THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

Here is yet another example of reality Vs The Doctrine:

"The study, which will be presented to a major conference on school segregation in London this week, supports the warning by Trevor Phillips in 2005 that the country is "sleepwalking to segregation". According to Mr Phillips, who was then chairman of the Commission for Racial Equality, the creation of "fully-fledged ghettos" in the UK is leading to "chronic cultural conflict".

No torchlight parades herald this change that is gradually taking place here on planet Earth. Normal White people are simply heeding common sense and leaving behind the nonsense spewed out by Bill O'Reilly and company.

Today Al Gore received the Nobel Peace Prize for his commitment to The Doctrine. No one outside of The Establishment or Rush Limbaugh or Sean Hannity payed any attention whatsoever.

If you will tune out "commentators" and even Stormfront, you will see that The New World Order is dead as Kelsey's nuts. Like any terminal patient, it too is having a few "good days" before suddenly expiring.

We are taught that life is about progress.

Progress is defined as the movement from barbarism to civilization. Barbarism can be defined as "like aboriginal people".

Two thousand years ago our ancestors wore pants, lived in permanent dwellings and built large and various complex machines to accomplish their various ends. We were not savages.

And when you understand the truth of this,

You will start to think as a white person.

The unquestionable assumption is that humanity is and always was one, needlessly divided by religion, race and political ideology.

Perhaps then, humanity by nature IS divided and needlessly cobbled and forced together in the name of religion, the new mixed race and political ideology.

Remember this,

Any "literature" can be deadly.

If we don't perform OUR OWN investigations OURSELVES.

Wordism arises because "intellectualism" is easy. All you have to do is master a "literature" and have a yap that likes to yap.

But real investigations are hard. You have to be a good soldier to perform a real investigation and arrive and YOUR OWN conclusions.

Very few of us are good soldiers.

Revolutions are based on good soldiers.

BW says:

"You can be reasonable or you can be truthful"

"This is not diplomacy."

"Every Truth is saleable and reasonable. The truth is neither."

I say:

Do not take BWs above statement and turn it into DOCTRINE. BW did not say, "Diplomacy doesn't matter".

That would be an excuse for failing to master diplomacy, a practical necessity in the real world.

Something turns into Wordism at the very moment it furnishes an excuse for failing to do what is necessary.

Two quick comments:

One, I prefer the term, "The Doctrine,' to the word, "Wordism."

When they ask you "Which doctrine?" the answer allows you to go into an analysis of Wordism - the PRACTICE of turning words into rules that neutralize the natural forces of favoring Family, over all else.

Two, "The Doctrine" reminds me of that moment where the Letter kills, where the Spirit gives Life.

"The Doctrine" results in a crystallization of a rule into something that worked, then, but does not work, now, and yet has so many political interests attached that is no longer as valuable a Rule as it was.

The hallmark of decay is when The Rule serves counterintuitive purposes; this is a reflection of the cultural, political, and economic ossification of the society wherein The Rule is in control.

One example of this is from Joseph Tainter's work on the collapse of complex societies. He notes that they only "collapse" to the point that marginal benefits from being part of a larger political entity are no less than equal than the marginal costs of membership in the political entity.

When The Rule ossifies into structures that absorb, and block, the organic development of a society, then Wordism has triumphed over the processes of organic development.

The End of an Age is close to hand; in the words of Agent Smith, at the beginning of the movie, "The Matrix," "Lieutenant, your men are already dead. They just don't realize it."

Two, the only "religion" that really works for the Western Soul is Christianity, as it should have been.

The root of "religion" is from the Latin, meaning "to bind back."

ALL of the stagnant Cultures have a religion that seeks to "bind them back" to an earlier state of Consciousness.

Thus, Islam longs for the Seventh Century to return, Buddhism hopes for the negation to prevail, Confucianism only seeks to control the here and now, and Judaism only seeks to control the here and now.

They are all, essentially, reflections of The Doctrine in the Forms of religions, with the substance of temporal control systems, seeking to rebuild tomorrow's world in yesterday's image.

This leads us to mrpelding's great Comment in an earlier comment on this page:

<blockquote cite="""Remember, we are forming a new religion. A radical shift in moral narrative."</blockquote cite=""

THIS is what Christianity, uniquely, provided, among all of the world's religions; it was inherently Creative, and refused to put "new wine in old bottles."

The old bottles could not take it.

Apply this thinking to the various Forms the concept "United States of America" has taken over the last several centuries; from thirteen colonies, to thirteen nations within one country, to one country with territories larger than European countries, to one nation...you get the idea.

Now, look at how the Practice of Christianity <b>at the Institutional level</b> has changed; in particular, whether you see the contrast between the Puritans and the Episcopalians between Plymouth Rock, and Jamestown, or the remarkable use of the Southern Baptist Convention to support the equivalent of indentured servitude as proof of moral superiority, Christianity, <b>the handmaiden of Real Power at the Institutional level</b>, has been transformed into the triumph of Doctrine over Spirit, and Control, over Growth.

