THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

I asked for help and Simmons defended Fleming there and condemned me here. I replied to him here, not there. There's no other way to contact him. But as I said, it helped anyway because it egged Fleming's ego on, so <i>nothing lost</i>. However, I do hope we all understand that the Mantra rests on exposing, and not supporting, the Assimilation doctrine.

"I do hope we all understand that the Mantra rests on EXPOSING, not supporting the Assimilation doctrine." A very important point. Fleming is now waxing eloquent about amalgamation, but makes the wrong comparisions. Never does he mention that ALL WHITE COUNTRIES and ONLY white countries are now expected to do this,with non-whites. Maybe Simmons could ask him some very pointed questions about that.

You have to know how to win, the strong do, while the weak "shriek and retreat." For one thing that forum is not an open one so high decibel argument is one keystroke from being deleted so what do I do? I Mantra-ize the debate I make them explain themselves. Besides Pain have you not heard of the good cop bad cop routine?

Noting that Fleming cut off comments on this topic early - when it was obvious his cause was lost, three quick observations:

One, it seems Fleming's use of Spanish displays one of the hallmarks of incipient dhimmitude - adopting the Conqueror's Language, and thus, implicitly, the Conqueror's Frames of Reference.

Two, it seems Fleming failed to speak clearly adn simply, masking his failure in a wall of excessive verbiage, and trivial bravado.

Rather like Buckley in that, really.

Three, most importantly, Fleming used the word "people," when the more powerful and more accurate term, "Race," is a far better choice.

Hence, when Fleming speaks of his "people," he is implicitly speaking poorly of his Race.

Classic CONservatvie trait, that.

Fleming is a treacherous toad. Nobody can trust him.

I don't know if he is a toad or not, but I would not want him in my foxhole because like his counterparts on the left I view him as a wordist fanatic. Wordism in the final tally relies on rage and fear, and is little different from the Jim Jones cult in results. Nobody can trust them, just another form of being rapture ready at any second being pleased to abandon everything for something/somebody else. The right question at the right time destroys all these little word cults, and the best thing about it they destroy themselves.

I still think he's a toad. Don't toads try to camoflauge them selves? I even think he has 2 or 3 toadies, who come right in, who are not sincere wordists. Wordists can be fanatics. But, if they are, they don't try to be subtle about it. Act as if they were neither hot nor cold, just very astute.