THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

HERESY IS SAYING THAT TWO PLUS TWO IS FOUR | 2010-12-10

LAWRENCE Brown wrote that one characteristic Western man does not notice about himself is that, for him, an infinite progression is natural. A child will ask why is there a fire, the adult will answer because there is a match, the child will ask why is there a match, the adult may tell him about supply and demand or about how the mechanics of a match work.

Then, of course, "Why do they work that way?"

Everybody else has always come up with an answer to shut the kids up, like hushpuppies at a fry:

"IT is the Will of the gods,"

"God moves in mysterious ways, his wonders to perform."

"Aristotle said so."

"Mommy Professor thinks so."

"It is the Modern Point of View."

It is the simple questions this is used on. Which is why only the West could have come up with supply and demand or Newtonian theory. Which is why Orwell said in his book 1984 that "Freedom is the right to say that two plus two is four."

Stagnant societies NEVER discuss basics. They have one of the few fat men in their tribe sitting around teaching the "Basics." Basic Truths were Absolem's occupation, and the reason he was one of the few fat guys around.

But of course some young people would wonder if Absolem was so hot. So Absolem decided it was the gods he represented, not just himself. Some kids still contradicted old Ab, so Absolem gave them the benefit of his long memory. He said he remembered a person who had contradicted the Will of the Gods and had soon fallen off a cliff.

The invention of Heresy was the clincher. In Africa a belief in Hell is replacing the older belief that if you treated someone wrong, his ghost would come for you after he died, but either one is the basis of a major occupation. As in 1900 the few people who are fat in Africa today are priests of the old black man's faith or the new white man's faith.

Today, about the ONLY fat people in Communist Angola are commissars. They don't depend on the next world; they don't even bother to explain their faith. They have decided to drop all the next-world faith and go straight into Heresy.

Heresy is asking about basics, like the Mantra or like supply and demand or about heredity. Heresy is prohibiting someone from saying that two plus two is four.

COMMENTS (2)

#1 Dave | 2010-12-10 10:53

Johann Goethe said, "God save us from BELIEF".

But there is only one race with the capability of being saved from BELIEF and that is the white race.

That makes the treason of the anti-white whites all the more egregious.

The anti-white whites must be brought to justice. We have a solemn obligation to send them to hell.

#2 BGLass | 2010-12-10 12:07

'a wiz is a wiz because because---because, because, because, because, because---' Of the wonderful things he does---"

In school, where we parsed SBE (standard black English), so we would have it drummed in that this was not a dialect, but a language, as we were told, "just like German or French," and where we read "Pedagogy of the Oppressed" and various ideological works, we ALSO read studies about "disenfranchised" children. (In itself, the very word seemed to say the problem might be tribal (as they were not "franchised"---in other words, not located with the Franks, meaning "free," later meaning "to speak freely" as in "frankly.")

Anyway, these studies detailed parent-child interactions of 'disen-frank-ised' versus 'middle class.' The whole point was that non-white kids were too hurt to be curious, and if they did ever ask the why of something, only white middle class answered with explanations instead of the conversation stoppers, (like, b/c X said so and that's that, and a reference to some grand authority.) Having more money was said to cause this. Yet "class" was simultaneously not described as money at all, but rather, this different cause-effect-reality thinking which had to be instilled in people who weren't even interested somehow.

In Orthodox Judaism, rabbis teach Astrology is "paganism." This is why birthdays are not important religiously to Jews---what could a birthday have to do with a god? (only some gentiles care about a god's birthdayb/c Jesus is a god in time and not-in-time simultaneously). Only people interested in (stupid) astrology (as if the astrology is really just little fortune-cookie paragraphs in newspapers) would go on about a "Savior's BIRTH: How dumb!" (The jewish messiah-to-come is a military leader, period; b/c god said so).

A significant aspect of the god incarnate is HISTORICAL POSITIONING, b/c a birthday says you're born in an exact place, at an exact moment, "into time," and among people, this may allow you to see some things and not others--- to think in "if/then" proposition. "If you were born at this time, then you would have experienced X. If you experienced X, reality would appear in this way, and therefore..." (so, having a history means you can think.)

U.S. Southern "Reconstruction" is, in a way, the banning Astrology. What differentiates the Southerner is that he/she has a name, date, time, place. Like, they always say Southerners ask who your family was, (the history of you), but Northerner's ask how you got money, what you do for "a living," and such other things... Name and Birthplace is the Southern thing, the thing that MUST BE reconstructed)--- the reconstruction is the de-historicizing of a people and their indoctrination, in a sense, as the bigot-thinkers.

Only others say: "Why does that happen?" Answer: "you're a bigot."

We seem to be people in time then. The Swiss were known for watches. And Swiss watches are "handed down" b/c every generation must be aware of the exact moment. Watching (being "on watch") is to bear witness to Divine in current time. In the same way, the Christmas tree is the web of wyrd, a matrix of fate---all about placing the beautiful ornaments: On which branch and where is which thing in RELATION to all the other things?

This is all just such a very different orientation, seems like. Without much translation, it wouldn't even be perceived, maybe. in fact, that may be why others always make clear they cannot perceive "white culture," and say it doesn't exist. They cannot perceive it, thus who they are in relation to it.

"History" becomes just slender little volumes of how hurt people feel, how wounded, of what should be received in payment for what wounds.