THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

KEEP DIARRHEA ABOUT JEWS OUT OF OUR WORKPLACE! | 2012-02-05

I have been in racial arguments tens of thousands of times and I am a champ at keeping the other side in full retreat.

I can handle our enemies.

Since I developed the Mantra style of argument the only people who were able to sabotage me thought they were on my side.

The best example of "with friends like these I don't need enemies" goes right to the basis of our killer strategy. We allow the anti-whites nowhere to retreat to. We box them in, showing that every one of their usual arguments about bad whites is a JUSTIFICATION for genocide.

Just when I have the rats in the trap, some drooling moron comes along and talks about JEWS. With glad relief the anti-whites start talking about Jews, or Israel.

PLEASE PAY SOME ATTENTION TO WHAT WE ARE DOING HERE.

It really riles me up when I see someone talking about Jews or anything else in the most serious area we have, the Swarm.

The Swarm is a tiny group which is beginning to put my lifelong dream into action. They remind me of efficient police radio, "Just the Facts, Ma'am," they list where they put the Mantra and they have short discussions of where the perps can be gotten at. There is nothing like it ANYWHERE!

Then someone drools in with "Israel First" or proposes "we" need to boycott education or -- this has been forgiven because he immediately saw his error -- including "Jewish Bankers" among the immigrants the white world is forced to allow to immigrate.

As the perp of the last error said, a lifetime of attacking Jews is a hard habit to overcome. But Generic, like Lord Nelson, took my criticism and used it and kicked the habit once it was pointed out to him.

The rat's best friend is the one who gets that thing off his neck. The anti-whites' best friend is the pro-white who gives him an exit from having his nose rubbed in the white genocide.

That is Point One. Point Two is that the Swarm is critical to me, above all the subject "Where Have You Posted the Mantra Lately?".

It took me two days to calm down enough to write this piece. I don't like to write when my temper explodes, which it does every time someone pollutes this critical part of our blog with Stormfront-type sentiments or verbal diarrhea about Jews or the left or the right.

PLEASE PAY SOME ATTENTION TO WHAT WE ARE DOING HERE.

COMMENTS (35)

#1 backbaygrouch | 2012-02-05 06:34

Being a keen follower of politics in its broadest sense I have opinions about News and Jews. They are expressed elsewhere. This is a battlefield, not the barracks and not home. Compartmentalization is useful. The Internet facilitates it. - BBG, aka tadzio, tadzio308, et alii.

#2 Simmons | 2012-02-05 10:33

Well said

#3 OldBlighty | 2012-02-05 07:47

There is a world of difference between advocating FOR White existence and attacking non-Whites, you do not like.

This is not rocket science.

#4 OldBlighty | 2012-02-05 07:55

There is a WORLD of difference, between how you are perceived by White and Normal people, when you:

1) Advocate FOR White existence.

or

2) Attack non-Whites you do not like.

This is not rocket science Bob is teaching, this is common sense.

#5 Simmons | 2012-02-05 10:34

Very important words sir

#6 Roderick | 2012-02-05 11:55

What do you guys think of also attacking the random people who use News and Jews as their arguments?

Maybe something along the lines of:

"By argueing about news and jews, you are promoting an anti-white stereotype. By doing this you're helping the anti-whites achieve their goal of white genocide. Stop giving the anti-whites the ammo they need or I have to assume you are anti-white. "Anti-racism" is a codeword for anti-white."

#7 WW | 2012-02-05 12:10

A question for Bob, Horus and everyone:

I'm posting on one of the most visited websites in Spain. There is a thread discussing British opposition to mass immigration and a non-White guy living in Spain said: "Oh, we're talking about the UK, that country that has colonies..."

I was so excited because I was going to post: "Israel has colonies, so you justify..." and say 6 excellent points (being flooded without voting, saying that there is no country, district, etc. for Jewish people and so on). At the end, I was going to write "Do you justify it or not? Be careful!! It's easy to justify that for British people but there is a lot of well-funded organizations who are watching you to report you if you do.

Ok, what's the problem then? I was searching for anti-racist campaigns against Israel:

1) A couple of Black people in Israel...No problem with this.

2) Many organizations against apartheid in Israel.

There is no doubt that Jewish people have organizations, districts and so on that nobody want to blend out even if they are against the apartheid in Israel but I want to make a really good point so what do you recommend?

Thank you BUGSTERS!

