THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

Seeing the unconsciously accepted tenants of one's religion, the never questioned 'underlying assumptions' of any belief system, is very difficult.

PC's don't realize they are actually functioning racially, and race hegemony drives all their programs. You could see this when all the t.v. shows announced "we are global now," without even realizing that ---if they demanded American gentile whites see themselves in a global context--that would immediately make American gentile whites into "minorities." Immediately, gentile whites were "oppressed," by pc's own terms, and that, in turn, may have caused the sudden phones ringing in Washington on "immigration," (importing endless non-white-ness), and people "waking up."

Repeatedly, they've tried to fix this with the idea that whites can NEVER EVER be a "minority" no matter how small their physical numbers--not even if there is only one single white person left on the entire planet--- B/c being a "minority" is a state of mind, a way of being. But that has seemed a hard sell.

Jews are funniest--- in that most of them see themselves as "white." And yet ALSO as the most oppressed minority on earth. But absolutely no one but them REALLY sees themselves as oppressed, and they cannot accommodate how the other groups see them, in part due to lack of self-reflexive tenants in their own (other underlying religion that is driving their thoughts, so unlike self-other "forgiveness" in the various Christianities).

They are the ultimate oppressor, (according to others, including some gentile whites), yet the ultimate oppressed, in their own view, and the zenith of the "endangered minority"---ALL AT ONCE, which is a truly impossible position. This leaves them confused, and they can fall back on "the chosen," idea, simply relying on "I am best," and most intelligent (and therefore more confused since so much more is going on inside me!)--- rather than truly examining these various internal tensions in themselves, or the need to surround themselves with non-white minorities in order to have and retain "power." (They will chose working with them over highly intelligent gentile whites--so what does that really say about THEM and their competency?)

I'm no philosopher, but once Marx attached a merely material idea (the want of money as the purpose of life, the "struggle" against each other for "scarce resources" in poverty) to Hegel's sense of Spirit moving dialectically through the world, causing what we perceive as "history---" they produced probably the ugliest view of man ever, imo. Just animalistic race-based rat groups fighting for one lone crust of bread, with nothing new ever to be made, created or innovated.

The only strategy for trying to unveil unconscious underlying assumptions that I can find is to repeat the simplest accepted ideas over and over, until one hears them. I wish there were more strategies for this.

It is destiny that the world remains fractured.

That is not a religious idea, nor is it prophecy.

It is simply a no-brainer. It is an easy prediction to make.

It is the way things are and the way things will remain, and the ways always will be, in the nature of the sun rising in the east and setting in the west, and that sort of thing.

There is no "progress" in race relations. Such a thing can't exist and could never exist without killing people off.

There are a lot of very smart people, who care about important details, who pay attention to their educations, who don't know about the particular important detail I just described. There is no way to get to "diversity". It is not doable. It is a dream of a culture and of a world of relations that can't be.

Furthermore, it is illegal.

It is our task at BUGS to inform people of this important detail that they are missing. We have to get their brains to attend to it. Forget about the dumb people. There is nothing that can be done about them. It is the smart people we need to address.

Things seemed to run less violently and more productively when mono-racial groups were underwritten by various Christianities and various paganisms.

The extreme multi-racial model where gentile ethnic European whites are discouraged from, and punished for, interacting among themselves as a group, while an underlying race-based-factionalism is in play for all other groups who are socialized to see whites as an enemy seems to be the least efficient model for everyone involved. (Not to mention genocidal for whites.)

It really is an unprecedented social structure held in place by fear and violence.

Taylor was interviewed by a right leaning newspaper recently and the comments thread is half taken up by Asian intelligence minutae (a dog to vomit).

Its about safety from the scorn of Big Momma, Tender Conservative Papa and the shrieks of Crazy Aunt Sally our present \ruling class.\

But if you stand up point at one of them, blame them, vow to hold them responsible, they will fold.

What the Soviet Communists have

done to Christians was every bit as

vicious as anything that the Nazis ever

did to the Jews. Indeed, much that has

been done, in the name of Communism, has

been eerily Nazilike. I sometimes think

that those who claim that the Holocaust

was "Uniquely Evil", do not know about the

eerily similar things that have been done,

by the Reds, in the name of Communism.

Also, the Jewish people are most fascinating

in their way. Christians, although they have

suffered comparatively under Communism, just

do not whine and whine about it, all of the time.

Jews do whine and moan, as often as they

can get away with it.

The Jews are brilliant,

in their way. If one did not

know of Communist crimes, and

about the Communist Concentration

Camps, then one really could jump

to the conclusion that the

Holocaust was, somehow, unique.

Actually, only on one level is it

to defame Germans; on another level

it is, by extension, to defame any

and all White gentiles at all.

I am glad that I have learned about

Communist crimes, so that I can see the

full picture of what is going on-- and,

what went on in the Second World War.

I am sure that if we can make a concerted

effort that other side-- the attrocities

committed by Stalin and his Commies-- will

also become public knowledge.

