THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

PERFECTION IS A CLOSED SYSTEM CONCEPT | 2012-11-09

Many speakers will put forth a concept and then, right there in front of the audience, recite the formula:

"Is it perfect?"

"No."

I seem to be the only person to react by seeing this as a gross insult.

He is saying, "You will naturally ask, 'Is it perfect?'"

No one above five years of age asks if anything is perfect.

It is like saying, "You are probably sitting there wondering what color your mother's underwear is."

No one who has any idea of ever being an adult ever asks whether something on this earth is "perfect."

In classical civilization "perfect" had a meaning, because there was a closed system. They did not think in terms of an undetermined, possibly limitless, future. They read old books and looked at art and discussed the Ideal, which meant whatever was closest to what artists aspired to in reproducing the human form or philosophers of each school declared to be the perfect life.

Our idea that in our ideal society future generations will invent for themselves never occurred to the Great Thinkers historians say were the basis of our present thinking.

As usual the silliest example of this sort of thinking comes from the World War II generation. Their idea of a Real Man, which I heard a thousand times, was someone who could make The Perfect Bed. They bragged that while us young folks didn't know what Reality was, they did, because they learned in basic training how to make up their cot so tight that their heroic Sergeant could bounce a quarter on the sheets.

Thus equipped, they went bravely forth to The War.

So they fought the War for Freedom that put one third of the human race under Communism. Thus they were trained not to think, so this would never occur to them.

As Horus says, everybody but BUGS, pro-white or anti-white, thinks in closed system terms. Stormfront consists largely of fights between people who want everybody to be ideologically perfect. The nastiest part of Stormfront was traditionally the Christian pages. They even tried to get ME to moderate that crowd.

I'm dumb, but I ain't crazy.

The thing about BUGS that is the hardest for people in this society to grasp is that what it is not is a hear-and-repeat business. Just as I am gladly building on Horus' concept of a closed society, we build on each other's ideas.

What we say about arguments depends entirely on whether they WORK or not. No Mantra critic ever talks to anyone but himself when he comments on strategy. In his closed little world, hit blockbuster arguments work perfectly every time.

So when Horus came up wit this open systems concept, my reaction was not, "Did that some from some famous philosopher?"

My reaction was, "Can we work with this concept?"

Damn right we can.

COMMENTS (6)

#1 Dave | 2012-11-09 09:09

Being trained and certified is one the great wellsprings of tyranny.

That Mommy Professor is a trafficker is the main thing her students are not allowed to discuss and they are denounced for immaturity and emotionalism if they do discuss it.

Instead, let's get back to PRETENDING that we are knowledgeable and educated.

That way you get to avoid engaging others honestly and attending to actual facts, which are always appalling and are certain to continue that way.

The wonderful thing about life is that no one gets to take the world by the tail.

#2 Daniel Genseric | 2012-11-09 09:48

What's equally frightening, and frustrating, is when people use the moron minimum as an excuse to screw up a project.

I've seen it happen in 3D. They say, "Meh... Nothing's perfect." And I tell them, "Fuck you! Go back and do it RIGHT."

I really appreciate it when Bob reminds me of this and tells me so.

#3 Gator61 | 2012-11-09 11:10

I just want to take a quick poll. How many BUGSters are big sports fans? I never have been. It just occurred to me why. I've always been an open system thinker. I just didn't have a name for it. Sports represents the ultimate closed system.

Two teams, limited time, limited number of players, limited playing field, and competition over a scarce resource, the ball.

An open system ball game might sound like this.

"The Brown team has position of the ball. Wait the White team has just made a better ball. Every member of the White team is getting one of the new improved balls. The yellow team is has traded some of it helmets for one of the white teams new improved balls. They are reverse engendering it and it look like they will go into pro deduction soon. Wait there is a flag on the play. The brown team is demanding that the White team share it's new improved balls."

Could it be that early indoctrination into a sports culture is the reason that so many people have a closed system paradigm?

#4 Frank | 2012-11-09 15:14

Right behind you in line on that one Gar, and for the same reasons. I was born an OST, and drove my parents-teachers nuts by always having more questions, and never settling for their answers. OST is a path, a process; not a destination.

Most of them think OST is a "disorder", which, from the viewpoint of a CST, it probably is ....

#5 shari | 2012-11-09 18:10

Sports are not a closed system. The introduction of anti-white, political correctness is. It was whites, who invented sports, as well as the notion of sportsmanship, which is being wrecked.

#6 Gator61 | 2012-11-09 19:53

Shari, I must not have made my point clearly. I'm not saying that sports or sportsmanship are a bad thing. What I'm saying is that a ball game is a closed system and many people think in sports metiphores so their thinking becomes closed. A baseball that would go twice as far when hit, would be illegal in baseball. Such a ball would result in a whole new ball game. In the real world a car that would go twice a far on a gallon of gas at half the price would result in a whole new ball game in the economy. This would screw up the plans of the people who want to plan the economy. The economy planners want to work with closed systems. Where things like improved baseballs and automobiles don't exist.