PS: To date, I got a lot of thumbs up on the thread I'm talking about! Even some people sent PMs to tell me "You are so right! It's not politically correct to say that but it's true! Anti-racists just focus on White people!

#8 OldBlighty | 2012-02-05 12:49

You should have asked this down in the SWARM, but here's a few you can use:

"Oh, we're talking about the UK, that country that has colonies..."

Simmons:

Poor justification for the genocide of whites. But I'll give you a chance to redeem yourself, which Asian or African country would you like to see flooded with non-Asians or non-Africans and the natives forced to intergrate, assimilate and produce children with the immigrants?

Bob:

All nations existing today, invaded someone else to get the country they are living in. But no one is using that as an excuse to justify their genocide, unless they are White.

Unknown:

As an anti-White can you name an Asian country that you believe must bring in millions of non-Asians and assimilate with them until Asians become extinct?

Which non-White populations do you INSIST must be 'mixed' and 'blended' out of existence in their own countries, or is it ONLY White people you are against?

*****

Bob:

Anti-Whites define a "White" country as one that must have massive immigration and forced integration with the third world, until the majority population is blended out of existence.

You can also list any countries the anti-Whites do not define as "White", Japan 98.5% Japanese, Korea about the same, Israel just for Jews, Kenya is 99% Black, Middle Eastern countries like all non-White countries, have immigration at their leisure. They send foreigners home, as regular as clockwork and no anti-racist groups protest them. Yet they declare WAR if White countries want to do the same.

Eastern Europe is dirt poor, yet is regularly asked when it will be ready for this immigration, before all the rich countries in Asia.

So why must Eastern Europe be "ready" before all the rich countries in Asia?

They are White.

Don't focus obsessively on one non-White group and what they are doing in their own countries, like a News and Jewser would.

Our focus is always on Whites and how we are treated, by these so called "anti-racists".

The PM gave you the answer:

"Anti-racists just focus on White people!"

#9 Gavin | 2012-02-05 13:19

1. You are justifying genocide.

2. So you are proposing that genocide is okay as long as the targeted race has "colonies"? Disgusting.

#10 WW | 2012-02-05 12:57

I already used it some of you points you mention. I thought of using Israel because:

1) He said "The UK HAS (now) colonies...". Israel HAS (now) colonies.

2) This is the most important one: EVERYONE knows that you can't say that for the Jewish people without feeling that you can have legal problems. Given the fact that they can have problems, they don't have any chance to win: if they don't say anything-> ANTI-WHITE, if they say "yes"-> ANTI-WHITE and ANTI-SEMITE, if they say "no"->ANTI-WHITE.

#11 OldBlighty | 2012-02-05 13:04

"EVERYONE knows that you can't say that for the Jewish people without feeling that you can have legal problems"

You can't say things like that about any non-White group, without getting problems, legal or otherwise.

Yet you can say it about White people and make a very good living at it and that is the point.

#12 OldBlighty | 2012-02-05 13:12

"EVERYONE knows that you can't say that for the Jewish people without feeling that you can have legal problems"

You can't say things like that about any non-White group (including Jews), without getting into trouble in all White countries, legal or otherwise.

Yet you can say these things about White people and make a very good living doing it, in government and academia and that is the point.

#13 WW | 2012-02-05 13:32

I thought of using the most dangerous weapon against them by saying that.

Another anti-White already said on the same thread "Yes, these policies will happen all over the world, not only in Japan" but I felt that it wasn't shocking enough".

I will be waiting for more comments but it doesn't mean that I despise your help!

Thank you all for your help!

#14 Harumphty Dumpty | 2012-02-05 12:58

Bob, I believe I understand how you felt (and I appreciate your laying it out), and I certainly agree about "Jews"...I've written extensively on this site (the thread for newbies) and elsewhere about the importance of staying away from that.

But at risk of arousing your temper again, I have to say that when a person wanders over here who has become interested in posting with us, and very naturally enough knows NOTHING of the fact that we don't post about Jews, or that we use no term other than "anti-White," and he unknowingly violates that rule, the proper response is, "We don't post about 'Jews' or use any term except 'anti-White' to describe those who are carrying out White Genocide."

NOT a rude comment that tells the fellow that with friends like him we don't need enemies!

