THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

RUSHTON | 2006-04-25

Those of us who have been in this intellectual battle for a long, long time will find this interesting.

If you don't know what we are talking about, don't worry about it.

MY COMMENT ON THE ARTICLE BELOW:

You know what I am talking about because you were at the AR Convention.

Rushton talked about this article at the American Renaissance Convention.

He remembered me very well.

He always starts by greeeting me profusely and then quickly getting tired of what I have to say.

I get tiresome fast, and he lets me know it.

Jensen would never have the guts to speak at an AR convention. Rushton, like me and Carlton

Coon, will say what he has to say anywhere they will let him say it.

Rushton is a complete IQ nutcase. He really believes the Chinese and Jews are our superiors because they have a higher average IQ.

But what makes ALL the difference is that he sees us white gentiles as FAMILY.

People breed with those who look like them. The whole point of that article is the Real version of "We are Family."

Rushton sees himself as part of OUR family, a family he will die for.

I finally realized that, as long as a man will fight for our survival because he is loyal to his race as a family, it doesn't make any difference to me if he IS an IQ nut.

You and I know a world with no whites and only Jews and Orientals would be an ant colony, never advancing.

You and I knew that the loyalty of those conservatives who worshipped the Japanese in the 1960s could not be trusted.

But Rushton has drawn Jensen and his followers into LOYALTY to our race, something no one else could have done.

Rushton has drawn Jensen into a whole new category that you and I never thought of.

When Rushton talked about the superiority of the Orientals at Charles Martel Society convention I walked out. I had heard too many Jews hit the IQ argument and then go for the "assimilation" of our race out of existence.

It took me LONG time to realize that Rushton, despite his IQ obsession, was loyal to our

racial survival.

Rushton is loyal.

And that is all I ask of anybody.

You can quote this if you like.

THIS IS "THE ARTICLE BELOW," A STATEMENT BY A HIGHLY INTELLECTUAL ALLY OF MINE THROUGH THE YEARS:

(N.b.: Elizabeth also cited this 1995 article as one of the breakthroughs of our age):

"I nominate April 25 as Rushton-Jensen Day, as it was on 1995 April 25 that

Eureka Alert! announced the issue of the 2005 June issue of Psychology,

Public Policy, and Law, which contained J. Philippe Rushton and Arthur R.

Jensen, "Thirty Years of Research on Race Differences in Cognitive

Ability, together with four responses (three critical), and a reply by the

authors."

"Rushton and Jensen both have been arguing, at least since Jensen's 1969

article, "How much can we boost IQ and scholastic achievement?" in the

Harvard Educational Review, 39, 1-123. While the article summarizes

research since, it says little the authors had not been saying all along."

"What is significant is that an issue of a major academic journal would

devote an issue to the topic. The reader will have to decide for

themselves whether the responses provide data-driven, positive evidence

*for* equality. That the article got published where it did is a powerful

indicator that the issue of equality vs. inequality is becoming less and

less salient."