THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

SNOBS AGAINST BOB | 2016-03-02

The February National Review cover page just says "Against Trump."

It makes me nostalgic.

Forty years ago they had the same sort of cover story about ME.

It was titled, "to the Nashville Station," comparing my stirring up the masses to Lenin's coming to the Finland Station in Moscow in 1917 to stir the Working Class to revolution.

It was the first time I had seen a cartoon of me, and I was standing right next to Pat Buchanan. In fact, it showed that HE was following ME!

The NR Snob charge was that I wanted Cuckservatives to get down and appeal to the filthy white working class, Wallace Democrats.

After Election Day 1980 NR and the New York Times they worshipped, never mentioned the word "Wallace Democrats" again. It was always "Reagan Democrats" and any other title fell under The Silence.

But the Snobs found a way not to work with white laborers.

Conservatives had noted that liberals never had to deal with blacks. The NYT crowd  just went to those who owned the minority vote and bought it.

Cuckservatives found they didn't have to "appeal" to white workers by opposing mass immigration or openly opposing busing.

Cuckservatives looked for the group that owned the white worker vote.

They found the evangelicals.  And they bought them.

It was cheap, it was easy.

Robertson, the PTL Club, the Catholic theologians dealt with filthy old working people all the time.

So they turned away from any real issues and stuck to abortion, prayer in the schools kids were bused from, and how great massive immigration would be.

Snobs Against Trump would be a good name.

I remember when it was Snobs Against Bobs.

COMMENTS (19)

#1 Tom Bowie | 2016-03-02 18:20

(Off-Topic)

Going to be on http://www.blackbird9tradingposts.org/breakfast-club/the-big-nine-at-9/ this evening at 9-ish Eastern Time.

Short Notice and have a brief stop by 2 other shows beforehand.

#2 Tom Bowie | 2016-03-02 18:26

and https://twitter.com/blackbird9_9/status/705099497668476929

#3 Secret Squirrel | 2016-03-03 05:06

I am sure you have heard already Bob. Unless the anti-Whites can bully the Trumps off it, Donald Trump Jr will be appearing on James Edward's Political Cesspool.

http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/mar/02/donald-trump-jr-james-edwards-radio-interview-white-supremacist

#4 Jason | 2016-03-03 07:36

I believe the interview is already recorded so we should hear it. But Trump Jr. says he didn't know anything about who James Edwards was or that he would even be there.

Trump Jr, of course, now disavows James Edwards!

On race, it seems like the Trumps fold pretty easily. Anyone else see that? Or maybe they are playing it coy. Either way, we still have lots of basic work to be done.

The Torch Light Parades aren't ready to start just yet.

http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-03-02/donald-trump-jr-disavows-radio-host-over-racist-views

#5 Secret Squirrel | 2016-03-03 09:26

"Trump Jr, of course, now disavows James Edwards!"

Ugh... Someone should fire his adviser.

I have lived through this several times before. Given enough time, the screaming mob always brings these types down.

#6 Henry Davenport | 2016-03-03 20:44

I think I'll eat a half gallon of ice cream tonight and then "disavow" it.

#7 Secret Squirrel | 2016-03-03 21:34

"On race, it seems like the Trumps fold pretty easily. Anyone else see that? Or maybe they are playing it coy."

Or they are doing exactly what Bob said they would do, when they get the nomination.

#8 Skippy01 | 2016-03-03 07:33

A light goes on. "My kingdom is not of this world" also works as practical political advice. Don't become part of the mechanism of bribery and betrayal, of flattering and soothing and stifling. If other people are falling into that trap, don't approve of it. Don't encourage it.

#9 -Gar5- | 2016-03-03 15:10

Bob -

In Australia an anti-White (government?) group has responded to our White countries for everyone meme.

http://alltogethernow.org.au/why-are-only-white-nations-like-australia-expected-to-open-their-borders/

#10 jo3w | 2016-03-03 19:39

I visited that site and read their response to the mantra. It was really exciting to see them put forth such effort to "disprove" what is patently obvious. When they go on the defensive it reminds me of a Republican swearing that he is not a racist, but only convinces people that he is indeed a racist and he is ashamed of that fact.

#11 Secret Squirrel | 2016-03-03 21:14

I just read it. What they say we have seen and dealt with many times before.

Anti-Whites say colonialism was Evil when Whites did it and they say its a Good thing when non-Whites do it to Whites -> Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.