Sorry to be as straight up about it as you are. I'll continue to be a bugster (unless you tell me to be gone of course) no matter what your view of that episode continues to be or how you reply to my comment if you reply, but I'm certain of few things in this world and one thing I'm certain of is that the style of your response to him was rude and unnecessary and counter-productive to your purposes.*

If a response of that kind had been made by you to one of US, that would be entirely different! But to a newcomer who doesn't yet know our rules...no way!

*Okay, as always, I could of course be mistaken (not about the response being rude, but about it being counter-productive). I do think that there is a huge danger of the Mantra approach becoming corrupted in coming years, since there are so many pressures working against keeping it as it is. So maybe it is GOOD to snarl at newcomers in their ignorance so that word will get out far and wide of what our principles are. That's not what I think...I think the snarls should be saved until there is some sign of resistance to our rules.

#15 OldBlighty | 2012-02-05 13:28

HD,

We've never had these dramas in the 2 or 3 years I've been coming here. Most people are attracted to BUGS from listening to Horus, or lurking and reading Bob's Blog, before they start posting here.

So next time you invite someone, make sure you explain the rules, because the rules are not going to change for anyone. We aren't going to have SF'ers, making the anti-Whites talking points for them, in BUGS of all places.

BTW, I never saw Mjodr using anti-White, or the Mantra at Stormfront, or in the Duluth Facebook group when I was there. He just chatted on about random things for the most part.

So don't invite people who haven't done their homework, as it is sure to cause trouble.

#16 Harumphty Dumpty | 2012-02-05 13:43

OB, as I posted to you before, I didn't invite him. Point taken though.

#17 OldBlighty | 2012-02-05 13:56

Oh sorry, I didn't see that.

#18 Harumphty Dumpty | 2012-02-05 15:40

No problem. When I'd stated earlier that I may have "instigated" his interest, I was referring to his having responded to my request on stormfront that someone please put up my post for me at Duluth.

I think people may arrive here with different degrees of knowledge of what we're about. I arrived here with ZERO knowledge...I was just cruising through pro-White sites and at this one I was thrilled to realize that people here were actually posting together in MSM. When I checked out the posts I was amazed at how good they were! (I didn't know there was a method...lol!)

Very excited, I jumped right in and started posting with you. Before long, someone told me, "We don't use the word racism here." I thought about that and realized it made a lot of sense, and then I continued to post.

Then someone told me, "We're working from a Mantra." I thought...what the devil, a MANTRA????. But since the posts were great, I didn't let that new-agey word put me off. I checked it out, and I needed a few days to get "genocide" under my belt enough to feel honest delivering that message, and then I continued.

I'm very glad no one was rude to me before I was even "family," since at the least it might have left a feeling in me that would have made me less effective for a very long time.

IMO we need to distinguish between newcomers and the rest of us, and when we make a mistake in that, simply apologize to the newcomer and move on.

Once a newcomer has been corrected in the same matter of fact way I was, if they THEN offer a fuss, then we should be hard assed, very hard-assed. They are here to learn from us, not to fuss with us. They may naturally have questions or doubts (which should not be confused with "offering a fuss")...I recall that as I was working through "genocide" I posted some of my doubts on the working thread (not realizing that there were other threads here that that that could be discussed on...please realize that this site will be a brand new and strange country to some newcomers!), but people here just let it go without comment, I suppose since it was obvious that my intention was to do my best to see things your way. Which I finally did.

I'm making some changes in my time management that I hope will result in my bugstering a lot more than I have been. Barring problems in my personal life, I think I will turn out to be an asset to this group. I think there may be other odd ducks out there who like me will show up here never having heard of either Horus or Bob Whitaker, and not having a clue what we're about except that they sure as hell like our style!!

#19 Genseric | 2012-02-05 13:31

Bob is old. More importantly, Bob is old AND tired. It drains the very lifeblood from his bones when he witnesses something or someone that could CRIPPLE our progress as a team.

He doesn't have the time nor does he have the energy to hunt down someone like Mjodr outside of the Swarm and verify their credentials or sincerity. That is up to US! That is up to the TEAM to put them through the paces and test their resolve.

What happened the other day is a crash course on what to expect from the culture over here at BUGS. "If you can't stand the heat, then you best stay out the kitchen."

Angels fear to tread where these anti-white fools rush in. We are doing the very SERIOUS work of fighting a global genocide here, gentlemen. Lest we forget this great task we have been charged with.

And if anyone deserves some latitude here, then it is most certainly Bob.

#20 c-bear | 2012-02-05 14:53

I grew up in a mostly white working class suburb.

