THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

We aren't theorizing we are making the accusations. It's not genocide in theory it's genocide in FACT.

Nick Griffin: "And You People will be in the Dock".

Mr Griffin must read BUGS ;)

Notice his use of the term "indigenous."

There are many groups within the UN trying to define the term indigenous. Their goal in defining the word is to define it as everyone except Whites (we would then have some amount of protection). Despite this fact, no one has argued with Griffin on his use of the term in relation to the White population he is defending.

The UN has been working on laws to protect indigenous populations but they will not make it law until they can define indigenous to their satisfaction (non White). The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples does not apply to international law yet.

Using the term will cut them off preemptively.

The current direction of the definition is as follows: non colonizing, distinct from other peoples, self identifying as indigenous, recognizable as different from other peoples, historical connection to the land, or historically dispossessed in some form.

So they have to make sure White people do not identify as indigenous, do not recognize our differences, and do not notice our dispossession so we can be pushed further along the path to genocide.

Article 7 of the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples:

Indigenous peoples have the collective and individual right not to be subjected to ethnocide and cultural genocide, including prevention of and redress for:

(a) Any action which has the aim or effect of depriving them of their integrity as distinct peoples, or of their cultural values or ethnic identities;

(b) Any action which has the aim or effect of dispossessing them of their lands, territories or resources;

(c) Any form of population transfer which has the aim or effect of violating or undermining any of their rights;

(d) Any form of assimilation or integration by other cultures or ways of life imposed on them by legislative, administrative or other measures;

(e) Any form of propaganda directed against them.

Google White Man March.

Remember that rock bob talked about awhile back?

It's moving.

Thank you Bob and Bugsers for giving White people the words needed to defend ourselves. Nick Griffin is a brave man and a great person to have on our side. I wanted to stand up and applaud at the end of Mr. Griffin's speech. I hope that Anti-White woman in the video gets what she deserves. Like an old saying said: Hanging is too good for Traitors!

Nick says the Anti-Whites are next up on the docket for trial.

It works in this speech, but is that something WE should say in our BUGS work? We don't want to sound menacing (it gets in the way of the message).

But at some point, that is the direction things should go. Is that a Next Step item or is that something we should be saying now?

We've been through the bit about NOT telling the person you are arguing with that their IP address has been logged and they will personally pay (feels good, works bad). The Mantra points out the crime. But it doesn't specifically call for criminal charges. However, I was impressed with how effective it was for Nick to tell the Anti-Whites they were next up for trial. It was effective in terms of impressing the audience with how serious the charge is.

I guess this is more a question of the tone of our communication going forward.