Still, one had to be careful. Jewish

people actually get off thinking that

others, nonJews, hate them.

Hitler was actually a Roman Catholic.

That is where he got all his

intolerant ideas about Jews from.

I doubt that he really was a

German Nationalist of any sort,

but rather, a devout Roman Catholic

fanatic posing as one.

There was nothing Nationalist at all

about what Hitler called National Socialism.

It was really a Roman Catholic movement,

through and through. Indeed, it was

the Roman Catholic answer to what the

Church percieved as Jewish Bolshevism.

To Epiphany.

The Communist slaughters are not "Eerily Nazilike," rather the alleged Nazi horrors are "Eerily Communistlike." That which preceeds cannot evoke memories of that which is to come. Think timeline.

As for Hitler being a fanatical Roman Catholic, having read his magnum opus , Hugh Trevor Roper's, Hitler's Table Talk and some of his other speeches, articles, etc., I cannot say that I detected much religiosity and nothing sectarian within Christianity at all. Look within your own heart for the roots of this slander, it does not exist without it. In politics Hitler was a secularist. As for him not being a nationalist, that is a new idea. It will get some thought after the laughter dies down.

Yes, Roman Catholics were repulsed and reacted to the inhumanity of the Leninist-Stalinist project. But then so were and did Lutherans in Germany, Protestants everywhere, Orthodox in Eastern Europe, Muslims in the Middle East, Confucians in China, Shintoists in Japan, et cetera. Only one tribal cult, as opposed to universal value systems, was not horrified and that was rooted in self identification with the perpetrators.

To Babygrouch,

That sounds more like it.

The Nazi alleged crimes were

"eerily Communistlike." They are

so much like Communist crimes that

it is hard to see how they are

"uniquely evil" or "unique" at all.

And, it is most intriguing how

they airbrush Communist sins out of

existence.

It is really weird how they

try to say that the German Nazis

were so horrible,

when they, themselves, committed the

exact same types of crime, under Communism,

that they accuse the Germans of committing.

People do not know that

much about the history of the Soviet Union!

Hitler may actually have

been attempting to beat them,

the Jewish Communists, at

their own game. That is why

his attrocities-- sending people

to concentration camps and such--

resembles their's so much.

Notice that the US media does not

much discuss the other side of the

story. They almost never talk about

the tens of millions of Christians who

perished in the Soviet Holocaust-- the

one perpetrated by Lenin and Stalin, among

others. I always used to wonder why.

Still, once in a while,

some stuff about the Soviet Union

comes out.

There is still much we do not

yet know about Communist crimes,

and if people did know about them,

they would not be so quick to call

the Holocaust "Uniquely Evil."

There are levels and levels, and layers

and layers, of deception in History.

I seriously doubt that the Marxist Communists

ever really cared about the plight

of the Workers at all. No, I

suspect that was all a fraud.

Behind which, was an esoteric Jewish

Supremacist ideology, that worked

much like how Nazi Aryan Supremacy allegedly

works. The Jewish supremacists

wished to enslave, or failing that slaughter,

millions of Goyim.

The key point was that they

thought that Jewish lives were

more important than those of non Jews,

of Goyim.

If you want to encapsulate the relationship between the horrors of Communism and those of Nazism try the following: No Holodomor, No Holocaust. Its accuracy drives PC types nuts.

That is right.

It just is not

as Politically Correct

to bring up Communist sins!

The Nazi alleged crimes were

"eerily Communistlike."

Well, there is a fight. That much can be definitely discerned without any chicken-and-egg questions. And everybody has the same books and strategy manuals to work with, maybe.

In the Holocaust museum in Manhattan ---somewhere around the 90s on the East side, I think-- there used to be (maybe still is) a WALL that details --law by law-- the encroaching loss of powers of Jews in Germany.

Many traveling Americans, viewing this, will be struck by the re-institution of these exact same moves in their own country, blow by blow, (although conscious thoughts about it will often be suppressed).

One of the best accounts of thought-reform-and-re-socialization programs around, imo, is the Book of Daniel in the Jewish Torah; it's all about Daniel hanging onto his strange ways as the Babylonians change his diet, his habits, his religious practice, etc, and how he, like so many others (Joseph, etc) gets in good with the PTB.

The enslavement of Egypt by Joseph preceded the "let my people go" business. But few ever remark it.

We see TP with the tea party/naacp dustup where the sides play by the "rules."

Not for much longer because these kids are taking their shoving match close to lion cage and someone is gonna get hurt.

Now we notice our semis never ever use the phrase "anti-white", hence they play by the rules whereas the "antis" are peaceful commies out to make the world a better place though in a wrong way.

But someone someday which I believe to be soon will use that phrase to describe a lefty nut or respectable lickspittle and that day will be when the world changes.

"Mr. Olbermann you are not a well meaning anti-racist you are a mean vicious anti-white."