(although I have put in my time on the other side of the tracks) It is a beautiful little town right on the ocean. There is no more white working class there. The synagogues started popping up. The American cars were eventually replaced with fancy imports. The property taxes were so high that everyone had to move. My home town was taken over by Jews. For this I carry a very deep resentment. I have seen first hand how they operate.

If someone like me can put this aside to join the fight here, anyone can. Some time ago I was reprimanded right here on BUGS. It only took once. Another reason not to allow N&J here on BUGS is that it provides a way in for trolls. Here we do what works. We are out there making a difference, not out running after tangents that don't matter. Thanks for the lesson Coach!

#21 Gar5 | 2012-02-05 15:21

Would it be possible to get a feature next to "REPLY" and "QUOTE" called "OFFTOPIC" that reports that post as being offtopic, so it can be removed?

That seems the best soloution against off-topic posts rather than just telling them they're off-topic.

#22 Coniglio Bianco | 2012-02-05 16:06

'OldBlighty'

If you had done your homework which would have taken all of five seconds you would have seen that Mjodr had in his profile 'Sanguine White Rabbit' and 'Anti-racist is a code-word for anti-white' in his signature. He has now removed the rabbit reference after being abused here and I don't blame him.

#23 OldBlighty | 2012-02-06 00:02

"abused here and I don't blame him."

Oh stop being a drama queen, Conglio.

Mjodr open carries and I have seen him invite antifa to his house, so he can I assume, shoot them.

So I'm sure Mjodr is not so fragile, that he can't handle a few harsh, but 100% accurate words from Bob.

Come on back Mjodr! Take your licks like a man, post the Mantra and use anti-White to fight White GeNOcide!

Fighting White GeNOcide is far more important than your ego.

#24 Harumphty Dumpty | 2012-02-05 16:32

Reading Bob's post over again and thinking about it, I'm now of several minds.

In fact I had NOT totally absorbed his feeling about the issue when I read his post the first time.

I think I need to understand more than I have the necessity of keeping "all" the threads here pure. In addition to honoring Bob's feelings about that, it's part of maintaining a high esprit de corps that's centered around the absoluteness of what we're doing. It's necessary to prevent corruption of the Mantra approach as time goes on.

I put "all" in quotation marks, because we need SOME thread SOMEwhere on which newcomers can discuss with us whatever things they or we feel they need to understand better than they do. Then Mjodr could have been just matter of factly corrected and directed to post on that thread if he had questions about it.

Just thoughts really...mainly I'm just realizing that Bob's post has content that I hadn't absorbed and that my posts above don't take into account.

#25 Gar5 | 2012-02-05 16:45

We REALLY need to make "Are you new to Bugs Swarm?" a more visited link.

If anyone spots a new member to the Swarm be sure to point them to that thread!

http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/topic/are-you-new-to-bugs-swarm/

I recommend that thread become like a portal from N&J to Bugs.

#26 Harumphty Dumpty | 2012-02-05 18:16

I just created the thread below,

"New bugsters' workshop on the Mantra"

I recommend that any newcomer who commits a fundamental error anywhere on our site be just matter-of-factly corrected on the spot, but also told that if he has any question about it to please post his question on this new thread.

That should keep the newcomer from responding to his correction in a place where we don't wish such dialogue.

I also second the recommendation that others have made that anyone recognized as a newcomer be asked to please announce himself on the thread, "Are you new to bugs swarm, " since that will be a help to us.

Gar5, I felt it best to create a separate thread for fundamental questions (like why to use the term "anti-White" and not terms like "Israel-firster"), so we can keep our welcoming thread for new bugsters, "Are you new to bugs swarm," unpolluted with stuff that we'd really rather not have around at all!

http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/topic/new-bugsters-workshop-on-the-mantra/

Welcome!

We preserve the main body of our site for discussions of how most effectively to spread the Mantra.

This thread is for fundamental questions from new bugsters that we feel fall outside of that. Or better, it's a place for you to work through those questions yourself while also inviting responses from others.

The fact that you've posted here will appear in our right hand margin, and someone may respond.

Please also introduce yourself on the thread,

"Are you new to BUGS Swarm?"

http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/topic/are-you-new-to-bugs-swarm/

#27 Harumphty Dumpty | 2012-02-05 18:32

My idea with the new thread is to keep the rest of our site free of dialogue that is in a very real sense a pollution of what we are about. (I think I understand Bob on that, and I definitely agree).

