MDERPELDING FORCES ME TO LOOK AT THE IDEA CHAIN - THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

MDERPELDING FORCES ME TO LOOK AT THE IDEA CHAIN | 2008-08-10

It is a shame when mderpelding goes into a cynicism kick or some other dead end, because he is so valuable.

Let me hasten to add that I go into funks and dead ends myself. When I am talking about BUGS with others, I love tell them about the time I started bitching about how tired I was and how I might have to quit, hinting it was because you were failing me.

One of our BUGS told me exactly what I would have said to anybody else here: "Bob, for God's sake, if you're going to quit, QUIT. Stop WHINING about it."

Not only can I take a kick in the ass when I need it, I am PROUD of it.

So whatever mderpelding gets off on, I read carefully what he says. In the midst of his diatribe, he said he was not interested in General Lee, he was interested in people who WON.

This got me to thinking about his point, and that led me to talk about someone who was a winner almost perfectly parallel to us: Franz Boas.

Franz Boas was a Prussian Jew who came to America full of hatred for all white gentiles. His are the ideas that the Greatest Generation imposed on all Americans. Franz Boas knew all about the chain of ideas.

In Boaz's time the chain of ideas began at the universities. Since nobody is interested in the chain of ideas but us in BUGS, no one but me notes that this is where a giant change has taken place in my lifetime. There was a time when you could trace an idea back to its ACADEMIC origin: Kant, Marx, DeGobineau, Nietzsche, Keynes. All the ideas came with a name out of academia.

It should be headlines that this is no longer true. Every new idea comes out of the Internet now. Academia now is like the churches in the nineteenth century: they are out to suppress all heresy.

But in his time, Boas saw where the chain of ideas began and acted accordingly. If you look at the books of Boas, Kluckhohn, "Ashley Montague," and Margaret Meade, it is amazing how often they simply quote each other. The declared purpose of what they decided to call "social anthropology" was to prove the races equal...

They formed one of those little cliques Dave refers to when he says that all great changes in thought come from a small group of that sort.

Yes, mderpelding, I was wrong to emphasize General Lee on several counts. He not only lost, but the Civil War itself was the result of a failure in the Real War, the one we are waging, the one Boas waged. When a country descends into civil war, the idea chain has long since FAILED.

The REAL war is right here, in the idea chain. War occurs when those who should have fought through the chain of ideas decades before the conflict starts, have failed.

COMMENTS (3)

#1 Dave | 2008-08-10 20:31

"The REAL war is right here, in the idea chain."

It just drives me crazy that so few Americans have any notion of real American history. They think our history is what they watch on PBS.

When BW said, "War occurs when those who should have fought through the chain of ideas decades before the conflict starts, have failed", he just explained the real reason for the Civil War (which actually started four generations earlier than the start of hostilities in Kansas in 1854).

With the founding of the "American Republic" the argument just got hotter and steadily hotter for 80 years before it finally boiled over in Kansas in 1854, and the argument is still going on today.

And the "American Republic" never worked. It was a failure right out the shoot.

However, the American people are taught a myth that has nothing to do with the truth, and the truth is our Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, and Nordic heritages of freedom that go straight back to antiquity.

Our real tradition is very circumspect about waving flags and always has been. And it was never our tradition that a young seaman is justly the nigger of an Admiral, as today's Pentagon has it (and more screwed up than anything Orwell could imagine).

I, for one, am sick of hearing nonsense about "the Founding Fathers". My ears close.

What separate Anglo-Saxons, Germanics, and Nordics from all nonwhite races are our very real traditions of freedom that never had anything to do with a government.

And there are no nonwhites anywhere with anything approximating our genetically based traditions of freedom, traditions entirely separate from the fact that we are Americans.

But this is BIG LIE number one with the US government and has been for decades: "The American mission is to spread democracy and respect for human rights throughout the world".

Never mentioned is the attitude: **I** WILL NOT SUBORDINATE **MYSELF** TO ANYONE (OR ANY INSTITUTION) ON THE ACCOUNT OF A UNIFORM (any kind of uniform, metaphorical or actual).

