THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

I WANT TO SEE MALE QUEERS KISS ON TV | 2009-11-01

As I have said before if homosexuality is "a legitimate lifestyle" then no one has any right to object to teachers or scoutmasters promoting it. By the same token, I am getting a bit tired of the TV showing me close-ups of black guys slobbering white girls but never showing queer MALES doing the same thing.

We could make a point of this. I for one would far rather see two queer males slobbering than a white girl slobbering a black. I can stop looking at either, but in the case of the homos I can get it out of my mind as I can the huge, long-dead rats and so forth I have seen in the third world. The miscegenation pairing hits my forebrain: the poor kids! Sex is to perpetuate. But that black is DESTROYING the blond beauty he wants so badly.

But the ONLY point here is that the media loves to offend us but does not offend the fundamentalists and Catholic Wordists. The fact is that HITLER objected to homosexuality so anyone who objects to homoism is anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews as much as a white separatist is.

I was baptized and confirmed Orthodox style but given a Catholic baptism certificate because the Melkite Church is Orthodox except that it is allied with the Pope and uses the filioque. In that Church I was baptized and confirmed at the same ceremony.

Come Lent, I told my priest what I would TRY to give up, I said: "I will TRY to give up being anti-Catholic." From a Bible Belt-raised grandson of a circuit-riding preacher this is not easy. I remember the self-righteous Catholics who had the only integrated schools in South Carolina. I remember they would often side with the Yankees who actually treated them like sharecroppers in the real world, the Buckleys who despised ethnic Catholics who were not ANGLO-Irish.

I want THEIR "prejudices" offended, too.

So I am very serious about homo slobber. I want these fundamentalists and Catholics to be offended the way I am offended.

But I wouldn't bring it up if I didn't think it makes a very to-the point argument.

But don't DWELL on it. REPEAT it and see if it works. Use it and then THINK about it to see how you can use it best.

COMMENTS (7)

#1 Dave | 2009-11-01 11:43

There is no such thing as "homosexuality". It is a word, that is all. There is only the male sex pervert and his larger criminal tendencies.

The "homosexual" identity is just one "sex perversion choice" in a tendency that has endless avenues to follow, a facet of a larger criminal tendency in most if not all criminal males.

The political class's attempt to legitimize "homosexuality" is their permission for criminal males to attack society with antisocial behavior, not criminal per se in the stereotypical "homosexual" faade we are all familiar with, but suborning criminality in its implicit legitimization of criminal subculture, an open attack on society, no different than the war Castro made on the American people in dumping his prison population on the American public in the Marelito incident.

Ordinary people are too removed from the criminal world, the world of gangs, and the world of prisons making them easy victims for MSM brainwashing regarding "homosexuality". But the MSM does not want to show "homosexual" men kissing because it is a too blatant promotion of criminal subculture.

It has no such problem in showing a black man kissing a white woman. Priests and pastors condone it.

Again, Robert Whitaker has done a splendid job of surfacing the criminality of priests and pastors in today's phony religious organizations and their fellow travelers in the political Establishment.

Criminals sniff out any weakness, and they infiltrate, infiltrate, infiltrate.

It is a horrible truth we have to face with unblinking eyes.

#2 bruce | 2009-11-01 12:50

If that were to happen, and I think it will if current trends in media degeneracy continue, it would simply result in a brief uproar followed by the same desensitization sheeple now have to interracial spit swapping and lesbian spit swapping.

I don't want to promote the queer agenda, I want to reverse turn the tide against the miscegenation agenda, and getting emotional satisfaction that a group that sometimes opposes us is disgusted for a little while isn't what I call productive toward that end.

#3 shari | 2009-11-01 17:03

There does come a point, when the mask is off, and what is evil, unnatural, cannot be presented in anyway, as attractive.

#4 Dave | 2009-11-01 18:04

Bruce,

I don't believe that people are capable of being "desensitized". For example, anyone actually familiar with "homosexuals" is well aware that the term is a fraud.

These are subcultures of male sex perverts, and are very widespread. Also, there is nothing new in them. They have been part of the urban scene since the dawn of cities. I think most people are aware of that fact too.