A sort of decontamination chamber for newcomers who need decontaminating.

Hopefully it will serve less as that, and more as just a reassurance to ourselves in keeping our on-the-spot corrections of erring newcomers just matter-of-fact.

#28 dungeoneer | 2012-02-05 20:25

It`s a requirement for anti-whites in order to comment that they must read BUGS and not waste our time with stuff we`ve already extensively.dealt with.

If someone`s posting in that particular thread they have to be either copying mantra straight or using it right,or we`ll obviously get up upset.

#29 The Seeker of Truth | 2012-02-05 21:36

For the record I must say that I do not like Mjodr, he is a fat douchebag, his actions here coupled with his cataclysmic pout prove that to me. I have also realized that most of the so-called 'allies' we have at Stormfront, WNN, VNN, and others fall squarely into that category, douchebag.

On to the topic. Naming jews is a fun thing to do, but doing it without making a point is counterproductive. The ONLY time we should name the jew is when we point out the contradiction between their treatment and ours.

When Jews pursue their ethnic interests it's called "lobbying."

When non-whites pursue their ethnic interests it's called "civil rights."

When Whites pursue their ethnic interests it's called "White Supremacy."

Or any number of the other mini mantras that deal with this in the same manner.

#30 Harumphty Dumpty | 2012-02-05 22:26

Everyone with the exception of Coniglio who's spoken up on the mjodr incident disagrees with my point of view, so I AM wondering if I'm mistaken, and if so what it is that I'm unable to see. If I am in fact mistaken, maybe I'll understand in time.

If I'm in fact mistaken, and I've caused grief by pressing so hard, I regret that.

But I feel like I did the right thing to speak up strongly for my view.

I get too involved and spend too much time on these threads, so I think it's time now for me to stick to one of my new time-management rules and only post on the working thread.

I have a personal matter to finish up the next day or two, and then I'll be back and see you guys there.

#31 OldBlighty | 2012-02-06 00:09

"I think it's time now for me to stick to one of my new time-management rules and only post on the working thread."

That's a good policy HD.

#32 timeforfreedom | 2012-02-06 01:27

This is great article. Essentially, there are two groups of people in my world view:

There are the pro-Whites like myself, and

There are the anti-Whites, which is comprised of all of the groups that want policies and outcomes that are in some way detrimental to people of my race, the White race.

I actually had someone call me a Nazi White supremacist. I replied by telling him that he was nothing more than a virulent anti-White genocidal freak who wanted to assist in the genocide of Caucasians. End of discussion. He was a jewish guy that I worked with.for a while...BUT, he wasn't jewish to me at that--or since--he was merely an anti-White.

#33 Gavin | 2012-02-06 02:40

"Since I developed the Mantra style of argument the only people who were able to sabotage me thought they were on my side."

The issue is genocide.

You can either be pro-White or pro-White genocide.

I do not give my enemy any room to get off the subject.

I don't care about Jews.

I don't care about IQ tests.

I don't care about crime statistics.

I care about the genocide of my race.

If you are in this for real, if it's in your bones, then once you get a taste of what our tactics do, you won't want to waste your time with anything else.

#34 WW | 2012-02-06 09:24

Bob, I'm really IMPRESSED. I didn't remember that comment!

I'm SO SORRY to make you and off-topic question but it's really important to me:

As you probably read, I have been using the Mantra thinking on a Spanish forum (there are ALWAYS more than 2,500 users on-line). This has been the first time I have used the Mantra thinking in Spanish in a discussion. I have already used Mini Mantras and even made up other Mini Mantras. I'm proud of the results and many people gave me thumbs up and sent me PMs.

However, I feel that to say "Yes, the policies that are been using in White countries will be used all over the world" sounds a little...distant, if you know what I mean.

A non-White guy living in Spain said "Oh, we are talking about the UK, that country that still has colonies..."

What about posting "Israel has still colonies so do you justify..." and adding at the end of the post "There is no problem to justify this for White people but you will have legal problems if you say yes". I guess this wouldn't sound as distant as the previous answer.

I would be thankful if you tell me your opinion.

Thank you, Bob!

#35 ANOTHERWHITERABBIT | 2012-02-06 11:35

lol "drooling moron" good post Bob and made me think as well I'm sure I have been that drooling moron more then once i will definitly keep that in mind. It is a hard thing to do for me as the anti semite in me screams to set the record straight about the jews