Just let these uniformed bastards try to censor the Internet.

#2 AFKANNow | 2008-08-10 22:31

One, if we look at the issue of Wordism and our Institutions - ALL of our Institutions - I think we see two interweaving developments shaping so many of our current difficulties.

People who live in, work for, and are largely defined by Institutions must accept commonplace lies - commonly agreed upon social practice, that crystallize in mores, and finally in policies.

All of them are simply not true enough, often enough, to form a reliable basis for our intellectual Reality.

Worse, they act to keep us in a state of Child-like subservience to the Institutions.

Notice one think Institutions have in common with Childhood - Adolescent bullies:

If you raise your hand to defend yourself, not by attacking but simply to soften the oncoming blows, you are treated as engaging in an act of Resistance.

THIS is what the bully truly wishes to crush, he interprets your feeble attempts at self-defense as resistance, and redouble his efforts.

In so many ways, the gelding of the American male has turned us into a nation who complain, and then, adapt the bully's Values, making them our own.

We then go mad as we attempt to grow out of Adolescence, while being forced into ever more perverted models of behavior.

The Answer, for all too many of us, in to seek tranquilizers - and alcohol, while identifying with Safe groups - GROUPS - as a means of vicariously compensating for our lack of the Adult Masculine.

Ergo, daily, we try to deal with a Social Reality that truly hates us, and what we stand for, personally and Racially.

At night, on goes the NFL Channel, a college football channel, plain old ESPN, or, for the younger among us, X-Box and HALO 3.

Two, we are taught that "America" came full-blown from the Founding Fathers. No one look too closely at the actual goings-on in Philadelphia, where a nascent Confederate States of America became crystallized into the United States of America, and an entire national model was hijacked, much less WHY this happened.

Three, going from the Founding of one America, to the Founding of another America, the fact that all five candidates for the presidency of Mexico started their last election in Los Angeles is a signal event as to where America is going, and it is not good. In effect, this was the beginning of the process that will lead to their Philadelphia Convention.

In Spanish.

The idea chain that leads to that simply reflects a demographic reality very few dare to criticize, but all will have to deal with, one way or another.

Three, Dave observed:

<blockquote cite="">Just let these uniformed bastards try to censor the Internet./<blockquote cite="">

in reply:

It's already being done, piecemeal.

Essentially, the major ISP's have concentrated a tremendous amount of power in their hands, particularly the high speed guys. Further control comes from AT&T controlling the Internet's backbone.

Thus, we are being systematically "disappeared," one blog at a time, one site at a time. Michael Hoffman's new book won't be sold by Amazon, and his blog has been removed by Google.

Guess the topic of Hoffman's new book?

This an be done, not simply because of the Terms of Service in all ISP contracts, which allow them to remove you at any time, just because they choose to do so.

No.

You have NO legal standing on a much more substantive principle - and you read this here first:

What passes over the Internet is CONTENT, and not SPEECH, for the purposes of the First Amendment.

And content which is privately transmitted, can be privately controlled.

The Good News is this:

By the time they do this, it will be obvious to one and all what is really going on, and why.

They might just up the meds, crack back on the applejack, and turn up the NFL Chanel a little louder, but that's their choice.

My choice is a bit different.</blockquote></blockquote>

#3 Simmons | 2008-08-11 11:44

I'll take a stab at guessing Hoffman's subject, "Revealed, The Secrets of the Jews", huh?

When we need a space ship booster like "2001" we get Gemini space shots like Shepard's blip into space.

Back to Mr. Duke, he produced an auto-biography several hundred pages long. Run of the mill stuff an interesting beginning and tails off into "Secrets" at the end, and yes I bought it read most of it and then filed it into the closet. Still his most interesting sentence was written recently rightly highlighted by Bob, it was Duke's executive summary of the Mantra.

Now back to censorship worst case scenario all the "Secrets" pontificators get locked up in the big houses of their respective law enforcement jurisdictions where then they communicate by tapping on the walls. The Mantra army won't need friendly ISPs because they will be everywhere asking that serious question, "You want our genoicide and my complicity in it?"