THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

SARGE SOUNDS LIKE SARGE | 2007-08-17

I was reading the comments, which you will have to read for yourself to keep up.

At first, just waking up, I was offended at Mark's insult to Hardric and his cheap psychoanalysis of Hardric. Then I had my coffee and read the comments again. Mark's personal comment is wrong, so I will ASK him to apologize for it, but the rest of what the Sarge says sounds, oddly enough, like what a Sarge SHOULD say.

Then I read the comments again and began to get the eerie feeling that they were psychoanalyzing ME without meaning to.

You see, in fifty years or so I have been through EVERY phase of what is being said REPEATEDLY. I gained my reputation in DC when I was in the "working class" phase of thinking. I was an Honorary Boston Southie. I was on the streets of DC and Louisville and DC getting working class people to rebel against the college-ruined brains of the establishment.

But, as Mark says, the white working class, which is different from the welfare class he describes, ended up asking for what it got. I learned that lesson by work on the ground.

Mark is describing the proletariat, which he is forced to deal with constantly, the crowd the Marxes and the Fondas are always praising and never get close enough to to SMELL.

I learned, painfully, that ideas filter DOWN. I couldn't stop working people from adopting the fashionable crap.

Especially the LEADERS. As soon as some nobody gets interviewed as a Leader they try to sound like somebody ABOVE the working people around them.

I will never forget an incident when I, PERSONALLY, had spent my time and position organizing the joint demonstration in DC of anti-busers and textbook protestors in Washington against the educational establishment. THOUSANDS of working people traveled hundreds of miles on buses they paid for personally to join in the march. It was a true grassroots protest.

Then the Leaders made their speeches on the back steps of the Capitol to the thousands. Some bitch from Boston, whose only accomplishment in life had been to get a leadership spot in Boston, declared that she was against busing, but anyone who was against INTEGRATION should leave.

A lot of people DID leave.

Before that, there was a big battle among the Bostonians about who would speak for them. You see, this was a big deal up there, and after years of protesting a lot of the "leaders" had had a taste of a little power for the first and only time in their lives, and that was their only concern. That was when I happened to walk up just as a West Virginia protestor said, "I don't understand what you're fighting about. Whitaker speaks for us and he's not even a hick."

I liked that. I liked being an honorary Southie. But the bottom line I found out was that concepts flow from the TOP. By the time I was essential to electing Reagan and Communism was doomed, my attitude toward any further progress on saving our race through the working crowd would have made Mark here look like Little Mister Sunshine.

But one thing I knew: Things NEVER stay the same. From 1980 on I was in a kind of holding pattern. The TOP of the idea chain was out of reach, up in New York and Harvard.

And, indeed, things HAPPENED, one I could have predicted and the other I could not.

First, those Sophisticated Ideas everybody heard over and over and over got OLD. They got a NAME: Political Correctness. When everybody has been to college and hear them again and again and again, firmly ingrained slogans get OLD. Today, they get old FAST.

Five hundred years ago the Chinese were still wearing the same clothes they had worn five hundred years before. The same was true of the Middle East. The famous "cod piece" came and went in Europe. The West CHANGES. It changes pointlessly in most cases, but that is not the POINT. The POINT is that, once any set of ideas get a foothold in the Orient, it is there to stay. Back in the 50s, an expert on Japan described it as the "most constipated society on earth." In Japan, you would routinely see statues of Jesus, Confucius and Buddha on the mantelpiece while the family voted for Marx.

Where college students used to come out with their diplomas and a desperate dedication to the New Ideas, they were now referring to "the old crap" their parents had talked about.

But we STILL lacked ACCESS to the TOP of the idea chain. Then ideas STOPPED coming from where "the same old crap" came from. The INTERNET sprang into being.

We are fighting the most ingrained idea of Political Correctness, anti-racism, anti-whitism. But if you LOOK at the anti-whit arguments, you will find that almost none of them parrot the LEFTIST line "conservatives" down at the bottom of the idea change chain are just beginning to repeat.

I carefully not that all the nostrums about gun control and socialism are GONE from the dialogue of all but the most OBVIOUSLY driveling antis. The idea that genetics does not exist is GONE.

But the anti-white syndrome is OLD. I heard it on the radio version of Long Ranger, Evil Whites against Noble Indians. I heard it in the civil rights crap. You can still hear it in North Carolina in the play Unto These Hills which I first heard in an all-white audience in 1950. We are fighting the hardest battle of all. That is why it is so critical for us NOT to get off on the immigration track or on the "white people deserve it" track.

After forty years, I watched THE TOP OF THE IDEA CHAIN OPEN UP. It is no longer at Harvard or in New York. The top of the idea train is RIGHT HERE!

Just when the perversions of the Masturbation Generation are becoming OBVIOUS nonsense, we have the top of the idea chain literally at our FINGERTIPS!

I spent plenty of time being frustrated and furious, so I can't blame YOU for going through that. But get OVER it!

