THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

NASTY GUARD MISTAKES | 2011-12-11

A commenter made an intelligent remark abut the National Guard, called the Nasty Guard by those who served in it -- soldiers love to bitch.

This comment reminded me of a professional propagandist's idea of what is killing the establishment.

They used to be New York provincials. Now they are totally out of it, not even Harvard provincials any more. The establishment based its attack on Bush, Jr., on the statement that he "dodged Viet Nam by being in the National Guard."

There are millions of voters who served in the National Guard during the Vietnam War. There are hundreds of thousands of voters serving in the National Guard right now. That was the sort of political gaff opposition advisors dream of!

But Obama and the media don't KNOW a single person who ever served in the National Guard. It is a Middle American institution.

Another time, remembering the Vietnam days when college was the way of avoiding the draft, Presidential nominee John Kerry made the hilarious comment at a college that if the students didn't do well they would end up in Iraq.

There were several hundred thousand voters in the armed forces at the time and they had several million relatives, none of whom appreciated the idea that anyone serving in the military did so because he was a dunce.

It reminds me of something that was on Family Guy, when the speaker before a yacht race said "We will now have moment of silence for those of you whose sons are serving in Iraq." There was moment of surprise, and then everybody laughed.

There is a lot of truth that is expressed in humor.

President Obama declared that a billionaire told him that he paid less income taxes than a lot of millionaires. Obama declared him a hero and wanted to name a tax increase after him.

To Obama and his billionaire and Hollywood buddies, this was True Politics. But the thing was, at best, a dud. Nobody outside the Democratic Party's limousine liberals considered a multibillionaire bragging abut much taxes he can pay without noticing it to be sign of admirable sacrifice.

They really are drifting out into LaLa Land.

COMMENTS (8)

#1 Dick_Whitman | 2011-12-11 08:44

"A commenter made an intelligent remark abut the National Guard, called the Nasty Guard by those who served in it soldiers love to bitch." (Bob)

Active duty soldiers called them the "Nasty Girls."

#2 Dave | 2011-12-11 10:02

Injustice is scarcely worthy of what we believe ourselves to be.

That thought cannot even occur to the limousine liberals and their followers. That is how colossally dumb they are.

#3 Bob | 2011-12-11 10:45

As the bishop said in Becket,

"It was worse than a sin."

It was a MISTAKE!"

For a set of political EXPERTS to kick several million VOTERS right in the 'nads is WAY beyond injustice.

#4 Dick_Whitman | 2011-12-11 11:52

Of course, being in the NG these days dose not get you out of the war. Most national guard units have deployed to either Iraq or Afghanistan. I'm pretty sure many NG units went to Vietnam as well?

Henry Kissinger said that "military men are just dumb stupid animals to be used as pawns in foreign policy."

At least he's honest about the military being pawns (for guys like him). I think people like Kissinger are dumb stupid animals for administering the anti-White globalist system.

Respectable Conservatives like to get all sympathetic about the military but then attack Kerry's actual combat record.

Respectable conservatives use the military the same way liberals use non-whites.

Respectable conservatives don't serve in the military and White liberals don't live among non-whites.

Occasionally one of these "defense intellectuals" like Max Boot will call for the augmentation of foreigners (non-whites mostly) into the military or an American foreign legion. Respectable Conservatives such as Hannity or Limbaugh generally kiss up to people like Max Boot or Victor Davis Hanson. They take them very, very seriously. Especially if they're Israeli. Respectable Conservatives are frightening to watch as they suck up to Benjamin Netanyahu.

Respectable Conservatives are door mats. They're lower than useful idiots. Respectable Conservatives are running dogs for the anti-White globalist order. But it does pay well. Respectable conservatism draws a damn good paycheck.

How much does Glenn Beck or O'Reily make on their speaking tours? These people say nothing of any importance. They won't last much longer.

Eventually they'll have to face the Mantra (by a skilled practioner of BUGS talking points).

#5 Dick_Whitman | 2011-12-12 03:55

I think there is a logical reason beyond all others to reject White genocide.Even if you have no care in the world about concepts of race. This is it.

People at BUGS (pro-Whites in general) are people who think there is something important about securing a certain DNA configuration in humans commonly associated with the indigenous populations of Europe (we call this "White"). We want to examine questions relating to DNA and consciousness (do Whites perceive reality different?). Another question relates to mythology and this question of the White "Gods." Do these advanced beings exist in the universe? What do they know? There are many interesting questions of this nature that we wish to examine surrounding this entity in the universe commonly thought of as "White." In short: pro-Whites feel there is something important about the White race; its creative abilities, and its contribution to humanity's understanding of itself.

Of course, we (pro-Whites) could be wrong? Maybe the world will be just fine as a blended humanity? Maybe all the White mythologies are dead-ends. Maybe "we all be the same?"

BUT WHY TAKE THE CHANCE?!

You see, that's the logic. If anti-Whites are wrong there is no going back?

If pro-Whites are wrong then nothing is harmed. If "we be all the same" it won't matter if Whites choose to exist.

This logic is Iron. You can care nothing for the mysteries of White beings in the Universe but must accept this logic regardless. Failure to comply with this logic is advocation of genocide.

Of course there are fanatical anti-Whites and assorted globalists who see Whites as a threat to their global order. These are actors who won't accept the Iron logic despite claiming to be "rational actors." They are a force for doing away with the White race (whatever and where ever the White mysteries lead to).

To the anti-White and globalist forces who fail to adhere to the Iron Logic you should keep this in mind::

If you can't or won't understand the Iron Logic then understand this: We preserve the White race because it is our WILL to do so, in which we WILL have YOU BEND.

#6 BGLass | 2011-12-12 11:40

You see, that's the logic. If anti-Whites are wrong there is no going back? If pro-Whites are wrong then nothing is harmed.

that's very succinct.

#7 shari | 2011-12-12 14:15

Doing no harm is always right.

#8 Dick_Whitman | 2011-12-13 00:14

The Iron Logic is undeniable. It asks a very simple question: "Why take the chance?"

If someone can't comply with the Iron Logic then they need only understand that we (pro-Whites) preserve the White race because it is our WILL to do so. You will accept the logic or bend to our WILL.

This logic is a way out for a lot of anti-Whites. They can say "you know, I was anti-White but now I accept Mr. Whitman's Iron Logic. There is no reason to take the chance on doing away with the White race."

Of course, there are some anti-Whites who can't take my way out. They can't accept the Iron Logic because they're "in too deep" with the Pink Rabbits (anti-Whites and assorted globalists).

To those on the Pink Rabbit path need only know that we preserve the White race because it is our WILL to do so, in which we WILL have you bend.

I suggest anti-Whites accept the Iron Logic.