Bob's blog doesn't seem very inspiring to make people dedicate their lives to this cause.

Bob lays out a possible future of gated, prison-like communities for whites (when we once had nation-states) - and another possible future in India of people who, besides their shared Varna, will not even be our descendants.

It not only fails to inspire someone who hasn't yet become 100% dedicated, it makes one want to forget everything he's learned here and find a nice hobby to take up. What's the point of working for something now if change will happen naturally 50 or 100 years from now?

But I understand this is a straight-talking, no-nonsense blog so you get an answer when you ask for one and I'm grateful for that.

Comment by Mderpelding


As you say, I am not a Marxist or an integrationist. I don't make up reality to look like our inevitable victory or to make you feel good.

As you indicate in your last grudging line, I do not tool my examples to make us seem like some Inevitable Flow of History. The essential media line today, as in all ages, is that what IS now leads to an INEVITABLE future.

THEIR future. I am saying all is in flux.

I'm a depressive myself, and if you choose to dwell on the example I gave to reach your depressive goal you will get there with or without me.

Certainly that is what the current media want you to do with ALL present reality. I gave you an example I can see from my apartment window. A REAL one. A Marxist would have made it more upbeat, but that is the kind of thinking BUGS does not engage in.

That is the sort of thinking you see on BBC documentaries. You get all but the last five minutes of interesting stuff. Then comes the last five minutes devoted to the Politically Correct Summation. This tells how all that has been said fits into current Politically Correctness.

A dinosaur's documentary wind-up: See! Look how long they lasted, but if we don't ratify Kyoto, we can disappear, too. With technological history, whoever they were talking about, including Aussie Abos, are incredibly advanced despite our looking upon them as "primitive, showing that a truly assimilated society can use their genius as much as whites can.

Your comment is very useful. For example, I have to explain something in more detail:

My optimism comes from my own experience. It was awful back in the 50's because nobody would believe that the white race was going anywhere. Now the Mantra is its own explanation. The Mantra would have made people laugh back in 1960 with the Baby Boom and national origin immigration quotas. That is the milieu in which the present immigration policy was made law in 1965.

You cannot change a world people see as frozen in plastic. I LIVED in a world like that. I sound immodest, but the fact is that now I have the reality coming at us and only I know what it is like.

All those people in Minnesota and Iceland to whom non-whites were whites with painted faces now have their faces jammed into their Colored Brothers' armpits. The security system you wail about is a symptom of this, not a guide to an Inevitable Future. A Norman Rockwell cover showing a brave little "Negro" girl being protected by troops is no longer all someone in Sweden likes to think of on race.

The second I give one example you see a future of inevitable gated communities and such "Alas and Alack" crap.

I see it as simply proving that there is no inevitable future. Thought Crime Laws always make it clear that the ruling group is lost. They cannot allow discussion because real discussion today will NEVER lead in the direction of our Politically Correct Future as laid down in 1960.

Despite desperate efforts, the Boasian world, the world of no genetics, is DEAD. In order to preserve a rule based on Mankind Middle Eastern History, into which our present rule is hardwired, you have to suffocate all objections. That means it's doomed.

In 1960 all over the world a PREFERENCE for the survival of white people was called Nazism, everywhere but in the some parts of the South. Even a SOUTH AFRICAN wrote that, with our ten percent black population, integration was a solution for US, but not for them.

Back then the argument was that you had to have a Nazi regime to do anything about genetics. Genetics will soon be a matter of preference, and it has happened far enough after Hitler that all those shrieks are now seen as part of a profit-making industry.

Now genetics will be a matter of PREFERENCE, and the whole world, not just the South, has had a good deep lungful of what mixed children look like and how their intelligence is not equal and is not the same. We have made huge progress in that direction from a time when Carleton Putnam argued in Race and Reason that IQ was different and was suppressed by all universities to today when everybody knows it is true. Now they have to keep anybody from SAYING it, which is the last ditch.

We are in a position to influence PREFERENCE, while the media and the fundamentalists are in a coalition to stop genetic research in its tracks.

Breaking down the "all races are the same" anti-Nazi Absolute was a hell of a job, but it has been done. That was the first push to get the car rolling. If you think we are marginalized now, you should have been with us back then.

But all I see is that we are going to have to be part of the formation of the future, instead of sitting around taking bets on some Inevitable. That leads to optimism or pessimism, but so do drugs.

Our Posterity and My Examples

Al Parker says that I outline a future "and another possible future in India of people who, besides their shared Varna, will not even be our descendants."

A very useful basis for discussion.



I was wondering when someone was going to bring this specific example up: We need a Just-So Future in which OUR descendants are the white people. My aim is the most basic one in nature: the survival of my phenotype.

If this "Posterity" bit worked I wouldn't be necessary.

An Indian child with its non-Aryan genes erased will be as kin to me as a Russian. Russians are not my descendants. Culturally India is rapidly westernizing, but Japan is doing it faster. We have been trained to believe that culture is all that matters. A society with our books but not our GENES will be just fine.

I say the opposite. Everybody can be culturally western, Orientals can catch up. But only whites can advance the West itself.

Al Parker, would you really put a pure Aryan child of Indians who wanted pure Aryan children in the same immigration category with brown Indians? I would rather have them than any rot-minded anti-white Whitakers from England.


You should look for what I am giving examples OF.

The problem is that, instead of taking every example I give as the Inevitable Bleak Things to Come, which is what our entire excuse for education has taught us, you should look for what I am giving examples OF.

The hole card for anti-whites Inevitability has always been Asia. They insist that the world is mostly Boasian "minorities" and therefore wildly pro-integration. So I gave the example of the weakness of that idea in Asia. Now I am told everybody is going to be an Indian.

It is terribly important for you to separate what I am giving EXAMPLES OF from the usual hard and fast Politically Correct Inevitabilities. We are ready to ride waves in a new age while they are desperately trying to jam everything into a hopelessly outdated framework.

When attacking the white race, the mantra of our enemies is, "This too shall pass." But it never occurs to them that THEY, too will pass. And their cult will pass a lot faster than a race will disappear.

But I will not give you a Just-So FUTURE to replace THEIR Just-So Future.

POINT TWO refers to the fact that I am attacking the very Inevitables that our depressive defeatists find so overwhelming.

Their real weakness of our cult is that it has a rigid framework. EVERYTHING hits it as an unwelcome surprise. From the Internet to genetic engineering to settling the moon and space colonization to advances in ways to find out the actual truth in any area, everything militates against their rigid framework.

But only so long as WE are NOT in a rigid framework.