AL PARKER, NOW YOU'RE USEFUL! - THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

AL PARKER, NOW YOU'RE USEFUL! | 2007-01-11

Commenters have broken their silence and are answering Parker. Parker is answering them.

That, boys and girls, is what the blog is for.

Parker says Peter is hinting that human beings are animals. I won't hint. Humans ARE animals.

Have you ever watched "rap" music?" Look at their THUMBS! The first sign of humanity is the opposable thumb. Rappers hold their thumb right against their forefinger and never move. Every movement they make is suggestive of monkeys, and I cannot believe this is accidental. Is this a reversion to the monkey? I don't KNOW.

For decades, the MMPI has shown that blacks have a much, MUCH higher rate of sociopathy than whites or Orientals. That's a matter of record as much as IQ tests are. But this was not the point of my piece. It's just that Parker said that if a race had a higher rate of sociopathy it would be obvious. It is, and has been, which is why the MMPI went out of popularity with IQ tests.

Black babies, and this has been tested endlessly, are able to move their heads at birth. White babies take quite a while to get there. Monkeys are able to do a great deal at birth. There is a steady, repeatedly shown curve which shows the human baby getting smarter and the monkey getting smarter, but MUCH more slowly. With both black and white babies and humans and monkeys, there is a crossover point at which the white gets smarter than monkeys, and another similar one for white and black babies.

The crossover between an African baby and a white baby is at forty weeks.

Now, can anybody guess how this was used? The big thin a generation ago was that there is nothing inherited. It was newborn nutrition and infant experience that made ALL the difference. They demonstrated this by showing that blacks were SUPERIOR to white and Oriental babies until about ten months old, when malnutrition and differential treatment kicked in.

If you said anything else, you were saying that blacks were like monkeys. You were anaziwhowantedtokillsixmillionjews. One Canadian, Dr. Ertel, got a huge fortune in research money to show how similar the EEGs were of black and white children at ten months.

This argument about human beings can be exploited that way. But reality does not yield to this kind of rhetoric.

COMMENTS (6)

#1 Simmons | 2007-01-11 15:25

NOT SPAM

As an aside I've noticed that we 40something athletic white men are still going strong where it seems black men are fading into a lifetime left of insulin shots. But this is another whole debate and I do not want to take up much time with it.

#2 Pain | 2007-01-11 16:21

NOT SPAM

Where's Mark?

"Black babies, and this has been tested endlessly, are able to move their heads at birth. White babies take quite a while to get there."

Don't foals walk at birth?

If you compare a group of black twelve-year-olds with white twelve-year-olds, you would notice that the blacks are much bigger and older looking. Many of the blacks will look as old as white sixteen-year-olds.

So by high school, when coaches are looking for football-players, they see that blacks are the biggest, so they pick them. By the time of college at age eighteen, the blacks are full grown, but the whites are not. So more blacks will be picked then too.

So even if pro ball teams did not deliberately deny whites opportunities to play ball (and they do, just like all other areas of life), early-bloomers would still have an unfair advantage over the late.

This is why cross-country teams are dominated by skinny white kids. Most of them are late bloomers who were too skinny to make it into football, which is a first choice sport for most boys.

By the way, the reason that Kenyans dominate long distant running today is that a few years ago, a remark gathered much publicity. The remark was that whites dominated long-distant running totally. But soon after a couple east African, Ethiopian mulattos did well in a few marathons. At about the same time, steroids that enhanced performance of endurance were developed.

So white sponsors went to east Africa to fly blacks over the US and train, drug, and put them on a payroll. Ethiopia and Eritrea were at war, so the recruiters wound up in nearby Kenya. Until then, the only pro-athletes that could make a good living were in team sports. Professional runners being paid tens of thousands and hundreds of thousands or more dollars a year was unheard. Whites still do not make good livings running.

But Kenyans do.

Kenya, a very poor country, now has ample finances to pay for the most successful long-distant running program in the world. The best Kenyans are flown by US corporate sponsors to America and provided with salaries and everything they need.

Another anti-white injustice to notice.

#3 Peter | 2007-01-11 21:58

NOT SPAM

Mr. Whitaker,

If you truly believe that you can quantify the

difference between our Gothic ancestors and

African savages by some simple material measurements

such as IQ or gestation or personality profiles or other

subjective test scores you are not the man

I thought you were.

Black people cannot progress beyond

savagery.

They can't possibly be our enemies.

We deserve a better foe.

#4 Alan | 2007-01-12 02:52

NOT SPAM

White babies surpass the blacks as their motor skills begin to kick in and they interact with their environment. When they crawl, reach for objects and run into road blocks they learn to work in their environment, they reason and think. Blacks through out evolution lived in the harshest environments, the superior white race seen to that. The savage environment required a savage humanoid, intelligence is less important in there evolution. In todays modern scoiety, in time of crisis blacks become savages and loot,, murder and rape at will until the whites restore order, this happens everywhere they live amoung whites. Its thee evolution, its in their blood.

#5 YearningForFreedom | 2007-01-12 17:03

NOT SPAM

OK, I wrote a reply yesterday but I didn't send it. Here is my rewritten reply after more thinking.

Of course humans are animals. But what I see what you are trying is introduce another frame of thought. But more than that, you are trying to introduce a new Weltanschaunng (world view).

I see the current Weltanschaunng as saying that all people are humans. We have black humans, yellow humans and white humans -- but we're all human. And we are more similar than different. Where there are differences, we should work to correct them, not to separate and segregate. Where some are lower, we must try our best to raise them up to our level.

You are trying to introduce a world-view that dehumanizes us. It makes us think of ourselves as animals. Then, we can say the non-whites are lower animals (or lower breeds). It seems like an un-Christian way of thinking. (Or at least the sick brand of Christianity, as you refer to it, that says, "According to the Bible, there are no "races" - there is only one race: the human race. We are all descended from Adam and Eve and diversity came later.")

I'll just say that if many people adopted the latter view, nobody would care about denying the Holocaust anymore.

#6 joedaddy | 2007-01-13 18:05

Pain, there isn't much money in professional long distance running. If a corporate sponsor wants to fly in Kenyans here and have them run a race and then fly them home...who cares? The important thing is they go home.

If the same corporations fire 10,000 American workers and replace them with illegal Mexicans, then we have a REAL problem.