THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

DENNIS | 2006-06-03

Dennis, with my comments as usual marked ***:

The thoughts are only a problem, if you fear they may be true.

*** Exactly. If you worry that somebody might have heard you when you said, "God, that's an ugly wart on his nose!" it's a sure sign he does have a wart on his nose and it's ugly.

Many blacks seem to flaunt the fact they have white women, so I have my doubts that it keeps them awake at night. There sure as hell are enough white liberals to defend them.

*** The blacks who will have nothing but white women STILL are the ones who wake up in a cold sweat about those white women who won'r have THEM.

*** They suspect they're only getting the whores.

*** Which, to return to your first point, is true.

It seems it is whites who are most offended when a percieved 'minority' (inluding women) are given derogatory labels? Why, because their is a suspicious that women/blacks/latinos/aboriginals whatever could be inferior. I don't care about racial terms, because they are no threat.

But a racial or sexist slur against blacks and women strikes deeper, because of the subconscious, or conscious awareness that there might be an element of truth.

*** My sister experienced this at her bridge club. One woman was praising feminist leaders, and my sister said what we all think about:

*** "Why can't they get some leader who are more ATTRACTIVE?"

*** The woman doing the praising turned cold as ice and furious as a volcano.

*** Which she would NOT have done if the feminist leaders were NOT so ugly.

I'm not going to debate whether it is true, but all the 'anti-defamation' screeching by liberals seems to imply that they at least, fear it could be.

I believe it was Walter Williams who defined the word "stereotype" as, "An unpleasant truth."

Yes, liberals do think we are better, they will NEVER admit it, but their actions seem to indicate that.

*** Yes, long ago I noticed that when I am debating with a white liberal about poor widdah not-up-to-human-standards black folks, our conclusions are different, but we are still talking about the SAME poor widdah not-up-to-human-standards black folks.

Comment by Dennis

COMMENTS (2)

#1 Antonio Fini | 2006-06-03 12:05

Not Spam.

And this is the psychological trick behind the Racial Guilt Industry. Even if the average American sportsfan hasn't seen that many lynchings and cross burnings, he still can't purge all gut, racial instincts from his own soul. So when he hears the magic word "racism" his buttons get pushed. Accusing people of subconscious racism is like accusing them of subconsciously loving their children.

It's a bit like the dark ages monk, awake on his stone bed and probing his heart for feelings of lust and gluttony. All have sinned and fallen short.

#2 Dennis | 2006-06-03 23:38

NOT SPAM

I have a confession to make. I know what the liberal mind is like, I for a short time was one, and an anti-racist, and * gasp * a supporter of race mixing and integration.

I suppose I could never drop my objectivity, and what could only be described as lust for looking upwards and to greater things.

But you learn a lot about the political left, and the way they think, when you think like them. You get an insight which cannot be explained unless it is experienced. They spend their lives coming up with philosophies and ideologies and 'facts' to try and explain away the truth. They live for ideals, and truth be damned. As you yourself would say, their ideals are the Truth.

They don't want to be wrong, and they treat factual evidence with the same reaction they treat these so called slurs. Make a slur and you are a 'nazi', use scientific evidence, fact, and you are a 'facts nazi'.

Point is, the intellectual stones we throw break apart the glasshouse they live in incredibly easily, so they, more than anyone else, have a desire to suppress anyone who may throw such stones.