THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

PAPILLON | 2006-11-08

There is a common mistake I discussed in a piece called "In other words" earlier. I now find that papillon did NOT make it after I said he might have.

Papillon did EVERYTHING right here. He did put in the Manra and put in comments of his own where appropriate.

But his work reminds me of a lesson we must keep in mind out there in the field:

I worked my butt off on the Mantra and I tested it.

Always sign off with it every time. It leaves no wiggle room except cries of "Heresy!"

" Liberals and respectable conservatives say there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries."

"The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them."

"Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to "assimilate," i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites."

"What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?"

"How long would it take anyone to realize I'm not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?"

"And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn't object to this?"

"But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews."

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

"Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white."

http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/

COMMENTS (1)

#1 Papillon | 2006-11-08 14:03

NOT SPAM

NOT SPAM

I'm not sure what you are saying here, Bob. I cannot locate the piece entitled "In Other Words". And what is 255?

If you are asking whether I quoted the mantra in full, yes, I did. If you are asking whether I tied it in with a few self-penned words that related specifically to what was being discussed, yes, I did that too.