I GET FINI BACK | 2005-12-21
In the last article I explained how Antonio Fini had raised my obseervations on respectable conervatives to the level of theoretical awareness.
I am now going to do the same for him
In his second comment, Antonio says,
"To expand on my point Bob, the Austrian liberals are loudly condeming Govenor Schwarteneggar for signing off on the execution of Black mass muderer Tookie Williams. They even want to name an Austrian football stadium after Tookie, to embarass Arnold."
"Now the Austrians I know are a pretty lawful, even obedient bunch of people. They won't cross against a red light on an empty street at 2am. "
"So what would Austrian liberals do if a white man walked into a store and shotgunned an entire family of Chinamen? Probably revive the death penalty for him. But a Black mass murderer is said to be "Most admirably rehabilitated" when he refrains from knifing any corrections officers. Why?"
"Because liberals expect Blacks to commit senseless acts of violence and Whites to obey the law. Liberals are racist to the core."
Conservatives on the other hand know that if only Tookie had read Ayn Rand and Ludwig von Mises he could have developed into a brilliant capitalist entrepeneur. It is conservatives, not liberals who believe in the infinite perfectability of man."
"We need to expose liberal racial hypocracy to conservatives. They already know about liberal economic hypocrisy."
By pointing out how OBEDIENT Austrians are, you have answered your own question.
If Europeans ever realized how OBEDIENT they are, it would embarrass many of them into rebelliousness.
You ask some very logical questions. But you are dealing with a continent which for over a millenium fed the poor when told to and burned people alive when told to.
Many of those who were burned alive were exactly the people who pointed out that this was a contradiction. Today those are being imprioned are the ones who ask exactly the kind od questions you are asking.
Remember that we are dealing with an established RELIGION today, Political Correctness. Europe's reaction today does not vary by one molecule from its blind obedience of the old established religion.
You asked why an obedient people could not be logical. You have answered your own question. Sitting at a stuck red light at 2 am is not logical. It is obedient.
The most ironic aspect of this is that Austrians think they are being rebellious in attacking Schwartzeneger. They think they are being independent-minded.
Why? Because they are TOLD that what they are doing they have been ordered to do because it represented independent, radical thought.
Karl Marx died in 1883. In his name, Joseph Stalin, Mao-Tes Tung and Pol Pot ran the most totally reactionary regimes in human history, including the cavemen. Those regimes DIED of terminal inability to deal with ANYTHING modern.
But to this day a follower of Karl Marx is still referred to in Europe as a "radical."
Why? Because Europeans have been TOLD that a "radical" is a follower of a man who was out of date when he died in 1883. An opponent of that particular corpse is officially a "right winger," one who advocates YESTERDAY'S ideas.
To me, as a free-born American, this is hilarious. To Europeans it is, quite literally, Gospel.