THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

POLITICAL CORRECTNESS AND TREASON | 2006-05-22

You've heard anti-whites introcude themselves this way:

"First of, let me introduce myself. I am English, white, have blue eyes, ..."

Readers need to understand this particular psychosis. It reminds me of the Communists who used to begin by bragging that they were born and raised in Middle America.

Why is it a virtue to declare that one is not merely anti-American or anti-white, but that one is also a genuine, dyed-in-the-wool, total traitor?

The reason is that, for Mommy Professor, the ultimate virtue for an American or a white gentile is to hate his own people. For white gentiles who belong to the cult of Political Correctness self-hatred IS virtue. Self-destruction is the ultimate Good.

But, unlike Christian monks, the religion of Political Correctness does not demand PERSONAL self-torture and locking oneSELF away in sterility and self-mortification.

Political Correctness sees salvation as the destruction of one's own country and one's own race.

So monks begin by explaining they are not homosexuals. They are lustful and are committing genetic suicide nad are therefore to be admired.

And Political Correctness has one start by saying he is blond and blue-eyed and he would be pro-white except for his Virtue.

To me anyone who thinks self-destruction is a virtue is simply a sicko.

But you may need this explanation of why they brag about it.

COMMENTS (4)

#1 Shari | 2006-05-22 19:30

NOT SPAM Well Pride can mask itself as humility I suppose. Or try to,for a while.

#2 Simmons | 2006-05-22 21:11

There is so much power out there just by unmasking Political Correctness

that I'm suprised that someone has not tapped into it by specifically

denouncing PC by name. Talking about lifting the onerous weight off of

somebody's shoulders, speaking against PC would vault any candidate

into political stratosphere.

#3 Antonio Fini | 2006-05-23 18:36

NOT SPAM!

I just saw the Da Vinci code. They made the villian, or one of the villians, a Catholic monk, albino White, and blue eyed. His hobby was wearing a spiked chain that bit into his thigh and beating himself with a knotted rope, so he can suffer, like Christ. Another villian was a scholarly English aristocrat who wanted to prove that Jesus Christ begat a great, great, grand daughter. This he believed would make the church stop persecuting women and people of color.

I'm not sure the what the writer was trying to tell us because these characters are portrayed as the dangerous kooks they are, not principled Marxist social critics. The hero is a White American professor fighting for intellectual integrity and historical truth. And not a noble, self sacrificing Black man in sight. How did this movie get made? Probably because Hollywood saw it as anti-church, which I guess it is.

#4 Dennis | 2006-05-24 04:29

Astute observation.

The more like the 'nazi' ideal you are, the more clout it seems that your anti-racist stance has.

Those who have more to lose, appear more virtuous because they have more to lose. They are willing to give away their race, their looks, their likeness, so who is to argue with someone who has made such a self-sacrificing commitment?