BUDARICK | 2006-06-10
Budarick says:
The two of you sure would make a great team.
Hang on a minute, what the hell am i saying here?
"Would make?"
You two ARE already a great team.
We are all part of a bigger whole and we find our niche.
What matters is seing the cause as a whole and how each of us fits in there.
I remember all those Nazis in their nice new uniforms in the late 1930's, looking real good, AND they had a GREAT legitimate cause. They had everything we dream off! They even had a well defined adversary! You can have no idea what a GREAT cause they had! But they were concerned with wanting to be on the right side of Hitler. AND Hitler was saying no, no, that is not important, what is important is being able to work effectively for OUR cause using your natural skills at whatever level you happen to be.
The point is that "president" and "vice" are functions and not status. Those functions are best served by those who have natural skills and not by those who seek the status.
But people without a true cause always seek status.
And that was the problem Hitler had to deal with in a pragmatic way.
He could not just use some social manipulation idiology.
That is the prolem any one of our leaders will have to deal with to.
This aberation of seeking status torments the White Nationalist movement.
In fact every movement!
Have a look at the Palestinians. Look at all those faction! Imagine what they could do if they were united in function. They would blow those sly sardistic baby killing worms who call themselves "Israel" absolutely to hell.
"Human nature".
From what i can tell over the internet and having listened to their broadcasts, David and Bob, have a very good understanding of "human nature". In my oppinion very much above normal.
My point is that David and Bob don't have to claim leadership.
They "have" it already.
Hitler wrote about these interesting matters of "human nature" in his first infamous book.
Comment by PeterGene Budarick
There is a lot of criticism of Hitler because he did NOT micromanage his movement.
None of the people doing the criticizing have ever set up a successful movement.
Budarick is dead right. As we say down South, "It makes me tired all over" when I hear somebody screaming about how somebody else in the movement has not toed his exact ideological line.
My reading of history is that Hitler didn't so much "set up" the Nazi movement in the accepted sense. He GATHERED it. As a political professional, I look for things that WORK, whichever end of the political spectrum they come from.
Hitler was a lance corporal. Rudolf Hess was not only an officer, he was a war hero who was the heir to Richtoffen. But five years after the War ended, Hess was acting as Hitler's SECRETARY.
Hitler's big mistake was actually going after Goering, who was first of all an egotist of the exact type Budarick describes.
There is an old saying, "If people can see you know where you're going, they will line up behind you." Except for Goerring, that is what Hitler did.
It has been said that Hitler personally came in and shot the head of the SA when it became a threat. This is supposed to show Hitler was a mean man, unlike Comrade Stalin who never shot anybody himself. The only violence Stalin ever committed personallly was beating his wife in public.
We Southerners have another saying: "A man should shoot his own dog." I don't know how well that translates to other cultures. If you are going to have someone killed, it is more moral to do it yourself than to sit in your office like Stalin while your apes do the work for you.
This is a very American attitude. Long before he was president, Grover Cleveland was the sheriff of a county in New York. He performed every single execution himself, with his own hands.
Preachers are always begging their congregations to build a new church. As Budarick says, the reason for this is show. They can say, "While I was preaching at that church, we built a new church building."
My father was the son of a circuit-riding preacher down here in the Deep South. Every time a preacher would talk about a new church, he would get up and say, "Preacher, you concentrate on PREACHING and on your MINISTRY. If you preach so well that this church gets crowded, you won't have to ask anybody to build you a bigger church. They'll built it."
In Mein Kampf, Hitler says, "I discovered that I could 'speak.'"
Actually Hitler SLAVED at improving his speaking style. He took note of every reaction he got from the groups he wa talking to.
He had a talent, but he WORKED at it.
He became the leader simply because nobody could move the masses anywhere near the way he could.
Even Trotsky argued htat Stalin wa a lesser man than Hitler because he maneuvered his way into power over a movement that was already victorious while Hitler built his own from the ground up.
No, I am not endorsing Hitler. But if you are in politics, you damn well be able to learn from anybody who has something to teach you.