THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

CRAWLING BACK INTO THE WHITE RACE | 2007-02-04

The whole Soviet system is actually hilarious now. And we are free to laugh at it. Granted tens of millions of people died under that regime, but Alan Colmes has pointed out that comparing the agony and death in Ukraine or the Gulag to Hitler's killing of JEWS "trivializes the Holocaust. Billy Graham, Jr. agreed with him.

So we can just laugh at the Soviet stuff because the massacre and agony was trivial.

Here were a bunch of eggheads, none of whom had ever held a job, much less met a payroll, who took over the entire Russian economy. When I was a professional economist we constantly had to use UN figures on "The Centrally Planned Economies" that showed the USSR rapidly overtaking the United States. When the USSR fell, we had a look at the naked economy of the USSR, and the entire economy, not just of Russia but of the whole USSR was less than half as large as that of the Netherlands alone.

But the Reds WERE good at their Ponzi scheme. They always got a great review from the "intellectuals," especially those in Europe and New England. They knew how to subvert. In short, they were good at POWER.

The cast I want to talk about now is how Stalin handled planning for the German surrender. At Potsdam in 1945 the Allies were startled to find that some of the proposal documents from Russia were dated 1941, when the LAST thing on Stalin's mind was how to handle a crushed Germany.

In June of 1941 Stalin was in total withdrawal at the shock of the German invasion. Every bit of Soviet force collapsed. But within a couple of months, while the Germans were running through the USSR and being greeted with wild joy by Soviets, he set up a group to study how to deal with the other Allies when the Soviet Army entered Berlin. No such planning group existed in the West.

But Stalin practiced political as well as military strategy. Much of the day-to-day work of the Pentagon is planning for unlikely battles, such as if Denmark's Navy suddenly struck at the US Fleet. But, though he named himself Commander in Chief, Stalin knew he was the POLITICAL warrior who had unseated Lenin and Trotsky. Hitler fancied himself, with some justification, as a military genius. Stalin knew his talent was political, power warfare, which, in the long run, is FAR more important than military strategy.

So Stalin set up a group to study German defeat when his great concern was survival, just as professional military planners routinely spend most of their time on unlikely scenarios. And, more to the point here, just the way professional POLITICAL planners spend THEIR time dealing with questions that are of no interest whatsoever to the headline hounds.

Stalin figured he could 1) Lost, 2) fight an endless war of the type he would have had to fight if Churchill hadn't become fanatically pro-Communist with Roosevelt, or 3) He would be part of a complete Allied victory. So he had sections dedicated to each contingency. The Soviets came to Yalta and Potsdam completely prepared. The Allies, who had been sporting "V for Victory" signs for six years, had done NO planning for these conferences.

I am a POLITICAL warrior. My military experience is largely limited to discovering that if there is enough incoming, I can dig my nose into solid rock.

As I have explained many times, the probably future of Western countries is based on the idea that a massive influx of non-whites will end the status of non-whites as nothing but the liberals' Faithful Colored Companions. When leftists were importing Moslems, they thought they were bringing in automatic leftist votes and nothing else. Now they are making Europe make Hitler look like a Jew Lover.

The future is not leftist revolution, the future is RACIAL. All of our political dialogue has relegated the old economic issues to such a low level that we cannot believe that the budget used to be about all there was to politics.

Where will anti-whites whites, those whose whole interest is in Praise the Lord or socialism, be in the future? Right now they are leading their black and tan minorities, a la Ted Kennedy, but the new natives are getting restless. Bill Cosby runs into criticism that he is not black enough. Hispanics are getting restless, big-time.

And you ain't seen nothing yet.

My prediction is that political bargaining will, probably without being openly recognized as such, more and more racial. There will no place for a legion of non-whites for whom white liberals speak. In a social animal, it is critical to be part of some group. Right now Mommy Professors white kids, including the white-headed ones who still belong to the 1960s, have a group.

But think about the 60s. Go down Haight-Ashbury where the legions of The Children of the Future hung out. Go there and try to be a hippie today and you will see the future of the Mommy Professorites, the antis, who are so numerous today. I saw thousands of the millions of uniformed (beads, headband) hippies then who said they represented Youth and the Future. Go to their nests today and you can hear the wind and see the tumbleweed go by.

Tomorrow the antis, the race traitors, will have to crawl back in. Nobody else will want them. It is time to do some planning for that right now. And we can learn from respectable conservatives what NOT to do.

Neoconservatives are liberals who saw the philosophy they had gotten fat on melting down. They were almost all Jews, but liberalism was largely Jewish. But the Jews knew when to get off a sinking ship. Respectable conservatives were ecstatic to have such Recognized Intellectuals joining them. Respectable conservatives knew that no rightists were considered intellectuals in New York and New England because these same neoconservatives had destroyed them when they were liberals.

But respectable conservatives were so delighted to have Official Intellectuals deign to speak to them they fell into a love feast: "Anything we have," They told the neos, "Is yours." And when the antis who suppressed us come in from the cold, many of us are going to say, "These are our racial brethren, especially the non-Jews. Bless their little hearts, they have seen the Light. Let them in."

I don't think I have to tell anybody who can read without moving his lips what neoconservatives DID to conservatives. So I don't have to tell you what letting in the antis in any way but on their knees and on lifetime probation will do to US.

COMMENTS (10)

#1 Peter | 2007-02-04 16:53

NOT SPAM

NOT SPAM

It makes me wonder if all those liberal schemes could be turned around. Recently there was

talk in the news media about a psychological test that could identify "closet racists." A

test like that could be just as useful to find those who are secret antis.

