I said that Kerry had danger in his lines in the form of the Clintons. I wrote about that on August 7.
See "Can the Clintons Stop Kerry in 2004?"
Hillary was mostly out of sight the whole time. Bill had heart surgery at just the right time. It may have been legitimate. It may have been something he could have put off. I am still trying to get the story on that.
In 1945 the group that calls itself The Greatest Generation came home. The Southern branch of that group insisted that "We are One Nation now." They took over the Sons of Confederate Veterans (SCV) and made it obedient to the Yankee nation.
In fact, I was at a SCV convention not long ago, and one speaker said, "We can openly support our flag now. The World War II generation isn't in control anymore."
In 1945, the railroad rates that had made the South a region of poverty were still in full force. But after four years of Obedience Training, Southerners were Yankee Nationalists. The same thing happened to Korean vets and Vietnam vets. They were almost all transformed into Yankee nationalists.
Most of the new generation has not been in the service.
They did not get their Obedience Training.
They are not what the Greatest Genereation proudly called themselves,"dog-faces."
Thank God!
When the discriminatory rail rates, and the Old Reconstruction, ended in 1951, the New Reconstruction was under way. It was called "Civil Rights."
The propaganda explained "Civil Rights" as just a love of blacks. It was a campaign of hatred against white Southerners. Southerners were forced to use the word "Nee-grows" for blacks. Yankees loved that word because it is so unnatural for Southerners to pronounce. A Southerner saying "Nee-grow" was like him falling on his face before Political Correctness.
It was the founder of the Black Panthers who introduced using the word "black." He made it clear that the word "Nee-grow" was not natural for blacks either. The Yankee Nation had never thought about that. Their only intent was to make Southerners crawl. How blacks talked was not their problem.
In 1861 the war was about the Southern Nation against the Yankee Nation. In 1960 the war was between the Southern Nation and the Yankee Nation. Blacks were irrelevant to both sides.
Another great history lesson, "Washington's Klan" has facts you've probably never heard.
This is not some sort of secret conspiracy. They could not be more blatant and open about the fact that hating white gentiles in general and white Southerners in particular is What America Is All About.
We have national TV ads and Senator McCain saying this as clearly as any human being can POSSIBLLY say it. There is nothing subtle here.
The Ad Council said it loud and clear and on national television. Senator McCain said it, also on national TV. National Review, which is always talking about the importance of words, spends a lot of effort making it clear that hating the South trumps verbal accuracy.
"John Brown's Body" is our real national anthem.
National Review makes it very clear that Reagan's victory was nowhere near as important to them as rejecting George Wallace's many millions of supporters.
They hate you, and I don't know how they could possibly make this any clearer.
And that, dear Virginia, is What America Means To Me.
"Again, with the Asian example, are we supreme over Asians, or do we just want them to stay in their own countries?"
Comment by Z
BW:
The simple answer to your question is the latter.
By definition, a white nationalist accepts the existence of other nations.
What I now have to say sounds like a quibble, but it is not. IN MY OPINION, it is a worldview your question does not reflect.
Non-whites can stay in their own countries or move to other non-white countries, this is not our concern while our survival is at stake.
One thing I saw, but that the media did not talk about, was that millions of Indians and Arabs who had lived in Africa for generations were driven out when blacks took power. The result was a loss of hard workers ands relatively intelligent people that is now causing literal starvation millions of Africans. This does not concern the media because it does not concern their real aims.
AS A PRO-White it does not concern me. It concerned me because I have seen and SMELLED real starvation. Yes it has a SMELL. I knew a lot of those Arabs and Indians the "humanitarians' forget existed, but from a white survivalist viewpoint, this none of our business.
We ask only our own place to survive. From a white nationalist point of view, and purely THAT point of view, whether non-whites stay home or go to other non-white countries is not relevant to our ideology.
To answer your question as you mean it, we only want them to "stay home," meaning inside the non-white world.
Our problem is that they don't WANT to. They want the benefits and stability a white country provides. The fly in that ointment is that when they get here they destroy those benefits. That is what is so obviously wrong with the libertarian "free movement of goods, capital AND LABOR" argument.
Non-white "leaders" keep demanding that whites not object to intermarriage and that non-whites be allowed into white countries. They blame the problems of the whole world on whites wanting to be separate. THAT is white supremacy, the idea that you can't have an education unless non-white kids sit beside white kids.
As one official in charge of school busing said, "White children are a precious resource. They must be distributed carefully."
How white supremacist can you GET?
White supremacy is not an ideology. It is a simple fact of world thinking today. IN THAT SENSE, it is the major force behind the drive to destroy us. "Nondiscrimination" is the battle cry behind the worldwide offensive behind the drive to assimilate whites off the Planet.
And in the real world, "nondiscrimination" means that there is to be no place on earth where whites are allowed to have as their own.