The Establishment will never succeed in legitimizing "homosexuality". It is impossible, so don't worry about it.

And this is related to the tragedy of white women being dragged into mulatto culture by bearing mulatto children. People understand that it is deeply tragic. The Establishment will never be able to alter that understanding either. A white woman bearing a mulatto child will never be fashionable outside of mulatto culture.

The portion of the Establishment that supports all this does so because they believe criminal subcultures are fashionable. They are just giving a nod that these urban subcultures are OK with them because it is "chic" to do so.

That is another way of saying they don't mind participating with the criminal mind in its vested interest in spreading ruin. After all, if it doesn't affect them personally, why should they care?

#5 AFKANNow | 2009-11-01 20:13

in reply to Dave:

Drawing one Bob's main point, this is part and parcel of the desensitization - "tolerance" - that leads to further desensitization.

Interracial is ALWAYS framed a the "strong, silent, Man Of Few Words" Faithful Colored Companion silently attracting White Females to him.

He literally does nothing, and this is because our Young Men - "incompetent males," to quote someone - have been so gelded as to be the inversion of the Warrior Caste we need.

Hence, Woman Want Real Men - and the only examples they see in the Controlled Media - absent a precious few, say "eight percent" - are very light skinned Faithful Colored Companions, in time replaced by dark skinned Faithful Colored Companions, both, in time, displacing and replacing White Men.

Why do I see Light in the Darkness on this issue?

Well, outside of the tremendous example of Sarah Palin, the very effective Candidate from Whitelandia, there is a new television show on that, for the first time, had cable beat the main tv network in the ratings.

It's on FX - the FOX Channel that brought you "The Shield."

It's called "Sons of Anarchy," and it's about VIRILE White Men - a motorcycle gang that runs guns, among other things.

The dialogue talks about sanctions against those who sell to "niggers and wetbacks" - you get the idea.

The interesting element is with this new season, where Man Among Men Henry Rollins - yes, THAT Henry Rollins - plays a - listen to the Framing - "White Separatist," who is brought in by the Powers That Be to stop the VIRILE White Males of the motorcycle gang.

THIS BEAT JAY LENO IN THE RATINGS.

And, the positive Framing we prefer - "White Separatist" is on the tongues of those who would like to be "White Nationalists," but can not grasp that degree of intellectual abstraction.

"White <b>Separatists</b>" as effective models of ACTIVE, Virile White Men, and a motorcycle gang of Virile White Men.

A show with that as its theme beat Jay Leno in the ratings.

And, what do White Women prefer, given a choice?

VIRILE White Men.

"The Sons of Anarchy," only on FX.

#6 Simmons | 2009-11-02 11:11

Starring Ron Pearlman, and I bet if interviewed would give a dissertation on the evils of the white race. Well nothing is perfect. Still I'm gonna go out and buy the first season on DVD.

Since our society is modeled on the "crazy jewish mother who must be placated at all costs to keep her quiet so we can live in peace" scenario the reversal to the natural patriarchy will be relatively swift if painful and chaotic. The seed corn is about gone and the shetl jew family life inflicted upon us as the guiding role model cannot provide, so its perfect time for Mantra truth.

If someone has one of those web accounts, there is a jew named James Kuntsler who writes about peak oil/end of the world BS who is deathly afraid that his culture model of crazy jew mother is in danger form what he calls the "corn-pone Hitler" (meaning Palin) phenomenon. If someone wants to use jewish paranoia to amplify the Mantra his is the blog to do it, especially since this morning's commentary specifically mentions "corn-pone Hitler." I admit I have been too lazy to sign up.

#7 Simmons | 2009-11-02 11:22

http://kunstler.com/blog/2009/11/thinking-the-unthinkable.html#comments

Leading edge of jewish paranoia. What this has to do with homos I do not know, since it seems this is one jew who is not obsessed about seeing homodom being "liberated." Instead he seems to obsess about the Corn Pone Hitler of his nighmares coming to fruition and an elite coming to power that is not beholden to rule like we are a giant jewish shetl family with a dutiful father listening/placating a nutty neurotic mother.

Please tell me Bob if this post does not belong here and have the mod cast it to hell, don't want to waste much bandwidth.