Bruce

#2 Simmons | 2007-02-04 18:19

NOT SPAM

NOT SPAM

That word "racist" that Bruce mentioned is one we should parse. I think if we want an expanding base we need to find a way to remove the effect it has on potential recruits. No doubt the Mantra in someways covers its definition and purpose, but I think we need to really take it apart and find a weapon that crucifies the antis and the mopes they front for.

#3 cl | 2007-02-04 23:41

One of the glaringly obvious differences between Whites and others is that White groups tend to take on pejoratives as their own mantle (redneck, yankee, most of the denominational labels, etc), while non-Whites perceive words as the thing itself. Thus, for instance, Blacks must continually be re-labeled since the "term of the day" always takes on the connotation of "worthless."

Name-calling is a form of blackmail. The proper way to respond to blackmail is to shrug your shoulders and say "so what," ala Bill Clinton. Only then does a pejorative lose its power. It's also a way in which the opposition does our work for us, by automatically culling the wishy washies who are "scared" of being a "racist" (leaving us to separate out the freaks).

#4 cl | 2007-02-04 23:43

NOT SPAM

NOT SPAM

Damn it, I didn't put "NOT SPAM" above the previous post. Maybe you'll catch this.

#5 Peter | 2007-02-05 06:19

NOT SPAM

NOT SPAM

There are often many ways to understand a political movement as such things have many components. At the risk of appearing conspiracy oriented, my view of the noecons has always been that they are a conscious Fifth Column of the Israeli government. They are well financed by Zionist elements. They put Israeli interests and lives first. They were hoisted on the GOP by the Zionist media. They were proclaimed spokesmen by the media when they had never carried, and still have never carried, a single precinct for the Republican party. My reading of their rise is that at the core they are pretty much directed and financed indirectly by Israeli politicians. In short they are not Americans. The same holds true of certain Democratic politicians, notable Lantos and Emanuel. Lest one think that no Congressman would be an agent on a foreign government, think of Samuel Dickstein (D-NY), salaried agent of the NKVD. This view is not antagonistic to view expressed by Bob. The two analyses can coexist.

Baxk Bay Grouch

NOT SPAM

NOT SPAM

#6 richard | 2007-02-05 09:37

NOT SPAM

NOT SPAM

This is an excellent article, expressing a very important idea. Here in the UK, many jews are starting to make supportive noises about the BNP and white nationalism, now that they realise that importing millions of muslims into Europe maybe wasn't such a good idea. We can do without their 'support'.

#7 Alan | 2007-02-05 09:39

NOT SPAM

NOT SPAM

Respectable conservatives and Liberals can never be trusted, I see these jerks the same way I viewed cold war defectors who fled to the USSR or to here in America. When a defector arrives in the enemy camp they are given assylum, debriefed and used as propaganda and never really trusted as one of us, a traitor is a traitor you know. The respectables and liberals have little to offer their fellow Whites,they betrayed all of us for fame, money and fasion. The respectable is a shister, the liberal was usually to stupid to know any better, either way, they will always pose a threat more dangerous than our real enemies, they will most likely create division and dissent, "A House Divided Will Fall", I hate it when the house falls twice.

#8 Peter | 2007-02-05 16:51

NOT SPAM

NOT SPAM

A few weeks ago, my head was almost bitten off for talking about assimilated non-whites on this blog.

Last night, I saw such an assimilated non-white, Dinesh D'souza, promoting his new book on C-SPAN. D'souza is an Indian (dot, not feather) who came to the States at age 17, went to college, became a Reaganite and a political writer -- and has almost completely lost his accent. His notoriety seems to be based on the fact he is a non-white "conservative" who is educated, eloquent and can speak and write at length. He wrote a book called "The End of Racism" -- which seems to be suggesting that smart Asians like him will herald in a new era for America - as a multiracial happy-place. This non-white elite will give the lower races the inspiration they need to elevate themselves -- or something. In other words, he believes the future will be the opposite of what this blog predicts.

D'souza is predictably a staunch anti-racist, strong supporter of Israel, and likes to babble on about "radical Islam." In other words, he is the perfect neo-con. He is married to a white lady. When one caller to C-SPAN pointed this out, he immediately became irate and said, "Look, i married so-and-so because I love her." His daughter is a half-caste, but still a higher caste than his own.

I wouldn't doubt that this blog considers him a hack or an impostor. Though, with his Bill Gates-ish look, I didn't feel he would go Ted Bundy on anyone anytime soon.

That's "conservatism" in America.

Al Parker

#9 cl | 2007-02-05 18:58

Al Parker said: "Last night, I saw such an assimilated non-white, Dinesh D'souza, promoting his new book on C-SPAN. D'souza is an Indian (dot, not feather) who came to the States at age 17, went to college, became a Reaganite and a political writer and has almost completely lost his accent. His notoriety seems to be based on the fact he is a non-white "conservative" who is educated, eloquent and can speak and write at length."

Ravi Zacharias fills the same role in the "evangelical" camp--with a very similar bio.

#10 Peter | 2007-02-08 07:27

NOT SPAM

NOT SPAM

Denish D'Souza did not have as much assimilating to do as you might think. While born in Mumbai (Bombay) his family was Goan. Goa was a Portuguese enclave that predated the British occupation of India. His family is Roman Catholic. Prior to coming to America for college received a Jesuit high school education. He dated Ann Coulter. His choice of babes is blond. He backs up Bob's thesis that India, with its preference for pure Aryan kinder, may be an important ally.

Back Bay Grouch

NOT SPAM

NOT SPAM