THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

MARK, ANTONIO AND ANONOWITZ | 2006-05-01

Mark, great minds think alike.

You and Antonio both brought up this heredity theme.

LibAnon also brought up the enormity of what we are trying to do here in his comment:

"we are still the only humans in town"

This is a hard saying; who can hear it?

Jews have always believed that there's an "ontological difference" between us and them. Aside from detail that they think THEY'RE the humans and WE'RE the animals, is the distinction you're making similar?

Please understand that this is not a trick question or a challenge of some sort. It's just that your reply to my post made me realize for the first time the enormity, and hence the enormous difficulty, of what you're trying to do with this blog. Anybody, either at the ADL or on Stormfront, who thinks that what you're trying to say here is easy to understand is foolish and even dangerous. I'm trying not to fall into that trap myself, and that's why I'm asking questions.

Comment by Bride of LibAnon (for those who missed a chapter of our soap opera, this signature is in reference to my entitling a second reference to LibAnon one day as "The Return of the Killer LibAnon") *

I hope this statement will cover your points:

Yes, the suicical tendency of the Aryan race IS genetic, but it is also an evolutionary breakthrough. It can be fatal, but the reason we are suicidal is because we whites have reached a new stage of evolution.

Every animal has always fought to preserve its life. In fact, our puzzlement over lemmings and beached whales is the exception that proves the rule.

The question is this: "Can a being that has reached the novel level of questioning its own existence survive?"

If we cannot, then humans are doomed to remain very large ants for the remainder of their existence.

And our existence will be limited like that of any other animal that is now extinct.

When the next giant meteor hits the earth, if hte white race has been gone for millennia, it will wipe us out. The same brain that can learn about meteors and counter them is also a brain that can look outside itself enough to question its own existence.

So today Christianity has degenerated into self-hatred and Judaism has degenerated into self-pity.

The very existence of Jews requires that they consider themselves a people apart. The very existence of Jews, given the nature of the human animal, is that they consider all other groups to be their enemies.

So the basic Jewish stratgy is to use anything they can to destroy white gentiles. The most obvious tool to do this is our tendency to feel guilt and to question the value of life itself.

BUT, and this is a CRITICAL but, if you get obsessed with the uniqueness of Jews you miss the evolutionary point here.

If it weren't the Jews, some other group would be using this against us.

New England used white guilt over slavery to turn the West against the South long before the present Jewish power developed.

Every Catholic country ended up being for race mixing, the official policy called assimilacion, because they said citizenwhip was based entirely on one's loyalty to The Only True Faith, no matter hwat color you were.

And this was back when Jews were still in the ghettoes.

The question is one of survival:

Can a race which reaches the level where it questions the animal urge to survive itself survive?

That is the question we are deciding today.

If we lose, what we call "mankind" is doomed to being a huge anthill of rising and falling slave pits called Great Civilizations. And what we call the "human race" will go out like the Permian Extinction and the dinosaurs after it.

The Jews are enemy, but they are NOT The Question.

WE are the Question, the most important Question of all time.

Mark begins with a quote from me -- the guy's got good taste:

"Animals and other races do not question whether life is worth living.

Aryans do.

The result is that we keep producing religions that degenerate into genetic suicide."

Couldn't it be genetic? Depression and mental illness runs in families, as does alocholism, abusing others, and many other unsavory traits. Why can't we just conclude that the white race has a self destructive genetic code built in. In physical sceience class in high school I was taught the more you refine something the more volitile and unstable it becomes. Perhaps human "perfection" really is outside our reach.

Comment by Mark

* Buckley uses untranslated French to impress people with how Sophisticated he is. LibAnon and I are trying to demonstrate to you that we, too, were exposed to High Culture in OUR youth.

Eat your hearts out, peasants!

COMMENTS (2)

#1 LibAnon | 2006-05-01 19:04

"I hope this statement will cover your points."

Yes, it does. I finally get it now. That's a bit of an understatement, actually. It would be more accurate to say that after a lifetime of pulling the handle, I've finally seen the three apples line up and now I'm watching the money pour out of the machine.

"C'est l'enjeu du sicle," as William F. Buckley would say.

It's not actually what you WROTE in that post that did this for me. Nobody can understand what you say unless they actually THINK about it. As you've been saying all along, of course. And now that I understand what you're saying, I now see how hard it is to explain.

No wonder you've had a hard life. Wow.

#2 Dennis | 2006-05-02 10:19

This is definately the most interesting blog you have ever made, at least from my perspective.

The problem of intellectual development, and the problem our race faces specifically has been one that has bothered me for a while.

It is a forgone conclusion that once any intelligent race begins to question its own existence, it does. It also stands to reason that any intelligent race which questions it own existance, and has the capacity to act in a way deterimental to it, will.

It also stands to reason, that as soon as white people fail, another race will come to where we are, and quite possibly do the same.

If we are to be philosophical about it, we could argue that nature is eliminating the genetics that allow a creature to question its own survival. Races and species that decide they don't need to survive do not compete with those that don't question. It appears evolution has a hard limit on how much intelligence any race or species can have, and if these are the questions we are facing, and the problems we are facing, then as mankind we may have reached our intellectual capacity. Nature affords us no more.

I disagree with the idea that it is genetic, I firmly believe it is imply intellectual phenomenon, not genetics. There is no answer to life, and any species with the ability to ask the question can only arrive to the same conclusion.

What we are experiencing isn't the effects of bad genetics, but the growing pains of a growing mind.