THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

IN THE MOUTH OF THE BEAST | 2010-12-19

Stormfront is having a discussion of the Genius Conspiracy that caused Pearl Harbor. When those folks consider the Conspiracy, they are looking at CIA agents who make James Bond look like a typist.

My picture of the Geniuses is a little different. In fact, what always comes to my mind is the incident of the Burn Bags.

OPM, where I was a Reagan appointee, had to deal with the employment of all civilian employees that were on budget. The CIA itself is off budget. But the Defense Intelligence Agency and the like are on budget.

Theoretically we dealt with a lot of highly classified stuff. Actually, we farmed it out to the agency. But we had to handle our documents the way any agency that might be in on intelligence work had to do it.

We also had to CLEAR all civilian personnel.

We were, in short, among the Geniuses.

When something came across our desks in the Director's Office that was what they call Top Secret, it went into the Burn Bag after we looked at it.

One day Reagan's appointee as General Counsel in this agency handling highly classified material came to the our regular meeting with the Director with a request:

"Would you please order them to BURN the damned Burn Bags?"

Someone from his office had been in the furnace room and had actually stumbled over one of the high pile of Burn Bags they hadn't gotten around to.

I was very uncomfortable, and the Director looked over and me without a word. I was in his line on staffing and security, the last person to see the stuff before it went to his office. I should have checked that sort of thing.

This was an evening meeting, when the "politicals" met after the regular folks had long since gone home. So I went and burned them myself. So I remember it well.

We were sloppy, but the CIA itself was sloppier.

When I hear people talking about The Beast, the Geniuses, about a dozen incidents like this come before me.

When Reagan needed some real manipulating done, he called in Ollie North, a new Lt. Colonel, to do it. When the congressman who got us into saving the Afghans in their rebellion against the USSR  ended up going to the front himself, the CIA opposed him the way any bureaucracy would.

I have been in the Mouth of the Beast.

It strikes me as toothless.

TEMPERANCE VERSUS TEMPERANCE | 2006-10-06

A temperate approach tempers something. That is to say, it moderates something.

If you are temperate in the use of alcohol it mwans TWO things:

1) you do not drink to excess and

2) You DO drink moderately.

There are two types of people who are NOT temperate on alcohol,

1) Those who drink too much and

2) Those who do not drink at all.

We take it for granted that the Temperance movement is not only dedicated to 2), but that it demands a law to ENFORCE 2).

We take it for granted that anything called Anti-Racist demands an end to the white race.

THREE LITTLE WORDS FOR US AND ONE LITTLE WORD THAT WOULD CHANGE HISTORY | 2011-04-15

Let Coach once again go over a play you need to be reminded of, to use when YOU think it is best.

One commenter in GC6 just reminded me of it.

It's three little words: "in your opinion."

The basics cannot be repeated too often.

If someone calls you a racist or a Nazi or a White Supremacist, you want a short, Mantra-thinking reply. Something that is, like the Mantra, so obviously true that it stops any debate or diversion the anti-white could make with it.

You simply state that "You mean that if I oppose genocide against my race it means that IN YOUR OPINION I am a (Nazi, racist, whatever)."

This also made me think how one word could do wonders for correcting history.

That word is "recorded."

One historian pointed out that the Romans got soap from "Roman Gaul." This is true. They used to scrape the dirt off with volcanic rock in their Baths. But it had been used by the GAULS since time immemorial.

What is true is that soap's first RECORDED use was in Roman Gaul.

If you read the internet, over and over someone will quote that such and such a thing was INVENTED someplace in the Middle East. The problem is that 1) the Middle East was where all the researches were since Christianity became the official religion of Rome, and 2) the Middle East is EMPTY.

History is exactly opposite from our daily experience. Usually we don't notice something when it is in a place we never go. Archeology CONSISTS of going places you never go.

History is lost in living lands, lands where a Great Civilization didn't die permanently, and by some strange coincidence, where the population is still white. Living lands built right over their earlier civilizations. But the Middle East is like a skeleton. Cities are abandoned, the extensive irrigation Iraq had in its white Babylonian days are gone, leaving the a land of bare bones where nothing is buried.

With carbon dating and all the other technology, we are beginning to find the true age of Stonehenge and a giant wooden bridge across the Thames near London that dates to 1500 BC. If you read standard history, the barbarians couldn't use the opposable thumb that far back, much less have built that bridge or have had the forgotten huge traffic such a bridge would be built for.

History comes from archeology and archeology dictates the history of technology.

And it is laughably wrong. Nothing is changing faster than history.

The ridiculous excuse for a history of invention could have avoided some of this by the simple use of the word "recorded," as in "the earliest RECORDED writing is found in Egypt." But the archeologist insisted, EACH TIME, that whatever they found in the bare bones of Middle Eastern white civilization did not represent what they found, but what was FIRST.

Basing history on what you happen to stumble across is not an intelligent error.

THE LUNCHEONEERS | 2016-02-25

Horus has only made one Luncheoneer comment to me. I'm sure he has forgotten it and I am sure he has outgrown it.

The Luncheoneer comment was when I said interviewers were AFRAID to interview me.

Horus gave me that look I have seen on a Thousand Luncheoneer faces, and said, "Now, Bob, I think you're overestimating yourself."

No, they are just plain scared of me. And Horus has known that quite a while.

I call this twisted lip look The Luncheoneer look because it is the standard reaction from people who say, "I had lunch with President Reagan or "I had lunch with Donald Trump."

These are the very people for whom power-brokers in Washington put on their Deepest Southern Accent.

The Luncheoneers ALWAYS fall for it.

My prime example is the late Senator Sam Ervin of North Carolina.

Ervin USED -- I repeat USED -- a Southern accent that would have seemed excessive in Hattiesburg, Mississippi.

Ervin's favorite lead-in was "I'm just a country lawyer from North Carolina."

Howard Baker of Tennessee was Ranking Member on the Senate Judiciary Committee in a period when Ervin was Chairman, and once when Ervin pulled that "country lawyer" line out Baker lost his temper and said, "Goddamnit, Sam, You are a summa cum laude graduate of the Harvard Law School!"

Sam leaned back in his Chair and replied, "Yea, Howard, but nobody is ever going to know it."

Sam was right as usual.

The people who live by who had lunch with Kissinger or Trump, the Luncheoneers, just like the Celebrity Fart folks today had not the slightest idea who real power was exercised with.

And they didn't CARE.

Power is complicated and hard to put into a simple press release.

And when it comes to power, you will note I am giving this explanation only to BUGSERS, and nobody else would WANT it.

My picture of a Luncheoneer is someone who is a bit like Superman:  He looks like his coats and tie are an outfit PERFECTLY made for him as a child, and which he has worn all his life.

In the evening he just puts his collar on a coat hanger and sleeps in his closet until dawn.

The Luncheoneer reports the world as he sees it and as his readers want to see it: A place where the Power Players are the ones who had lunch with or call the President by his first name.

Not only do I not object to this, it was a major source of my power.

My only problem is when I am honestly trying to judge the effect of my latest power play and the person I am talking to turns, however briefly into a Luncheoneer.

You see, the problem with Luncheoneers News was that which I did never showed up in the news.  I have had a hundred "white genocides" that went viral before the Internet but the whole point was nobody CAUGHT them.

So I depended on the few people in Washington who understood real power.  They were few and VERY far between.

So when people like Horus, however temporarily, gave me the old "You are overestimating yourself" with the curved lip, it was a serious problem.