THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

RADICAL STERILITY | 2008-07-14

The Carbon Count is the amount of carbon each human leaves in the world. We are being urged to look up our Carbon Count on the internet and try to minimize it. You cannot eliminate it except by committing suicide. Your job is to minimize this evil. The last thing you should do is have children.

No one seems to notice how traditional this train of thought is. Like Marxism, environmentalism claims to be new but it really just a bastard child of the worst part of Judeo-Christianity:

"Where every prospect pleases and only man is vile."

No one but me has a memory, but I saw all this in the 1970s. In the thinking that led to the movie Soylent Green, a 1972 hit, Zero Population Growth (ZPG) was the semi-ideal. The ideal was Bob Barker, one of the better-known names of the 1970s. Barker said his wife had made him Socially Aware, so he had himself sterilized and dedicated his life to taking in stray animals.

Let me add the ritual statement: No, I am not joking. No, I am not exaggerating. This was seen as not only sane, but the Highest Form of Idealism at the time.

Barker went on to the next logical step of dedicating himself to the sterilization of animals.

Our Victorian heritage gives us the impression that chastity had to do only with the morality of young women. This was a complete distortion of the basis of chastity as Gnostic Judeo-Christianity saw it.

Let me repeat that there is not one single word advocating total sexual abstinence in the Old Testament. "Be fruitful and multiply" is as close as it comes. Both the Ten Commandments and Jesus condemned only ADULTERY.

If anyone confuses all sex with adultery, he needs a dictionary or medication.

The Gnostics insisted that all things of THIS WORLD were evil. The first temptation Satan offered Jesus was "all the kingdoms of the world." It never occurred to anybody that Satan did not have them to give.

Origen tried the surgical method of ending human life on this earth, The Bob Barker Method, but the Church rejected him for it. Human sacrifice was out. It was prohibited both by the Roman Empire and by the story of Jacob and Esau.

All that was left was total abstinence from sex, which St. Paul DID say was the ideal. He said it would be better if Christians were totally abstinent, as he was, but "It is better to marry than to burn."

I know people have objected to my saying this, but "It is better to marry than to burn" is NOT a ringing endorsement of marriage.

What is interesting about the radicals, Marxist and environmentalist, is how CONSERVATIVE they are. Marx offered the same inevitable Judgment Day we have been faced with for two thousand years. Bob Barker's ZPG and environmentalism say all human life is vile.

In the new 2008 version, the Carbon Count says all human life is evil.

Three thousand years ago Zoroaster said the God of This World was Evil, the God of the Next World was good. THAT, not the Old Testament, was where ending all life as an ideal came from, and that was a distortion of what even Zoroaster himself went on to say.

I am not at all sure that Zoroaster wasn't repeating something someone said a thousand years before HIM. Bit I AM sure that none of this is new.

COMMENTS (7)

#1 Simmons | 2008-07-14 16:23

ZPG is a very small cult of useful idiots about to be turned into useless idiots. Not 1 in a 100 democrats will claim to have any affinity for them.

Let me critique you on this one you are seeing the Left here as a monolith like Limbaugh does and why he has leveled off in effectiveness. The effective lion pride singles out its target, Limbaugh is a Jackal who yips at the whole herd expecting them at any moment to fall down and die for him.

Divide and conquer, and what I mean by that is that right wing rhetoric should always accentuate the fringeness, smallness and divisiveness of each of the left's cults. You might have added into your informative post those above qualities of ZPG. Imagine telling 80IQ Yolanda to stop producing carbon copies (pun intended).

#2 Dave | 2008-07-14 18:43

'The first temptation Satan offered Jesus was "all the kingdoms of the world." It never occurred to anybody that Satan did not have them to give.'

Not only that, it never occurs to anybody the Satan never wanted "all the kingdoms of the world" if even for one instant. It is the very thing he did not want.

That's because Satan, being the angel of light, seeks only silence. The "kingdoms of the world" were Michael and Eve's doing, in opposition to Satan, Michael and Eve being intent upon creating a race of angels.

Satan opposed this with all of his might but his attempt to seduce Eve failed. And in the end, because of his love for Eve (a love much greater than Michael could ever imagine), he could not bring himself to kill Michael (which he, being the greatest of all the angels, has the power to do), condemning himself to an eternity of suffering.

BW's observation is not new. Most of the truly great art throughout the world is based upon it. BW shares this observation with every great artist that has ever lived.

The story of Lucifer, Eve, and Michael gets told again and again in endless variations, it is the most enduring paradigm in storytelling and art there is. Funny thing, most never realize it.

#3 shari | 2008-07-15 17:52

This might be a little off topic, but I wonder if Dave would give some examples of the Lucifer, Eve, and Michael paradigm that we don't realize?

#4 mderpelding | 2008-07-16 17:53

"All that was left was total abstinence from sex, which St. Paul DID say was the ideal."

Hey, aren't leftists idealists?

Aren't they following the Pauline prescription?

Haven't we suffered enough under toxic oriental religions?

You have written in the past that our ancestors were forcibly converted to an alien religion.

Under threat of death.

C'mon, under Christianity the white race suddenly has nihilistic thinkers like St. Augestine and Boethius. All content to suffer for otherworldly rewards, just like Buddhist monks or Hindu mendicants.

The whole third world is full of starving masses, all believing in various magic fantasies as answers for their miseries.

The actions of Prometheus and Odin are consistent with the actions of the serpent in Genesis.

The root of all evil in the orient.

The root of all good in the occident.

"That's because Satan, being the angel of light, seeks only silence. "

I've never been harmed by Satan. But I have had problems with all the parasitic savages that the Jesus crowd insists on bringing in to my homeland.

Seems to me that when Somalians come here, it is in the name of Christ, not Satan.

And, have you ever been to an immigrant area?

Dark and noisy. Dirty.

Give me silence and light.Just like Satan.

Clean and quiet. Just like a white neighborhood.

Satan says, "let them starve". I agree.

So would Odin. Or Prometheus.

#5 Pain | 2008-07-16 22:26

There must have been a lot of weird Holiness people around you when you grew up. Now that the Methodist Church is defunct, I wonder where they all went?

#6 mderpelding | 2008-07-18 18:46

Pain..

It is what it is.

We live in a world defined by "who, what, where, when, and WHY.

Note the language roots.

And the fact that the term "why" is metaphysical.

But we also ask how.

The word "how" seems to be an orphan of sorts.

After all, it should be spelled, "whow".

We ask "how" and our religions' say "It's a mystery".

White people are the only people who ask "how".

#7 Pain | 2008-07-18 19:42

mderpelding-

Actually, I should have started my comment with "Bob-", though maybe it applies to you, too. I think that in Bob's country Methodist Churches was where the Holiness faction grouped. This would explain his strange comments about sex and so forth.

Two days ago, I spotted a blog that complained that boys and girls were swimming in a lake near his house "bare-chested" and in bikinis. This was so prissy, I am sure the guy is gay.

You can't heal yourself of your sins. That's what the Redeemer is for. If you try, they will reappear in more shameful ways.

The man doesn't even know his Bible, such as that the prophets, John the Baptist, and the Galilean fishermen were known for public nudity. Yes really. I would gladly swim in a lake as God made me if it were legal. If "bare chests" bother a man, he should quit spying on people in the lake.