THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

IMMIGRATION LAW IS DISCRIMINATION | 2006-04-29

Jared Taylor said at the AR Conference that he was a liberal until he realized a simple fact:

The answer to "Can't we all along together?" is

"NO."

I LOVE short, straight statements like that.

I would like some American Renaissance member to judge whether this Bob's Blog entry is a pretty good summary of AR's view:

-- Immigration Law IS Discrimination

President Carter's head of the INS stated flatly that, is it were up to her, she would let everybody intot he United States without restrictions.

Nobody objected.

NOBODY objected.

Remember that this was in the late 1970s, when Pat Buchanan was saying that Americans died in World War II specifically to open Europe up to third world immigration, Joe Sobran was pro-immigration, and the official conservative doctrine was "free movement of good, services, and LABOR."

What if somebody were being appointed to the Civil Rights Commmission and said that, as far as they were concerned, slavery was OK.

Do you think anybody would mention it?

They would say, as they have said in hearing after hearing, "You can't enforce civil rights law if you don't really BELIEVE in it."

Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that, to be a true American, you must believe that we are a nation of immigrants.

Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that a true American agrees that all mankind is ONE.

In fact, the official doctrine is that we are " a nation founded on the principle that all men are created equal." That's the PURPOSE of America.

Immigration law is founded onthe idea that WE have a right a right to be here and THEY don't.

Immigration law is founded on the principle that there IS a "we" and a "they."

So how can Real Americans and all the Little Americans in Europe who insist on the same ideas of "democracy" America does turn around and keep "them" out?

From the Wordist point of view, the "undocumented workers" marching to demand that all of Mexicobe allowed into the United States are true Americans.

All who oppose them are NOT true Americans.

We don't BELONG here.

They do.

Remember, from the liberal and respectable conservatives' REQUIRED view of what constitutes an American, there IS no "us" and "them."

You cannot argue for immigration restrictions and at the same time be a "real American" from the Wordist point of view. According to liberals and respectable conservatives you are unAmerican if you do not believe that an American is somebody who sincerely believes that this nation is dedicated to the proposition that all men are created, that all men are ONE.

Immigration law is based on the Preamble to the United States Constitution: "We the people of the United States and OUR posterity."

In July of 1863 Abraham Lincoln changed that preamble and substitute the preamble to the Declaration for it: "All men are created equal."

For Lincoln, tha is what the Civil War was about: "We are now engaged in a great civil war to test whether a nation so dedicated can long endure."

National Review practically has a hernia insisting that it is Lincoln Magazine. Liberals swear by Lincoln's words.

Then NR expressses outrage and puzzlement that US immigration law is not enforced.

In Lincoln's day, there were no immigration laws. In the Gettysburg Address, he tacitly promised there never WOULD be.

How in the HELL can Big America and all the Little America's who insist they are just as multiracial enforce immigration laws?

Immigration law requires an "us" and a "them."

There will be no "us" and "them" until we learn to DISCRIMINATE again.

COMMENTS (5)

#1 Peter | 2006-04-29 15:56

**Jared Taylor said at the AR Conference that he was a liberal until he realized a simple fact:

The answer to "Can't we all along together?" is

"NO."**

Until we can, there will be no revolution. Our Mob rulers know this and so do their utmost to split us in half. They shake in their boots when they see the likes of LibAnon commenting on this Blog -- for it means unity.

On one hand, the Mob has shunted both real Liberals and real Conservatives into equivalent PC camps, whose leaders equally swear loyalty to genocide while promising to annihilate each other.

But it is a sham battle.

So on the other hand the sham neo-Liberalism and the sham neo-Conservatism no longer represent anybody. This leaves the people in a mass, discontented. We real Liberals and real Conservatives no longer have any representation and so we are coalescing.

If you listen closely to your neighbor Liberal or Conservative, you can hear that they are all perceiving the same thing: the abuse of power, the abandonment of the people.

Both real Liberals and Conservatives responded to Reagan's mock-Populist rhetoric and he won in a landslide. Both real Liberals and Conservatives were attracted to Perot and he backed out lest he be elected. Both real Liberals and Conservatives were fascinated with Nader and so he was acknowledged a threat.

I hear both Liberals and Conservatives vent their anger over the Invasion. The Mob ignores them. More of us are starting to awaken to the fact that the Mob rules for itself and the people are the enemy. The more the Mob ignores us, the wider the gulf between them and us.

The Mob wants to create a split among the people between Left and Right.

But in so doing they have split the top from the bottom, pushing the old Left and Right together.

We who can see the ongoing genocide must work dynamically to understand and speak to the ordinary, real Liberals. For by doing this we unite ourselves. We did this early in the twentieth century as populists and the Mob feared revolution until they arranged the world wars.

The Germans were extremely won at home with this strategy. They had a song: "70 Millionen, ein Schlag." We, too, outnumber the Mob and there are 190 million of us in the US alone who could strike one blow. The Germans had another song which said: "Kameraden die Rotfront und Reaktion ershoen," We, too, should unite the old Left and Right on the bottom against both neo-Liberalism and neo-Conservatism on the top.

We need to hear more from LibAnon on how to listen to and speak to Liberals.

The fight between Left and Right is a sham battle. The real fight is between top and bottom.

#2 Peter | 2006-04-29 16:24

Oh, duhh. By "all living together" Taylor meant the races, not the political spectrum.

#3 Shari | 2006-04-29 18:05

It's gotten to the point where it can't stand. There has to be some plausibility to hold nonsense up. I have thought such things before I started reading Bob Whitaker, but he can clarify and put an edge on vague thinking. The truth is so much more exciting than nonsense.

#4 kane | 2006-04-29 19:29

"I would like some American Renaissance member to judge whether this Bob's Blog entry is a pretty good summary of AR's view"

I'm no member, only the speakers and writers are "members" but I suscribe to the online version of the magazine for 15 bucks a year.

You make similiar points to what Taylor does, but as always, your own personality and way of talking shows through. Taylor talks of an "us" and "them" as you do. He talks about Mexicans coming to conquer America, whereas you talk about a similar thing using your own words about how they want the "us" out. Of course, the terms "liberals and respectable conservatives" are your kind of trademark, so that's your spin. But overall, your views seem to be within the range of Amren acceptabillity. The only thing they are against is blaming the jews as the sole problem and saying that the "good" jews who want to help out shouldn't be able to. They just don't want people to be obsessed over jews, of course I believe Jews should be called out for what they do, but so should everyone else. This is one of the reason I support them. Your bud David Duke has pounded the issue so much that its like geez, don't you have something else to say. Jewish Supremecists is a good message, but when it gets to the point of jew = race and your dog died, it was the jew's fault, its almost overdone. I believe only by exposing the names of the individuals who work against racial integrity, whether these individuals are Jewish or gentile, is necessary to saving the white race. And I don't think a complete hyperfocus is good, as in the last issue, Taylor said the goal is not to "unmask it as a conspiracy" but to "prove egalitarianism is immoral."

In addition to trying to show that egalitarianism is bad, the magazine also talks of political, scientific, historical, and anlytical issues regarding race.

#5 LibAnon | 2006-04-29 22:51

"Oh, duhh. By 'all living together' Taylor meant the races, not the political spectrum."

I think you were right the first time, actually. My sincere thanks, Peter, for a brilliant post.