you think the blacks there want to be African. They hate being African. You would hard pressed to find any black African who would not give his right arm to be anything but African.

Now the blacks are an extreme case among nonwhites. But being an extreme case, they represent with clarity the entire attitude of all nonwhites, including Asians such as the Japanese.

It is because of the indoctrination of Political Correctness among whites that whites, even white nationalists, do not understand this issue.

The simple truth is that all foreigners, including white foreigners, want to learn English. That is because English is the primary transmission vehicle for white capability.

A nonwhite who speaks English is a nonwhite heavily involved in the appropriation of white capability. They don't do this because they hate us. They do it because they love us.

This is not a nonsequitur at all. It is central. You cannot dismiss language. White languages are manifestations of our white genetic heritage and like all of our art and science is available for appropriation by other peoples.

This is precisely what threatens us. It is what today's (hot and bloody) real wars are all about. Our (very own) weapons and technology are being used against us.

The central problem is the appropriation of white capability. The core manifestation of it is the appropriation of our white languages by nonwhites. Without our languages, nonwhites have no access to our art and our science.

The realization of this is the beginning of addressing the issue in realistic way.

Just dismissing it or saying nothing can be done about it is accepting defeat.

It's such a wicked, stupid, betrayel. Non-whites learn English so they can have the jobs that should go to white men. Not to mention access to white women. The world turns brown and NOBODY wins.

It's good to know that there are some white men who want to rule the world and not give it up. I'm glad to hear Dave say he is a "RESENTER" jealous for white capability, which is wide and deep.

Dave,

What are you saying?

"Without our languages, nonwhites have no access to our art and our science."

Quotes are mine.

By your logic, the nigger who learns english is an Englishman.

Language is an effect.

Not a cause.

This is not meant to contradict any of the above. Asians also adore white. I live on a mixed residential commercial street. The adjacent building has a business run by a charming lady. It is aimed at upscale Asians. She is Asian. Her product line is female cosmetics.

What does she push to attract trade? What do the signs proclaim? Skin whiteners. Young Asian women see this as a the ticket to an up and coming young man, be he Asian or White. Settled women see it as beauty. This is not the result of a government edict or PC bromides. It is free choice. It is what people, given a chance, value.

mpderpeling,

I am trying to argue with you. All I am saying is something very basic, something that took me a took time to fully grasp.

In southern Thurston County in the State of Washington, there is one the more unusual billboards in America along the heavily traveled I-5 corridor (running from Vancouver BC to Tijuana Mexico).

It is owned by a "notorious right winger" who has fought and won several court battles to keep the sign up.

This is what this "notorious right winger" had to say on that billboard to Mexican immigrants: "Welcome to America. Now Speak English!"

This "right winger" thinks he is being patriotic and profound when he mouths a dyed in the wool Marxist-Leninist doctrine. He is wholly ignorant that he is following a dyed in the wool Marxist Leninist doctrine.

I don't want Mexican immigrants to speak English. I am a full supporter of multilingualism. I don't want assimilation.

I don't want Mexicans to access my culture. I want them to fly their Mexican flags and to not bother to learn English. I want them to stay insular. I want them to remain Mexican.

That protects me, as a white. If they attack me, I will retailate against them as Mexicans occupying my land, not as acculturated Americans.

Get the point?

Dave,

I think we are approaching the same destination via different routes.

But my point is that language is an effect of capability. Not a cause.

Learning English guarantees nothing.

I am fighting the idea that success in our society is dependent upon learning English.