It is this Spirit we will need to recover, and the simple test to be used in guiding the recovery - and Transformation - is, "Was the Sabbath made for Man, or was Man made for the Sabbath?"

I KNOW this:

Christianity began as a religion, but is greater than all religions, because it is inherently Creative, and is more than willing to ignore the old bottles as fit vehicles for the new wine.

Now, how we are remaking Christianity <b>in practice</b> is up to us.

Christianity, and, in time, all of society.

To cite mrpelding's focus on <blockquote cite="">"...a radical shift in moral narrative."</blockquote> is to focus on the importance of morality over The Doctrine.

If The Doctrine does not support the highest of morality - survival, and growth, of you, the Family, and, by extension, the <b>RACE</b>, then The Doctrine has shown that it is archaic, and no longer meets the needs of the new Cultural Moment.

I have thought about things that Afkan says here. When Christ told Peter that on this "pebble" , his faith, that he would build HIS church and the gates of hell would not prevail against it,I don't think he meant that the vatican and all the pomp would go on forever ,but we, the people, would die, swallowed up. I also don't think that one mass interracial camp meeting is the future. That's all been judged and found wanting.

in reply to Shari:

you wrote:

<blockquote cite=""> I have thought about things that Afkan says here. When Christ told Peter that on this "pebble" , his faith, that he would build HIS church and the gates of hell would not prevail against it,I don't think he meant that the vatican and all the pomp would go on forever ,but we, the people, would die, swallowed up. I also don't think that one mass interracial camp meeting is the future. That's all been judged and found wanting. </blockquote>

in reply:

The "pebble" - the Foundation - was NOT the faith of Peter, but the <b>realization</b> of Peter that Jesus was the Christ, the Messiah. Note that Christ did not say, "Upon YOU I will build My church." It was the Insight that mattered, and not the Messenger.

THAT is a Living Idea, of a Living Ideal.

No idolatrous images, no middleman taking a cut, no body of written Laws tp become crystallized in decaying Doctrine - remember, the only time Christ wrote, it was in the sand, and He promptly erased even that.

In short, Christianity's strength, in terms of temporal organization, is that such Doctrine as it had was expansive enough to allow the organizations to meet the changing needs of the people, and the Cultures they Created.

Remember, at the age of twelve, He confounded the master Wordists of His place and time.

I like mrpelding's idea of a new religion, for that is was Christianity was supposed to be - always renewing itself, and Creatively transforming the people, and the Institutions, to make them vehicles for the Living Words to manifest within.

That takes us back to an earlier observation I made about White Nationalism requiring the functional equivalent of a spiritual transformation, a religious conversion, to become what it should become.

Bluntly, the transformation from cult to religion is a major leap that few cults make; they focus on the Man before them, and fall apart when the Man before them falls - as he always does.

Look at the WN bulletin boards, and they are little more than one exercise after another in going in circles - a lot of ACTIVITY, but precious little PRODUCTIVITY.

"Man, ever since Rockwell died, things have fallen apart, I don't know what to do." "Yeah, ever since Pierce died, things have fallen apart around here. Hey, did you hear Pierce (insert personal shortcoming, real or imagined, here)?"

In short, Western Nationalism/White Nationalism, and the entire Western Nationalism/White Nationalism "Movement" (WN2/M), is trapped in some bizarre, ritual of self-selecting impotence, where the entire System never really leaves Childhood.

In short, while it certainly provides entertainment, it does not provide an impetus to move forward, in a social order of achievement...

Thus, it fails, every time.

The sad irony, of course, is, to paraphrase Alex Linder, "It just amazes the Hell out of me. We have the best Idea, and the best Ideals, and the damndest bunch of fools, idiots, clowns and perverts out there as our nominal 'representatives.'"

I have wondered why this was, and have come to realize it is because most are stuck in Child/Adolescence, and can not accept the </b>PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY</b>, which only Adults do, to actually CHANGE something, starting with themselves, where they are.

THAT is the Vanguard that will make all of the difference, because they will not be trapped in The Doctrine, but will be in touch with the spiritual forces, which they will transform into religious forces, and use THOSE to transform themselves, first, and then, by their deeds and their living examples, the world around them.

An easy Framework for all questions, and all activities, is this:

<blockquote cite="">What does this mean to my Family, as the microcosm of my Race; my Race, as the macrocosm of my Family; and my Race, as the Living Bridge between Family and Culture?</blockquote>

To resolve these issues even more concretely, and even more directly, I look at my nephews, and think about what effect my activities will have on their future.

The rest is easy.

Thank you, Afkan. I agree that the foundation was Peter's realization that Jesus was the Christ. I think that faith is just what keeps us looking a little farther after we have realized something. I think that a new religion will come from the rediscovery of simple truth, while ossified, Truth, will be rejected.