I have enough pent-up anger for all of you. But if I were starting NOW, knowing what I know and have experience, I would go after the reality only I am fully equipped to SEE.

Sarge, shoot NOW. We'll sort out the bodies later.

COMMENTS (8)

#1 mderpelding | 2007-08-17 20:12

The so called proles have far more racial sense than their self described superiors. They don't like to think too much, so they tend to ascribe to simple ideologies. They also tend to reject trends, mostly because they can't afford the latest best thing. They hold a line that most of us can't even imagine. To discount them or demean them is a form of race treason. No other group of our people has suffered more from the tender ministrations of our "caring" enemies than these people. They are a HUGE potential asset. Eventually, violence will become more prevalent in this country. Do you want it to be divided over race, or over class? Or maybe we just leave those so-called "lumpenproles" to fend for themselves. Who knows, maybe they will come out on top. Just as forseen in the beatitudes.

#2 AFKAN | 2007-08-17 21:36

in reply to mrpelding:

You look at the socieconomic fault lines within our RACE, and see in them something that seems absent, a functional ability to deal with the RACE issue in anything more than the impotent waving of yesterday's symbols.

They don't "hold a line"; quite the contrary.

The Wallace voters tried to "hold the line," and our RACIAL Enemies just changed the nature of Line. They moved the line, and, today, NASCAR has a full-tilt "Affirmative Action/Diversity Program."

The students at Virginia Tech were quickly brought back into line when Nikki Giovanni told them how to see themselves, and what to think about themselves.

Do you see a Pattern unfolding here?

I have been reconsidering some of my comments here in the Light of my latest thinking on the issue of RACE, and my latest thinking is to see RACE as something like a fractal, with a fludity of Form that allows it to change Form, while the basic Substance remains.

The Key is to get the Pattern RIGHT, as soon as possible, and work it through, as often as possible; quietly, softly, discreetly, but relentlessly working the Pattern through the situations in which it Manifests.

I am actually quite hopeful concerning our RACE's long-term prospects, if only because all other RACES simply fall back into mudpiles. Incidentally, note that China has a new computer game where the players EXECUTE corrupt public officials, and get their Ideas from, and are tested on, their understanding of the Game's Scrolls...

That's right - Confucianism, with modern technology, returns to the Middle Kingdom.

Russia, on the other hand, is resurging following its new Alignment along RACIAL lines, as the "Soviet" (ie; JEW) Model fails, and is replaced by the displaced Christian Culture.

The Fractal, Manifesting itself in the fluid medium of Culture, and from there into Politics, and Economics...

What of us?

I see the RACE vs CLASS duality as artificial; our Underclass has a standard of living undreamt of by most of our Ancestors during the Great Depression; we could resurge much more quickly, much more effectively, with an Internet-enabled Commonality - a de facto White Commonwealth, if you will. Remember, as Devi and Yockey remind us, RACE has a vertical component, as well...

The spiritual foundation of Western Civilization remains RACE- First, Foremost, Forever, as the Living Bridge between Family and Culture.

As my nephews grow more comfortable with these Ideas, I shall expand on them and elaborate on them, using the poems of Kipling to illustrate a point about RACIAL responsibilities, defined in the Framework of Family.

The good news is, they no longer discuss NASCAR, which they now describe as "a bunch of guys driving in circles." In short, they no longer passively accept their Dreams being defined for them.

The better news - they really are taking to the martial discipline of Judo, and might well learn the ways of Judo's Russian brother, Sambo.

In short, they are taking responsibility for their personal Destiny, today, and their duty in the fulfillment of their RACIAL destiny, in time.

I'll take that, and keep thinking about the Fractal Theory of RACIAL Development.

They are also, seen externally, part and parcel of the lumpenproletariat...

For now.

#3 mderpelding | 2007-08-17 21:59

Afkan, Read your own words...

"I see the RACE vs CLASS duality as artificial; our Underclass has a standard of living undreamt of by most of our Ancestors during the Great Depression; we could resurge much more quickly, much more effectively, with an Internet-enabled Commonality - a de facto White Commonwealth, if you will. Remember, as Devi and Yockey remind us, RACE has a vertical component, as well..." Quotes are mine here.

This is how I translate your words...

Well, every poor slob can afford cable T.V., or satellite.

Why should they complain if their daughters date niggers?

#4 AFKAN | 2007-08-17 22:50

in reply to mrpelding:

Afkan, Read your own words...

"I see the RACE vs CLASS duality as artificial; our Underclass has a standard of living undreamt of by most of our Ancestors during the Great Depression; we could resurge much more quickly, much more effectively, with an Internet-enabled Commonality - a de facto White Commonwealth, if you will. Remember, as Devi and Yockey remind us, RACE has a vertical component, as well..." Quotes are mine here.

This is how I translate your words...

Well, every poor slob can afford cable T.V., or satellite.

Why should they complain if their daughters date niggers?

in reply:

Not in the least; indeed, quite the contrary.

Remember, cable tv, and satellite tv, simply reduced broadcasting to narrowcasting, and allow them to turn away from that which deliberately denigrates them.