Oil rich Arab countries are bringing in Guest Workers. They segregate them from the locals and when their contracts are up they kick them out.

Singapore as I understand it, the corporation that controls it is going full blown genocide on the Asians that built it. They are trying to turn it into India and the Singaporese are very upset, as you would expect.

Singapore is the smallest nation in Asia, 225 square miles of Islands, about the size of Trenton, New Jersey and is an exception they found in Asia. Whereas no exceptions are allowed for any White country on the planet. All White countries have "Diversity" forced on them and White Minority which was Planned and Calculated to the Exact Year, is openly celebrated by the anti-White elite.

#12 Henry Davenport | 2016-03-03 20:28

[off-topic]

I just sent this to the contact box at AFP:

Hello,

Could you please share this suggestion with the other members of the AFP Board at your next meeting.

http://whitegenocideproject.com/the-robo-call-the-american-freedom-party-should-be-making-to-the-various-states/

Thank you,

Henry Davenport

It was good for a wgp article anyway. (It's the suggested robo-call that Bob liked a few blogs ago).

(Tom...thanks a lot for your detailed twitter posts...I'll study them soon!)

#13 Tom Bowie | 2016-03-03 22:25

and to let you know HD;

AFP has sent your work out to the Board of Directors already by group E-Mail.

#14 Henry Davenport | 2016-03-04 00:46

This from a BUGSer may be useful:

Disavowing a person [or an organization - HD] is much easier than disavowing an idea like opposition to White genocide.

What's [Trump] going to say, "I disavow fighting White genocide, everyone who knows me would say that I have always been a strong supporter of White genocide"?

I assume Trump would say he doesn't consider White Genocide to be happening, or whatever, but then you have a discussion of White Genocide taking place on national TV.

Maybe that would have some appeal to the AFP Board.

Lay it out for them though, since I doubt it's the kind of thing they're used to thinking about: The value to us of having one of our organizations disavowed, the value to us of having a prominent pro-White disavowed, vs. the value of having White Genocide publicly disavowed.

They will probably go for the fist option, publicity for the AFP, and when their membership fails to spike as a result, say, "If only we hadn't included the word 'genocide.'"

#15 Daniel Genseric | 2016-03-04 11:03

They'll never ask Trump about White genocide and he knows it.

That's why during The Disavowal Failure, i.e. RE: "David Duke's KKK and OTHER GROUPS", he asked Jake Tapper, "If you tell me what groups, then I can RESEARCH them and tell you." Jake Tapper wanted it to go on record that, in addition to the KKK, our pro-White activism is also tied to the GOP.

But, both parties have already done their research. Tapper won't ask Trump about White genocide because of what you alluded to. And Donald Trump will never talk about White genocide because the Jake Tappers won't ask.

So, we gluttons for punishment retain our seemingly never-ending job security.

On the 1% outside chance that they DO ask, it will be during the general election. The anti-White liberal media would never waste such a tasty morsel on saving the Cuban Republicans of the world.

#16 Secret Squirrel | 2016-03-05 09:20

"If you tell me what groups, then I can RESEARCH them and tell you."

They came back with a list of 10-12 Pro White Pundits. The most conspicuous one missing was Bob Whitaker. They did not want Trump to research him!

#17 Jason | 2016-03-06 03:49

I notice MSNBC is much more willing to accept that White working class people have grievances than the cuckservatives at Fox News. The MSNBC crowd may not like it but they seem willing to admit it.

Fox News claims it doesn't know White people exist and says we can take 200 million Kenyans as long as they learn the Constitution!

#18 Henry Davenport | 2016-03-05 07:50

Collaboration with pro-Whites can sometimes bear fruit for awhile, but in time they will always return to their basic drive to be as inept and ineffective as possible.

We should always expect that to happen, because they never understand Mantra...if they did, they wouldn't be collaborating with us, they'd be BUGSers themselves.

That's my conclusion after more than 3 years of intense effort at SF to get help with a couple of Mantra projects. My conclusion pretty much amounts to what Horus told myself and others here 4 years ago, but I had to learn for myself.

#19 Secret Squirrel | 2016-03-05 09:17

The numbers some Alt-Right people are getting is staggering, so I think you would make more of a difference, if you post mantra on Twitter. And if you enjoy teaching, make some videos demoing your work and pin them on your Twitter account.

Here is Angelo John Gage doing just that:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3FjxGFBSvhY