THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

The obvious and only conclusions to draw are:

(1) Churchill wanted WWII from the beginning;

(2) Churchill was pro-Communist and part of the International Revolution.

(3) Poland was a phony pretext for starting WWII.

--------------------------------------

We know that Churchill wrote out a blank check to the new Polish government to support Poland unconditionally in the event of a conflict with anyone. However, Churchill left Poland to the dogs, and as you say, supported the Soviet Union unconditionally in war -- a country which had just invaded Poland.

We also know from correspondence from a Polish ambassador that British agents had assassinated the previous Polish president, a leader who was staunchly pro-German. The new revloutionary government in Poland was supported immediately by Churchill. When Churchill gave his blank check, Poland began attacking the native Germans who still lived within the Polish borders. Forty thousand Germans were dead. Germany had to defend these Germans, or the Nazis would have been out of office.

The pretext for launching WWII was not the invasion of Poland; it was Danzig. Danzig had voted to return to Germany in free elections overseen, monitored, and approved by the international community. Since Germany had accepted this vote, Danzig became the pretext for Churchill, FDR, and Stalin to start WWII which to be the International Revolution that Princip failed to start in 1917.

Germany was incredibly weak and was not expected to last more than a few weeks or months.

However, the Red troops, led by Jewish comissars, were awesomely incompetent. Within two weeks, the Germans captured 4,000,000 Red troops that were meant to sweep through Western Eruope and the British Isles.

This was also proof that The Reds intended to make good in their threats to take over the whole world in their promised International Revolution. Four million Reds, armed, were not in the middle of Poland to bake pancakes.

Later, the Germans discovered that altogether, the Reds had some 20,000,000 tanks! No one in the world ever had so many. Germany had a few thousand. At the end of the war, when Hitler had a talk with Mannheim in Finland, he confessed that had they known what they were up against, they never would have defended themselves.

<b>War guilt</b>

Churchill: Started the war/revolution by provoking Poland with a blank check, then threw Poland aside to make the ALLIANCE with the Red revolutionary government, the Soviet Union.

FDR: Gave unconditional financial and materiel support to the Red revolution and to its ally, Churchill. Immediately joined the war/revolution by starting the war on the Atlantic by seeking out and sinking all European shipping.

Stalin: Provided the Soviet Union as the man-power and home base for the Jewish leadership of the world revolution. Churchill continued supplying the Soveit Union's financial and materiel needs until 1940, when Germany was about to win. Following that, ground troops were added to fight side by side with the Reds.

<b>Outcome</b>

The International Revolution failed. Fifty years later, the Reds could no longer keep control of their own country and the Soviet Union itself fell.

<b>Current status</b>

The same world struggle goes on today, but this time, the heirs to the Reds no longer openly dare to name the International Revolution. 85% of the Soviet Uhnion's defense budget was spent on domestic destablization of its allies the USA and UK. There were three prongs: the media, education, and the churches. All organizations, recipients of the billions of dollars in aid channelled from the Soviet Union were expected to be self-running, recruit their own, and raise their own funds in addition to the Soviet bankroll.

When the Soviet Union fell, these organizations in the "free" world were now wholly independent. Thus the hoome base of the heirs to the Reds is now the USA and the UK.

The ideas of the Reds, of the International Revolution, are now mainstream. But instead of calling for "freedom of the proletariat," etc, the Red ideology has distilled into the nastiest possible evil: white genocide.

<b>The Red track record</b>

Revolution of 1848 - failed

War against the South - succeeded

WWI - International Revolution failed except in Russia, Europe's backwater.

WWII - failed

The Soviet Union - lost

the white world in the 21st century - genocide ongoing but not completed

Yes, and this was done to end ethnic and racial nationalism and to make the world free for assimilation and equality.

That's why the Germans of Southeastern and Eastern Europe were herded into Germany's post war borders (despite the fact that these Germans had never lived with their brethren Germans), and the Jews of Central and Eastern Europe were herded out into Israel (despite the fact that these Jews had never had any prior contact with each other), and the Greeks and the Turks were herded into respective bordered and patrolled post war geographically contiguous enclaves (they too having never had any contact with each other).

Recently, in this same tradition, the Anglo-Saxon powers assisted the herding of the Serbs out of Croatia, Bosnia, and other Balkan countries into (so-called) Serbia proper (so the Serbs could get to know each other better), with each of the Balkan ethnicities being marched to their very own geographically contiguous bordered and patrolled enclaves (so they could get to know one another better also).

Now the same service is being performed for the races and ethnicities Mesopotamia with each ethnicity getting its very own walled off, bordered, and heavily patrolled geographically contiguous enclave (and now each ethnicity has no problem at all knowing exactly where everybody lives).

All this happened because multiculturalism works!

Proof that Political Correctness is right!

Accordingly, we can have confidence in our leaders and their doctrines.

There is a wonderful correspondence between their words and actual results.