Also, cable tv opens the door to cable internet (same with satellite,but slower), and THAT allows them to go outside the Jew-controlled Propasphere, AND develop networks of like-minded Brethren.

I have faith that we shall have to face what I call the Rebuilding - the functional equivalent of a Second Reconstruction, but done on OUR terms, for a long overdue change.

I didn't say it would be easy, but I have personal knowledge of White Children whose parents recognize SOMETHING is profoundly wrong with the System as they have known it.

They - who have virtually nothing, and nothing to lose - are, appearances to the contrary, the most willing to adopt, at least in part, our RACIAL-Based Solutions to their problems.

It's a Beginning, for them, and a New Beginning, for US.

#5 Mark | 2007-08-17 23:41

Sorry, Bob, but I cannot and will not apologize for my remarks. I stand by them. If we are to fight for the white race we must fight for only the good of the race, not the 10 - 20 % who are exist as leeches and suck off our physical and financial strength.. If we give them a pass -- or those who support them -- we will end up repeating where we are today.

You say genetics accounts for almost every behavior. I agree. Welfare trash breed extended families of welfare trash. We are now knee deep in our 3rd. or 4th. generation of habitual welfare recipients. I will not fight to save them. They must abide by the laws of nature: He who does not work does not eat. Those that support this kind of behavior deserve the same fate.

History has proven those who compromise are the ones who cause our race to fail. Genocide is the result of compromise and if it takes weeding out the Hadrics or anyone else who supports the genetically tainted aberrations, with their hands out for more, so be it. They are as bad if not worse than those they support.

I repeat: I will not risk my way of life to fight for those whites too lazy to do for themselves. If that is what this movement is about, then I say let the brown skins win and I will continue to exist quite comfortably by turning a blind eye and swimming downstream instead of up.

#6 Hardric | 2007-08-18 01:37

RE: <i>and if it takes weeding out the Hadrics or anyone else who supports the genetically tainted aberrations, with their hands out for more, so be it. They are as bad if not worse than those they support.</i>

No need to apologize, my friend. My family got a kick out of your remarks. And yes, I work with computer software and mathematics, so I am an upscale village idiot. :)

As far as Ha<b>r</b>dric and genetics goes, Mark, it just so happens that Hardric is known to his friends as a rather strong believer in eugenics. You got confused because I told you not to use welfare class whites as a lame excuse to forego the racial struggle.

So I will repeat that. Do <b>not</b> use welfare class whites as a lame excuse to forego the racial struggle.

#7 Alan B. | 2007-08-18 03:05

Mark wid pigs are very clean, they seldom sit where thye eat, I worked on farm in my youth, if you pen pigs in and deny them room to move, they will eat and sleep in a foot of shit, it is out of their control. If welfare dependant whites were cut off from this leash, they would regain their dignity and refuse to be enslaved to that nanny dependant poison if so offered to them.

#8 Back Bay Grouch | 2007-08-18 06:59

This is not particularly germane, but old men orally meander. Bob, we may well have been manning opposing ramparts decades ago. Your honorary Southie status reminds me of an incident in 1967. Mrs. Hicks ran for mayor that year on a vehement antibusing platform. Living on Beacon Hill at the time and being a GOP sort I worked hard for John Sears against her. (In the final I voted for her. On of my cats, Louise Day Puddytat, would not have had it any other way), In any case I had recently moved to Boston. One day John reminded me to register to vote. Now the Boston Election Department had sent some volunteers down to Mississippi to help register blacks. They were very big on civil rights - in the South. I went down to City Hall, took the literacy test, and registered. A couple of days later, John asked if I had done my duty. The answer was yes. He then inquired if I had registered Republican. Again, yes. He told me that I wasn't registered and that I should verify the fact. Next day I sped to the Hall and asked if I was on the roll. The same clerk looked at the book and told me that I was. Later that evening John and I had the same conversation. He asked if I had actually seen the book with my name on it. I told him that the clerk had checked it for me. "You're not registered," he said. He gave me the name of one of the GOP Commissioners and said go to his office if you don't see the book itself. Next day, back to the Hall. The clerk was annoyed to see me again. Upon asking to view the book with my name I was aggressively brushed off. "I don't have time for your nonsense." The book remained behind the counter. Off to the Commissioner's office. Mr. Purley Dyer Chase came out with me and told the clerk that a member of the public wished to look at a public record. The clerk, Jack McGonagle of Roxbury's Mission Hill, a neighborhood similar to Southis, turned red, crumpled a piece of paper in his fist, tossed it to the floor and said, "OK, I'll register him." You see, all these civil rights loving liberals made sure that any time a white Republican registered in Boston, he became a clerical error. That was the way it worked. Just like that woman that shafted her own in Washington these bastards had no trouble screwing their own. Nearly twenty years later I caused McGonagle to take an early retirement that he very much did not want to take. Local politics can be merciless. I am not proud (entirely), but that is another story. As Bob Hope would say, Thanks for the memory.