PAIN | 2007-08-04
For 500 characters, you can say:
Liberals and respectable conservatives say there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.
The Netherlands and Belgium are as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.
http://whitakeronline.ORG
http://www.nationalsalvation.net/
This is a piece of the Mantra I was talking about; if spaces aren't counted, you can add a bit more. Adding the "100 million" figure is a transition for an anti-immigration context. The reason for adding a transition is really so that the post looks more on-topic. If a statement fits the context, people are more likely to think, "Yes, I see," than "who is ineptly posting this goofy spam?"
You have to make it seem to fit, or people will regard it just like you do when you see something you feel is off-topic on your own blog. At Hannity, for example, a person gets to post the blog once, then he is banned, his ISP is logged, and the thread is closed. That means we can go in there every once in a while with an ISP randomizer and post it.
The ten million anti-immigration sites are a perfect opportunity for posting the mantra. They also are usually moderated. You have to experiment to see if the whole thing will make it through, or if only a part will.
You do what works.
At YouTube, you can post anything, it will appear without moderation, but it can be removed later. There is the 500-character limit each comment.
When you know the Mantra will be deleted is when you start thinking. If you can see that people at the site are sympathetic, but the Mantra doesn't get through, then you have to ask yourself what other way can you get the message in.
ME:
Try to imagine what I feel when, AT LONG LAST, you are doing the mental WORK I have been doing ALONE for so long. My gut reaction was, as I said, that you were following what Lord Nelson called the path of least resistance.
And here I have a full technical explanation of your approach, OUR approach. OUR message.
It is time, past time, for the torch to pass on. Pain, Simmons, Lord Nelson, SysOps, DO it.
I PITY the Wordist. All he gets in the end is a chance to detail how those who read his works fall short of His Own Perfection.
I sit here and marvel at how you people are developing everything anew. Sure, I get to bitch when I want to, but for me each day is ORIGINAL, a new day made by YOU.
Let the Orientals worship the old. For me, joy is watching YOU.