THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

MARK | 2006-09-15

NOT SPAM

NOT SPAM

Okay Bob, Enough already!!!!! Are you starting the Preamble

Part for real, and if so, how can I/we help, and what do we need

to do? Aaaaaaagggghhhh!!!!!!!!

Comment by Mark

ME:

This gives me a chance to explain how I have exercised power.

Mark, you being very flattering, but the question is somewhat ironic.

You are asking me if I am going to form a political party when I can't even motivate my readers to copy and paste a short statement on the Internet.

It requires a past master to even SEE how I exert power. The Preamble Party is a master stroke just as it is, as an idea that will be used. But how can I explain a lifetime of experience in using this kind of thing?

Every Great Historical Leader has done nothing but carry out an idea someone else thought of.

Everybody's heard of Hitler. Practically nobody has heard of Gobineau.

The concept that Political Correctness is a religion is laready the subject of Ann Coulter's latest book, "The Churchof Liberalism."

I spent many years urging the political effort that led to Wallace's ten million votes in 1968. I spent another twelve years in turning that into the Reagan victory that took out the Soviet Empire. I was indespesable to BOTH these processes, but I worked ALONE, with the same kind of in-and-our help from a few visionaries that I have gotten here.

In 1982 I was the only person a major publisher would have do The New Right Papers. I was the one National Review had a cover article attacking as the basis of what became the winning Reagan Coalition. But I could not have done any of this if I had dedicated myself to getting people off of their preesent obsessions and do what needs doing.

Everybody sees themselves as leading the giant marches we see historians writing about. But those historians know NOTHING about real power. Power does not mean being Fuhrer. Power does not mean leading a Giant March. Power does not "come from the barrel of a gun!" as the old drunk kept screaming in New Orleans.

Power means changing the world.

I have the kind of satisfaction a rich man would have if he had gotten the Mona Lisa stolen and a successful copy put in its place in Paris, and he owned the REAL Mona Lisa himself. Only I can see the strings I have on the puppets.

I win big and I lose big, but I am the only one who can SEE the game.

Some of my opponents can see me, but very, very few, and you won't hear about THEM. Iget a kick out of conspriracy theories, because they are so far away from where the REAL game is. Theyknow there is a game, but they have not the slightest ability to understand how it is played.

Most people catch on early to the fact that SOMEONE is manipulating things, but they look to money and guns and offices. The basic truth that power is being manipulated is easy to understand. But neither poeple in general nor the "intellectuals" have any ability to understand HOW this is done, any more than historians can understand the real history of power.

No, the Preamble Party will not get under way with people who cannot be bothered to copy and paste on the Internet. But it is an idea someone can USE. It is directly on target. You will yalk it up and it will reach someone who NEEDS it when the time comes, just as "The Church of Liberalis" and the idea that the people we are fighting are a Religion is spreading like wildfire.

While others bitch that Reagan was a fake, I was able to stand on the Moscow River bridge in December and give the Kremlin the finger, "I brought your whole goddam machine down!" That's MY Mona Lisa.

I am going to sotp here because I have found a group of invaluable seminar people, and they don't like long pieces.

Look at the sentence above. NOBODY can understand it but me. You see, the Band of Conspirators who Make HIstory are supposed to be those who work day and night, who sacrifice everything, to Bring On The Revolution. So how can I call YOU my revolutionaries when you won't copy and paste and you don't even want to read a long piece from me?

See next piece.

COMMENTS (4)

#1 Al Parker | 2006-09-15 16:06

NOT SPAM

Interesting fellow, this guy Gobineau.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_de_Gobineau

Here's a biographical sketch of Arthur de Gobineau that outlines his ideas, putting all references race in quotes.

He considers Spain, Portugal and much of France to be composed of degenerative races. I don't understand the inclusion of eastern England in that group.

#2 Al Parker | 2006-09-15 16:18

NOT SPAM

I have to read your book.

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0972929207/002-2061239-0303256?v=glance&n=283155&s=books&v=glance

How do you respond to the reviewer Rock God?

"The book may be "researched" and "thorough," but there is no way that any self respecting person should believe any of these theories. I actually attended a Catholic seminary for high school, and then one of the top ten American universities, and I can honestly say that I benefitted from the professors urging students to open their minds to progressive possibilities. I am not a person who believes the mantra "without culture, what is there?," I do not subscribe to the theory that genetics are responsible for intelligence or brain capacity, and I certainly do not believe that schools are wrong in teaching racial harmony and intermixing. I support the right of choice for all people in all personal matters, and I will continue to spread these words forever. There is a reason why this book is not taught in schools-because the rhetoric is flawed in a major way. Anyone who believes in any sort of ethnic superiority and separation is greatly mislead, and, obviously (judging from the publication of books such as this) are seeking something to blame-hence these unjustified, savage attacks on institutions of higher learning. It is even more unfortunate that this is rhetoric being spread in 2006; most reasonably minded people would have thought that this kind of classicism and racialism would have been eradicated in society by now. There is certainly no surprise that people who buy this book buy writings by David Duke, yet another harbinger of outdated, irrelevant race-based ideology. Please, people, spare yourselves this and start realizing that the real path towards maturity and understanding is the peaceful path of non-hatred and of heterogeneity, both in genetics and in society. No one will ever sway me into believing that this is not either the goal or the way."

#3 Bob | 2006-09-15 16:29

Al, what is there to respond to?

He says all racial ideas are "outdated." He says all such ideas should be "eradicated."

He says he believes in Political Correctness,and that professors are scientific realists.

How do I respond to that?

How do I respond to people who declare that Shiite Islam is the Only True Religion?

I don't.

BASICS, damn it, BASICS!

#4 Alan B. | 2006-09-23 22:27

NOT SPAM

Listen to Bob, never defend yourself against this baseless retoric. Its the old leftist trick of taking you off message, just stress our points. Did anybody see how Joan Rivers reacted to a charge of racism by one of these kooks, she went nuts and made an ass out of her self and wasted all her time. Be polite say thats silly or laugh at them, and get to your message. Rudeness and racism will kill any respect just be professional and pleasent.