MARK | 2007-08-19
Bob, your point of view on eugenics is all wet.
Eugenics has never been attempted in large enough numbers to count. The rulers did the get the best women, but there were a million times more peasants who reproduced at a much higher rate, spreading their inferior genes. If eugencis was tried on a MASSIVE level we would see fantastic and wonderful results.
ME:
As I have pointed ut at least a dozen times here, eugenics is goig to become a PRACTICAL concern in the this century, not just a theoretical one, as we learn to pick genes in a practical way. But like everything else, it wil be used against whites.
As I pointed out, it already IS being used against whites.
And your current jag notwithstanding, RACE is the purpose of this blog.
The argument is that interracial marriage is fine becuse the best will sort themselves out, regardless of race. That is the history I was addressing. But as we begin to SELECT our genes, this non-racial eugencis stuff is going to become fanatical.
The argument that anyone who mentions genetics is anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews has gone out. Naturally, as usual, I am the one looking for what will replace it. In the next generation everybody will say they knew it, but at this moment, the idea that eugenics will be used AGAINST race sounds like us "Nazis" have gone NUTS.
You are going to have an uphill struggle explaining why eugenics,which is inevitable, has to be INTRAracial. But by then you will have powerful allies who control the future.
In a couple of decades everybody s going to say they knew what I wrote about in 1976, that there is going to be a collision between the science establishent and the old SOCIAL science establishment. I have talked about it half a dozen times here, but it doesn't have the sex appeal of a big story on TV.
When the establishments really start to collide, we will need to concentrate on preventing them from destroying us in the name of "pure" eugenics. It will be easier than it now appears.
I have been talking abut eugenics endlessly here, but you don't seem to have noticed.
You don't have to advocate it. All the Bible-thumpers and social scientists together can't STOP it.